1. 6.2.2012 Paul Dolejschi Progress of Interstrip Measurements on DSSDs SVD

2. Progress of Interstrip Measurements on DSSDs 2Paul Dolejschi6.2.20122Paul Dolejschi QTC-Setup switching-system LCR-meter (measurement of capacitance) 2 SMUs (Bias-Voltage, Resistance) electrometer (current) needles, chuck, table LabView-software Completley automated setup

3. Progress of Interstrip Measurements on DSSDs 3Paul Dolejschi6.2.2012 Switching Scheme (Vienna) 3

4. Progress of Interstrip Measurements on DSSDs 4Paul Dolejschi6.2.2012 What have we tested? Global parameters: –IV-Curve: Dark current, Breakthrough –CV-Curve: Depletion voltage, Total Capacitance Strip Parameters e.g. –strip leakage current I strip –poly-silicon resistor R poly –coupling capacitance C ac –dielectric current I diel 4

5. Progress of Interstrip Measurements on DSSDs 5Paul Dolejschi6.2.20125Paul Dolejschi13.4.2011 Validation of oxide thickness SEM result: 355nmaverage from C_ac measurement: 354.2 nm Micron average: 391.8 metal layer implant oxide

6. Progress of Interstrip Measurements on DSSDs 6Paul Dolejschi6.2.2012 Interstrip measurements Interstrip Capacitance –Comparison of Frequency dependent measurements on Hamamatsu barrel sensors CMS-test structure Interstrip Resistance –Hamamatsu Barrel sensors 4 batches –Micron Wedge sensors 2 batches, p-stop/p-spray

7. Progress of Interstrip Measurements on DSSDs 7Paul Dolejschi6.2.2012 Interstrip Capacitance Capacitance between –Implants (p + /n + ) Charge Sharing –Metal layer (Al) Cross Talk, Signal to noise –Oxide (AC coupling) Separates strip leakage current from readout electronics → Electrical Network!

8. Progress of Interstrip Measurements on DSSDs 8Paul Dolejschi6.2.2012 Interstrip Capacitance Different measurement methods –Contacting Implants only (via DC pads) –Contacting metal layer only (via AC pads) –Contacting both implants and metal layer Additional option: Measuring 1, 2 or 4 neighbouring strips Slightly different result for each method and/or sensor type –AC or DC coupled structures, different strip length, bias- resistor,… –Try to distinguish different contributions of capacitances, restistors etc…

9. Progress of Interstrip Measurements on DSSDs 9Paul Dolejschi6.2.2012 Frequency dependent interstrip capacitance measurement LCR-meter measures impendance and phase at the same time and then computes capacitance with chosen equivalent circuit.

10. Progress of Interstrip Measurements on DSSDs 10Paul Dolejschi6.2.2012 Comparison of different measurement types Strip length 12cm

11. Progress of Interstrip Measurements on DSSDs 11Paul Dolejschi6.2.2012 Comparison of different measurement types Strip length 1cm

12. Progress of Interstrip Measurements on DSSDs 12Paul Dolejschi6.2.2012 Influence of polysilicon resistor High pass filter

13. Progress of Interstrip Measurements on DSSDs 13Paul Dolejschi6.2.2012 Unknown effect of implants in low frequency region Frequency dependent interstrip capacitance measurement High frequency: no contribution of implants if strips are long Low frequency: no contribution of metal layer because of high pass filter

14. Progress of Interstrip Measurements on DSSDs 14Paul Dolejschi6.2.2012 Conclusion High Frequencies: –Above a certain frequency only a small length of the implant contributes to the capacitance –The capacitance between the metal layers dominates the observed value when both AC and DC pads are contacted Low Frequencies: –Presence of a polysilicone resistor influences low frequency region  high pass filter if R_poly is low –Unknown effect of implants in low frequency region

15. Progress of Interstrip Measurements on DSSDs 15Paul Dolejschi6.2.201215Paul Dolejschi Interstrip Resistance - Measurement Principle DC pad #X kept on ground, voltage applied to DC pad #X+1, electromenter measures current on pad #X Don‘t want to measure series connection of poly-resistances R-poly can be measured at the same time Strip X Strip X+1

16. Progress of Interstrip Measurements on DSSDs 16Paul Dolejschi6.2.201216Paul Dolejschi Usually five voltage steps, slope of the IV curve represents 1/R Typical ΔI: 5-20pA Typical R_int: 50- 200GΩ Intersection of R-poly curve at y=0 reveals current of next strip

17. Progress of Interstrip Measurements on DSSDs 17Paul Dolejschi6.2.201217Paul Dolejschi Fit fails sometimes (often) failed fit„Fit ok“

18. Progress of Interstrip Measurements on DSSDs 18Paul Dolejschi6.2.2012 Measurement with 3rd SMU for compensation 18 introduces current for I_strip compensation Keeping electrometer in lowest possible range (200 pA)!

19. Progress of Interstrip Measurements on DSSDs 19Paul Dolejschi6.2.201219Paul Dolejschi „Ideal stripscan“ Interstrip resistance and polysilicon resistor measured at same time Value plotted for each strip More than 90% „fit ok“ in this exapmple Measurement success

20. Progress of Interstrip Measurements on DSSDs 20Paul Dolejschi6.2.201220Paul Dolejschi Hamamatsu n-sides n-side –Similarity in shape –new measurement method using 3rd SMU for I_strip- compensation (+guarded positioners) - no improvement –Measurement accuracy high enough to measure >1TΩ Similarity between Hamamatsu sensors (all 4 batches) Independent of „direction“ of stripscan HPK #4 HPK #80

21. Progress of Interstrip Measurements on DSSDs 21Paul Dolejschi6.2.2012 Hamamatsu n-sides The higher the strip number, the higher the resistance „mean dI“: –after the voltage is applied, it takes some time (sec) until current is stable –Difference between first and final value = „mean dI“ –Can be positive or negative –„responsible“ for higher resistance? current

22. Progress of Interstrip Measurements on DSSDs 22Paul Dolejschi6.2.2012 Hamamatsu n-sides ~50% „Fit ok“

23. Progress of Interstrip Measurements on DSSDs 23Paul Dolejschi6.2.2012 Hamamatsu n-sides ~50% „Fit ok“

24. Progress of Interstrip Measurements on DSSDs 24Paul Dolejschi6.2.2012 Hamamatsu n-sides ~96% „Fit ok“

25. Progress of Interstrip Measurements on DSSDs 25Paul Dolejschi6.2.2012 Other frequently onserved effects Mainly on Micron p- side s „Fit ok“ below 5% (averaged over all sensors from same batch) Well reproduceable

26. Progress of Interstrip Measurements on DSSDs 26Paul Dolejschi6.2.2012 Statistics

27. Progress of Interstrip Measurements on DSSDs 27Paul Dolejschi6.2.2012 Conclusion The overall detector performances (dark current, depletion voltage, radiation hardness,…) are ok, but interstrip resistance measurement is not fully understood –Reproducable effects on Hamamatsu n-sides and Micron p-sides –Improvement with growing batch number –Measurement impossible on noisy strips –Effects possibly caused by pn-junction effects, simulation required