Surface Maintenance Engineering Planning Program Update

Surface Maintenance Engineering Planning Program Update
4/26/2017 Surface Maintenance Engineering Planning Program Update FMMS Port Engineer Symposium Mark Leary, John Murphy, Mark Darwin 01 September 2015

Agenda Background & Review: SURFMEPP Mission and Products
New/Recent CMP tasks & revisions Recent Process Changes Time-Directed Maintenance Strategy (Mark Darwin) Third Party Planning (John Murphy) Class Standard Work Templates & Master Spec Catalog Mandatory Safety Alterations & SURFMEPP role in modernization Routines and Services standardization effort Issues and Concerns

SURFMEPP Mission and Key References
SURFMEPP Mission: Provide centralized surface ship life cycle maintenance engineering, class maintenance and modernization planning, and management of maintenance strategies Standard Organization and Regulations of the U.S. Navy (SORM) (OPNAVINST D) OPNAVINST L (Maintenance Policy for U.S. Navy Ships) Ships’ Maintenance and Material Management (3-M) Manual (NAVSEAINST C) Joint Fleet Maintenance Manual (JFMM) (COMFLTFORCOMINST ) Surface Force 3-M Assessment & Certification Program (COMNAVSURFPAC/LANTINST change 1) Guidance documents originate from various sources. When a conflict exists, the governing document has to be determined on a case by case basis. The five documents listed are examples of documents that govern how we execute ship maintenance 1. STANDARD ORGANIZATION AND REGULATIONS OF THE U.S. NAVY 2. OPNAVINST L: MAINTENANCE POLICY FOR U.S. NAVY SHIPS. 3. SHIPS MAINTENANCE AND MATERIAL MANAGEMEMENT MANUAL. -- “The Ship‘s 3-M System is the nucleus for managing afloat and applicable shore station equipment. This system provides maintenance and material managers throughout the Navy with a process for planning, acquiring, organizing, directing, controlling and evaluating the manpower and material resources used to support maintenance” OPNAV 3-M Instruction 4. JOINT FLEET MAINTENANCE MANUAL (JFMM) 5. SURFACE FORCE ASSESSMNENT AND CERTIFICATION PROGRAM Maintenance and technical. The following are guidance used for preventive maintenance, troubleshooting, assessment, alignment, calibration, TEMPALTS, alterations, overhaul, replacement, and repair of systems and equipment. PRECEDENCE 1. DEPARTURE FROM SPECIFICATIONS. 2. PMS. EXAMPLES - MRCS, PMRS, CRL 3. REQUIREMENTS. EXAMPLES - JFMM, 7010, CMP/ICMP, GSO, MRC 4. DRAWING. EXAMPLES - NAVSEA DWG, BUSHIP DWG, NAVAIR DWG, SYSCOM APPROVED VENDER DRWG. 5. TECH MANUAL. EXAMPLES - COMPONENT TECH MANUAL, NSTM, OEM TECH MANUAL. 6. DIRECTIVE. EXAMPLES - SORM, NAVORD, SYSCOM TECH BULLETIN, TYCOM TECH NOTES, ADVISORIES. 7. INSTRUCTIONS. EXAMPLES - NWPS, SYSCOM INSTRUCTIONS. 8. MAINTENANCE PROCEDURE. EXAMPLES - TWD (MP, FWP, CWP), UIPI, PPI, MAINTENANCE STANDARDS, HANDBOOK. OPNAVINST L SURFACE Force Assessment and Certification Program SORM Ship’s 3M Manual Joint Fleet Maintenance Manual SURFMEPP has an ENDURING focus on the maintenance requirements

Evolution of SURFMEPP 2008 Pre – Surface Ship Life Cycle Management Activity (SSLCM) 14 people for entire surface Navy No Technical Foundation Papers (TFP) No Baseline Availability Work Packages Ship Sheets at the Class level Budgets based on averages of historical costs (MRS) SSLCM – May 2009 36 total staff in May 2009 Class Maintenance Plan TFP for DDG 51 class only BAWP Deferral tracking Ship Sheets based on deferrals SURFMEPP – Est. Nov 2010 83 total staff in Nov 2010 226 total staff today Class Maintenance Plans TFP for all major ship classes BAWPs for all CNO availabilities Deferral tracking by hull Monthly status reports for all Mandatory Technical Requirements (MTR) Ship Sheets for every CNO availability Long Range Maintenance Schedules by hull Corrosion Control (CCIMS, TPRs, LRTPRs) Prior to 2008, we only had a dedicated workforce of 14 personnel charged with managing the life cycle maintenance of our fleet. Products were limited to Ship Sheets at the class level (i.e. no TFP, no BAWP). This deficiency was recognized and in 2009, we established the Surface Ship Life Cycle Management Activity and increased staffing to 36 personnel. Products were expanded to include Class Maintenance Plans, TFP for DDG 51 class, ship sheets, and we started to track deferred work. Continuing on the evolution, SURFMEPP was established in 2010 and for the first time, we had a holistic, integrated view across the entire spectrum of surface fleet maintenance. Drawing on best practices from the long-established Submarine Maintenance Engineering Planning and Procurement organization and the Carrier Planning Activity, SURFMEPP is tasked with managing the maintenance and modernization and getting the requirements right for all surface ships, ranging over 11 classes of ships and ~170 ships. SURFMEPP has quickly built on SSLCM’s success and will grow to an organization of roughly personnel. Additionally, SURFMEPP has the responsibility to track Corrosion Control requirements, strengthen the Class Maintenance Plan (CMP), and improve the integrated maintenance package between modernization and maintenance.

SURFMEPP Global Footprint
SURFMEPP HQ Portsmouth, VA PACNW Detachment Lead: Don Kultti (428) Yokosuka Detachment Norfolk Detachment Lead: Ed McIntyre (757) ext. 1137 Lead: Jim Batchelor San Diego Detachment Lead: George McVey (619) Rota Detachment Mayport Detachment Lead: Dan Hengerer Sasebo Detachment Lead: Al Owczarek (904) ext. 3380 Bahrain Detachment Lead: Russ Fitzwater Lead: Dennis Reinhardt Pearl Harbor Detachment Lead: Jen Valle (904) ext. 3383 Product Areas Availability Analysis Study Baseline Availability Work Package Change Management Documentation Class Maintenance Plans Class Standard Work Templates Contracting Strategies Corrosion Program Management Deferral tracking by hull Integrated maintenance & modernization work packages Master Specification Catalog POM Ship Sheets by hull Robust Metrics Ship Sheets Technical Foundation Papers We now have a local waterfront detachment in all surface ship homeports. Their functions are: Communicate the technical requirement Plan and host Life Cycle Planning Conference, and Mid-Cycle Review to ensure MT understands the technical requirements for the current cycle Review all technical requirements with MT prior to entering in CSMP shore file Track and report the status Mandatory Technical Requirements Work with the MT & RMC to resolve issues Validate the technical requirement Visit ships to validate work in progress Ensure all current technical requirements are on CSMP shore file Verify repairs are tied to originating assessment Identify gaps in CMP (missing, incorrect or unnecessary requirement) Represent SURFMEPP HQ at the waterfront Provide SURFMEPP perspective Be the advocate for the waterfront community Provide a voice back to the technical requirement owners Ensure the process can be executed (barrier ID and removal assistance) The sun never sets on SURFMEPP

SURFMEPP Product Value Stream
Plan Long Range Requirements into Availabilities Class Maintenance Plan (CMP) Technical Foundation Paper Ship Sheets (Ship specific LRMS) Baseline Availability Work Package (BAWP) (C+150) POM & DON Submission Technical Reqts Class Reqts ($) Specific Ship Reqts ($, Schedule) Plan FRP Cycle TAKE AWAY: SURFMEPP’s products integrate into the overall E2E process to ensure that life cycle maintenance is programmed and tracked through the FRP and across the FYDP. CMP: the library of technical requirements TFP: the Owner’s Manual that shows the application of technical requirements and maintenance, at the class level, notional values. SHIPSHEETS: Refinement of the notional requirement to the hull level for a given availability AWP: The discrete jobs supporting a ship for a single FRP cycle MMWP: The BAWP + Modernization Package. (Solidified at A-540). Represents the TYCOM repair package 6. EXECUTE AVAILABILITY: SURFMEPP tracks each technical requirement at the JSN level to ensure that the life cycle investment is completed. 7. AVAIL CLOSE OUT: SURFMEPP conducts a technical and financial review and audit of the availability to determine compliance, to program deferred maintenance and to update existing CMP tasks and supporting products (is an iterative process). Assessment Results Ship CSMP Modernization Availability Work Package (AWP) Execute Availability Avail Close Out (Technical & Financial) Execute (A-0 through C+0) Document & Feedback (C+100) Integrate Package (A-360 through A-35) Plan Availability (A-540 through A-360) Deferred Life Cycle Maintenance Work Item Level Integrate, Execute, Document and Feedback Enhanced tracking during AWP planning process

Additional Info in Backup Section
4/26/2017 FY15 CMP Task Additions LSD Stern Gate Hydraulic Cylinder Overhaul LSD Stern Gate Transom Gasket LSD, LHD Sea Valves and Waster Sleeves LPD Caley Davit Overhaul LPD Sea Valves LPD, DDG VCHT Chemical Cleaning LHD, LCC Ventilation Steam Heaters NSWC Below Waterline Space Assessments LPD Bulwark Overhaul LCC, LHD Condenser Sea Water Rubber Expansion Joints LSD, LPD, MCM Laundry and Galley Ventilation Steam Propulsion ISEA Assessment support DDG, LSD, CG, LHA6, LCS1 Lube Oil Purifier Heater Cleaning and Calibration LHD, LSD, LPD lower vehicle G1N6 G1N6 bilge area breakout (All classes) DDG and CG CPP and Lube Oil Settling Tank Heater one-time assess These are new CMP tasks introduced in FY15. “Good News” slides are located in Backup section. For full text of CMP task and fielding plan, contact your local SURFMEPP Waterfront Detachment. Additional Info in Backup Section

FY15 CMP Changes / Updates
4/26/2017 FY15 CMP Changes / Updates IR SURVEY: 12 Month IR survey now 36 months SPS-67: Modified pedestals now 48 month vice 30 or 36 month periodicity DDG: VLS strikedown crane task inactivated for all DDGs with torpedo strikedown ALT completed DDG and CG: CSAV and Collimation validated and all LMA/NDD aligned with PHD MCM MP Air Flask now 180M vs 120M PC Parasense refrigerant monitor DDG lube oil cooler tube bundle replacement Underwater hull preservation LSD fuel oil purifiers DDG SVTT assessment Significant CMP task changes FY15. Note: Deletions are not listed here. For full text of CMP task and fielding plan, contact your local SURFMEPP Waterfront Detachment.

What Happened to the Requirement? CMP “SWEEP”
4/26/2017 Total Assessment and Repair Tasks Pre SWEEP: 6,644 tasks: Mandatory A1 Post SWEEP: 2,704 tasks: 316 Mandatory A1 Assessment tasks: Pre SWEEP: ~2,800 tasks Post SWEEP: ~1,800 tasks Overall: 1,546 task modifications 5,259 task inactivations 323 new tasks with technical underpinning IMPACT: Right task at the right time in the FRP to maximize investment Right Sizing the CMP CMP Sweep: strengthened, standardized, consolidated and, where appropriate, inactivated tasks from the legacy CMP, going from over 8000 down to about 2400 unique maintenance requirements with TWH, ISEA and CNRMC approved technical references. Results: Defendable, Accurate, Executable Maintenance Requirements

Pre-/Post-SWEEP Mandatory (A1) Maintenance Actions
Work Items (by MRID) Non-pedigreed requirements removed. Technically valid maintenance actions remain.

Pre-/Post-SWEEP Non-Mandatory (B9) Maintenance Actions
Work Items (by MRID) Non-pedigreed requirements removed. Technically valid maintenance actions remain. Fully supports TSRA / CAP processes.

Recent Process Changes
4/26/2017 Recent Process Changes Shift from MSMO Cost plus Incentive Fee contract vehicles to Firm Fixed Price contracts in all AORs. Package lock date moves from A-99/A-75 to A-170. Single deferral letter required at A-220 ISO Firm Fixed Price availabilities and earlier package lock. Previous requirement was one deferral letter at A-240, another at A-120, in support of A-99/A-75 package lock. New requirement is only one letter at A Response from Ship Design Manager should be back to MT prior to A-170 package lock. This cuts the admin burden of deferral letters in half. As before, Type Commander MAY write additional deferral requests any time, as needed. For details / info / training – contact your local SURFMEPP Waterfront Detachment

4/26/2017 Recent Process Changes Branding Review (“AR” Category of Work) from A-150 to A-250 First SURFMEPP review of CSMP will still be at A-440, ISO A-410 Mid-Cycle Review. Second SURFMEPP review of CSMP will be at A This will give MT time to put “AR” branded items into work package OR into A-220 Deferral Request. No new jobs are pushed to the CSMP – this is a review of existing CSMP jobs for SSEOC impact items. We will notify MT before changing Category of Work. CMP Situational Periodicity Code change from A-150 to A-360 All CMP tasks with SPC of A-150 will now be due at A-360. Goal is earlier completion of assessments and earlier work identification ISO earlier package lock. No additional assessments, requirements or workload. Just changing WHEN. For details / info / training – contact your local SURFMEPP Waterfront Detachment

4/26/2017 Recent Process Changes Non-Mandatory TSRA tasks Closure Method = MA COMPLETE 811 (A1), 816 (A6), 832 (AR), 833 (AH), and now 849 (B9) Type Sequence Number are all changed to “MA COMPLETE” via VSB script. Port Engineer should not have to Customer Close these jobs when MA executes and closes these jobs in TAAS, AIM or NMD. Removal of CDNS – Per PE requests, SEA05 has also concurred First step: All CDNS notifications will be EXEMPT (no auto-generated s). Deferrals of MTRs will all be via letter process (AWPM/TDCA can assist). You will get the pop-up window as a notification but it won’t stop you from screening 2nd step: remove from VSB altogether For details / info / training – contact your local SURFMEPP Waterfront Detachment

4/26/2017 Recent Process Changes Additional Details In Following Slides: Time-Directed Tank and Void Maintenance Strategy Third Party Planning Master Spec Catalog & Class Standard Work Templates with Front Load Mandatory Safety Alterations For details / info / training – contact your local SURFMEPP Waterfront Detachment

Agenda Background & Review: SURFMEPP Mission, SURFMEPP Products
New/Recent CMP tasks / revisions Recent Process Changes Time-Directed Tank Maintenance Strategy (Mark Darwin) Third Party Planning (John Murphy) Class Standard Work Templates & Master Spec Catalog Mandatory Safety Alterations & SURFMEPP role in modernization Routines and Services standardization effort Issues and Concerns

Place Holder Time-Directed Tank Maintenance Strategy (Mark Darwin)
PE Symposium Briefing TDMS.pdf

New/Recent CMP tasks & revisions Recent Process Changes Time-Directed Tank Maintenance Strategy (Mark Darwin) Third Party Planning (John Murphy) Class Standard Work Templates & Master Spec Catalog Mandatory Safety Alterations & SURFMEPP role in modernization Routines and Services standardization effort Issues and Concerns

Place Holder Third Party Planning (John Murphy)
PE Symposium 3PP slides ppt

Class Standard Work Templates with “Front Load”
Method: Obtain relevant historic maintenance data from NMD. We started with the SWLINS with the most growth in CNO avails. Review current CSWT to identify functional area coverage Look for repeated /recurring maintenance actions Compare maintenance actions to the current CSWT: If maintenance actions are covered adequately by CSWT, no modification needed If maintenance actions are not covered, generate recommendation based on average/median of data If an existing reservation is not required, it will be removed

Top Growth for all Surface Ships

Example: CG Gas Turbine Exhaust Repair
Developed Two CSWTs - One for 1A and 1B and One for 2A and 2B - to include the following reservations: 10 linear feet of Vee-out and weld repair 10 manhole cover studs replaced 10 manhole cover bolting ring holes repaired 450 ft2 of interior insulation replacement 100 ft2 of perforated sheathing panel replacement The following CSWTs have been modified to include the reservations: CSWT A and 1B Gas Turbine Exhaust; repair CSWT A and 2B Gas Turbine Exhaust; repair

Official Definition of “MSA” Approved - NDE Being Populated
4/26/2017 MSA Definition Created and codified via the NMPT in NDE MSA ALTS identified in NDE by selection of the “Mandatory Safety Alteration” field Safety risk assessment provided by ALT sponsor Currently SURFMEPP uses a list of MSAs provided by SEA21 (vetted by SEA05) Navy leadership has determined that a more controlled governance process is needed to ensure that the most significant of those are installed according to the plans laid out in formal risk mitigation and acceptance processes per Cross-SYSCOM INST, Naval SYSCOM Risk Management Policy, of 21 Jul These SCDs shall be classified as “Mandatory Safety” SCDs, which include: Any SCD intended to mitigate a Serious or High System Safety Risk Any SCD reported to the Safety Investigation Board (SIB) and/or Fleet Safety Center as an action in response to a Class A mishap Other SCDs as determined by formal Flag level direction Official Definition of “MSA” Approved - NDE Being Populated

MSA ID, Tracking and Deferral
SURFMEPP reviews LOA and IDs MSA Pushes MSA JSN to MT and brands “AS” “AS” in JFMM as “Mandatory Safety Maintenance” Volume II, Part I, Chapter 3 Being added to Appendix “AN” at next JFMM BoD Set Due Date to end of CNO avail and notifies stakeholders Reviewed at E2E meetings (LCPC, A-410, IPTD, and C+70) Tracked in A-360, Deferral and Closeout letters Stakeholders notified if LOA change removes MSA Deferral through LOA change process vice JFMM Deferral from FRP to FRP may be an SSEOC reportable requirement

CNO Availability Services and Routines
4/26/2017 CNO Availability Services and Routines In an effort to standardize Services and Routines and the associated processes need to ensure jobs are on the CSMP, SURFMEPP conducted an analysis to identify tasks needed to support the planning and execution of CNO availabilities Tasks were divided into two categories, Core and Optional by AOR Task review is complete in Norfolk Task review is ongoing in San Diego For details / info / training – contact your local SURFMEPP Waterfront Detachment CNO Services & Routines Under Review For Standardization By AOR

Core Services and Routines
4/26/2017 Core Services and Routines Core Services and Routines are tasks deemed required to support the planning and execution of the CNO availability The AOR specific Core Services and Routines were developed by SURFMEPP and concurred upon by the TYCOM and RMC Core Services and Routines will be discussed at LCPC Core Services and Routines will be pushed with the BAWP but will not be branded mandatory For details / info / training – contact your local SURFMEPP Waterfront Detachment Core Services & Routines are Pushed with the BAWP

Optional Services and Routines
4/26/2017 Optional Services and Routines Optional Services and Routines are unique package relevant tasks deemed needed to support the planning and execution of the CNO availability The AOR specific Optional Services and Routines were developed by SURFMEPP and concurred upon by the TYCOM and RMC Optional Services and Routines will be discussed at LCPC and the A-410 meeting Optional Services and Routines will be pushed to the CSMP when requested by the Maintenance Team For details / info / training – contact your local SURFMEPP Waterfront Detachment Optional Services & Routines Pushed at Maintenance Team Request

Agenda Background / Review: SURFMEPP Mission and Products
New/Recent CMP tasks & revisions Recent Process Changes Time Directed Tank Maintenance Strategy (Mark Darwin) Third Party Planning (John Murphy) Class Standard Work Templates & Master Spec Catalog Mandatory Safety Alterations &SURFMEPP role in modernization Routines and Services standardization effort Issues and Concerns

Issues and Concerns CSMP Management CMP Task Ownership
Tasks must be completely closed out in VSB – Last Accomplished Date does not update until the JCN is closed out. Job will continue to appear on “overdue CMP task” list until closed. Jobs that are NOT complete must stay on the CSMP – If the job is still valid, leave it open so we can put on Ship Sheets and ensure you have the budget for it in the next cycle. All DFS need a JCN – A DFS can’t be screened and brokered…only a JCN can be screened and brokered. Without a JCN there is no mechanism to actually get it fixed. CMP Task Ownership If it is in the CSMP with an “A” Category of Work it is PE responsibility to Screen and Broker (or get deferred by SDM). When it is assigned to the RMC it is their responsibility to get it accomplished. “Upon completion of a mandatory assessment, the assessment team is responsible for creating CSMP-ready repair AWRs” BAWP report is distributed every 30 month. Full listing of all “A” Category of Work items in the CSMP with a due date in the current cycle, WITH current status (Avail plus authorized, assigned, rejected, on hold, etc) For details / info / training – contact your local SURFMEPP Waterfront Detachment CSMP-ready repair AWRs quote– JFMM Vol II, Part 1, section Many instances still of assessment teams leaving discrepancy lists with ship’s force.

Issues and Concerns CMP Task Feedback / TFBR Deferral Process
If a CMP task is not right (not executable as written, wrong periodicity, mismatch with tech manual, etc.), don’t just “live with it” - give us that feedback so we can fix it. If no task exists for a piece of gear, but it should – we can help with that too. We can work with ISEA / TWH. You can write your own TFBR in PMSMIS, or you can talk to / / call your local SURFMEPP detachment. We can either show you how to do a TFBR or we can do it on your behalf. Deferral Process Not being fully utilized. We still see items not accomplished but never adjudicated on almost every closeout letter. If you know it can’t / won’t be done, request deferral. Call your AWPM / TDCA. Deferral letters can be submitted at any time. RMC Chief Engineer can also adjudicate tasks during execution, per JFMM. For details / info / training – contact your local SURFMEPP Waterfront Detachment

Working with you to improve Surface Maintenance
Summary TYCOM and SURFMEPP: One TEAM/One FIGHT “It’s all about the ships” SURFMEPP is fully engaged in the Surface Maintenance and Modernization E2E process Defining and Defending the requirement Working with you to improve Surface Maintenance

Questions/Backup

Team Ships Organization
COMBATANTS OFFICE Ms. Bilyana Anderson (SES) EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR PMS 400D DDG51 PM: CAPT Vandroff Ships Acquisition Management Office DIRECTOR: B. Budd DEPUTY DIRECTOR C. Teichert PMS 500 DDG 1000 PM: RDML (Sel) J. Downey DPM L. Radocha PMS 377 LHA(R) / SSC / LCAC / AADS / LCU / SC(X) PM: CAPT Mercer PMS 317 LPD 17/ LX(R) PM: CAPT Plath PMS 325 Auxiliary Ships / Small Boats & Craft PM: M. Kosar Team Ships Staff Chief of Staff P. Murphy PROGRAM EXECUTIVE OFFICER SHIPS RADM David Gale DEPUTY COMMANDER FOR SURFACE WARFARE RDML Larry Creevy M. Sermon PMS 385 Strategic & Theater Sealift PM: CAPT Stevens T. Rivers M. Lyons T. Roberts (acting) C. Mitchell SURFACE WARFARE DIRECTORATE Ms. E. Anne Sandel (SES) SEA 21I Inactive Ships DIRECTOR: W. Boozer (acting) PMS 443 Surface Ship Readiness and Sustainment PM: CAPT Crone PMS 326 International Fleet Support PM: CAPT Dick PMS 407 Surface Ship Modernization PM: CAPT Zobel E. Littig SURFMEPP CO: CAPT Bauer B. Smith T. White (acting) PMS 320 Electric Ships Office DIRECTOR: S. Markle P. Grabowski AMPHIBIOUS, AUXILIARY & SEALIFT OFFICE Mr. Jay Stefany (SES) EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR F. Thompson T. Conlon T. Gallagher SEA 21P Chief Financial Office M. Scott PMS 339 Surface Training Systems PM: CAPT Sinclair SEA 21D Director, Contract Mgmt M. Reese Team Ships is responsible for the acquisition (PEO Ships) and complete life-cycle support (SEA 21) for U.S. Navy non-nuclear surface ships. The ships range from surface combatants to amphibious ships that transport Marines and their equipment to supply and replenishment cargo ships. PEO Ships begins the "cradle to grave" responsibility with the ship and system research, development, acquisition system integration, and construction. Surface ships then transition to SEA 21 to lifetime support including modernization, inactivation, and transfer to friendly nations or disposal. SURFMEPP is an echelon 3 command reporting directly to the Deputy Commander for Surface Warfare (SEA 21) within COMNAVSEA. As you will see on the next slide. Developing SURFMEPP was an evolutionary process for us. As of July 2015 38

Class Maintenance Plans
Class Maintenance Plans (CMP) are the “maintenance manual” of the ship class. Specifically included are: Maintenance Delivery Plan including required dry-docking intervals Engineered maintenance requirements such as equipment overhauls, shaft replacements, and corrosion protection System certification requirements CMPs are continuously updated based on class maintenance history Class Maintenance Plan (CMP): The CMPs are the maintenance and assessment tasks that are required to be performed for a class of ships to meet their expected service life. The CMP is updated based on technical analysis and periodic review with the associated technical authority. CMP = “Automobile’s Maintenance Manual”

Technical Foundation Paper Building Blocks
Purpose Identify maintenance required to meet the expected service life (ESL) for CMAV and CNO avails “Class-level” notional long range maintenance schedule for a well designed and maintained ship. TFP Includes: - Man-days Availability periodicity Availability duration for depot level maintenance Maintenance Requirements by Availability Technical Foundation Paper (Summary) Technical Foundation Paper (Owner’s Manual) Time Directed Services Corrective (CMP) (CSMP) Fleet Alts Total Notional Requirement C+90 Deferral Requirements across the lifecycle for CM and CNO avails Baseline is a well designed and maintained ship in each class Time directed repairs and assessments are executed per CMP and NSTM requirements Services are based on historical and technical requirements to perform maintenance Fleet Alteration allocation is 8% on average across the lifecycle of the various ship classes Corrective maintenance allocation is developed based on engineered and historical data CMP: Repair requirements resulting from time-directed CMP assessments CSMP: Repairs documented by ship’s force or TYCOM assessments

4/26/2017 Ship Sheets Ship Sheets support the annual requirements and budgeting process “at the hull level” Dollars and schedule Technical Foundation Paper is the baseline Material condition is used to develop ship-specific requirements Assessments are critical to document material condition Two year old process for Surface Navy - improved upon Sub and Carrier model Deferred maintenance is tracked via MMWP and Ship Sheets The Ship Sheet documents labor and material costs associated with each ship’s CNO availability maintenance requirements and is developed by comparing the current condition of the ship against the TFP to determine specific maintenance tasks required to “fix” the ship. These costs in turn inform the Program Objective Memorandum (POM) process and support ships meeting their ESL.

BAWP LCPC held/BAWP items reviewed at C+140
A collection of all Mandatory Technical Requirements ISO CNO Availability Work Package, and includes: Mandatory Safety Alterations Integrated/approved Mod sked & avail duration risk assessment CMP Assessment and Repair Tasks Mandatory DFS / CLAD items Routines and Services LCPC held/BAWP items reviewed at C+140 BAWP items pushed to CSMP 10 days later MOD items to CSMP ISO Letters of Authorization at A-360 Baseline Availability Work Packages are provided for each ship as that ship is initially inculcated into their first FRP maintenance cycle, and each subsequent maintenance cycle thereafter through the end of the ship’s service life. Packages provide a list of mandatory maintenance requirements derived from the Ship’s CMP and the Long Range Maintenance Schedule in the Class Technical Foundation Paper. The package covers a repeating period of time in the ship’s life called a “Fleet Response Plan Maintenance Cycle”. A cycle begins immediately after the previous avail ends and runs through the end of the next CNO availability. BAWPs are the baseline requirements that are developed from the CMP and Ship Sheet. These maintenance tasks are required for the ship to meet its expected service life. Modernization and routines/services are combined with the BAWP to form the Availability Work Package (AWP). SURFMEPP tracks Mandatory Technical Requirements (MTR) to ensure they are completed, including a disciplined and documented deferral process involving the TYCOMs, Technical Warrant Holders, and Ship Design Managers to ensure each MTR is properly adjudicated and accounted for. The BAWP is maintained throughout the maintenance cycle and forms the basis of the further refined Availability Work Package, which is turned over to the TYCOMs at A-360 to match mandatory technical/life cycle maintenance requirements with current readiness requirements within each ship’s maintenance budget control.

SURFMEPP Life Cycle Planning Conference
C+140 Start of the cycle - get everyone on the same page right from the start End to End Maintenance Process / CNO Availability Milestones Baseline Availability Work Package (BAWP) Status Mandatory work deferred from last cycle Tank Assessments (G1N5), Preservation and Repairs Corrosion Assessments (G1N6) Infrared Surveys (T1B6) Additional Items to be pushed Docking Items / Routines and Services Class Advisories (CLAD) / DFS Maintenance Events Remaining (TSRA / CMAV) / Establish Milestones BAWP Summary

SURFMEPP Mid-Cycle Review
A-410 MCR - a key input to the Maintenance and Modernization Work Package Baseline Availability Work Package (BAWP) Status Tank Assessments (G1N5), Preservation and Repairs Corrosion Assessments (G1N6) Intake / Uptake Assessments (G1E8), Infrared Surveys (T1B6) Docking Items / Routines and Services Class Advisories (CLAD) / Departures from Specifications (DFS) status CSMP review for Lifecycle Critical JSNs (AR Branding) Modernization Items / Availability Duration Scorecard

SURFMEPP Closeout Process
C+70 Closeout meeting, formal audit report issued C+100 Review Status of Mandatory Technical Requirements (MTR) Review MTRs to Re-Program Establish notional milestone dates for the next FRP maintenance cycle Review the status of Departures From Specification (DFS) Review recommendations for SURFMEPP process improvement and possible LEAN initiatives SURFMEPP also reviews actual expenditures vs budget and controls (W=X=Y=Z) Future state: will also include a review of planned modernization

SSEOC Life Cycle Critical Systems
100 Structure U/W Hull Superstructure / Mast Sonar Dome Decking, Structure Bilges Tanks / Voids Bulkheads, Structure Corrosion, General 200 Propulsion Steam Turbines Boilers MPDE MRG Shafts Struts Hubs / Propulsors Intakes / Uptakes Forced Draft Blowers Main Feed Pumps Main Steam Valves (>4”) Gas Turbine Module Mounts Piping: Fuel Main / Aux Steam 300 Electrical SSDG EDG SSTG GTG Module Mounts Cabling Distribution Switch Boards 400 Command/Surveillance SPY Array PCMS MK 82 SPG 62 500 Auxiliary Ventilation System - Structure Ballast Systems Steering Hangar Doors Rudders Aux Blr /WHB Elevators -Aircraft Boat Davits Stern Gate CHT Firemain CMWD Main / Aux SW 600 Outfits/Furnishings ICCP System U/W Hull Paint Systems 700 Armament VLS Magazines Elevators - Weapons JSNs are branded and tracked throughout the E2E process

Impact of Non-compliant Deferral Process
USS STOUT: BMD SHIP TANKS COND 3 and COND 4 REPAIRS DEFERRED. RESULTED IN : INCREASE TANK INTERNAL DEGRADATION FUTURE AVAIL CHANGED TO DOCKING REPAIRS INCREASED FUTURE AVAIL COST TO SUPPORT DOCKING REQUIREMENTS USS IWO JIMA: AVAILS CANX TO INCREASE OPERATIONAL SCHEDULE. RESULTED IN : TANKS NOT ASSESSED SINCE COMMISSIONING 115 TANKS IN UNKNOWN STATUS 25 TANKS REQUIRING 100% RECOAT POSSIBILITY OF AVAIL EXTENSION AND LOST Ao POSSIBILITY OF INCREASED AVAIL COSTS DUE TO MANDATORY DOCKING WORK USS ASHLAND: ASSESSMENTS & MAINTENANCE DEFERRED OVER MULTIPLE FRP CYCLES RESULTED IN : MULTIPLE AVAIL EXTENSIONS DUE TO GROWTH/NEW WORK (AVAIL NOW 18+ MONTHS) INCREMENTAL DISCOVERY AVAIL (1,600+ RCCs) INCREASED AVAIL COSTS (219% G/NW) LOSS OF OPERATIONAL AVAILABILITY IWO TANK PICTURE ; COND 3 TANK PLACE HOLDER

FY14 CMP tasks / revisions
Radiation Hazard Certification Pointing and Firing Cutouts Certification LPD 17 SWAN Fail-over Test MCM Rudderstock Seals Replacement LHD Laundry and Galley Ventilation LPD 17 Fiber Optic Cables LHD Stern Gate Transom Gasket Stern Gate Cylinder Rebuilds DDG Collective Protection System Silicon Aluminum Bronze Union Nuts NSWC Below Waterline Space Assessments

Executing the Requirement Developing & Tracking CMP / CSWT Tasks
4/26/2017 Executing the Requirement Developing & Tracking CMP / CSWT Tasks Analysis Review CMP, SWTs, CSWTs, and LWTs Technical Doc. Configuration Data Failure Analysis Return Cost Data Develop Strategy Identify Gaps Engage with ISEA Identify tasks to be inactivated, modified or created Draft Maintenance Strategy Approval / Develop Task TWH Approval AP cards SWTs or CSWTs and IGEs Fielding Plan Resource Plan CMP task in M&SWP Implementation Socialize with the Waterfront Master Spec Catalog M&SWP – Go Live TWH Follow-up Avail Close Out (Variation Analysis) Execution (Track growth vs. Est.) AWP (Gov. Est.) BAWP (Est. $, Scope) CMP / CSWT (Technical. Req.) Class Standard Work Template (CSWT) Standardizes recurring repair planning – reduces planning costs Reduces variance of work scope between ports/contractors Provides contract vehicle for detailed technical instructions Standardizes cost estimating Improves cost return analysis for feedback into the requirement process Incorporates best practices/lessons learned Currently 5500 templates in the Master Spec Catalog

Stern Gate Cylinder Rebuilds
The Good News about… Stern Gate Cylinder Rebuilds Background: Stern gate hydraulics and operating equipment are high usage items that are operated in a harsh exposed environment which can lead to increased corrosion. System downtime can impact amphibious operations and the ship’s ability to meet mission tasking. Strategy: Preserve Stern Gate Foundation and Cylinder to include rebuilding of the Port and Starboard Hydraulic Cylinders (and associated components). Benefit: Time directing the maintenance in the CMP will improve the overall maintenance strategy for the stern gate equipment, provide a budget for better and lower cost of continuous maintenance, while minimizing the excessive costs of growth and new work; all of which will increase reliability and support the primary mission of the ship. CMP Task at a Glance: ICMP Task Number: Q A MRID: Periodicity: 72M Short Description: Overhaul Stern Gate Mechanical System Cost Estimate: Man-days: Material: $210, Associated CSWT: Class Applicability: LSD 41/49 First Hull: USS ASHLAND (LSD 48) Questions concerning this CMP Task should be addressed to:

Stern Gate Transom Gasket
The Good News about… Stern Gate Transom Gasket Background: Stern gate gaskets are damaged during normal operation and require maintenance every FRP avail. Strategy: Replace stern gate transom gasket every 36M IAW LSD 41 and LSD 49 CSWTs. Benefit: Time directing the maintenance in the CMP will improve the overall maintenance strategy for the stern gate equipment, provide a budget for better and lower cost of continuous maintenance, while minimizing the excessive costs of growth and new work; all of which will increase reliability and support the primary mission of the ship. CMP Task at a Glance: ICMP Task Number: Q A MRID: Periodicity/Situational Requirement: 36M Short Description: Replace Stern Gate Lower Transom Gasket Cost Estimate: Man-days: Material: $10, Associated CSWT: (41)/ (49) Class Applicability: LSD 41/49 First Hull: USS GERMNANTOWN LSD 42 Questions concerning this CMP Task should be addressed to:

LSD 41 Sea Valves and Waster Sleeves
The Good News about… LSD 41 Sea Valves and Waster Sleeves Background: Routine work performed on ships in dry dock normally consists of inspect and repair, sea valves and sea chests. Waster sleeves are installed in sea chests to prevent galvanic corrosion of sea chest valves and piping components. Waster sleeve removal facilitates proper inspection of sea chests. Standard waster sleeve configurations require the sea valve to be removed, most times damaging the waster sleeve in the process. Sea valve inspections are preformed to accurately assess the extent of damage requiring repair. Repairs vary in cost, smaller valves often exceeds 50% of the cost of a new valve. Strategy: Replace sea valves 2 ½ inches and below, overhaul sea valves greater than 2 ½ inches within every normal docking interval. Replace waster sleeves in conjunction with the sea valve task. Benefit: Additional costs to remove sea valves for repair is eliminated, the cost of valve removal is rolled into the cost of the waster sleeve repair. Catastrophic failure to sea valves that are exposed to harsh environments are reduced. Decrease need for costly diving services that pose logistical challenges affecting ships operational requirements. ICMP Task Number: Q A0A /Q A01 MRID: /93106 Periodicity/Situational Requirement: Every normal docking interval Short Description: SEA VALVES REQUIRE REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT/ WASTER SLEEVES REQUIRE REPLACEMENT. Cost Estimate: Man-days: 474 / 209 Material: $61,455/8,738 Associated SWT/CSWT/AP: / Class Applicability: LSD First Hull: LSD 42 USS GERMANTOWN CMP Task at a Glance:

CALEY DAVIT OVERHAUL The Good News about…
Background: Currently there are no tasks for overhaul the Caley Boat Davits for LPD 17 class ships. The davit suffers from maintainability and reliability issues. Strategy: Scheduled CMP task to overhaul the Boat Davit and Tow Boom every 72 months. Benefit: A time directed overhaul strategy will improve equipment lifecycle and readiness requirements while minimizing growth and new work CMP Task at a Glance: ICMP Task Number: Q A21 MRID: Periodicity/Situational Requirement: 72 CNO Avail Short Description: CALEY DAVIT OVERHAUL Cost Estimate: Mandays Material: $93,657 (Including OEM Cost) Associated CSWT: Class Applicability: LPD First Hull: LPD-2 USS NEW YORK

LPD 17 Sea Valves The Good News about… Background: Strategy: Benefit:
Routine work performed on ships in dry dock normally consists of inspect and repair, sea valves and sea chests. Sea valve inspections are performed to accurately assess the extent of damage requiring repair. Repairs vary in cost, smaller valves often exceeds 50% of the cost of a new valve. Strategy: Replace sea valves 2 ½ inches and below, overhaul sea valves greater than 2 ½ inches within every normal docking interval. Benefit: Catastrophic failure to sea valves that are exposed to harsh environments are reduced. Decrease need for costly diving services that pose logistical challenges affecting ships operational requirements. ICMP Task Number: Q A0A MRID: Periodicity/Situational Requirement: Every normal docking interval Short Description: SEA VALVES REQUIRE REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT Cost Estimate: Man-days: 1,119 Material: $53,374 Associated SWT/CSWT/AP: Class Applicability: LPD First Hull/: LPD 18 USS GREEN BAY CMP Task at a Glance:

LPD VCHT Chemical Cleaning
The Good News about… LPD VCHT Chemical Cleaning Background: VCHT piping is highly susceptible to corrosion and clogging due to build-up. This can lead to failure of the system and greatly affect ship’s habitability. Waterfront best practice determined chemically cleaning to be necessary on a time/availability directed basis. Strategy: Accomplish a chemical cleaning of Vacuum Collection, Holding, and Transfer piping every FRP to ensure system operational integrity. Benefit: Supports Waterfront Best Practices to avoid failure and effective maintenance planning. Reduces growth and new work during CNO availabilities. CMP Task at a Glance: ICMP Task Number: Q A MRID: Periodicity/Situational Requirement: CNO Availability Short Description: VACUUM, COLLECTION, HOLDING, AND TRANSFER PIPING REQUIRES CHEMICAL CLEANING Cost Estimate: Man-days: Material: $75, Associated CSWT: CSWT Class Applicability: LPD First Hull: USS ANCHORAGE (LPD 23)

Ventilation Steam Heaters
The Good News about… Ventilation Steam Heaters Background: Ventilation system service steam heaters have become severely degraded are in various states of inoperability, presenting safety hazards to Ship’s Force personnel and other ship equipment. Strategy: Establish mandatory tasking for ISEA to inspect service steam heaters and piping components, assess operability and configuration, assist Ship’s Force in 2K generation, and provide a written report with a Risk Matrix and ILS recommendations. Benefit: Increase safety to personnel and equipment, improve system readiness and operability, reduce overall repair costs CMP Task at a Glance: ICMP Task Number: I A MRID: Periodicity: 72 Months (AVAIL PRE-270) Short Description: ASSESS VENTILATION SERVICE STEAM HEATER SYSTEM Cost Estimate: Man-days: Estimate provided by NSWCCD-SSES Code 922. Class Applicability: LHD-1, LCC First Hull/Date: TBD

NSWC Below Waterline Space Assessments
The Good News about… NSWC Below Waterline Space Assessments Background: Unidentified structural and corrosion related deficiencies would often lead to growth and new work during docking availabilities. Correction of the deficiencies would often result in availability duration extensions and impact total costs. Strategy: NSWC-CD will conduct a “below the waterline” structure and corrosion assessment prior to each scheduled docking. The assessment will be scheduled for completion at A-720 during the DSRA FRP cycle. Credit will be given for any G1N6 technical requirement to prevent duplication of effort. Benefit: Early and consistent identification of structural and corrosion required repairs. Detailed report to include risk matrix, technically valid JSNs and DFS direction. Reduction of growth and new work. Reduction in assessment costs by non-duplication of efforts by multiple activities. Provides early input to the POM budget submission process. CMP Task at a Glance: MRID: Periodicity/Situational Requirement: Dry Dock FRP cycle Short Description: CONDUCT STRUCTURAL ASSESSMENT OF ALL COMPARTMENTS BELOW WATERLINE Cost Estimate: Man-days: 220 (COMB), 265 (AMPH) Material: N/A Associated CSWT: N/A Class Applicability: All Classes (MCM, PC excluded) First Hull/Date: CURRENTLY BEING FIELDED

LPD-17 Bulwarks The Good News about… Background: Strategy: Benefit:
Due to the bulwark design, applied coatings and location, the bulwarks on LPD-17 class have experienced recurring premature coating system failure and subsequent structural degradation. These structural failures have frequently resulted in water penetration to adjacent compartments and running rust on the ship exterior requiring additional repairs and coating application. Strategy: Every docking availability, bulwarks will receive a directive task with a supporting Class Standard Work Template (CSWT) to repair any structural degradation and preserve the deck plating and structural members utilizing Ultra High Solids (UHS) coatings. Benefit: The new repair task will maintain the structural integrity of the bulwarks, improve ship appearance by reducing running rust, and result in cost avoidance through reduced growth work and new work. CMP Task at a Glance: MRID: Periodicity/Situational Requirement: DRYDOCK Short Description: REPAIR & PRESERVE WITHIN THE BULWARK Cost Estimate: Man-days: Material: $50,020 Associated CSWT: Class Applicability: LPD First Hull: LPD-18 USS NEW ORLEANS

Sea Water Rubber Expansion Joints
The Good News about… LCC Condenser Sea Water Rubber Expansion Joints Background: Main condenser rubber expansion joints accommodate thermal growth and shock motion of the sea water circulating piping system. In compliance of NSTM requirement , “Replace rubber expansion joints in manned spaces at least every years”. This supports the O-FRP 36/9 construct. Strategy: Replace main condenser expansion joints each scheduled docking availability. Benefit: Avoid catastrophic failures and costly emergent repairs that will affect Operational Availability and Expected Service Life. CMP Task at a Glance: ICMP Task Number: Q A MRID: Periodicity/Situational Requirement: Docking Availability Short Description: Replace Main condenser expansion joints. Cost Estimate: Man-days: Material: $22, Associated CSWT: CSWT Class Applicability: LCC First Hull: BLUE RIDGE (LCC 19)

LSD Laundry and Galley Ventilation
The Good News about… LSD Laundry and Galley Ventilation Background: Ventilation systems associated with shipboard laundries and galleys that are poorly maintained cause a buildup of dirt, grease, and oil in ventilation ducts; restricts airflow, reduces air flow capabilities, exceeds design pressure and results in elevated temperatures, hazardous environments, loss of ships efficiency and increased operational costs. Most ventilation components are located in constrained spaces, making maintenance difficult for ships force; resulting in repairs and cleaning being accomplished on a fix-when-fail basis. Strategy: Cleaning of galley and laundry ductwork and associated components with NAVSEA approved methods within every FRP cycle. Benefit: Clean ventilation protects personnel and sensitive equipment from potentially hazardous airborne contaminants, fires, explosions, and excessive heat; reduces ships emissions, ship operates more efficiently and lowers operational costs. CMP Task at a Glance: ICMP Task Number: Q A01/ Q A MRID: / Periodicity/Situational Requirement: Every FRP Short Description: GALLEY AND LAUNDRY VENTILATION REQUIRES INTERNAL CLEANING Cost Estimate: Man-days: 129 (LSD 41), 131 (LSD 49) Material: $18, Associated CSWT: (LSD 41), (LSD 49) Class Applicability: LSD 41 and 49 First Hull: USS RUSHMORE (LSD 47)

Steam Propulsion Plant Readiness
Enhanced CNO Maintenance Availability ISEA Support Background: Errors in assessments/repair planning/execution, lack of critical spare parts, and failure to implement lessons learned have led to CNO Availability propulsion plant growth work, schedule extensions and significant cost increases. Strategy: Provide ISEA engineering and inspector involvement in critical steam propulsion plant equipment baseline assessments, work package development, onsite technical support during critical repairs, inspections and tests, and participation in post availability IPTDs. This approach applies the proven Boiler Strength and Integrity Inspection process model (PSAI/SAI/ISVs/CAI/IPTD) to critical steam propulsion components and systems. Includes: main propulsion and auxiliary steam turbines, SSTGs, forced draft blowers, heat exchangers, condensers, distilling plants, pumps, piping & valves, all associated automation/controls, etc… Benefit: Early and accurate identification of deficiencies and associated critical LLTM, technical input and OQE for repair planning, critical QA inspections for complex work packages, proactive onsite assistance with immediate engineering reach back to all NAVSSES Subject Matter Experts and application of lessons learned between repair activities. Result is reduction in growth work, schedule disruption and total costs. CMP Tasks at a Glance: MRID: Periodicity/Situational Requirement: “R”: Scheduled at A-270 each FRP cycle Short Description: Steam Propulsion ISEA Assessment Cost Estimate: Man-days: 220 Material: N/A Associated CSWT: N/A Class Applicability: LHD 1-7 /LCC-19 (8 ships/15 propulsion plants) First Hull: USS ESSEX

Radiation Hazard Certification
The Good News about… Radiation Hazard Certification Background: NAVSEAINST Integrated Topside Safety and Certification Program for Surface Ships and S9040-AA-GTP-010/SSCR Surface Ships Certification Requirements, Rev 5, Chapter 1, require: “RADHAZ Cert. issued upon confirmation of proper placement of required control measures and is effective for 5 yrs.” Strategy: NSWC Dahlgren Division Q52 and NSWC PHD A33 requested SURFMEPP CHENG convert existing Routine into a 60M Scheduled Assessment that can be pushed and tracked within the CMP. Benefit: This Certification, with safety impacts, will be formally tracked and managed by NAVSEA 21 via SURFMEPP. CMP Task at a Glance: ICMP Task Number: I A03 MRID: Periodicity/Situational Requirement: 60M Short Description: Certify Radiation Hazard (RADHAZ) Control Measures Associated SWT/CSWT/AP: NAVSEAINST , NAVSEA S9040-AA-GTP-010/SSCR Class Applicability: All Surface Ships First Hull/Date: Ongoing Last Hull/Date: Ongoing

Pointing and Firing Cutouts Certification
The Good News about… Pointing and Firing Cutouts Certification Background: NAVSEAINST Integrated Topside Safety and Certification Program for Surface Ships, Encl (1), Para 1.g.(1) requires: “safe, correct and interference free installation of weapon systems pointing and firing cutout (P&FCO) zones whenever a SHIPALT has been accomplished which affects the P&FCO or if it has been more than three years since the last certification.” Strategy: NSWC Dahlgren Division G73 requested SURFMEPP CHENG convert existing Routine into a 36M Scheduled Assessment that can be pushed and tracked within the CMP. Benefit: This Certification, with safety impacts, will be formally Tracked and managed by NAVSEA 21 via SURFMEPP. CMP Task at a Glance: ICMP Task Number: I A02 MRID: Periodicity/Situational Requirement: 36M Short Description: CERTIFY POINTING AND FIRING CUTOUTS. Associated SWT/CSWT/AP: NAVSEAINST , NAVSEA S9040-AA-GTP-010/SSCR Class Applicability: All Surface Ships First Hull/Date: Ongoing Last Hull/Date: Ongoing

LPD 17 SWAN Fail-over Test
The Good News about… LPD 17 SWAN Fail-over Test Background: INSURV Technical Issue Paper of 13 Jun 12 cited OPNAVINST 9070, 2009 NVR and DOD Directive in requiring formal demonstration of SWAN redundancy and survivability. PEO Ships 317 contracted Raytheon to develop test procedures to meet the requirements and TWH NAVSEA 05WH approved the resulting drawings and mandatory requirement. Strategy: Implement the 3 drawings, by WAN architecture and hull series, in a scheduled pre-deploy CMP Task with execution funded by PEO Ships 317. Rev B - LPD 17/18 Rev D - LPD Rev A - LPD Benefit: Demonstrate ability to sustain combat ops, mission critical networks and contingency plans required in cited documents. CMP Task at a Glance: ICMP Task Number: I-4A040-A04 MRID: 97426 Periodicity/Situational Requirement: DEPLOY PRE - 180 Short Description: SWAN Fail-over Test. Cost Estimate: 24 M/H Director/Rover; 156 M/H SF Operators. Associated SWT/CSWT/AP: Drawings (see above) Class Applicability: LPD 17 First Hull/Date: LPD 20 USS GREEN BAY

Rudderstock Seals Replacement
The Good News about… Rudderstock Seals Replacement Background: A number of US Navy surface ships have recently experienced severe damage to rudder spherical roller bearings (SRB). CG 47, DDG-51, FFG 7, LHD 1-7, LHA 1, LPD-4, LPD-17, MCM and LSD41/49 class ships are susceptible to sea water intrusion into the lower rudder bearing. Strategy: Create mandatory CMP task and supporting CSWTs to replace Rudderstock Inflatable Seal, Hull Seal, Upper & Lower Bearing Seals, and Sand Excluder Seals every CNO Dry-Docking Availability. Benefit: Prevent premature bearing failure, cost savings through effective planned maintenance. CMP Task at a Glance: ICMP Task Number: Q A MRID: Periodicity/Situational Requirement: Dry-dock Short Description: Rudderstock Seal Assemblies Require Replacement Cost Estimate: Man-days: 28 Material: $46, Associated CSWT: MCM Class Applicability: MCM First Hull/Date: USS CHIEF (MCM 14)

LHD Laundry and Galley Ventilation
The Good News about… LHD Laundry and Galley Ventilation Background: Ventilation systems associated with shipboard laundries and galleys that are poorly maintained cause a buildup of dirt, grease, and oil in ventilation ducts; restricts airflow, reduces air flow capabilities, exceeds design pressure and results in elevated temperatures, hazardous environments, loss of ships efficiency and increased operational costs. Most ventilation components are located in constrained spaces, making maintenance difficult for ships force; resulting in repairs and cleaning being accomplished on a fix-when-fail basis. Strategy: Cleaning of galley and laundry ductwork and associated components with NAVSEA approved methods within every FRP cycle. Benefit: Clean ventilation protects personnel and sensitive equipment from potentially hazardous airborne contaminants, fires, explosions, and excessive heat; reduces ships emissions, ship operates more efficiently and lowers operational costs. CMP Task at a Glance: ICMP Task Number: Q A01/ Q A MRID: / Periodicity/Situational Requirement: Every FRP Short Description: GALLEY AND LAUNDRY VENTILATION REQUIRES INTERNAL CLEANING Cost Estimate: Man-days: Material: $ Associated CSWT: LHD Class Applicability: LHD First Hull/Date: USS IWO JIMA (LHD 7)

LPD 17 Fiber Optic Cable Plants
The Good News about… LPD 17 Fiber Optic Cable Plants Background: ISEA NSWC Dahlgren Division W64 Proposed and TWH NAVSEA 05W Approved creating AP-MRC-based scheduled 60-days-pre-deployment tasks to ensure LPD 17 FOCP material, crew, tools readiness and to assess growth capacity. Strategy: Implement the following AP Cards as Scheduled CMP Tasks, Funded by PMS 470 A6G4 - Fiber Repair Readiness Assessment A6G5 - FOCP Growth Tube Assessment A6G6 - FOCP Material Condition Assessment Benefit: Greatly improved Operational Availability. Crew over-the-shoulder training. Improved information for fiber capacity growth planning. CMP Task at a Glance: ICMP Task Numbers: I-4A040-A01, 3 & 2 MRIDs: 93145, 96907, 96905 Periodicity/Situational Requirement: DEPLOY PRE – 60 (A6G4) , CNO AVAIL (A6G5, A5G6) Short Description: FOCP Repair Readiness, Growth Tube and Material Condition Assessments. Cost Estimate: 16, 384 & 80 Man-Hours each. Associated SWT/CSWT/AP: A6G4, A6G5, A6G6 Class Applicability: LPD 17 First Hull: USS SAN DIEGO (LPD 22)

Stern Gate Transom Gasket
The Good News about… Stern Gate Transom Gasket Background: PREPRL and SSEOC noted a need to create Stern Gate CMP tasks. There is a clear shortage of CMP stern gate time directed repair and assessment tasks. The number of A1 branded repair tasks is currently zero. Strategy: Replace Stern Gate Transom Gasket (Lower Section) every 27M. Please see CSWT Benefit: Time directing the maintenance in the CMP will improve the overall maintenance strategy for the stern gate equipment, provide a budget for better and lower cost of continuous maintenance, while minimizing the excessive costs of growth and new work; all of which will increase reliability and support the primary mission of the ship. System Photo CMP Task at a Glance: ICMP Task Number: Q A MRID: Periodicity/Situational Requirement: 27M Short Description: Replace Stern Gate Lower Transom Gasket Cost Estimate: Man-days: Material: $4, Associated SWT/CSWT/AP: Class Applicability: LHD-1 First Hull: USS BATAAN (LHD 5) Questions concerning this CMP Task should be addressed to:

Stern Gate Cylinder Rebuilds
The Good News about… Stern Gate Cylinder Rebuilds Background: PREPRL and SSEOC noted a need to create Stern Gate CMP tasks. There is a clear shortage of CMP stern gate time directed repair and assessment tasks. The number of A1 branded repair tasks is currently zero. Strategy: Preserve Upper and Lower Stern Gate Foundation and Cylinder to include rebuilding of the Upper and Lower Hydraulic Cylinders (and associated components). Please see CSWT Benefit: Time directing the maintenance in the CMP will improve the overall maintenance strategy for the stern gate equipment, provide a budget for better and lower cost of continuous maintenance, while minimizing the excessive costs of growth and new work; all of which will increase reliability and support the primary mission of the ship. System Photo CMP Task at a Glance: ICMP Task Number: Q A MRID: Periodicity/Situational Requirement: 54M Short Description: Overhaul Stern Gate Mechanical System Cost Estimate: Man-days: Material: $163, Associated SWT/CSWT/AP: Class Applicability: LHD-1 First Hull: USS BATAAN (LHD 5) Questions concerning this CMP Task should be addressed to:

DDG’s Collective Protection System
The Good News about… DDG’s Collective Protection System Background: During CPS filter change outs, chemical/biological/radiological (CBR) filters are leak tested to verify the filters, housings, and plenums do not leak. During leak testing of CBR filters serving CPS Zone 1 on DDG51 class hulls, leak failures are often identified through a plenum access plate in Zone 1 bulkhead separating the clean side plenum from the dirty side plenum in CPS fan room 01- 110-3-Q. ISEA Advisory Rev 1. DTG Z NOV 13. Strategy: Remove Collective Protection System (CPS) clean side access opening and replace with a new welded plate. Benefit: CPS integrity, protecting personnel from hazardous CBR environments. CMP Task at a Glance: ICMP Task Number: Q A MRID: Periodicity/Situational Requirement: One-Time Short Description: CPS CLEAN SIDE PLENUM ACCESS OPENING REQUIRES REMOVAL Cost Estimate: Man-days: Material: $ Associated SWT/CSWT/AP: DDG: Class Applicability: DDG First Hull/Date: USS HIGGINS (DDG 76)

DDG Silicon Aluminum Bronze Union Nuts
The Good News about… DDG Silicon Aluminum Bronze Union Nuts Background: Silicon Aluminum Bronze (SAB) unions have been known to have failed on high pressure air systems. This was first discovered at the beginning of 2000 on DDG 51 class ships, and again in October 2010 on LPD 17 class ships. A series of laboratory tests was conducted and identified specific conditions, stress levels, and defined the limitations of SAB nuts making them susceptible to failure. As a result, Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) issued Surface Fleet Advisory No Silicon Aluminum Bronze Union Failure, directing the Surface Fleet to conduct ship-wide inspections of systems greater than 300 psi, to identify unions with SAB material, and immediately replace them. This shall be adjudicated by DFS, for later repair. Strategy: Accomplish a one-time, ship-wide inspection of all union-ended valves and takedown joints for the presence of SAB material in piping systems with a design pressure of greater than 300 psi, and replace indentified SAB unions. Benefit: Prevents risk of union failure and potential of endangering personnel and equipment . CMP Task at a Glance: ICMP Task Number: I A MRID: Periodicity/Situational Requirement: One-time Short Description: PIPING SYSTEMS REQUIRE INSPECTION FOR SAB MATERIAL Cost Estimate: Man-days: Material: $60, Associated SWT/CSWT/AP: CSWT Class Applicability: DDG (51-92) First Hull/Date: USS JOHN PAUL JONES (DDG-53)

Surface Maintenance Engineering Planning Program Update

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Surface Maintenance Engineering Planning Program Update"— Presentation transcript:

Similar presentations

About project

Feedback

Log in

Auth with social network:

Surface Maintenance Engineering Planning Program Update

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Surface Maintenance Engineering Planning Program Update"— Presentation transcript:

Similar presentations

About project

Feedback