Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published bySydney Campbell Modified over 9 years ago
1
Factors affecting soil sub-surface phase of purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) development Tal Naamat 1,2, Hanan Eizenberg 1 and Baruch Rubin 2 1 Newe Ya’ar Research Center, ARO; 2 The faculty of Agriculture, Food and Environment, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot The 2 nd International Conference on: Novel and Sustainable Weed Management in Arid and Semi-Arid Agro-Ecosystems
2
The problem: Purple nutsedge A troublesome weed causes heavy damages in irrigated summer crops A sweet potato field in Israel infested with purple nutsedge Photographed by Baruch Rubin
3
The biology: Mostly vegetative reproduction by tubers and bulbs The tuber contain many buds It can survive in moist soil long time Although the sub-surface development affects the above ground growth the knowledge of the factors affecting the soil sub- surface development of purple nutsedge is limited
4
Temperature: Temperature is considered as a main regulator in purple nutsedge development Based on preliminary experiments, temperature data can be converted to physiological age (thermal time) units, expressed in Growing Degree Days (GDD)
5
Objectives: To study the effect of various environmental conditions on key stages in the sub-surface development of purple nutsedge Specifically, to study the effect of: Temperature Radiation Tuber burial depth Desiccation To appoint the development on a time course of GDD
6
Key stages that were studied: Accumulation of foliage biomass Accumulation of sub- surface biomass and tuber production Tubers’ sprouting Emergence
7
1. Sprouting: Temperature Desiccation Depth
8
Heat Source The effect of temperature on sprouting 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 Temperature (°C) R 2 =0.86; P<0.0001 The relations between temperature and sprouting were addressed for developing a prediction means for purple nutsedege sprouting 80-120 GDD at sprouting
9
1. Sprouting: Temperature Desiccation Depth
10
The effect of desiccation on sprouting 15°C20°C25°C30°C35°C Time (Days) Thermal time (GDD) accumulation
11
The effect of desiccation on sprouting R 2 =0.9; P<0.0001 R 2 =0.95; P<0.0001 Later than 200 GDD A tuber loses 55% of its biomass It has 30% chance to sprout
12
Illustration
13
After cultivation
14
Control Irrigation at 200 GDD 30% sprouting 90-100% sprouting
15
1. Sprouting: Temperature Desiccation Depth
16
The effect of tuber burial depth on sprouting Tested in 2 methods: Field experiment Homogeneous temperature regime 50 cm Heterogeneous temperature regime 234 Days from burial 10 20 30 Bud elongation (mm) Minirhizothron experiment
17
Tuber’s depth (cm) Sprouting (%) 4 DAP 7 DAP 11 DAP 4 DAP 7 DAP 11 DAP The effect of tuber burial depth on sprouting LSD Minirhizothron expt. Field expt. N.S
18
Key stages that were studied: Accumulation of foliage biomass Accumulation of sub- surface biomass and tuber production Tubers’ sprouting Emergence
19
2. Underground biomass accumulation 3. Tuber production Temperature Radiation
20
The effect of radiation on tuber production Control35% 90%60% Natural sun light 35% shade 60% shade 90% shade
21
The effect of radiation on tuber production Temperature and radiation are key factors affecting the sub-surface biomass accumulation Therefore, both factors and their interactions must be taken into consideration when developing a mathematical predictive model for the sub- surface growth of purple nutsedge
22
Conclusions: o The sub-surface development of purple nutsedge is environmental related o The effect of sub-surface biomass accumulation on shoots biomass accumulation can be quantified o The combined effects can be theoretically integrated for the entire model on a GDD time course o This empirical model must be validated in field conditions Temperature Water Content Radiation
23
The predictive model might be of use as a tool in control management; e.g. – to imply on the optimal time frame of control 0100300400 Average time of sprouting Emergence of deep tubers Beginning of tuber production GDD Thermal time frame of control
24
Thanks… My advisors – Hanan Eizenberg and Baruch Rubin EWRS - for funding my trip Newe Ya’ar, the Department of Weed Research: Joseph Hershenhorn, Radi Ali, Daniel Joel, Evgeny Smirnov, Tal Lande, Guy Achdari, Evgenya Dor, Dina Plakhin The Faculty of Agriculture, Weed Lab My fellow students
25
Conclusions: The sub-surface development of purple nutsedge is environmental related The effect of sub-surface Biomass accumulation on Shoots biomass Accumulation can be quantified The combined effects can be theoretically integrated for the entire model on a GDD time course This empirical model must be validated in field conditions Temperature Water Content Radiation The predictive model might be of use as a tool in control management; e.g. – to imply on the optimal time frame of control 0100300400 Average time of sprouting Emergence of deep tubers Beginning of tuber production GDD Thermal time frame of control
26
Control Irrigation at 200 GDD 30% sprouting 90-100% sprouting
27
Illustration
28
0 GDD
29
100 GDD
30
250 GDD
31
500 GDD 40% Shade
32
800 GDD 65% Shade
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.