1. CONCERTO Premium Performance indicators of energy supply units Michael Kleber 23 October 2012 - Brussels

2. 2 Data collection status for CONCERTO energy supply units Calculated CONCERTO performance indicators Environmental Economic Eco-environmental Technical Up-scaling results to Europe Summary and Outlook Outline

3. Data collection status for energy supply units Building integrated energy systems (BIES) Community energy systems (CES) Biomass boiler Solar thermal Heat pump microCHP Photovoltaics Chiller Rev. heatpump Other Biomass boiler Geothermal Solar thermal CHP Photovoltaics Wind turbine Water turbine District heating Storage Biogas Other 3

4. 4 Data collection status for energy supply units For high quality results we need high quality data: Technical parameters Calculated energy demand, measured energy consumption Consumed amounts of fuel Investment, grants, costs and revenues Our goal: Represent the good work you are doing in your project! Include every single demonstration object of each CONCERTO site and make it accessible via www.concerto.eu So far we have 1,701 energy supply units Handover certificates are the best representation of the total number of objects

5. 1,701 data collection sheets for energy supply units Community energy systems (CES) Building integrated energy systems (BIES) 5

6. 1,701 data collection sheets for energy supply units 6

7. Calculated CONCERTO performance indicators Technical  Design vs. measured energy production  Full load hours  Efficiency Environmental  CO 2 -emission reduction Economic  Investments  Net present value  Dynamic payback period  Energy production costs Eco-environmental  CO 2 -abatement costs  Triggered investment per grant 7

8. Design vs. measured energy production 150% 100% 50% Measured heating energy output [MWh/a] Building integrated biomass boilers 8 n=224

9. Full load hours Building integrated biomass boilers 4000 full load hours 1000 full load hours 200 full load hours Design heating energy output [MWh/a] 9 n=568

10. Efficiency Efficiency of micro CHP in french CONCERTO project 10

11. Efficiency 11 Amount of energy carrier used Heating value Density kWh in kWh out = efficiency

12. Efficiency 12 Efficiency [%]

13. Availability 13 Is the new technology as reliable as the conventional? E.g. a wood chip boiler vs. an oil condensing boiler? In numbers it could be expressed as: „Overall equipment efficiency“: availability * efficiency * average capacity utilization

14. CO 2 -emission reduction Building integrated solar thermal 14

15. CO 2 -emission reduction Metadata 15

16. Investments Building integrated photovoltaics Maximum 75% Quantil Median 25% Quantil Minimum 16

17. 17 Investment [€/kW] Investments Building integrated photovoltaics

18. 18 Building integrated solar thermal Investment [€/kW] Investments

19. Net present value NPV for building integrated PV 19 interest rate = 3%, operation time = 20 a

20. Dynamic payback period Dynamic payback period for building integrated PV 20 interest rate = 3%, operation time = 20 a

21. Energy production costs Building integrated biomass boilers Energy production costs [€/kWh] 21 operation time = 20 a

22. CO 2 -abatement costs Building integrated photovoltaics in Germany CO 2 -abatement Costs [€/t] 22 interest rate = 3%, operation time = 20 a

23. Triggered investment per grant 23 Investment per grant [€/€] Maximum 75% Quantil Median 25% Quantil Minimum Building integrated biomass boilers

24. Every community has ist very own characteristics None of the 58 CONCERTO sites is up-scalable exactly to a given city in Europe Provide a way of finding the „best matching“ site Upscaling of CONCERTO 24

25. Upscaling of CONCERTO Typology of your city/municipality 25 010,000100,0001,000,000 7,800

26. Upscaling of energy supply units 26 3 Scenarios  Technical potential:  CONCERTO BAU 1) :  CONCERTO+: Technical potentialCONCERTO BAU 1) BAU: Business as usual 2) NREAP: National renewable energy action plan Goal  Extrapolation of CONCERTO results to other European communities  Analysis of potential market penetration of large-scale renewable energy technologies Maximum potential with regard to geographical and technical restrictions Potential based on today‘s technology Potential considering increased undertake of energy supply units CONCERTO+ National potential of renewable energies [GWh/a] 2020 target for renewable energy technologies specified in NREAP 2)

27. Scope 27 Share of area suitable for large-scale PV 0.000 - 0.149 % 0.150 - 0.299 % 0.300 - 0.449 % 0.450 - 0.599 % 0.600 - 0.749 % ≥ 0.750 %  Large-scale renewable energy technologies:  Biomass  Windpower  Photovoltaic  Spatial Resolution:  EU27 countries  NUTS-3 level  Target figures:  GWh/a  €/kWh

28. Summary & outlook First results Transparency via meta-information for indicators and ESU Large number of CONCERTO demonstration objects is an excellent base for wide-range european evaluations, but Data bottlenecks Consumption of energy carriers Measured values of energy production (monitoring) Costs and revenues Outlook Ongoing delivery and collection of data and quality control Combining buildings and energy supply units Assessment, deeper understanding of „why?“ Up-scaling from CONCERTO results to Europe 28

29. Thank you for your attention!