Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byBennett Hopkins Modified over 9 years ago
1
クオーク模型によるエキゾチッ クハドロン構造研究 E. Hiyama (RIKEN)
2
今までハイパー核の構造計算をしてきまし た・・。
3
Single Λ hypernuclei
4
P-shell double Λ hypernuclei ( A=7-10) : α+x+Λ+Λ model E. Hiyama, M. Kamimura, T. Motoba, T. Tamada and Y. Yamamoto, Phys. Rev. C66, 024007 (2002)
5
でも、基本的に、私の計算法は、 Hamltonian が与えられるのでしたが、 なんでも計算できます。 ということで・・。
6
(1) Pentaquark system uu dd s (2) Tetra quark uu CC Non-relativistic 4- and 5-body constituent quark model E. Hiyama, M. Kamimura, A. Hosaka, H. Toki and M. Yahiro, Phys. Lett.B 633,237 (2006). Θ+Θ+ X(3872)
7
So far, experimentally, exotic hadron systems such as X(3872) etc have been observed. One of the theoretical important issue is whether we can explain the experimental value or not. The purpose of our work is to answer this question in the framework of the non-relativistic 4- and 5-body constituent quark model. Before going to study of pentaquark and tetra quark systems, I shall explain our method briefly.
8
Gaussian Expansion Method Developed by Kyushu Univ. group Kamimura (1) 3-cluster structure of light nuclei (2) Coulomb 3-body muonic molecular ions appearing in the muon-catalyzed fusion cycles (1987 ~ ) (3) 3-nucleon bound states with realistic NN and 3N forces (1988) (4)Metastable antiprotonic helium atom (He + +p+e)(1995 ~ ) E. Hiyama, M. Kamimura and Y. Kino, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 51 (2003), 223. Applied to
9
(1) Pentaquark system uu dd s (2) Tetra quark uu CC
10
Θ + T.Nakano et al. (LEPS collaboration) Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 (2003), 012002. Mass: 1540MeV Γ‹25 MeV S=+1 uu dd s N+K threshold (1433 MeV) About 100 MeV Θ + (1540 MeV) The ground state of N -- 938 MeV The ground state of K -- 495 MeV
11
Theoretically, it is requested to evaluate accurately the mass and decay width of this five quark system. For this purpose, we need to impose any proper boundary condition to NK scattering channel of this system. uu dd s
12
To study this pentaquark system is very interesting from view points of few-body physics. Because pentaquark system gives us to develop our method to 5-body problem to treat both resonance states and continuum scattering states. Very recently, I developed my method to such a calculation together with M. Kamimura H. Toki A. Hosaka M. Yahiro
13
I succeeded to perform 5-body calculation imposing proper boundary condition to NK scattering channel of this system. N K I shall discuss the structure of pentaquark, Θ +, within the framework of non-relativistic 5-body constituent quark model. q q q q s E. Hiyama et al., Phys. Lett.B 633,237 (2006).
14
Hamiltonian N. Isgur and G. Karl, Phys. Rev. D 20, 1191 (1971)
17
N+K scattering channel Model space of 5-quark system: We employ precise 5-body basis functions that are appropriate for describing the q-q and q-q correlations and for obtaining energies of 5-quark states accurately.
18
Ψ JM (qqqqq)= Φ JM (C=1) +Φ JM (C=2) +Φ JM (C=3) +Φ JM (C=4) +Φ JM (C=5) Φ JM (C) =∑A α (C) Φ α,JM (qqqqq) α Φ α, JM (qqqqq)= A qqqq {[(color) (c) α (isospin) (c) α (spin) (C) α (spatial) (c) α ] JM } (spatial) (c) α =φ nl (c) (r c )ψ νλ (c) (ρ c )φ (c) kj χ NL (c) (R c )
19
(spatial) (c) α =φ nl (c) (r c )ψ νλ (c) (ρ c )φ (c) kj (S c )χ NL (c) (R c ) φ nlm (c) =r l e- (r/r ) Y lm (r c ), r n =r 1 a n-1 (n=1 ~ n max ) n Ψ νλμ (ρ c )=ρ λ e- (ρ/ρ ) Y λμ (ρ c ), ρ μ =ρ 1 α μ-1 (μ=1 ~ μ max ) ^ Φ kjm’ (c) (S c )=S j e -(S/S ) Y jm’ (S c ), S k =S 1 a’ k-1 (k=1 ~ k max ) ^ μ 2 2 k ^ χ NL (c) (R c )=R L e -(R/R ) Y LM (R c ), R N =R 1 A N-1 (N=1 ~ N max ) 2 Geometric progression For many reasons, Gaussian basis functions are good Basis functions for few-body systems. (H-E)Ψ=0 By the diagonalization of Hamiltonian, we obtain N eigenstates for each J π.
20
Here, we use 15,000 basis functions. Then, we obtained 15,000 eigenfunction for each J π. We investigate two spin parity states, J=1/2 - and J=1/2 + of Isospin I=0. I=0,1/2 + ½+1½+1 ½+2½+2 I=0,1/2 - ½-1½-1 ½-2½-2
21
We finally solve 5-body problem under scattering boundary condition for the N+K channel in order to examine whether 5 quark system are resonance states or non-resonance continuum states. So far in the literature calculations, N+K channel was neglected due to very difficulty of this calculation. But, this difficult calculation was performed by our method for the first time. N K q q q q s
22
R. Jaffe and F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 232003, (2003). Important to describe the pentaquark system
23
s Jaffe and Wilczek N+K threshold
24
½+½+ ½-½- s qq correlation is twice stronger than the qq correlation. C=2 and 3 channels are appropriate Jacobian coordinate to describe the qq correlation. N+K threshold
25
N+K scattering channel
26
Results before doing the scattering calculation Bound-state approximation Do these states correspond to resonance states or Discrete non-resonance continuum states? N+K threshold Large contribution from N+K channel!
27
useful method: real scaling method often used in atomic physics In this method, we artificially scale the range parameters of our Gaussian basis functions by multiplying a factor α: r n →αr n in r l exp (-r/r ) for exmple 0.8 <α<1.5 n 2 and repeat the diagonalization of Hamiltonian for many value of α. ← resonance state Non-resonance continuum state α: range parameter of Gaussian basis function [schematic illustration of the real scaling] What is the result in our pentaquark calculation?
30
Real scaling calculation No resonance in 0 – 500 MeV above the N-K threshold N+K threshold
31
Real scaling calculation No resonance in 0 – 500 MeV above the N-K threshold N+K threshold
32
In order to see in more detail whether each discrete states survive as a resonance or melt into the non- resonance NK continuum state, we finally solve the scattering problem using Kohn-type coupled-channel variational method. This method is useful for the scattering between composed particle and were used in the 3q-3q scattering in the study of NN interaction. (For example, M. Oka and K. Yazaki, Prog. Thor. Phys. 66, 556 (1981).) Phase shift of J=1/2 – and 1/2 +
34
Scattering phase shifts No resonance in 0 – 500 MeV above the N-K threshold N+K threshold
35
I did the same calculation using a linear type confining potential, recently. The result that we had no resonance in the reported energy region of Θ + was qualitatively was the same as the present one. I also calculated the other spin parity states such as 3/2 + and 3/2 -. But, we had no resonance states in the observed energy region.
36
(1) Pentaquark system uu dd s (2) Tetra quark uu CC Non-relativistic 4- and 5-body constituent quark Θ+Θ+ X(3872)
37
D 0 + D ρ+J/Ψ ( T=1) X(3871.2) ω+η C (T=1) η+J/Ψ (T=0) 3644MeV 3756 3763 3872.4 3871.2 ρ+η C (T=1) X(3872):3871.2±0.5 MeV 1 ++ Γ<2.3MeV Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 262001 (2003) Belle Group uu CC
38
Theoretical interesting issue: (1)Can we explain the observed mass and width of X(3872) as a tetra quark state? Or X(3872) is qq meson state? (2) Is there any manifestly exotic tetra quark meson? For example, X + (ccud),X - (ccdu) are the manifestly exotic hadrons which cannot be constructed by qq.
39
Tetra quark uu CC At first, let’s search for manifestly Exotic tetra-quark hadron ( I=1 state) around the energy region of DD* threshold. If X(3872) is I=1 X + (ccud) X 0 (ccqq) X - (ccdu) It is possible to find X ± states which are manifestly exotic mesons.
40
I=1 state J/Ψ+π 3255 MeV 3756 3871 3872 X(3871.2) η C +ρ J/Ψ+ρ DD* uu CC uu C C π、ρπ、ρ J/Ψ 、 η C D D The qq interaction employed in the pentaquark does not reproduce the experimental data. Therefore, I employed another qq interaction.
41
V qq =V con +V OGE +V qq C Goldstone-boson exchange interaction Proposed by J Vijande etc, J. Phys. G 31(2005) 481
42
J/Ψ : 3097 MeV 3097 MeV η C : 2989 2990 D* : 2017 2009 D : 1897 1868 ρ : 773 771 π : 149 138 Cal. Exp.
43
I=1 state J/Ψ+π 3244 MeV (Exp.3255) 3761 (3756) 3868 (3872) 3914 (3875) η C +ρ J/Ψ+ρ DD* How is the results of 4- quark system using this potential?
44
All the 15 Jacobi-coordinate channels
45
uu C C=1 C DD* uu CC π、ρπ、ρ J/Ψ 、 η C C=2 Scattering channel
46
Ψ JM (qqqq)=∑Φ(r c,R c,ρ c ) Here, we use 13,000 basis functions. Then, we obtained 13,000 eigenfunction for 1 +. I=1,1 + 1+11+1 1+21+2 C=1 15
47
I=1 D+D* threshold J/Ψ+ρ Results before doing the scattering calculation Bound state approximation 0MeV 46MeV Are there are bound states or resonance state? Or All states are non-resonance states?
48
D+D* J/Ψ+ρ0MeV 46 Real scaling I=1 no bound sate and no resonance state Scaling parameter of Gaussian basis function
49
In order to confirm it, I solved the scattering problem under the scattering boundary condition for the J/Ψ+ρ channel and D+D* channel with the full 15 channel coupled. In the next figure, I show 2 types of phase shifts. 1)For the J/Ψ+ρ incoming and the J/Ψ+ρ outgoing 2)For the D+D* incoming and D+D* outgoing in the presence of the 15 channel coupled.
50
D+D* threshold J/Ψ+ρ (MeV) No resonance No bound state Phase shift (degree) δ(J/Ψ+ρ→J/Ψ + ρ) δ ( DD*→DD*)
51
Let’s discuss about I=0 state. Use of the present qq interaction ・・・ J/Ψ : 3097 MeV 3097 MeV η C : 2989 2990 D* : 2017 2009 D : 1897 1868 ρ : 773 771 π : 149 138 Cal. Exp. ω : 696.3 783 η : 572 547 Much lower by 100 MeV than the observed mass of ω
52
I=0 state η C +ω 3685 MeV 3669 3792 3914 J/Ψ+η J/Ψ+ω DD* 3644 3763 3872 3875 Cal.EXP. Calculational results do not reproduce the observed data.
53
I=0 D+D* 46MeV stable state J/Ψ+ω Scaling parameter 0 MeV
54
DD* Stable state J/Ψ+ω Cal. It should be noted that this J/Ψ+ω threshold is much lower than the experimental value. J/Ψ+ω 3792 MeV 3872 MeV Exp. When I artificially tried to adjust the qq interaction so as to reproduce the experimental J/Ψ+ω threshold, then there was no bound state and no resonance state. No bound state No resonance For the study of I=0 state, I need better qq-bar interaction.
55
Summary (1) I studied the pentaquark system within the framework of the constituent quark model. But, we had no resonance state in the observed energy region. (2) I searched manifestly exotic tetra quark hadron X ± (ccud) (I=1) around the energy region of DD* threshold. But, we did not find any bound state and any resonance state. For I=0, since the calculated mass of ω does not reproduce the observed mass, we did not conclude that there was bound state or resonance state or all states are non-resonance continuum states So, I need to have better qq-bar interaction for I=0 state.
56
Once I have better qq-bar interaction, I can perform 4-body calculation accurately. So, if you have a better qq-bar interaction, Please provide me it. And I am very happy to collaborate with you! Thank you!
57
s u,d One body density of the J=1/2 -
58
C=1 N+K scattering state
59
C=2 Confining state Bound state
60
C=3 Confining state Bound state
61
C=4 Confining state Bound state
62
C=5 Confining state Bound state
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.