Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Image Registration Lecture ?: Detecting Failure & Assessing Success June 14, 2005 Prof. Charlene Tsai.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Image Registration Lecture ?: Detecting Failure & Assessing Success June 14, 2005 Prof. Charlene Tsai."— Presentation transcript:

1 Image Registration Lecture ?: Detecting Failure & Assessing Success June 14, 2005 Prof. Charlene Tsai

2 Image RegistrationLecture 1 2 Introduction  The last component is a registration embedded system is often the determination of the quality of alignment, i.e. success for failure  The alignment need to be perfect, but it must be adequate for the problem at hand.  How to measure the degree of alignment?  The last component is a registration embedded system is often the determination of the quality of alignment, i.e. success for failure  The alignment need to be perfect, but it must be adequate for the problem at hand.  How to measure the degree of alignment?

3 Image RegistrationLecture 1 3 Measure of Success  Quality of alignment has been estimagted in published work  by visual inspection,  by comparison with a gold standard, or  by some self-consistency measure  Two distinct notion of success:  for a class of image pairs  for a given image pair  Quality of alignment has been estimagted in published work  by visual inspection,  by comparison with a gold standard, or  by some self-consistency measure  Two distinct notion of success:  for a class of image pairs  for a given image pair

4 Image RegistrationLecture 1 4 Target Registration Error  We have been using this type of error  Let (p,q) be the pair of corresponding points in the 2 images and T the mapping that takes the 1 st image to the 2 nd.  Often, only the magnitude of TRE is reported.  We have been using this type of error  Let (p,q) be the pair of corresponding points in the 2 images and T the mapping that takes the 1 st image to the 2 nd.  Often, only the magnitude of TRE is reported.

5 Image RegistrationLecture 1 5 Fiducial Registration Error  Very similar to TRE, but applies only to “fiducial” features.  Fiducial features are selected because of their locatability  Easily visible anatomical features  Centroid of specially designed fiducial markers affixed to the anatomy before imaging  Very similar to TRE, but applies only to “fiducial” features.  Fiducial features are selected because of their locatability  Easily visible anatomical features  Centroid of specially designed fiducial markers affixed to the anatomy before imaging

6 Image RegistrationLecture 1 6 Comparison between TRE & FRE  TRE is more meaningful than FRE  TRE measured at clinically relevant point, whereas FRE limited to fiducial points  FRE may over- or underestimate registration error.  Why?  Other measures:  Distance between lines  Distance between surfaces  Angular displacement for rigid-body xform  TRE is more meaningful than FRE  TRE measured at clinically relevant point, whereas FRE limited to fiducial points  FRE may over- or underestimate registration error.  Why?  Other measures:  Distance between lines  Distance between surfaces  Angular displacement for rigid-body xform

7 Image RegistrationLecture 1 7 Methods for Verification  Compare with a ground truth transformation  Some gold standard registration system with accuracy known to be high.  Registration Circuits  Consistency measure among a set of images  Compare with a ground truth transformation  Some gold standard registration system with accuracy known to be high.  Registration Circuits  Consistency measure among a set of images

8 Image RegistrationLecture 1 8 Gold Standards  May be based on  computer simulation,  phantoms (better for development work),  Cadavers (limited due to changees at death), or  Patients (most difficult choice)  May be based on  computer simulation,  phantoms (better for development work),  Cadavers (limited due to changees at death), or  Patients (most difficult choice)

9 Image RegistrationLecture 1 9 Computer Simulations  Computer simulations are image pairs generated by computer.  Possible to produce both images, but often one is simulated from another using known geometrical transformation.  Advantages:  Transformation is know exactly  Transformation is readily available  Disavantages:  Lack of realism due to anatomical changes, such as respiration, cardiac cycle, etc  Computer simulations are image pairs generated by computer.  Possible to produce both images, but often one is simulated from another using known geometrical transformation.  Advantages:  Transformation is know exactly  Transformation is readily available  Disavantages:  Lack of realism due to anatomical changes, such as respiration, cardiac cycle, etc

10 Image RegistrationLecture 1 10 (con’t)  Providing an upper bound on success  Useful for system under development  Intramodality registration  Using only geometrical transformation  Due to interpolation issues, images with isotropic voxel/pixel are prefered, such as MR volumes.  Intermodality registration  Identify issue types  Generate new graylevel values according to the physical processes of the 2 nd image modality  Providing an upper bound on success  Useful for system under development  Intramodality registration  Using only geometrical transformation  Due to interpolation issues, images with isotropic voxel/pixel are prefered, such as MR volumes.  Intermodality registration  Identify issue types  Generate new graylevel values according to the physical processes of the 2 nd image modality

11 Image RegistrationLecture 1 11 Target Features  Stereotatic frame attached to the skull  Appropriate only for rigid anatomy because all positioning is measured relative to the frame  Providing easier and reliable verification, since neither the anatomy nor the pathology are involved in frame-base registration  Stereotatic frame attached to the skull  Appropriate only for rigid anatomy because all positioning is measured relative to the frame  Providing easier and reliable verification, since neither the anatomy nor the pathology are involved in frame-base registration

12 Image RegistrationLecture 1 12 Fiducial Marker Systems  Fiducial markers are implanted on the skull or skin.  Excellent gold standard for both intramodality and intermodality  Disadvantages:  High invasiveness  Subject to relative motion of the marker and anatomy between image acquisitions. More so for skin-attached markers  Fiducial markers are implanted on the skull or skin.  Excellent gold standard for both intramodality and intermodality  Disadvantages:  High invasiveness  Subject to relative motion of the marker and anatomy between image acquisitions. More so for skin-attached markers

13 Image RegistrationLecture 1 13 Registration Circuits  A consistency measure involving at least three images of the same modality.  By independently registering A->B, B->C, and C->A, a target point in A can be mapped using the circuit back to A.  Serious weakness is the assumption that the errors between registrations are uncorrelated  Inevitably violated, since successive registrations, A->B and B->C, say, share a common image (B).  A consistency measure involving at least three images of the same modality.  By independently registering A->B, B->C, and C->A, a target point in A can be mapped using the circuit back to A.  Serious weakness is the assumption that the errors between registrations are uncorrelated  Inevitably violated, since successive registrations, A->B and B->C, say, share a common image (B).

14 Image RegistrationLecture 1 14 Conclusion  Improving registration accuracy is an important goal.  But without a means of validation, no registration method can be accepted as a clinical tool.  Improving registration accuracy is an important goal.  But without a means of validation, no registration method can be accepted as a clinical tool.


Download ppt "Image Registration Lecture ?: Detecting Failure & Assessing Success June 14, 2005 Prof. Charlene Tsai."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google