Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byLorraine Palmer Modified over 9 years ago
1
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster EMCICs and the femtoscopy of small systems Mike Lisa & Zbigniew Chajecki Ohio State University
2
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster Outline LHC predictions –H.I. see SPHIC06 talk (nucl-th/0701058) –p+p: see talk of T. Humanic Introduction / Motivation –intriguing pp versus AA [reminder] –data features not under control: Energy-momentum conservation? SHD as a diagnostic tool [reminder] Phase-space event generation: GenBod Analytic calculation of EMCIC Experimentalists’ recipe: Fitting correlation functions [in progress] Conclusion
3
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster Introduction & Motivation
4
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster MicroexplosionsFemtoexplosions 10 17 J/m 3 5 GeV/fm 3 = 10 36 J/m 3 ss0.1 J 1 J T10 6 K200 MeV = 10 12 K rate10 18 K/sec10 35 K/s energy quickly deposited enter plasma phase expand hydrodynamically cool back to original phase do geometric “postmortem” & infer momentum
5
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster MicroexplosionsFemtoexplosions ss0.1 J 1 J 10 17 J/m 3 5 GeV/fm 3 = 10 36 J/m 3 T10 6 K200 MeV = 10 12 K rate10 18 K/sec10 35 K/s energy quickly deposited enter plasma phase expand hydrodynamically cool back to original phase do geometric “postmortem” & infer momentum
6
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster Beyond press releases The detailed work now underway is what can probe & constrain sQGP properties It is probably not press-release material......but, hey, you’ve already got your coffee mug Nature of EoS under investigation ; agreement with data may be accidental ; viscous hydro under development ; assumption of thermalization in question sensitive to modeling of initial state, under study
7
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster Femtoscopic information xaxa xbxb papa pbpb xaxa xbxb papa pbpb femtoscopic correlation at low |q| must vanish at high |q|. [indep “direction”] Au+Au: central collisions C(Q out ) C(Q side ) C(Q long ) 3 “radii” by using 3-D vector q
8
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster Femtoscopic information - Spherical harmonic representation femtoscopic correlation at low |q| must vanish at high |q|. [indep “direction”] Au+Au: central collisions C(Q out ) C(Q side ) C(Q long ) 3 “radii” by using 3-D vector q Q OUT Q SIDE Q LONG Q nucl-ex/0505009
9
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster Femtoscopic information - Spherical harmonic representation femtoscopic correlation at low |q| must vanish at high |q|. [indep “direction”] A LM (Q) = L,0 Au+Au: central collisions C(Q out ) C(Q side ) C(Q long ) 3 “radii” by using 3-D vector q L=0 L=2 M=0 L=2 M=2 nucl-ex/0505009
10
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster Kinematic dependence of femtoscopy: Geometrical/dynamical evidence of bulk behaviour Amount of flow consistent with p-space nucl-th/0312024 Huge, diverse systematics consistent with this substructure nucl-ex/0505014
11
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster p+p: A clear reference system?
12
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster STAR preliminary m T (GeV) Z. Chajecki QM05 nucl-ex/0510014 femtoscopy in p+p @ STAR Decades of femtoscopy in p+p and in A+A, but... for the first time: femtoscopy in p+p and A+A in same experiment, same analysis definitions... unique opportunity to compare physics ~ 1 fm makes sense, but... p T -dependence in p+p? (same cause as in A+A?)
13
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster Surprising („puzzling”) scaling HBT radii scale with pp Scary coincidence or something deeper? On the face: same geometric substructure pp, dAu, CuCu - STAR preliminary Ratio of (AuAu, CuCu, dAu) HBT radii by pp A. Bialasz (ISMD05): I personally feel that its solution may provide new insight into the hadronization process of QCD
14
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster BUT... Clear interpretation clouded by data features STAR preliminary d+Au peripheral collisions Gaussian fit Non-femtoscopic q-anisotropic behaviour at large |q| does this structure affect femtoscopic region as well?
15
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster STAR preliminary d+Au peripheral collisions Gaussian fit Decomposition of CF onto Spherical Harmonics Z.Ch., Gutierrez, MAL, Lopez-Noriega, nucl-ex/0505009 non-femtoscopic structure (not just “non-Gaussian”)
16
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster Baseline problems with small systems: previous treatments STAR preliminary d+Au peripheral collisions Gaussian fit ad hoc, but try it...
17
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster STAR preliminary d+Au peripheral collisions NA22 fit Try NA22 empirical form NA22 fit data Spherical harmonics L =1 M=0 L =2 M=0 L =1 M=1 L =2 M=2
18
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster Just push on....?... no! –Irresponsible to ad-hoc fit (often the practice) or ignore (!!) & interpret without understanding data –no particular reason to expect non-femtoscopic effect to be limited to non-femtoscopic (large-q) region not-understood or -controlled contaminating correlated effects at low q ? A possibility: energy-momentum conservation? –must be there somewhere! –but how to calculate / model ? (Upon consideration, non-trivial...)
19
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster Genbod
20
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster energy-momentum conservation in n-body states spectrum of kinematic quantity (angle, momentum) given by n-body Phasespace factor R n statistics: “density of states” larger particle momentum more available states P conservation Induces “trivial” correlations (i.e. even for M=1)
21
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster Genbod:phasespace sampling w/ P- conservation F. James, Monte Carlo Phase Space CERN REPORT 68-15 (1 May 1968) Sampling a parent phasespace, conserves energy & momentum explicitly –no other correlations between particles Events generated randomly, but each has an Event Weight WT ~ probability of event to occur ALL EVENTS ARE EQUAL, BUT SOME EVENTS ARE MORE EQUAL THAN OTHERS
22
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster “Rounder” events: higher WT ALL EVENTS ARE EQUAL, BUT SOME EVENTS ARE MORE EQUAL THAN OTHERS larger particle momentum more available states 30 particles
23
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster Genbod:phasespace sampling w/ P- conservation Treat identical to measured events use WT directly MC sample WT Form CF and SHD
24
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster CF from GenBod Varying frame and kinematic cuts
25
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster N=18, =0.9 GeV, LabCMS Frame - no cuts
26
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster N=18, =0.9 GeV, LabCMS Frame - | | =0.9 GeV, LabCMS Frame - | |<0.5 The shape of the CF is sensitive to kinematic cuts
27
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster N=18, =0.9 GeV, LCMS Frame - no cuts The shape of the CF is sensitive to kinematic cuts frame
28
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster N=18, =0.9 GeV, LCMS Frame - | | =0.9 GeV, LCMS Frame - | |<0.5 The shape of the CF is sensitive to kinematic cuts frame
29
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster N=18, =0.9 GeV, PR Frame - no cuts The shape of the CF is sensitive to kinematic cuts frame
30
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster N=18, =0.9 GeV, PR Frame - | | =0.9 GeV, PR Frame - | |<0.5 The shape of the CF is sensitive to kinematic cuts frame
31
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster GenBod Varying multiplicity and total energy
32
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster N=6, =0.5 GeV, LCMS Frame - no cuts The shape of the CF is sensitive to kinematic cuts frame
33
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster N=9, =0.5 GeV, LCMS Frame - no cuts The shape of the CF is sensitive to kinematic cuts frame particle multiplicity
34
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster N=15, =0.5 GeV, LCMS Frame - no cuts The shape of the CF is sensitive to kinematic cuts frame particle multiplicity
35
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster N=18, =0.5 GeV, LCMS Frame - no cuts The shape of the CF is sensitive to kinematic cuts frame particle multiplicity
36
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster N=18, =0.7 GeV, LCMS Frame - no cuts The shape of the CF is sensitive to kinematic cuts frame particle multiplicity total energy : √s
37
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster N=18, =0.9 GeV, LCMS Frame - no cuts The shape of the CF is sensitive to kinematic cuts frame particle multiplicity total energy : √s The shape of the CF is sensitive to kinematic cuts frame particle multiplicity total energy : √s
38
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster So... Energy & Momentum Conservation Induced Correlations (EMCICs) “resemble” our data –... on the right track... But what to do with that? –Sensitivity to s, Mult of particles of interest and other particles –will depend on p 1 and p 2 of particles forming pairs in |Q| bins risky to “correct” data with Genbod... Solution: calculate EMCICs using data!! – p T conservation and v 2 Danielewicz et al, PRC38 120 (1988) Borghini, Dinh, & Ollitraut PRC62 034902 (2000) –D spatial dimensions and M-cumulants Borghini, Euro. Phys. C30 381 (2003) –3+1 ( p+E) conservation and femtoscopy Chajecki & MAL, nucl-th/0612080 - [WPCF06] – p T conservation and 3-particle correlations Borghini,nucl-th/0612093
39
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster Distributions w/ phasespace constraints single-particle distribution w/o P.S. restriction
40
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster Distributions w/ phasespace constraints single-particle distribution w/o P.S. restriction k-particle distribution (k<N) with P.S. restriction
41
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster Distributions w/ phasespace constraints single-particle distribution w/o P.S. restriction k-particle distribution (k<N) with P.S. restriction
42
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster But... Energy conservation coupled to on-shell constraint huge correlations between E tot, P X,tot, P Y,tot, P Z,tot ???
43
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster CLT & ∑E - ∑p correlations
44
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster Using central limit theorem (“large N-k”) k-particle distribution in N-particle system N.B. relevant later
45
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster k-particle correlation function Dependence on “parent” distrib f vanishes, except for energy/momentum means and RMS 2-particle correlation function (1 st term in 1/N expansion)
46
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster 2-particle correlation function (1 st term in 1/N expansion) “The p T term” “The p Z term” “The E term” Names used in the following plots
47
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster EMCICs Effect of varying multiplicity & total energy Same plots as before, but now we look at: p T ( ), p z ( ) and E ( ) first-order terms full ( ) versus first-order ( ) calculation simulation ( ) versus first-order ( ) calculation
48
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster N=6, =0.5 GeV, LabCMS Frame - no cuts
49
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster N=9, =0.5 GeV, LabCMS Frame - no cuts
50
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster N=15, =0.5 GeV, LabCMS Frame - no cuts
51
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster N=18, =0.5 GeV, LabCMS Frame - no cuts
52
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster N=18, =0.7 GeV, LabCMS Frame - no cuts
53
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster N=18, =0.9 GeV, LabCMS Frame - no cuts
54
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster Findings first-order and full calculations agree well for N>9 –will be important for “experimentalist’s recipe” Non-trivial competition/cooperation between p T, p z, E terms –all three important p T1 p T2 term does affect “out-versus-side” (A 22 ) p z term has finite contribution to A 22 (“out-versus-side”) calculations come close to reproducing simulation for reasonable (N-2) and energy, but don’t nail it. Why? –neither (N-k) nor s is infinite –however, probably more important... [next slide]...
55
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster Remember... relevant quantities are average over the (unmeasured) “parent” distribution, not the physical distribution of course, the experimentalist never measures all particles (including neutrinos) or anyway, so maybe not a big loss
56
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster The experimentalist’s recipe Treat the not-precisely-known factors as fit parameters (4 of them) values determined mostly by large-|Q|; should not cause “fitting hell” look, you will either ignore it or fit it ad-hoc anyway (both wrong) this recipe provides physically meaningful, justified form
57
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster 18 pions, =0.9 GeV
58
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster
59
The COMPLETE experimentalist’s recipe femtoscopic function of choice fit this......or image this...
60
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster “Full” fit to min-bias d+Au - work in progress data EMCIC Femto (gauss) full
61
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster Summary understanding the femtoscopy of small systems –important physics-wise –should not be attempted until data fully under control SHD: “efficient” tool to study 3D structure Restricted P.S. due EMCIC –sampled by GenBod event generator –stronger effects for small mult and/or s Analytic calculation of EMCIC –k-th order CF given by ratio of correction factors –“parent” only relevant in momentum variances –first-order expansion works well for N>9 –non-trivial interaction b/t p T, p z, E conservation effects Physically correct “recipe” to fit/remove MCIC –4 parameters, determined @ large |Q| –parameters are “physical” - values may be guessed
62
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster Famous picture from famous article by famous guy Energy loss of energetic partons in quark-gluon plasma: Possible extinction of high p T jets in hadron-hadron collisions J.D. Bjorken, 1982 b
63
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster Thanks to... Alexy Stavinsky & Konstantin Mikhaylov (Moscow) [original suggestion to use Genbod] Nicolas Borghini (Bielefeld) & Jean-Yves Ollitrault (Saclay) [helpful guidance and explanation of previous work] Adam Kisiel (Warsaw) [emphasize energy conservation; resonance effects in + - - ] Ulrich Heinz (Columbus) [suggestions on validating CLT in 3+1 case]
64
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster Extra Slides
65
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster CLT? distribution of N uncorrelated numbers (and then scaled by N, for convenience) Note we are not starting with a very Gaussian distribution!! “pretty Gaussian” for N=4 (but 2 /dof~2.5) “Gaussian” by N=10
66
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster What is an A lm ? Q OUT Q SIDE Q LONG Q nucl-ex/0505009 C(|Q|=0.39,cos , )
67
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster Multiplicity dependence of the baseline Baseline problem is increasing with decreasing multiplicity STAR preliminary
68
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster d+Au
69
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster Schematic: How Genbod works 1/3
70
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster flow chart, in text F. James, CERN REPORT 68-15 (1968)
71
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster F. James, CERN REPORT 68-15 (1968)
72
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster Schematic: How Genbod works 2/3
73
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster Schematic: How Genbod works 3/3
74
ma lisa - ALICE week 12-16 Feb 2007 - Muenster Example of use of total phase space integral In absence of “physics” in M : (i.e. phase-space dominated) single-particle spectrum of : “spectrum of events”: F. James, CERN REPORT 68-15 (1968)
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.