1. Syntheses of high-spin and cluster molecules Hiroki OSHIO (University of Tsukuba) Syntheses and Magnetic measurements Dr. M. Nihei, A. Yoshida, K. Koizumi, Yamashita ( Univ. of Tsukuba ) Dr. M. Nakano (Osaka Univ.) HF-EPR Prof. H. Nojiri (Okayama Univ.) Low-temperature Magnetic measurements Profs. A. Yamaguchi and Ishimoto (ISSP, Univ. of Tokyo) Solid State NMR Profs Y. Fujii (Fukui Univ.) and T. Goto (Kyoto Univ.) Workshop on Nano-magnets at Kyoto, Dec. 1 - 4, 2003

2. Syntheses of · SMMs of Ferrous Cubes: Structurally controlled magnetic anisotropy · Mixed Valence Fe clusters · Hetero-metal SMM

3. Single Molecule Magnets [Mn(III,IV) 12 O 12 (O 2 CR) 16 (H 2 O)](S = 10) (T. Lis, 1980) [Mn(III,IV) 12 O 12 (O 2 CR) 16 (H 2 O) 4 ] - (S = 19/2) [Mn(III,IV) 4 O 3 X(O 2 CMe)(dbm) 3 ](S = 9/2) [Fe(III) 8 O 2 (OH) 12 (tacn) 6 ] 8+ (S = 10) [V(III) 4 O 2 (O 2 CR) 7 (L-L)] + (S = 3) D. N. Hendrickson, G. Christou, and D. Gatteschi (1993) S = 10, D = –0.46 cm -1 L. Thomas et al., Nature 1996, 383, 145 [Mn 12 O 12 (OAc) 16 (H 2 O) 4 ] [Fe II 4 (sae) 4 (MeOH) 4 ] H. Oshio et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 112, 12602 S = 8, D = -0.28 cm -1

4. Syntheses of SMM EE Magnetization Direction  E = |D|S z 2  E :Energy barrier to reorientate between two possible directions of magnetizations D : Zero Field Splitting parameters Relatively high-spin ground state Negative D value

5. Strategy for the High-spin Molecule Ferromagnetic Interactions by LMCT interactions AGK Theory P. W. Anderson (1959), J. B. Goodenough (1958), J. Kanamori (1959) Strict orthogonality Accidental orthogonality

6. High-spin Cluster Orthogonal arrangements of the magnetic orbitals

7. Fe(II) Cube of [Fe II 4 (sae) 4 (MeOH) 4 ] triclinic P1- a = 13.3625(7) Å, b = 13.7572(7) Å, c = 14.2004(7) Å  = 66.538(1)°,  = 74.973(1)°,  = 71.105(1), V = 2239.92(1) Å 3, Z = 2 R1 = 0.0477, wR2 = 0.0959 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000. 122. 12603. S = 8 (4x2)

8. AC measurements of [Fe II 4 (sae) 4 (MeOH) 4 ]

9. Relaxation in [Fe 4 (sae) 4 (MeOH) 4 ] with S =8 Ground State  =  0 exp(  E/kT)  = 1/(2  AC ) AC : Freq. of AC Field T : Temp. of max. in  ”  E = |D|S z 2 = 64|D| M s = -8M s = 8 M s = 0  E = |D|S z 2

10. Iron(II) cubes with S = 8 ground state SMM nonSMM nonSMM nonSMM [Fe 4 (sae) 4 (MeOH) 4 ] [Fe 4 (sap) 4 (MeOH) 4 ] [Fe 4 (3-MeO-sap) 4 (MeOH) 4 ] [Fe 4 (sapd) 4 ]

11. Magnetization Experiments of High-spin Ferrous Cubes g D / cm -1 [Fe 4 (sae) 4 (MeOH) 4 ]2.126-0.64 [Fe 4 (sap) 4 (MeOH) 4 ]2.261+0.81 [Fe 4 (3-MeO-sap) 4 (MeOH) 4 ]2.243+1.14 [Fe 4 (sapd) 4 ] 2.180+1.10

12. [Fe 4 (sae) 4 (MeOH) 4 ] Fe(1)-O(1) 1.978(2)Fe(1)-O(2) 2.094(2) Fe(1)-N(1) 2.053(2)Fe(1)-O(4) 2.078(2) Fe(1)-O(9) 2.2908(18)Fe(1)-O(8) 2.2736(17) [Fe 4 (sap) 4 (MeOH) 4 ]·2H 2 O Fe(1)-O(1) 2.029(2)Fe(1)-O(2) 2.045(2) Fe(1)-N(1) 2.127(2)Fe(1)-O(2)* 2.1616(15) Fe(1)-O(3) 2.2107(17)Fe(1)-O(2)* 2.2505(14) [Fe 4 (3MeO-msap) 4 (MeOH) 4 ]·2MeOH Fe(1)-O(1) 1.991(5)Fe(1)-O(2) 2.037(4) Fe(1)-N(1) 2.104(6)Fe(1)-O(10) 2.137(4) Fe(1)-O(6) 2.238(4)Fe(1)-O(4) 2.242(5) [Fe 4 (bsap) 4 (MeOH) 4 ] Fe(1)-O(1) 2.036(3)Fe(1)-O(2) 2.056(3) Fe(1)-N(1) 2.123(3)Fe(1)-O(2)* 2.159(3) Fe(1)-O(2) 2.259(2)Fe(1)-O(3) 2.263(3) Selected coordination bond distances (Å) in the cubes Equatorially less compressed: D < 0 Equatorially compressed: D > 0 Elongated octahedron strong ligand field week ligand field

13. Angular Overplap Model calculations of Energy splitting of the 5 B 2g state The variable p changes the equatorial ligand field strengths. P = 0.5 week LF P = 1.0 strong LF D < 0D > 0 saesap week LFstrong LF

14. Sign of D Cube values sap : equatorially less compressed: D Fe < 0: Orthogonal alignments of four ions with easy axis sae : Equatorially compressed: D Fe > 0: Orthogonal alignments of four ions with hard axis

15. [Fe 4 (3,5-Cl 2 -sae) 4 (MeOH) 4 ]  E = 26 K D = -0.29 cm -1 T B = 1.1 K

16.  E = 30 K D = -0.33 cm -1 T B = 1.2 K [Fe 4 (5-Br-sae) 4 (MeOH) 4 ]

17. Summary Structurally controlled magnetic anisotropy Compounds in red are SMM. The g, C, and  values were obtained from temperature dependence of the magnetic susceptibility. D values were estimated by the analyses of magnetization data at 1.8 K, supposing the only S = 8 being populated.  E and T B values were estimated from the ac magnetic susceptibility measurements. gC [emu mol -1 K]  [K] D [cm -1 ]  E [K] T B [K] [Fe 4 (sap) 4 (MeOH) 4 ]·2H 2 O2.26115.439.56+0.8 [Fe 4 (5-Br-sap) 4 (MeOH) 4 ]2.22714.869.32+0.80 [Fe 4 (3-MeO-sap) 4 (MeOH) 4 ]2.24315.2712.59+1.15 [Fe 4 (sapd) 4 ]·4MeOH·2H 2 O2.18014.294.57+1.10 [Fe 4 (sae) 4 (MeOH) 4 ]2.12615.5515.98-0.76281.1 [Fe 4 (5-Br-sae) 4 (MeOH) 4 ]·MeOH2.20914.5715.68-0.66301.2 [Fe 4 (3,5-Cl 2 -sae) 4 (MeOH) 4 ]2.12013.4413.99-0.67261.1

18. [NaFe III 6 ] New Cluster Molecules with higher nuclearity [Fe II Fe III 6 ] [Fe III 2 ] [Fe III 3 ] [Fe II 3 Fe III ] [Fe III Fe II 6 ]

19. Ferric wheel of [NaFe III 6 (5-MeO-sae) 6 (  2 -OMe)]ClO 4 +NaClO 4  [Fe III 3 Cl 2 (5-MeO-sae) 3 (  3 -OMe)(MeOH)] (  3 -alkoxo bridges)

20. [Fe II Fe III 6 (5-MeO-sae) 6 (  2 -OMe) 6 ]Cl 2 7FeCl 2 ·4H 2 O + 6H 2 (5-MeO-sae) + 2/7(t-Bu 4 N)(MnO 4 )  (  3 -alkoxo bridge) g(Fe 3+ ) = 2.0 and g(Fe 2+ ) =2.10(5) J(spoke) = -7.3 cm -1 and J(rim) = -8.7 cm -1 ? Spin frustrated system

21. [Fe II 6 Fe III (5-MeO-saeH) 6 (  3 -OMe) 6 ]Cl 3 7FeCl 2 ·4H 2 O + 6(5-MeO-saeH 2 ) + 1/21(t-Bu 4 N)(MnO 4 )   2 -phenoxo bridges S = 29/2 and D = +0.53 cm -1 Angew.Chem. 2003.

22. Next target molecules Air insensitive SMM Heteronuclear SMM The smallest SMM

23. Hetero-nuclear SMM CuCl 2 ·2H 2 O [Mn III 3 (  -O)(Br-sap) 3 (H 2 O) 3 ]Cl + MnCl 2 ·4H 2 O

24. [Mn III Cu II (Br-sap) 2 Cl(MeOH)] Selected Bond Distances (Å) Mn-Cl 2.616(4) Mn-O1S 2.658(9) Other bonds 1.871(5) - 1.973(6) Mn 3+ : Axially elongated octahedron for d 4 MnCu

25. Magnetic susceptibility and magnetization data of [Mn III Cu II (Br-sap) 2 Cl(MeOH)] Ferromagnetic interactions between Mn 3+ and Cu 2+ ions S = 5/2 ground state

26. MO diagram of Mn 3+ -Cu 2+ system Tetragonally elongated quasi D 4h Mn 3+ Square-planar quasi D 4h d xz d yz dz2dz2 d xy d x 2 -y 2 dz2dz2 d xy d xz d yz Cu 2+ O CuMn O LMCT from O - Strickt orthogonality

27. Quasi-single Crystal HF-EPR OF [Mn III Cu II (Br-sap) 2 Cl(MeOH)] -5/2  -3/2 -3/2  -1/2-1/2  1/2 1/2  3/2 381.5 GHz *Magnetic field is tilted 13° with respect to the principal axis. H. Nojiri (Okayama Univ.)

28. Plots of resonance fields (H r ) vs. the value of Ms [Mn III Cu II (Br-sap) 2 Cl(MeOH)] g = 2.04 D = -1.70 cm -1 B 4 0 ’= -0.0074 cm -1

29. Yamaguchi, Ishimoto (ISSP) Single Crystal AC magnetic susceptibility [Mn III Cu II (Br-sap) 2 Cl(MeOH)]

30. Packing diagrams of [Mn III Cu II (Br-sap) 2 Cl(MeOH)] ac projection view bc projection view ab projection view

31. Magnetization data for [Mn III Cu II (Br-sap) 2 Cl(MeOH)] with S =5/2 ground state Yamaguchi, Ishimoto (ISSP) Integer SpinHalf-Integer Spin No-spin tunneling at H ext =0 X T B = 500 mK  E = 10.5 K

32. Summary: Nano Magnets with different sizes Mn Cu Fe [Mn III Cu II ] S = 5/2 with T B = 0.8 K 4 核 :[Fe II 4 ] S = 8 with T B = 1.1K 6 核 :[Mn III 6 ] S = 12 with T B = 1.0 K [Fe II 6 Fe III ] with S = 29/2 [Mn III 4 Mn IV 2 Cu II 8 (O) 6 ] 1.5 nm 2.0 nm 2.5 nm [Mn III 8 Mn IV 4 Cu II 8 (O) 16 ] ？ Strong correlated electron oxide clusters S N Tunneling -7 -6 -5 0 -4 M s = 8 7 6 5 0 4 S N Nano magnets -3 -2 3 2 1 M s = -8

33. Organizer Tadashi Sugawara (University of Tokyo) General Secretaries Hiroki Oshio (Tsukuba University) Kunio Awaga (Nagoya University) Kazuhito Hashimoto (Unrsity of Tokyo)