Download presentation
Published byMark Dickerson Modified over 9 years ago
1
Jenny Wahl Economics Department Carleton College
Understanding and Teaching the Roots of the Civil War EDS 112 Summer Institute 2009 Jenny Wahl Economics Department Carleton College
2
Influence of Regional Portfolio Composition
Land use Population density Urbanization Farm size Production process (output = f[asset inputs]) Output mix Types of agricultural products Agriculture vs. manufacturing Home consumption, domestic market, exports Generation and use of public funds Land sales vs. tariffs Internal improvements Transportation regimes Credit and banking institutions Asset Composition Land (immobile) Physical capital (partly mobile) Slaves (generally mobile) Free human capital (mobile) Climate (immobile)
4
The Shift from Indentured Servants to Slaves
Skilled labor price D0 D1 Sslaves Sservants Unskilled labor price D0 D1 Sslaves Sservants
5
Distribution of Population (1790, 1830,1860) and Land Mass
Note: Northeast= New England and MidAtlantic, South includes Texas and Oklahoma but not Missouri, West includes Midwest, Plains, Mountain, and Pacific. Sources:
6
Distribution of Population (1860) and Land Mass, Part 2
Slaveholding states had 38% of the total population Slaveholding states had 29% of the total white population Border states had 1/3 of the white population in slaveholding states Land Mass Territories 49% North 23% South 23% Border 5% Sources:
7
Population per square mile, 1850 and 1860, selected states
Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census, Historical Statistics Series A-196 (reported in Gavin Wright, Political Economy of the Cotton South)
8
Percentage of Population in Urban Area, by Region (1790, 1830, 1860)
Note: Northeast= New England and MidAtlantic, South includes Texas and Oklahoma but not Missouri, West includes Midwest, Plains, Mountain, and Pacific. Source: Tab Aa36-92, Historical Statistics of the U.S., Millennial Edition online.
9
Urban Population, 1860 Source: US Census, reprinted in Roger Ransom entry, Historical Statistics Millennial edition online.
10
Source: U.S. Census, various years.
12
Location of Foreign-Born, 1860
North -- 86% NY – 24.4% PA – 10.5% OH, IL – 8% each WI – 7% MA – 6% South --13% Border states of MO, MD, and KY % LA – 2% TX – 1% Source: U.S. Census, 1860.
13
Wealth of Farmers by Region, 1860
15
Improved Acreage and Value of Implements per Worker by Region, 1860
16
Source: Gavin Wright, Capitalism and Slavery on the Islands: A Lesson from the Mainland, 17 J. Interdisc. Hist. 851 (1987).
17
Distribution of Slave Population by State, 1860
Source: Table Bb , Historical Statistics; fisher.uva census browser.
18
Total Value of U.S. Slaves, 1810-1860
Source: Ransom and Sutch, Capitalists without Capital.
19
Average Value, U.S. Prime Male Slaves, 1843-1860
400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 1843 1844 1845 1846 1847 1848 1849 1850 1851 1852 1853 1854 1855 1856 1857 1858 1859 1860 year dollars sales price appraised value Source: Robert Fogel and Stanley Engerman. Slave Sales and Appraisals, [Computer file]. ICPSR07421-v3. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester [producer], 1976.
20
Productivity of Southern Farms Relative to Northern Farms, 1860
21
Slave Ownership in the South
Percentage of families owning slaves: 1830 – 36% 1850 – 31% 1860 – 25% (half owned fewer than 5, 90% owned fewer than , only 0.2% held 100 or more slaves) Percentage of farm owner-operators owning no slaves: 1850 – fewer than 40% 1860 – about 50% Sources: Gavin Wright, Political Economy of the Cotton South; Porter, Encyclopedia.
22
Per Capita Income by Region, 1840 and 1860 ($ 1860)
23
Sectoral Shares, U.S.,
24
Size of U.S. Manufactures by Industry, 1860
25
Importance of Manufacturing by Region, 1860
Source: 8th and 9th Census of Mfrs, cited in Wright Pol Econ of Cotton South 1978
26
Value Added in Manufacturing per Capita, 1850 and 1860, Southern States
27
American Production of Raw Cotton, 1790-1860 (bales)
28
Cotton and Slaves,1805-1860 (output/slave, slave price, cotton export price)
30
Trade in Manufactures and Cotton, 1830-1860
Source: Historical Stats; tables Ee and Ee
31
Effects of Import Tariff
32
U.S. Import Tariffs,
33
Some Summary Stats by Region, 1860
Sources: Easterlin 1961, Bateman and Weiss, Fishlow – reported in Lindstrom, Dom Trade, Am Ec Hist Encyclo
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.