Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

DRI THE DEVELOPMENT OF DITCHING and WATER IMPACT DESIGN LIMITS PRESENTED AT INT’L CABIN SAFETY CONFERENCE NOVEMBER 17, 2004 LISBON, PORTUGAL DYNAMIC RESPONSE.

Published byRobyn Glenn Modified over 9 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "DRI THE DEVELOPMENT OF DITCHING and WATER IMPACT DESIGN LIMITS PRESENTED AT INT’L CABIN SAFETY CONFERENCE NOVEMBER 17, 2004 LISBON, PORTUGAL DYNAMIC RESPONSE."— Presentation transcript:

1 DRI THE DEVELOPMENT OF DITCHING and WATER IMPACT DESIGN LIMITS PRESENTED AT INT’L CABIN SAFETY CONFERENCE NOVEMBER 17, 2004 LISBON, PORTUGAL DYNAMIC RESPONSE INC. (DRI) FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION (FAA-TC)

2 DRI SBIR WATER IMPACT PROGRAM PHASE I Feasibility of Hybrid and FEM Methodology PHASE II Perform Full Scale Tests, Model and Correlate (KRASH and MSC/DYTRAN) KRASH Model For Existing Scale Model Ditching test Evaluate FAR27/29 Water/impact/Ditching Regulations & Compliance Develop Preliminary Water impact Design Limits With KRASH PHASE III Develop Military and Civil Helicopter KRASH Models Evaluate Correlation Techniques/Procedures Develop Design Criteria & Design Envelopes (DLE) & Procedures- Using KRASH --- Ditching and Water Impact --- Civil helicopters --- Military helicopters Recommend Ditching and Water Impact Design Criteria

3 DRI IMPACT ENVELOPES

4 DRI SIGNIFICANT QUESTIONS 1.Can modeling simulate /represent the significant aspects of full-scale impact and scale model ditching tests? 2.Can analytical modeling be an effective tool in the development of crash design criteria?

5 DRI ASPECTS OF WATER IMPACT AND DITCHING Kinematics BehaviorKinematics Behavior Overall responseOverall response Discrete location responseDiscrete location response FailuresFailures Design parametersDesign parameters Seat-occupant performance/toleranceSeat-occupant performance/tolerance Trends & relationshipsTrends & relationships

6 DRI FULL SCALE WATER IMPACT TESTS 1998 - 1999 Tests of UH-1H Test S1 26 fps vertical Test S2 28 fps vertical 39 fps longitudinal

7 DRI OVERALL RESPONSES & KINEMATIC BEHAVIOR

8 DRI FLOOR ACCELERATION

9 DRI PRESSURE RESPONSE

10 DRI FLOOR PULSE

11 DRI FLOOR VERTCAL PULSES – GROUND, WATER, REGULATIONS

12 DRI SIGNIFICANT QUESTIONS 1.Can modeling simulate /represent the significant aspects of full-scale impact and scale model ditching tests? 2.Can analytical modeling be an effective tool in the development of crash design criteria?

13 DRI DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS- SEAT LOAD LIMIT 26 FPS VERTICAL WATER IMPACT NO SEAT LOAD LIMIT 14.5G SEAT LOAD LIMIT

14 DRI TRENDS – SEA STATE VS. CALM SEA

15 DRI S2/S1 Pressure Trend Comparison; Analysis Vs. Test Resultant Velocity S1 Test = 26 FPS S2 Test = 48 FPS S2/S1 Velocity Ratio 1.85 S2/S1 KE Ratio 3.41 3.41

16 DRI TRENDS Correlation Sea State Levels S2/S1 Test Levels -Pressure -Acceleration -Transfer Function (Accel. to Pressure) -Filter Levels Design Envelopes Panel Failure Floor Acceleration Mass Item Response Occupant-Seat Response VS. -Panel Strength -Pitch Attitude -Seat Load Limit -Velocity Profile -Sea State

17 DRI DITCHING COMPLIANCE

18 DRI DITCHING COMPLIANCE PROCEDURES Scale Model Testing - rigid, deficient, misleading, costly Similarity to Existing Designs - questionable basis Pressure Calculations - static flotation analysis Vertical Load Factor Calculations - stall speed, no sink velocity Procedures - under-estimate pressure & acceleration

19 DRI What Exists – Relative to Ditching Assessment Capability Inadequate evaluation and compliance procedures KRASH modeling features that address significant issues, i.e. trends, sea state, nose-over, failures Analysis predictable within a level of acceptance Analysis simulation time efficient

20 DRI CURRENT DLE CONSIDERATIONS; TAKE INTO ACCOUNT

21 DRI CURRENT WATER IMPACT DLE CONCEPT

22 DRI DLE-DITCHING APPLICATION

23 DRI KRASH/SOMR-HIC RESULTS

24 DRI APPLICABILITY TO FAR 25; TRANSPORT CATEGORY AIRCRAFT FAR 25, FAR 27 and FAR 29 HAVE MANY SIMILARITIES: Ditching Envelope Seat Dynamic Test Requirements Mass Item Retention Acceptance Criteria Compliance Procedures

25 DRI SUMMARY Balanced Test, Analysis, Design SBIR - F/S WI and Scaled Ditching Tests - Civil and Military Rotorcraft Models/Correlation - FAR 27/29 and Military Design Specifications/Compliance Development of Ditching Criteria and Design Limit Envelopes Based On; - Occupant –Seat-Restraint System Integrity - Structural and Mass Retention Integrity - In Excess of 300 Simulations Performed Applicability of DLE to Evaluate Design Strength, Operational Conditions, Acceptance Criteria, New Designs, FAR 25, 27, 29 End Product Goal- Recommended Ditching and WI Design Criteria, DLE and Procedures

26 DRI

Download ppt "DRI THE DEVELOPMENT OF DITCHING and WATER IMPACT DESIGN LIMITS PRESENTED AT INT’L CABIN SAFETY CONFERENCE NOVEMBER 17, 2004 LISBON, PORTUGAL DYNAMIC RESPONSE."

Similar presentations

EUROCAE WG 73: UAS integration Elements for the European Commission UAS panel Presentation at Workshop 2 UAS insertion into airspace Gérard Mardiné (SAFRAN-Sagem)

EUROCAE WG 73: UAS integration Elements for the European Commission UAS panel Presentation at Workshop 2 UAS insertion into airspace Gérard Mardiné (SAFRAN-Sagem)
Recovery Boiler Modeling

Recovery Boiler Modeling
August 2007 LS-DYNA Cargo Net Simulation 1 of 10 Industry standard cargo nets. The nets are made from 1.75” wide nylon or polyester webbing with nominal.

August 2007 LS-DYNA Cargo Net Simulation 1 of 10 Industry standard cargo nets. The nets are made from 1.75” wide nylon or polyester webbing with nominal.
R.G.W. Cherry & Associates Limited International Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety Research Conference Slide 1 – Lisbon November 2004 International Aircraft.

R.G.W. Cherry & Associates Limited International Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety Research Conference Slide 1 – Lisbon November 2004 International Aircraft.
The Evolution Of Energy Absorption Systems For Crashworthy Helicopter Seats S. P. Desjardins Safe, Inc The Fourth Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety Conference.

The Evolution Of Energy Absorption Systems For Crashworthy Helicopter Seats S. P. Desjardins Safe, Inc The Fourth Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety Conference.
11-16-2004Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety Research – Lisbon, Portugal In-Flight Fuel Tank Flammability Testing The 4th Triennial Int’l Aircraft Fire and.

Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety Research – Lisbon, Portugal In-Flight Fuel Tank Flammability Testing The 4th Triennial Int’l Aircraft Fire and.
VERRES VLTA Emergency Requirement Research Evaluation Study Crew Co-operation in VLTA The Fourth Triennial International Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety.

VERRES VLTA Emergency Requirement Research Evaluation Study Crew Co-operation in VLTA The Fourth Triennial International Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety.
Modeling of Fuel Tank Inerting for FAA OBIGGS Research

Modeling of Fuel Tank Inerting for FAA OBIGGS Research
DRI THE DEVELOPMENT OF DITCHING and WATER IMPACT DESIGN LIMITS PRESENTED AT INT’L CABIN SAFETY CONFERENCE NOVEMBER 15-17, 2004 LISBON, PORTUGAL DYNAMIC.

DRI THE DEVELOPMENT OF DITCHING and WATER IMPACT DESIGN LIMITS PRESENTED AT INT’L CABIN SAFETY CONFERENCE NOVEMBER 15-17, 2004 LISBON, PORTUGAL DYNAMIC.
AE 1350 Lecture Notes #10 TOPICS TO BE STUDIED Take-off and Landing Performance There is considerable variations due to –pilot technique –ground conditions.

AE 1350 Lecture Notes #10 TOPICS TO BE STUDIED Take-off and Landing Performance There is considerable variations due to –pilot technique –ground conditions.
William Cavage AAR-440 Fire Safety Branch Wm. J

William Cavage AAR-440 Fire Safety Branch Wm. J
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Meeting Task Group Session on Revised.

Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Meeting Task Group Session on Revised.
Modeling Wing Tank Flammability Dhaval D. Dadia Dr. Tobias Rossmann Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey Piscataway, New Jersey Steven Summer Federal.

Modeling Wing Tank Flammability Dhaval D. Dadia Dr. Tobias Rossmann Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey Piscataway, New Jersey Steven Summer Federal.
DESIGN FOR CRASHWORTHINESS

DESIGN FOR CRASHWORTHINESS
Aircraft Dynamic Response

Aircraft Dynamic Response
An Update on FAA Fuel Tank Ullage Modeling

An Update on FAA Fuel Tank Ullage Modeling
Computing Trust in Social Networks

Computing Trust in Social Networks
Parametric Design Design phase info flow Parametric design of a bolt Parametric design of belt and pulley Systematic parametric design Summary.

Parametric Design Design phase info flow Parametric design of a bolt Parametric design of belt and pulley Systematic parametric design Summary.
Auditing A Risk-Based Approach To Conducting A Quality Audit

Auditing A Risk-Based Approach To Conducting A Quality Audit
Cost Implications of Architectural Design Variables Ahmed S. Al Zahrani December 2005 King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals Department of Construction.

Cost Implications of Architectural Design Variables Ahmed S. Al Zahrani December 2005 King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals Department of Construction.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google