1. Physical I&IT Infrastructure Proposal Presentation to the UTFAB Monday, November 8 2004, 5-6:30 PM, Library Tom Maher, Dir. of OIS, Tom.Maher@Colostate.edu, 1-1325om.Maher@Colostate.edu Andre Smith, Manager, CSS-OIS, Andre.Smith@Colostate.edu, 1-1325 Andre.Smith@Colostate.edu

2. UTFAB - 11-8-04Classroom Technolopgy Status2 Outline Background Classrooms – status regarding technology Peer institutions Current Year 1 & 2 Plans Status Budget 3-yr. plan Analysis – “fit” with UTFAB funding criteria Q&A

3. Background

4. UTFAB - 11-8-04Classroom Technolopgy Status4 CSU GA Classrooms Status 154 total GA (General Assignment) classrooms at CSU All have Internet access 74 have technology (49%) Insufficient number to meet a growing demand Need more mid to small-sized classrooms with computer projection systems Many have old, dim projectors and older optics resulting in a less sharp image New computer projector technology can avoid expensive lighting modifications

5. UTFAB - 11-8-04Classroom Technolopgy Status5 Comparison to Peers – GA Classrooms with Technology CU Boulder has 160 GA classrooms – about the same number as CSU About 100 (60%) have computer projectors About 30 of these (20%) have “all the bells and whistles” AHEC in Denver has 100% of GA classrooms equipped with technology

6. Status of FY 04 Plan- Completed

7. UTFAB - 11-8-04Classroom Technolopgy Status7 FY 04 Plan Approved by UTFAB 1. Refresh technology in 17 smart classrooms where old technology exists New projectors are brighter and sharper, and function with modern laptop computers To avoid maintenance and repair problems Mixture of upgraded projectors, document cameras, podiums, control systems, etc. 2. Build 7 new smart classrooms by adding computer projection systems 3. Total approved – $117K (reduced from $175K and then to $102k) 4. Completed

8. Status of Project for FY 05

9. UTFAB - 11-8-04Classroom Technolopgy Status9 Classroom Prioritization Physical Development Plan (PDP) Process Departments prioritize their PDP elements and forward to their Vice President (VP) Each VP reviews department submissions, establishes their priorities and forwards to the University PDP Committee The University PDP Committee reviews VP submissions, and establishes University priorities Classroom elements are forwarded to the Classroom Review Board (CRB) for their recommendations and actions

10. UTFAB - 11-8-04Classroom Technolopgy Status10 Classroom Prioritization (cont’d) The CRB reprioritizes, and allocates resources to projects Due to budget cuts, all CRB resources are consumed by non-IT elements Chairs, lighting, carpeting, white boards, ADA, etc. CRB recommendations integrated into the University physical I&IT prioritization process Building rewires, classrooms, and wireless

11. UTFAB - 11-8-04Classroom Technolopgy Status11 Status: Technology Upgrades

12. UTFAB - 11-8-04Classroom Technolopgy Status12 Status: Technology Refresh

13. UTFAB - 11-8-04Classroom Technolopgy Status13 Summary of Proposal for FY 05 11 rooms for new technology 5 rooms for technology refresh 720 student seats total, mostly smaller rooms to meet most pressing demand Project is ahead of schedule and on budget

14. UTFAB - 11-8-04Classroom Technolopgy Status14 FY 05 University Cost Share Agreement was that for every $1 of student funding for classroom infrastructure, the University would fund $1 of building rewires Completed VTH rewire @ > $580,000 8 additional buildings, in process AERC, Alder Hall, GSB, Industrial Science, NRRL, Painter Center, Physiology, Spruce

15. 3-Year Plan

16. UTFAB - 11-8-04Classroom Technolopgy Status16 3-Year Plan or Process That the UTFAB consider funding technology in classrooms for 3 additional years, for both some new rooms and some technology refresh 21 New rooms (7 annually plus 11 in FY05) 24 rooms for technology refresh (8 annually after 5 in FY05) 120 (78%) total smart rooms by Fall 2008

17. UTFAB - 11-8-04Classroom Technolopgy Status17 UTFAB Funding Criteria 1. Benefit as many students as possible Est. 20,000+ students will pass through these classrooms in any single semester CSUIITE eventually will benefit all students, faculty and staff Current rewire proposal mostly benefits occupants of Wagar, Music and VTH, but the network is bi-directional 2. Ability to effectively utilize the fee - judgment 3. Not funded by CFT - correct 4. Adherence to budget and accountability – quotations for classroom equipment, accounting in arrears for rewires 5. Potential for direct student use - judgment 6. Effort and thought reflected in the plan - judgment 7. Justification and clarity of the project plan - judgment

18. UTFAB - 11-8-04Classroom Technolopgy Status18 Summary Thank you for your support. Discussion and questions are most welcome.