Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

11/18/2016 Test beam studies of the W-Si tracking calorimeter for the PHENIX forward upgrade Y. Kwon, Yonsei Univ., PHENIX.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "11/18/2016 Test beam studies of the W-Si tracking calorimeter for the PHENIX forward upgrade Y. Kwon, Yonsei Univ., PHENIX."— Presentation transcript:

1 11/18/2016 Test beam studies of the W-Si tracking calorimeter for the PHENIX forward upgrade Y. Kwon, Yonsei Univ., PHENIX

2 Contents PHENIX forward upgrade PHENIX forward upgrade Calorimeter geometry & test setup, schematics Calorimeter geometry & test setup, schematics Test results Test results – Reconstructed energy profile – Limited energy sum and reconstructed energy – Linearity –  (E)/E as a function of Energy – Longitudinal/lateral energy deposition profile – Position reconstruction (simulation study) Summary Summary 1/18/20162

3 3 Beam PHENIX forward upgrade in consideration ~ 44cm from the interaction point,  = 1.2-2.7

4 Calorimeter geometry & test setup Preamp hybrid 7 vertical channels grouped (cost issue) 8 pad sensors in one carrier board Beam

5 Schematics Schematics Segment - 0Segment - 1Segment - 2 Lateral Longitudinal 8 pad sensors in one carrier board 15 mm W, 4mm

6 Cosmic muon test

7 Test results Test results 1/18/20167

8 Energy distribution fits with Gaussian function (with highly suppressed low energy tail) Beam energy resolution  Detector energy resolution 75(GeV) electron at normal incidence

9 Limited energy sum and reconstructed energy Energy sum over 3x3, 5x5, 7x7, all pad

10 Linearity Linearity 10 = p 0 x E + p 1 x E 2, (Good beam, e)

11  (E)/E as a function of Energy  (E)/E as a function of Energy Constant term Beam energy resolution Gain equalization Non-uniformities Damage in summing cables

12 Longitudinal energy deposition profile 6 GeV electron at normal incidence at normal incidence Largest energy in segment 0. Very small energy deposition in segment 2. DATA SIM

13 Lateral energy deposition profile 6 GeV electron at normal incidence at normal incidence - Good agreement in general (Note energy in segment 2 is about 1% of that in segment 0). DATA SIM Segment 1 Segment 2

14 Real position vs. x CG from Pad x real : position of incidence, front of segment 0.

15 x real expected obtained from x CG and previous result

16 Summary Summary Deposited energy distribution ~ Gaussian Deposited energy distribution ~ Gaussian Lateral shower containment in 5 x 5 pads Lateral shower containment in 5 x 5 pads Good linearity Good linearity Energy resolution for electron Energy resolution for electron Longitudinal/Lateral shower development : Good agreement with simulation Longitudinal/Lateral shower development : Good agreement with simulation Position resolution from pad : 2.1 mm Position resolution from pad : 2.1 mm The detector performs as designed.

17 Beam test of a prototype Si/W calorimeter Y. Kwon (Yonsei Univ.) Beam test of a prototype Si/W calorimeter Y. Kwon (Yonsei Univ.) ALICE upgrade workshop, Mar. 2011

18 FCal ALICE Forward Calorimeter Upgrade Stage 1: Highly segmented ( ,  ) EM-Cal, 3.6 m from vertex, 2.3 <  < 4.0 - to measure:  0, 1 < p T < 50 GeV/c and jets, 20 < E T < 100 GeV Stage 2: Extending forward coverage to 4.5 <    < 6.5 region and beyond

19 6 inch fabrication line 19/32 8 inch fabrication line R&D environment 300 cm 2 ~ $ 500

20 Outlook Outlook STRIPAD development with BNL utilizing Korean fabrication facility STRIPAD development with BNL utilizing Korean fabrication facility –Continue the journey towards the tracking calorimetry (  0 ) –Collaboration with PHENIX and BNL –ALICE FOCAL? –Continue the journey started with Prof. Shim 1/18/201620


Download ppt "11/18/2016 Test beam studies of the W-Si tracking calorimeter for the PHENIX forward upgrade Y. Kwon, Yonsei Univ., PHENIX."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google