Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byNathan Moore Modified over 9 years ago
1
(Coupled) Arctic Regional Climate Model Intercomparison Project (C)ARCMIP K. Dethloff, A. Rinke, W. Dorn Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Potsdam, Germany & (C)ARCMIP group
2
(Coupled) Arctic Regional Climate Model Intercomparison Project 1)What processes are currently not accounted for (or not well) in Arctic RCMs? What is the appropriate level of complexity of parameterizations? What are the bias magnitudes ? What are the common model successes? Are there common errors in the Arctic RCMs? recommendations for parameterization improvements 2) What is the level of uncertainty in current Arctic RCMs? quantify the scatter among the models (in which variables and/or locations do show RCMs consensus, in which not?)
3
ARCMIP for the SHEBA sub-domain (successfully finished) ARCMIP for a Pan-Arctic integration domain (planned) CARCMIP for a Pan-Arctic integration domain (planned) (C)ARCMIP
4
ARCMIP for the SHEBA sub-domain (successfully finished) 8 RCMs; 4 papers have been published Tjernström et al., 2005; Rinke et al., 2006; Inoue et al., 2006; Wyser et al., 2008 (C)ARCMIP
5
ARCMIP#1 group: 1. AWI: Dethloff, Rinke 2. CIRES: Cassano, Shaw, Serreze 3. DMI: Christensen 4. GIT: Curry, Inoue, Liu 5. Met.no: Haugen, Køltzow 6. MPI: Pfeifer, Jacob 7. Rossby Centre: Wyser, Jones, Döscher 8. Uni. Melbourne: Lynch 9. Uni. Quebec: Girard, Laprise, Du 10. Uni. Stockholm:Tjernström, Zagar, Svensson ARCMIP#1 simulations for the Beaufort Sea and SHEBA period
6
SHEBA: Surface Heat and Energy Budget of Arctic Ocean; Sept. 1997-Sept. 1998 Model grid: 61x48 grid points ~3500x2800 km 2 Trajectory of ice camp during SHEBA year ARCMIP#1 simulations for the Beaufort Sea and SHEBA-period
7
Participating models 1.ARCSyM (USA) 2.COAMPS (S,USA) 3.HIRHAM (D,DK) 4.CRCM (C) 5.RCA (S) 6.HIRHAM.no (N) 7.REMO (D) 8.PolarMM5 (USA) Experimental set-up Same domain Same horizontal resolution (50km) Same boundary conditions (lateral: ECMWF, lower: SSM/I, AVHRR) Different dynamics/physics, vertical resolution Simulated period one year: SHEBA period September 1997-September 1998 ARCMIP#1 simulations for the Beaufort Sea and SHEBA period
8
Across-model scatter; 2m air temperature wintersummer across-model scatter (isolines): inter-model stdev [˚C] significance of scatter (color): ratio of intermodel stdev to observed variability Rinke et al., 2006 ARCMIP#1 simulations for the Beaufort Sea and SHEBA period
9
Wyser et al., 2008 Surface radiation and clouds ARCMIP#1 simulations for the Beaufort Sea and SHEBA period
10
Wyser et al., 2008 Radiation-cloud relationship SWD [W/m 2 ] Cloud cover CWP [g/m 2 ] SWD [W/m 2 ] ARCMIP#1 simulations for the Beaufort Sea and SHEBA period
11
shf ~ - C H U 10m (T 2m - T srfc ) C H : heat transfer coefficient Scaled sensible heat flux vs. temperature difference Tjernström et al., 2005 ARCMIP#1 simulations for the Beaufort Sea and SHEBA period
12
Summary: Simulated large-scale flow patterns reproduce observations and are in high agreement among the individual models. Considerable scatter in temperature, radiation, clouds among different models even under strong constrain. Largest scatter in 2m temperature over land and within the lowest 1000 m. Ensemble mean outperforms the individual models. Significant biases for surface fluxes (connected with biases in clouds). Key processes to improve: clouds, boundary layer-, land surface processes, coupling to the surface ARCMIP#1 simulations for the Beaufort Sea and SHEBA period
13
References: Wyser, K.; Jones, C.; Du, P.; Girard, E.; Willén, U.; Cassano, J.; Christensen, J.H.; Curry J.A.; Dethloff, K.;Haugen J.E.; Jacob, D.; Koltzow, M.; Laprise, R.; Lynch, A.; Pfeifer, S.; Rinke, A.; Serreze, M.; Shaw, M.J.; Tjernström, M.; Zagar, M., 2008: An Evaluation of Arctic Cloud and Radiation processes during the SHEBA year: Simulation results from 8 Arctic Regional Climate Models, Clim. Dyn. 30, 203-223, doi:10.1007/s00382-007-0286-1 Inoue, J., Liu, J., Pinto, J.O., Curry, J.A., 2006: Intercomparison of Arctic Regional Climate Models: Modeling Clouds and Radiation for SHEBA in May 1998, J. Clim. 19, 4167-4178 Rinke, A.; Dethloff, K.; Cassano, J.; Christensen, J.H.; Curry J.A.; Du, P.; Girard, E.; Haugen, J.E; Jacob, D.; Jones, C.G.; Koltzow, M.; Laprise, R.; Lynch, A.H.; Pfeifer, S.; Serreze, M.C.; Shaw, M.J.; Tjernström, M.; Wyser, K.; Zagar, M., 2006: Evaluation of an ensemble of Arctic regional climate models: spatiotemporal fields during the SHEBA year, Clim. Dyn. 26, 459-472, doi:10.1007/s00382–005-0095-3 Tjernström, M.; Zagar, M.; Svensson, G.; Cassano, J.; Pfeifer, S.; Rinke, A.; Wyser, K.; Dethloff, K.; Jones, C. ; Semmler, T.; Shaw, M., 2005: Modelling the Arctic boundary layer : An evaluation of six ARCMIP regional-scale models using data from the SHEBA project, Boundary Layer Meteorol. 117, 337-381, doi:10.1007/s10546-004-7954-z ARCMIP#1 simulations for the Beaufort Sea and SHEBA period
14
ARCMIP for the SHEBA sub-domain (successfully finished) ARCMIP for a Pan-Arctic integration domain (planned) at least 5 RCMs: HIRHAM (Rinke, Dethloff, AWI); COAMPS (Tjernström, MISU); RCA (Wyser, et al., SMHI); WRF (Cassano, Gutowski, US); CRCM (Laprise, et al., UQAM). (C)ARCMIP
15
Simulation period: IPY-period 2007 – 2008 Experimental set-up: - pan-Arctic domain (different in each model) - same horizontal resolution (50 km) - same boundary conditions (initial and boundary: ECMWF; ice thickness from I-O model?) - ensemble runs Observations: TARA, Oden, NP35, etc. ARCMIP#2 simulations for the pan-Arctic and IPY-years
16
Trajectory of NP35 ice camp November 2007-March 2008 Evolution of surface pressure at NP35; February Observation HIRHAM Forecast12 HIRHAM Ensemble mean HIRHAM Ensemble members
17
ARCMIP for the SHEBA sub-domain (successfully finished) ARCMIP for a Pan-Arctic integration domain (planned) CARCMIP for a Pan-Arctic integration domain (planned) 4 RCMs: RCAO (Döscher, SMHI); HIRHAM–NAOSIM (Dorn, Dethloff, Rinke, AWI); REMO-MPI/OM (Mikolajewicz, MPI); WRF-NPS (Cassano, Gutowski, Maslowski, US) (C)ARCMIP
18
Simulation period: ca. 1960-2008, and target: IPY-period 2007-2008 Experimental set-up: - pan-Arctic domain (different in each model) - similar horizontal resolution (atmosphere: 50 km, ice-ocean: 25 km) - same atmosphere lateral boundary conditions (ECMWF, NCEP) - ocean lateral boundaries climatological (Levitus, …) Observations: - TARA, Oden, NP35, etc. - Low ice vs. high ice phases etc. CARCMIP simulations for the pan-Arctic
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.