1. Department of Economics Climate Change Legislation & Agriculture 2009 Ag Outlook and Management Seminars

2. Department of Economics Climate Change Source: www.conservationreport.com

3. Department of Economics Climate Change Source: Congressional Budget Office

4. Department of Economics GHG Emission Rules Greenhouse gas rules are coming –Whether through legislation or regulation EPA has the authority to regulate GHGs –Via Clean Air Act However, Congress would like to set the rules –H.R. 2454, American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009, Passed in U.S. House of Rep. on 6/26/09, 219-212 –S. 1733, Clean Energy Jobs and American Power Act Introduced 9/30/09, In committee (actually, six committees)

5. Department of Economics U.S. GHG Emissions Source: EPA, Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-2007

6. Department of Economics CO 2 Emissions Source: EPA, Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-2007

7. Department of Economics CH 4 Emissions Source: EPA, Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-2007

8. Department of Economics N 2 O Emissions Source: EPA, Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-2007

9. Department of Economics GHG Emission Categories Source: EPA, Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-2007

10. Department of Economics GHG Emissions by Sector Source: EPA, Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-2007

11. Department of Economics Agricultural GHG Emissions Source: EPA, Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-2007

12. Department of Economics GHG Emission Statistics Source: EPA, Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-2007

13. Department of Economics Climate Change Legislation Source: Congressional Research Service American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 (H.R. 2454) Requires utilities to supply an increasing percentage of their demand from a combination of energy efficiency savings and renewable energy (6% in 2012, 9.5% in 2014, 13% in 2016, 16.5% in 2018, and 20% in 2021-2039). Provides for issuing, trading, banking, retiring, and verifying renewable electricity credits. Establishes targets to cap and reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, annually, so that GHG emissions from capped sources are reduced to 97% of 2005 levels by 2012, 83% by 2020, 58% by 2030, and 17% by 2050; and establish a federal GHG registry. Provides for trading, banking and borrowing, auctioning, selling, exchanging, transferring, holding, or retiring emission allowances.

14. Department of Economics Climate Change Legislation Source: Craig Raysor, Gillon & Associates, PLLC Agriculture provisions in H.R. 2454 Provides some exemptions from the GHG emission reduction requirements for agriculture and forestry Provides incentive-based approach to GHG emission reduction/capture Allows USDA to help establish eligible GHG offset practices and review of those practices Shifts question on indirect-land-use to an independent panel for study with EPA and USDA to review in the future Allows for a specific exemption for livestock (enteric fermentation from ruminant animals) from uncapped emissions guidelines

15. Department of Economics Lots of Analysis The EPA has funded the development of several models that are capable of examining the impact of this bill and other similar bills The environmental economists who worked on these models are very well respected and the work is sound However, the only certainty in the bill is the limit on carbon, everything else is assumption driven Source: ISU, Dermot Hayes presentation, Oct. 2009

16. Department of Economics Key Assumptions The US economy was already on a slow growth path for energy consumption, the analysis assumes that this continues Coal fired plants largely shut down and are replaced by nuclear Enormous reliance on international and domestic offsets If we cannot build the large number of nuclear plants or find the international offsets, then the price of carbon will increase at about twice the reported rate Source: ISU, Dermot Hayes presentation, Oct. 2009

17. Department of Economics Energy Sources Source: EPA Analysis of H.R. 2454, June 23, 2009

18. Department of Economics GHG Emissions & Abatements Source: EPA Analysis of H.R. 2454, June 23, 2009

19. Department of Economics Domestic Offsets Implementing regulations not yet written Uncertainty about how the offsets would work in agriculture, particularly for conservation tillage, but the intention is clearly to use these offsets as a way to stimulate agricultural incomes Consideration of leakage is prohibited pending a study Heavy reliance on the growth of trees on pasture and crop land Source: ISU, Dermot Hayes presentation, Oct. 2009

20. Department of Economics Domestic Offsets Source: EPA Analysis of Waxman-Markey, April 20, 2009

21. Department of Economics Domestic Offsets Source: ISU, Dermot Hayes presentation, Oct. 2009

22. Department of Economics Shifting Land Patterns Source: EPA, “Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Potential in U.S. Forestry and Agriculture”, Nov. 2005

23. Department of Economics International Offsets Must be a developing country that is a member of a unilateral or multilateral emissions reduction agreement with the United States Must have the technical capacity to monitor, measure, report and verify forest carbon fluxes resulting from deforestation Must have the capacity to reduce emissions from deforestation, including strong forest governance The international offset project itself must be shown to result in permanent verifiable reductions that are net of any leakage measures Source: ISU, Dermot Hayes presentation, Oct. 2009

24. Department of Economics Allowances Source: Congressional Research Service, June 2009 2016 2030

25. Department of Economics Carbon Prices Increase Over Time Source: EPA Analysis of H.R. 2454, June 23, 2009

26. Department of Economics Prices Are Sensitive to Offsets Source: EPA Analysis of H.R. 2454, June 23, 2009

27. Department of Economics Energy Price Paths Source: EPA Analysis of H.R. 2454, June 23, 2009

28. Department of Economics Impacts on an Average Household Source: EPA Analysis of H.R. 2454, June 23, 2009

29. Department of Economics Impacts on Tillage Practices Source: EPA Analysis of H.R. 2454, June 23, 2009

30. Department of Economics Comparison of Results Allowance Price Source: ISU, Dermot Hayes presentation, Oct. 2009

31. Department of Economics Assumptions Impact Results Fall 2007 CARD Data (Baseline) Fall 2008 CARD Data (Baseline) Model usedSearchinger et al.GreenAgSiM US Deforestation Yes No LCA ModelGREET BESS Agricultural Production No YesNoYes Ethanol increase (mill. liters) 55,950 29,859 Difference in Area Harvested (thou. ha.) 10,817 6,076 (1,281) 6,076 Difference in Emissions (million tons of CO 2 eq) 3,801 4,179 3,2181,4251,514 403 1,514 Payback Period (years) 166.69 183.27 141.13117.18124.41 31.50 55.40 Source: ISU, Dermot Hayes presentation, Oct. 2009

32. Department of Economics Climate Change Legislation Source: USDA, Office of Chief Economist “A Preliminary Analysis of the Effects of HR2454 on U.S. Agriculture”

33. Department of Economics Climate Change Legislation Source: FAPRI-Missouri, Report #05-09

34. Department of Economics Climate Change Legislation Source: Ben Lieberman, Heritage Foundation, July 21, 2009 “Since farming is energy intensive, it will be hit hard by Waxman-Markey's energy price hikes. In addition to higher diesel fuel and electricity costs, prices for natural gas-derived fertilizers and other chemicals will also rise. Everything else affecting agriculture, from the cost of constructing farm buildings to the price of tractors and other farm equipment, will also go up. Consequently, farm profits are expected to decline by 28 percent in 2012 and will be an average 57 percent lower from 2012-2035.”

35. Department of Economics Results from a Budget Based Analysis USDA and FAPRI calculated the direct impact on corn production costs at 6% to 8% due to higher energy and fertilizer costs, actual increase could be twice this amount In addition, livestock producers will face higher utility costs Total for these two impacts is about $3.50 per hog by 2030 Benefits of about $1.50 per hog for fertilizer displacement and/or manure offsets Source: ISU, Dermot Hayes presentation, Oct. 2009

36. Department of Economics Concluding Thoughts The potential for cropland conversion points to higher crop prices and feed costs Crop prices will likely track carbon prices Cropland conversion will benefit landowners through higher rents Agriculture will experience the benefits and the costs of climate change legislation

37. Department of Economics Thank you for your time! Any questions?