1. Effects of Domestication on Hatchery and Wild Spring Chinook Phenotypic and Demographic Traits: What Have We Observed So Far? Curtis M. Knudsen 1, Steve L. Schroder 2, Mark V. Johnston 3, Todd N. Pearsons 2, C. A. Busack 2, William J. Bosch 3,and David E. Fast 3 1 Oncorh Consulting 2 Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife 3 Yakama Nation

2. Purpose: Overview of what we’ve observed in terms of domestication's effects on demographic and phenotypic traits –Size at age –Spawn timing –Jack production –Gametic traits

3. ≠

4. The YKFP spring chinook hatchery program was designed to minimize domestication effects. use only wild-origin broodstock limit the size of the program so as not to overwhelm the naturally spawning population (mean 52%; 20-76%) take no more than 50% of the wild returns into the hatchery utilize factorial crosses during artificial matings limit the proportion of jacks in the broodstock randomly mate individuals use “best culture practices” such as relatively low rearing densities volitionally release juveniles at sizes larger than, but comparable to, wild-origin smolts

5. Both share common hatchery and post-release environments SH returns experienced one generation of hatchery selection HC returns experienced two generations of hatchery selection (BY2002 to BY2005) Differences in their phenotypic traits should be expressions of genetic differences due to the one additional generation of hatchery selection experienced by the HC line Hatchery Control vs SH Comparisons

6. Hypothetical Trends 600 650 700 750 800 850 900 2000200120022003200420052006200720082009 Return year Phenotypic trait HC SH NO

7. Size-at-Age (reflecting growth rates)

8. Age 4 POHP length 57 59 61 63 2006200720082009 Return year POHP length (cm) HC SH NO * * *

9. Age 3 POHP length 38 40 42 44 46 48 20052006200720082009 Return year POHP length (cm) HC SH NO * * *

10. 255 260 265 270 2006200720082009 Return year Median spawn date SH NO HC Median Spawning Date CESRF * * **

11. Proportion Jacks Produced by Broodyear 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 2002200320042005 Brood year Proportion age 3 jacks SH Jacks HC jacks NOR Jacks

12. Gametes

13. 0.17 0.19 0.21 0.23 2006200720082009 Return year Gonadosomatic Index SH NO HC Gonadosomatic Index *

14. Total Female Gamete Mass 600 650 700 750 800 850 900 200520062007200820092010 Return year Gamete mass (g) SH NO HC

15. 3.94.04.14.24.3 log e (POHP) 6.0 6.2 6.4 6.6 6.8 7.0 7.2 log e (Gamete mass) SH HC Origin 2007 ANCOVA: Equal slopes p=0.014

16. SH HC Origin 2008 ANCOVA: Equal slopes p=0.442

17. 12345 Body Wt (kg) 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 Adult Male GSI NO SH HC ANOVA HC>SH=NO p<0.01 2009 Adult Male Gonadosomatic Index

18. Fecundity 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 2006200720082009 Return year Fecundity SH NO HC

19. Fecundity vs POHP length 2008

20. Mean Egg Mass 0.16 0.17 0.18 0.19 0.20 0.21 2006200720082009 Return year Mean Egg mass (g) SH NO HC * *

21. 1.01.52.0 log e (♀ Body weight) -1.9 -1.7 -1.5 -1.3 log e (Egg wt) HC SH 2008 Results: SH eggs are 9% larger than HC eggs ANCOVA equality of means p=0.037

22. 3.503.553.603.65 log e (Fork length) 5.4 5.5 5.6 5.7 5.8 5.9 6.0 6.1 log e (Fry Body wt) NO SH HC Origin Fry Length at ponding BY08 ANCOVA equal slopes p<0.001 NO SH HC

23. 70% 75% 80% 85% 90% 95% 200720082009 Return year Survival eyed egg stage (%) Mean Survival to Eyed-egg Stage (+1 se) HC SH NO ANOVA 2-way Origin x Broodyear: HC significantly higher survival than SH p=0.046

24. Change in Body Wt At CESRF Adjusted for Holding Time and Initial Body Weight 2008 returns 2009 returns 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 HCSHNOHCSHNOHCSHNOHCSHNO Delta Body Mass (kg) Male Female a a b b a a b a a b a a b

25. Mini-jack/Precocious Male Production 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% BY 2002BY 2003BY 2004BY 2005BY 2006 Pre-Release Mini-Jack Percentage BY 2007 Figure modified from Neeley, D. 2009. HxH vs NxN Comparison Draft Summary for Juvenile Traits. SH - 1 gen domestication HC - 2 gen domestication * * * *

26. Observations Phase 2 Age 4 SH and HC fish have increased their growth rates more rapidly over time than NO fish and in 2009 were approximately equal in size to NO fish. Spawn timing of SH fish at CESRF was significantly earlier than NO fish, HC earlier than NO but too few data points at this time The more generations of domestication the less body mass lost during holding at CESRF

27. Observations – cont’d In a few return years gametic trait means were significantly affected by an additional generation of domestication Within certain years gametic traits exhibited significant differences such as: –The rate of gamete biomass production (kg eggs per cm change in body length) –The rate of egg production (# eggs per kg body growth) –Milt production (GSI)

28. Observations – cont’d Survival to the eyed egg stage within the hatchery is greater for HC than SH fish The proportion of males maturing as precocious males was significantly reduced by an additional generation of domestication selecting against that life history type The proportion of males maturing as age 3 jacks was not different between HC and SH, but was greater than NO fish

29. Acknowledgements Yakama Nation Roza Adult Monitoring Facility Crew Cle Elum Supplementation Research Facility Crew WDFW Ecological Interactions Crew Bonneville Power Administration for providing funding

30. Questions?

32. Domestication Domestication - Any genetic changes that result directly or indirectly from human efforts to control the environment experienced by a population. Domestication selection - “any change in the selection regime of a cultured population relative to that experienced by the natural population” –Broodstock selection and holding –Mating practices –Incubation –Juvenile Rearing –Release Waples, R. S. 1999. Dispelling some myths about hatcheries. Fisheries 24(2):12- 21.