1. doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0 Submission July 2008 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)Slide 1 IMT-Advanced Opening Report Date: 2008-07-12 Authors: Name Company Address Phone email Bruce Kraemer Marvell 5488 Marvell Ln Santa Clara, CA 95054 +1-321-427- 4098 bkraemer@marvell.com Darwin Engwer Nortel Networks 4655 Great America Pkwy, Santa Clara CA 95054 +1-408-495- 2588 dengwer@nortel.com

2. doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0 Submission July 2008 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)Slide 2 Updates since May

3. doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0 Submission July 2008 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)Slide 3 One Page Summary Most of Circular letter components completed in Dubai –IMT.TECH contents/numbers finalized –IMT.EVAL contents/numbers finalized –Circular letter structure finalized Work to perform final cleanup and formatting will continue in correspondence Circular letter contents to be completed in WP5D Seoul, Korea October 8-15 –Technology Templates Also Workshop Tuesday October 7 WP5D Reports require approval by SG5 in November 10,11

4. doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0 Submission July 2008 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)Slide 4 IMT-ADV Schedule Dubai

5. doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0 Submission July 2008 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)Slide 5 IMT-Advanced RIT development process Jan 2008 Jul 2008 Jan 2009 Nov 2009 Jan 2009 Jul 2010 Jan 2009 Nov 2010 Jan 2009 Jan 2010 Jan 2009 Nov 2009

6. doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0 Submission July 2008 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)Slide 6 Meeting Report Documents Updated WP5D workplan was 5D-97 now TEMP-81 Workshop draft plan 5D-185 Activity Reports: 53 Services Aspects 96 Spectrum Aspects 94 AH-Circular Letter 81 & 53 + Attachment Chapter 2 - ITU-R WP 5D Structure and Workplan Meeting Report of Services WG

7. doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0 Submission July 2008 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)Slide 7 Submission Related Documents 89 (Rev 1)Draft New Report on Requirements related to technical system performance for IMT-Advanced Radio interface(s) [IMT.TECH] 90 (Rev 1)Draft New Report [Guidelines for evaluation of radio interface technologies for IMT-Advanced] 87 (Rev 1)Compliance template for Services 88 (Rev 1)Compliance template for technical performance 93 (Rev 1)Technology description template 78 (Rev 1)Draft new Report [IMT.REST] requirements, evaluation criteria, and submission templates for the development of IMT ‑ Advanced 86 (Rev 1) IMT-ADV/2 – Submission and evaluation process and consensus building

8. doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0 Submission July 2008 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)Slide 8 Supported Test Environments At least 1 required to propose candidate At least 3 required to enter final standardization phase.

9. doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0 Submission July 2008 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)Slide 9 Environments IMT-Advanced: Required Test Environments The critical decisions were made regarding the four “test environments”: Indoor Microcellular Base coverage urban High speed A radio interface technology (RIT) is required to satisfy the minimum performance requirements of a least one test environment, as specified by the proponent. A set of RITs (SRIT) needs to meet the requirements in at least two test environments. Later in the process, after evaluation of the proposals, only RITs or SRITs that meet the requirements in at least three test environments may proceed to be included in IMTAdvanced. It’s possible, for example, for a candidate RIT that meets only one test environment to proceed through the process and be evaluated. However, during the “consensus building” process, it would need to join with other RIT partners to form a SRIT covering at least three test environments in order to be included in the IMTAdvanced recommendation.

10. doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0 Submission July 2008 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)Slide 10 Service Type Examples - Titles only From M.1822 Messaging Voice telephony Push-to-talk/Push-to-X High-quality video telephony Video conference Internet browsing Interactive gaming File transfer/download Multimedia e-Education Consultation Remote collaboration Mobile commerce Mobile broadcasting/multicasting Machine-to-machine Remote sensor Remote bio-monitoring Personal environment service ITS-enabled services Emergency calling Public alerting Number portability Priority service Lawful intercept Location-based services

11. doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0 Submission July 2008 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)Slide 11 Candidate RIT Info IMT.TECH highlights IMT.EVAL highlights

12. doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0 Submission July 2008 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)Slide 12 IMT- Advanced IMT.TECH - Radio Requirements 4.1 Cell Spectral Efficiency - Table 1 4.2 Peak Spectral Efficiency –15 b/s/Hz downlink –6.75 b/s/Hz uplink 4.3 Bandwidth –At least 3, Scalable up to and including 40 MHz 4.4 Cell Edge User Spectral Efficiency – Table 2 4.5.1 Control Plane Latency –<100ms 4.5.2 User Plane Latency –<10 ms 4.6 Mobility up to 350 km/h - Table 3, Table 4 4.7 Handover – Table 5 4.8 VOIP Capacity – Table 6

13. doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0 Submission July 2008 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)Slide 13 Test environment **Downlink (b/s/Hz/cell) Uplink (b/s/Hz/cell) Indoor32.25 Microcellular2.61.80 Base coverage urban2.21.4 High speed1.10.7 IMT.TECH - 4.1 Cell Spectral Efficiency TABLE 1 Cell Spectral Efficiency Cell[1] spectral efficiency (  ) is defined as the aggregate throughput of all users (the number of correctly received bits, i.e. the number of bits contained in the SDUs delivered to Layer 3, over a certain period of time) divided by the channel bandwidth divided by the number of cells. The cell spectral efficiency is measured in b/s/Hz/cell. [1]A cell is equivalent to a sector, e.g. a 3-sector site has 3 cells.[1]

14. doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0 Submission July 2008 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)Slide 14 Test environment* *Downlink (b/s/Hz)Uplink (b/s/Hz) Indoor0.10.07 Microcellular0.0750.05 Base coverage urban0.060.03 High speed0.040.015 IMT.TECH - 4.4Cell edge user spectral efficiency TABLE 2 Cell Edge User Spectral Efficiency The (normalized) user throughput is defined as the average user throughput (i.e., the number of correctly received bits by users, i.e. the number of bits contained in the SDU delivered to Layer 3, over a certain period of time, divided by the channel bandwidth and is measured in b/s/Hz. The cell edge user spectral efficiency is defined as 5% point of CDF of the normalized user throughput. Table 2 lists the cell edge user spectral efficiency requirements for various test environments.

15. doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0 Submission July 2008 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)Slide 15 IMT.TECH - 4.2Peak spectral efficiency The peak spectral efficiency is the highest theoretical data rate (normalised by bandwidth), which is the received data bits assuming error-free conditions assignable to a single mobile station, when all available radio resources for the corresponding link direction are utilised (that is excluding radio resources that are used for physical layer synchronisation, reference signals or pilots, guard bands and guard times).

16. doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0 Submission July 2008 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)Slide 16 Bits/s/HzSpeed (km/h) Indoor1.010 Microcellular0.7530 Base Coverage Urban 0.55120 High Speed0.25350 IMT.TECH - 4.6Mobility TABLE 3 Traffic Channel Link Data Rates

17. doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0 Submission July 2008 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)Slide 17 Test environments* IndoorMicrocellularBase coverage urban High speed Mobility classes supported Stationary, pedestrian Stationary, pedestrian, Vehicular (up to 30 km/h) Stationary, pedestrian, vehicular High speed vehicular, vehicular IMT.TECH - 4.6Mobility TABLE 4 Mobility Classes The following classes of mobility are defined: –Stationary: 0 km/h –Pedestrian: > 0 km/h to 10 km/h –Vehicular: 10 to 120 km/h –High speed vehicular: 120 to 350 km/h

18. doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0 Submission July 2008 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)Slide 18 Handover Type Interruption Time (ms) Intra-Frequency27.5 Inter-Frequency – within a spectrum band – between spectrum bands 40 60 IMT.TECH - 4.7 Handover TABLE 5 Handover Interruption Times The handover interruption time is defined as the time duration during which a user terminal cannot exchange user plane packets with any base station. The handover interruption time includes the time required to execute any radio access network procedure, radio resource control signalling protocol, or other message exchanges between the user equipment and the radio access network, as applicable to the candidate RIT or SRIT. For the purposes of determining handover interruption time, interactions with the core network (i.e, network entities beyond the radio access network) are assumed to occur in zero time. It is also assumed that all necessary attributes of the target channel (that is, downlink synchronisation is achieved and uplink access procedures, if applicable, are successfully completed) are known at initiation of the handover from the serving channel to the target channel.

19. doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0 Submission July 2008 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)Slide 19 Test environment**Min VoIP capacity (Active users/sector/MHz) Indoor50 Microcellular40 Base coverage urban40 High speed30 IMT.TECH - 4.8 Voip Capacity TABLE 6 VoIP Capacity VoIP capacity was derived assuming a 12.2 kbps codec with a 50% activity factor such that the percentage of users in outage is less than 2% where a user is defined to have experienced a voice outage if less than 98% of the VoIP packets have been delivered successfully to the user within a one way radio access delay bound of 50 ms.

20. doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0 Submission July 2008 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)Slide 20 IMT-ADV Evaluation (Temp 90) ITU-R IMT-ADV/3 Report Contents Section 4 - ITU-R Reference documents Section 5 - Describes the evaluation guidelines. Section 6 - Lists the criteria chosen for evaluating the RITs. (Table 6-1) Section 7 - Outlines the procedures and evaluation methodology for evaluating the criteria. Section 8 - Defines the tests environments and selected deployment scenarios for evaluation. Section 9 - Describes a channel model approach for the evaluation. Section 10 - Channel Model Technical references. Technical Guidance Annexes: Annex 1:Test environments and reference channel models Annex 2:Traffic models Annex 3:Link budget template

21. doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0 Submission July 2008 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)Slide 21 IMT.EVAL Section 6 Characteristics for Evaluation Table 6-1 Evaluation methods and configurations Characteristic for Evaluation MethodEvaluation methodology / configurations Cell spectral efficiencySimulation (system level)Section 7.1.1; Table 8-2, 8-4 and 8-5 Peak spectral efficiencyAnalyticalSection 7.3.1; Table 8-3 BandwidthInspectionSection 7.4.1 Cell edge user spectral efficiencySimulation (system level)Section 7.1.2; Table 8-2, 8-4 and 8-5 Control plane latencyAnalyticalSection 7.3.2; Table 8-2 User plane latencyAnalyticalSection 7.3.3; Table 8-2 MobilitySimulation (system and link level)Section 7.2; Table 8-2 and 8-7 Intra- and inter-frequency handover interruption time AnalyticalSection 7.3.4; Table 8-2 Inter-system handoverInspectionSection 7.4.3 VoIP CapacitySimulation (system level)Section 7.1.3; Table 8-2, 8-4 and 8-6 Deployment possible in at least one of the identified IMT bands InspectionSection 7.4.2 Channel bandwidth scalabilityInspectionSection 7.4.1 Support for a wide range of servicesInspectionSection 7.4.4

22. doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0 Submission July 2008 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)Slide 22 IMT.EVAL Section 8 Test Environments & Evaluation Configurations Table 8-2 Baseline evaluation and configuration parameters Deployment scenario for the evaluation process Urban macro-cellUrban micro-cellIndoor hotspotRural macro-cellSuburban macro-cell Base Station (BS) antenna height 25 m, above rooftop10 m, below rooftop6 m, mounted on ceiling 35 m, above rooftop Number of BS antenna elements [1] [1] Up to 8 rx Up to 8 tx Up to 8 rx Up to 8 tx Up to 8 rx Up to 8 tx Up to 8 rx Up to 8 tx Up to 8 rx Up to 8 tx Total BS TX power at antenna feedpoint 46dBm for 10MHz, 49dBm for 20MHz 41 dBm for 10MHz, 44 dBm for 20MHz 24dBm for 40 MHz, 21 dBm for 20 MHz 46dBm for 10MHz, 49dBm for 20MHz User Terminal (UT) power class 24dBm 21dBm24dBm UT antenna system (see the footnote) 1 Up to 2 tx Up to 2 rx Up to 2 tx Up to 2 rx Up to 2 tx Up to 2 rx Up to 2 tx Up to 2 rx Up to 2 tx Up to 2 rx Minimum distance between UT and serving cell [2] [2] >= 25 meters>= 10 meters>= 3 meters>= 35 meters Carrier Frequency (CF) for evaluation (representative of IMT bands) 2GHz2.5 GHz3.4 GHz800 MHzSame as Urban macro-cell Outdoor to Indoor building penetration loss N.A.see Annex 1 Table A1-1 N.A. 20 dB Outdoor to in-car penetration loss 9 dB (LN, σ = 5 dB)N.A. 9 dB (LN, σ = 5 dB)

23. doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0 Submission July 2008 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)Slide 23 Other Info

24. doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0 Submission July 2008 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)Slide 24 Seoul, Korea Workshop Objectives of the workshop –to provide common understanding of the process for IMT-Advanced standardization including technical requirements and evaluation guidelines. In particular, it will enable those not directly involved with the Circular Letter works to understand procedures better. –to observe current and future development aspects of IMT-Advanced Radio Interface technology by development parties –to exchange the views among possible proponents for consensus building of the possible candidate IMT-Advanced RITS –to share IMT-Advanced market and regulatory aspects for the introduction of the IMT-Advance –to promote more participation from developing countries into the WP5D activities, Ref: TEMP/82E coordinator Dr K. J. Wee

25. doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0 Submission July 2008 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)Slide 25 Seoul, Korea Workshop Expected Agenda Topics of the workshop –Procedure and requirements of IMT-Advanced standardization –Possible Candidate IMT-Advanced RITs –Market and Regulatory Aspects –Needs of Developing Countries Ref: TEMP/82E coordinator Dr K. J. Wee

26. doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0 Submission July 2008 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)Slide 26 WP5D Meeting Schedule GROUPNo.STARTSTOPPLACE WP 5D128 Jan-081 Feb-08Geneva WP 5D224 Jun-081 Jul-08UAE WP 5D308-Oct-0815-Oct-08Korea WP 5D411 Feb-0918 Feb-09[India] WP 5D510 Jun-0917 Jun-09[Germany] WP 5D614 Oct-0921 Oct-09[China] WP 5D717 Feb-1024 Feb-10[TBD] WP 5D89 Jun-1016 Jun-10[TBD] WP 5D913 Oct-1020 Oct-10[TBD] WP 5D1016 Feb-1123 Feb-11[TBD] WP 5D1115 Jun-1122 Jun-11[TBD] WP 5D1212 Oct-1119 Oct-11[TBD]

27. doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0 Submission July 2008 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)Slide 27 SG5 Meeting Schedule GROUPNo.STARTSTOPPLACE SG5 10 Nov-0811 Nov-08Geneva

28. doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0 Submission July 2008 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)Slide 28 Study Group 5 Chairs Mr. A. HASHIMOTO Chairman, Study Group 5 Japan - NTT DoCoMo, Inc. Wireless Technology Standardization Dept Mr. T.K.A. ALEGE Vice-Chairman, Study Group 5 Nigeria - Department of State Services Mr. A. CHANDRA Vice-Chairman, Study Group 5 India - Ministry of Communications & IT Mr. J.M. COSTA Vice-Chairman, Study Group 5 Acting Chairman, Working Party 5A Canada - Nortel Networks Mr. T. EWERS Vice-Chairman, Study Group 5 Acting Chairman, Working Party 5B Germany - Bundesnetzagentur für Elektrizität, Gas Telekommunikation, Post und Eisenbahnen Mr. C. GLASS Vice-Chairman, Study Group 5 Acting Chairman, Working Party 5C US - Department of Commerce – NTIA Mr. A. JAMIESON Vice-Chairman, Study Group 5 Added Value Applications Ltd. New Zealand Mr. A. KLYUCHAREV Vice-Chairman, Study Group 5 Russian Federation - General Radio Frequency Centre Mme L. SOUSSI Vice-Présidente, Commission d'études 5 Tunisia - Agence Nationale des Fréquences Mr. L. SUN Vice-Chairman, Study Group 5 China - Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Mr. K.-J. WEE Vice-Chairman, Study Group 5 Korea - Ministry of Information and Communication Radio Research Laboratory

29. doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0 Submission July 2008 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)Slide 29 Following the Dubai meeting, three new mailing lists are being established: rwp5d-bwa@itu.int - BWA sharing studiesrwp5d-bwa@itu.int rwp5d-workshop@itu.int - Preparation for the IMT- Advanced workshop to be held on 7 October in Seoul.rwp5d-workshop@itu.int rwp5d-template@itu.int - Finalization of the Technology Description Templaterwp5d-template@itu.int

30. doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0 Submission July 2008 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)Slide 30 WG18 Meeting Tuesday 10:30 am Quartz A Joint WG discussion ITU-R WP5D Outcome of Dubai meeting Schedule & Milestones –Plans for correspondence group –Plans for Korea meeting (October 8-15) IEEE Additional contributions? Plans for correspondence group Plans for Korea meeting (October 8-15)

31. doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0 Submission July 2008 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)Slide 31 Next Steps Continuation of activity in WG11, WG 18, WG16 Technical steps Assessment of ability to meet baseline requirements Submission to ITU-R Operation in licensed bands Cooperation with WG16 to construct SRIT submission Sanity checks Sufficient interest in WG11 to support any of the above Other, better alternatives Connection to <6GHz PAR Volunteers to participate/lead

32. doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0 Submission July 2008 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)Slide 32 Group Discussion/Suggestions