Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byScott Daniels Modified over 9 years ago
1
Metropolitan Groundwater Model for Water-Supply Availability Analysis Technical Advisory Group Meeting June 19, 2008
2
Quick Review
3
Model Domain Entire 7 county metro Extend to edge of Mt. Simon – Hinckley Aquifer to NW 4913 sq miles Model cell size: 500m 417,793 active cells Anoka Hennepin Dakota Scott Carver Washington Ramsey
4
Model Layers Mt Simon-Hinckley Franconia Eau Clair Ironton-Galesville St. Lawrence Jordan Prairie du Chien St. Peter Glacial Drift West East Carver Hennepin Dakota Washington All major aquifers and aquitards included Total of 9 Layers
5
Rivers and Streams All rivers and streams represented with lake package
6
River Segments Each river broken into segments (reaches) Stage based on topography or gage data
7
Lakes Stage from DNR or DEM Deeper lakes allowed to be in deeper layer Represented with River Package
8
Targets 14,542 Head targets –SWL from CWI 33 Baseflow targets 55 Transmissivity targets –Pumping Tests 378 Anisotropy targets –Penalty for K z > K x within a zone
9
Head Targets 14,542 head targets Static water levels from county well index Cross- validated
10
Baseflow 33 baseflow reaches
11
Transmissivity Targets
12
Surface Water Balance (SWB) Model for Recharge Topography (30-m Digital Elevation) Daily Precipitation Temp, Julian Day Wind Soil Type (Hydrologic Classification) Land Use (including imperviousness) RECHARGE EVAPOTRANSPIRATION SURFACE RUNOFF (Adapted from Dripps and Bradbury, 2007)
13
SWB Recharge Output Mean recharge 1975-2003 30m grid
14
Recharge Model Grid 500 m grid
15
Calibration Parameters 756 hydraulic conductivity zones –378 K x =K y –378 K z 8 lake conductance zones 33 river conductance reaches Recharge remained fixed
16
Quaternary Zones Zones roughly defined based on sand content 65 zones
17
Quaternary Zones Zones roughly defined based on sand content 65 zones
18
Jordan Zones 48 zones Zones defined based on first bedrock unit and subdivided into additional zones
19
Calibration Results for Head Targets
20
Calibration Stats Mean Head Residual = -1.65 m Residual Standard Deviation = 5.18 m Minimum Head Residual = -31.21 m Maximum Head Residual = 33.08 m Total range of observed values = 125.27 m Percent of head residuals within 5% of range = 93.2%
21
Baseflow Residuals
22
Horizontal Hydraulic Conductivity Unit Geometric Mean Kx (m/day) Min Kx (m/day) Max Kx (m/day) Quaternary 11.80.1143.0 St. Peter 1.30.115.0 Prairie Du Chien 8.81.050.0 Jordan 11.03.050.0 St. Lawrence 0.24.2 x 10 -2 2.0 Franconia 5.70.130.0 Ironton- Galesville 6.70.130.0 Eau Claire 1.3 x 10 -2 3.0 x 10 -4 0.1 Mt. Simon - Hinckley 1.60.110.0
23
Vertical Hydraulic Conductivity Unit Geometric Mean Kz (m/day) Min Kz (m/day) Max Kz (m/day) Quaternary 0.70.0120 St. Peter 0.15.0 x 10 -4 9.8 Prairie Du Chien 0.31.0 x 10 -2 15 Jordan 0.53.0 x 10 -2 1.9 St. Lawrence 3.1 x 10 -3 3.0 x 10 -5 0.1 Franconia 0.13.0 x 10 -4 3.0 Ironton- Galesville 0.23.0 x 10 -4 3.0 Eau Claire 1.1 x 10 -5 3.0 x 10 -7 1.0 x10 -3 Mt. Simon - Hinckley 7.3 x 10 -2 9.9 x 10 -3 0.3
24
Using the model to address future water supply Example for the City of Ramsey
26
(Runkel, 2006)
27
Projected Municipal Demands (Ramsey) Year Projected Municipal Avg. Day (gal/day) Projected Municipal Maximum Day (gal/day) 20103,300,45415,600,514 20205,206,37022,387,300 20304,932,35117,221,000 20406,242,84217,037,200 20507,319,03220,443,162
28
Regional Model Run regional model with 2050 average day pumping Extract TMR for more detailed analysis Used constant head boundaries at edge of TMR
29
Municipal Supply Wells
30
Well spacing about 1 mile
31
Grid Refinement Refine grid in the Ramsey area
32
Ramsey Well 7 Pumping Test Observation Well
33
Ramsey Well 7 Pumping Test Drawdown (m) Time (days) Pumping Rate: 1000 gpm (constant)
34
2030 Drawdown in Ironton - Galesville (Average Day) Contour Interval: 1 ft
35
2030 Drawdown in Ironton - Galesville (2 Week Peak) Contour Interval: 2 ft
36
2030 Drawdown in Layer 1 (Average Day) Contour Interval: 1 ft
37
2030 Drawdown in Layer 1 (2 Week Peak) Contour Interval: 1 ft
38
2050 Drawdown in Ironton - Galesville (Average Day) Contour Interval: 1 ft
39
2050 Drawdown in Ironton – Galesville (2 Week Peak) Contour Interval: 2 ft
40
2050 Drawdown in Layer 1 (Average Day) Contour Interval: 1 ft
41
2050 Drawdown in Layer 1 (2 Week Peak) Contour Interval: 1 ft
42
Head Above Franconia (2050, 2 Week Peak)
43
Water Table Distance From Ground Surface
44
Wetlands in Ramsey
45
Additional Info
46
Layer 1 Residuals (Quaternary)
47
Layer 2 (St. Peter)
48
Layer 3 (Prairie Du Chien)
49
Layer 4 (Jordan)
50
Layer 5 (St. Lawrence)
51
Layer 6 (Franconia)
52
Layer 7 (Ironton-Galesville)
53
Layer 8 (Eau Claire)
54
Layer 9 (Mt Simon – Hinckley)
55
Layer 1
56
Layer 2
57
Layer 3
58
Layer 4
59
Layer 5
60
Layer 6
61
Layer 7
62
Layer 8
63
Layer 9
64
OSTP
65
OPDC
66
CJDN
67
CSTL
68
CFRN
69
CIGL
70
CECR
71
CMSH
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.