1. 11. Other concepts1 Other Concepts Agenda r1. Studies r2. References r3. Project

2. 11. Other concepts2 1. Studies rOptimization rTrades Studies rQuality Functional Deployment (QFD) 1. Studies

3. 11. Other concepts3 Optimization rProcess of finding the most favorable rTools generally used 1. Studies

4. 11. Other concepts4 Analysis of Ice Cube Tray rMaterial is 1 cent per square inch rMinimize cost = xy+3xz+7yz rMust be 12 compartments rCompartments must be square x y z 1. Studies

5. 11. Other concepts5 Manual Solution rThis problem can be solved using LaGrange multipliers 1. Studies

6. 11. Other concepts6 Excel Solver Solution 1. Studies

7. 11. Other concepts7 Trades Studies rUsed to make decisions rCommon technique is to use weighted ranking l Ideal -- Choose weights before study l Reality -- Choose weights after study rINCOSE Systems Engineering Handbook discusses in detail 1. Studies

8. 11. Other concepts8 Trade Study for Lawn Mower 1. Studies

9. 11. Other concepts9 Quality Functional Deployment (QFD) rA requirements flowdown technique rDeploys voice of the customer rFlows down requirements to design, parts, and manufacturing 1. Studies

10. 11. Other concepts10 QFD for Lawn Mower - - -- - 1. Studies

11. 11. Other concepts11 QFD Flowdown what how much how what how much how what how much how Design Parts Manufacturing 1. Studies

12. 11. Other concepts12 QFD Limitations rDuplicates information in specs rRequires tool 1. Studies

13. 11. Other concepts13 2. References rCurrent status rSystem engineering rMilitary references 2. References

14. 11. Other concepts14 Current Status rSystem engineering is evolving and many references on the subject are appearing rSome references retain the older approach, which is not a product-based development approach rMany of the references have good information, although some of the process descriptions are cumbersome and deal with a large number of objects 2. References

15. 11. Other concepts15 System Engineering References (1 of 4) rDoD 4245.7-M Transition from Development to Production. September 1985 l Templates for avoiding problems rNAVSO P6071. Best Practices: How to Avoid Surprises in the World’s Most Complicated Technical Process. March 1986 l Templates for avoiding problems l Compliment to DoD 4245.7-M Transition from Development to Production rDefense Systems Management College (DSMCS). System Engineering Management Guide. Fort Belvoir, Virginia. 1989 l Classic document l Older approach 2. References

16. 11. Other concepts16 System Engineering References (2 of 4) rMIL STD 499B l Original basis for EIA 632 l Older approach rReliability Toolkit: Commercial Practices Edition. Reliability Analysis Center. P. O. Box 4700, Rome, NY 13442-4700. 1993 l Excellent handbook on reliability l $29 rIEEE Std 1220. Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers, Inc. 345 East 47 th Street. New York, NY 10017. 1995 l IEEE entry to meet needs of ISO 9000 2. References

17. 11. Other concepts17 System Engineering References (3 of 4) rMartin, James N. Systems Engineering Guidebook -- A Process for Developing Systems and Products. CRC Press. New York. ISBN 0- 8493-7837-0. 1996 l Our textbook l Product-based development approach rInternational Council on Systems Engineering. Systems Engineering Handbook. A How To Guide for All Engineers. INCOSE. 2033 Sixth Ave. #804. Seattle, Washington 98121-2546. 1998 l A lot of good material on teams, costing, definitions, and EIA 731 l Older approach l $20 for INCOSE members 2. References

18. 11. Other concepts18 System Engineering References (4 of 4) rEIA 632. EIA. 2500 Wilson Blvd. Arlington. Virginia 22201-3834. 1998 l Replacement for MIL STD 499 l Product based development approach rEIA 732. Systems Engineering Capability Model. EIA. 2500 Wilson Blvd. Arlington. Virginia 22201- 3834. 1998 l Capability maturity model analogous to five- level technique used by software l Part 1 -- model. Part 2 -- appraisal method 2. References

19. 11. Other concepts19 Military References (1 of 5) rA memorandum from Secretary of Defense William Perry in June 1994 officially changed the way the military develops and acquires systems. rCommercial and military approaches are no longer distinct rMilitary standards are out and commercial practices are in rNevertheless, military specifications contain a lot of good guidance 2. References

20. 11. Other concepts20 Military References (2 of 5) rClimatic information -- MIL-STD-210 rLogistics -- MIL-HDBK-59 rCorrosion -- MIL-STD- 1210, 1568 rEnvironmental -- MIL-STD-810 rEMC -- MIL-STD-461, 1541; MIL-HDBK-237; MIL-E- 6051 rHuman factors -- MIL-STD- 1472, 1794, 1800; MIL- HDBK- 46855; MIL-H- 46855 rMaintainability -- MIL-STD- 470, 1843, 2184; MIL- HDBK- 791 rManufacturing -- MIL-STD-1528 Karl Arunski 2. References

21. 11. Other concepts21 Military References (3 of 5) rNon-destructive inspection -- MIL-HDBK-728, 731; MIL-I-6070 rParts control -- MIL-STD-965 rProducibility -- MIL-HDBK-727 rQuality -- MIL-Q-9858, MIL-I-45208 rReliability -- MIL-STD-785, 1530, 1543, 1783, 1796, 1798, 2164 rSafety -- MIL-STD-882 rSoftware -- DoD-2167, MIL-STD-1803, 1815, MIL- HDBK-287 rSupportability -- MIL-STD-1388 Karl Arunski 2. References

22. 11. Other concepts22 Military References (4 of 5) rSurvivability -- MIL-STD-1799, 2069, 2169; MIL- HDBK-336 rSecurity -- MIL-STD-1785 rTelecommunications -- MIL-STD-188-xxx rTestability -- MIL-STD-2165 rThermal -- MIL-HDBK-251 rTransportability -- MIL-STD-1367, MIL-HDBK-157 rValue -- MIL-STD-1771 2. References

23. 11. Other concepts23 Military References (5 of 5) rSpecifications -- MIL-STD-490B l MIL-STD-490B is a draft l MIL-STD-490A and MIL-STD-490B have the same specification outline except for section 3.7 l MIL-STD-490A suggests giving characteristics of subordinate elements. MIL-STD-490B does not require this 2. References

24. 11. Other concepts24 Project r1. Complete the following Excel table for each numbered task in chapters 6 through 8 in our textbook by placing a 1 in the one column that most applies. 3. Project

25. 11. Other concepts25 Project r2. Explain where the block labeled “Design, ILS Production, and Deployment” in Figure 4-2 of Martin’s book fits in the PBD approach r3. What is the difference between a SEMP, a SEMS, and a SEDS? What is the difference between a SEMS and an IMP? r4. What is a functional design discipline (FDD)? r5. What is a cross-project team (CPT)? Who should CPTs report to? r6. List five system engineering metrics and give a method for determining a numerical value for the benefit and cost of each. 3. Project