Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published bySharleen Owen Modified over 9 years ago
1
Meeting AYP and Generating API: Preventing “Leakage”
2
“Leakage” AYP Two Reasons AYP is not met: 1. Failure to move Basic students to Proficiency. 2. Having students “leak” multiple quintile levels out of proficiency.
3
Figure #2- California Standards Test (CST) Levels: Language Arts Far Below BasicBelow BasicBasicProficientAdvanced 150 to 268269 to 299300 to 349350 to 392393 to 600 State Target for All Students
4
“Checking for Leaks”: Fleming Middle School Spring 2004 to Spring 2005 CST results Targeted Intervention Program in Math 50 students moved to CST proficiency 60 students move out of CST proficiency Net Growth of Proficient students in Math: -10
5
“Leakage” API Two Main Reasons API drops: 1. Failure to move students from Far Below Basic to Below Basic. 2. Having students “leak” multiple quintile levels.
6
Academic Performance Index (API) Criteria: Quintile Rankings and Weights Quintile API Weights 51000 4875 3700 2500 1200 Advanced Proficient Basic Below Basic Far Below Basic
7
Academic Performance Index (API) Criteria: Quintile Rankings and Weights Quintile API Weights 51000 4 875 3 700 2 500 1 200 Advanced Proficient Basic Below Basic Far Below Basic 100 200 400 100 200 Numbers of Students
8
Academic Performance Index (API) Criteria: Quintile Rankings and Weights Quintile API Weights Gain in API Weight 51000125 4875175 3 700200 2 500300 1 200N/A Advanced Proficient Basic Below Basic Far Below Basic
9
Figure #1- California Standards Test (CST) Levels: Language Arts Far Below BasicBelow BasicBasicProficientAdvanced 150 to 268269 to 299300 to 349350 to 392393 to 600 State Target for All Students API For Academic Performance Index (API), greatest gains will occur when moving students from the lowest CST levels due to weighting factors.
10
Preventing “Leaks”: Early monitoring of proficient and above students with the periodic assessments in ELA and Math. Provide early differentiated instruction for struggling proficient students.
11
Prevent Leakage: Elementary CST Comparison Data. Procedure to create an SIS report which compares two or more years of CST data for individual students. Type/Press: Main Screen- #7 Testing Menu-#4 CST Menu-#2 Current Teacher Report All or Specific Room- Press Enter Checking for “Leaks”: Elementary
12
ID99,2 (current year) “1” (for active) (enter today’s date) “2” (select by class number) “Y” (enter by district course #) 310102 – Grade 6 Math 310104 - Grade 7 Math 310302 – Algebra I 310318 – Algebra Readiness (proceed to next step) “T” (sort by teacher) Press enter (Do start a new page or switch to Don’t) (create a new report) Type in title, then enter Checking for “Leaks”: Secondary
13
Wade Hayashida Categorical Program Coordinator Local District 8 310 354 3416 wade.hayashida@lausd.net
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.