1. Sarah McCabe October 2014 Penn State Advisor: Joe Bishop

2. Outline: Topic : Conserving habitat for Migrating Songbirds Place: Texas Midcoast National Wildlife Refuge Complex Project Question: Making choices for a Refuge plan Identify the Criteria Identify Data Model the Criteria Identify Parcels with Forest Habitat

3. Columbia Bottomland Forest Crops Forest

4. The Columbia Bottomlands Percent Canopy, 2001 National Land Cover Dataset 1976: 305,914 acres 1996: 254,269 acres Reduction of 16% (Webb, 1996) Original extent: 700,000 acres (US Fish and Wildlife Service, 2013)

5. Texas Parks and Wildlife US Fish and Wildlife Service Natural Resources Conservation Service Ducks Unlimited Gulf Coast Bird Observatory Cradle of Texas Conservancy Austin’s Woods Conservation Plan Goal: Conserve 10% of original forest area, or 70,000 acres. Methods: Donation of fee title Conservation Easements Purchase of Fee title from willing sellers 28,000 acres conserved.

6. Austin’s Woods Part II 42,000 acres for a bioreserve network What would be the ideal configuration of refuges, to select the most ecologically valuable areas, and to enhance the wildlife habitat conserved already?

7. Michael Lange, Biologist US Fish and Wildlife Service With members of the Gulf Coast Bird Observatory

8. Assigning “Suitability” values to tax parcels.

11. Austin’s Woods Project Land Protection Plan Priorities List 1)High quality old growth undisturbed habitat? 2)Exceptional/unique plant communities 3)Size of tract greater than 1,200 acres, or expandable 4)Near other protected areas 5) Acquisition helps maintain natural hydrological patterns 6)Plant structure complexity, topographic complexity 7)Restoration potential 8)Does the unit influence hydrologic or watershed patterns?

12. How to model the goals of the Land Protection Plan?

13. Size of the patch of Forest Old-growth Character of Forest Distance from managed lands Core Forest Neighboring Landscape Streams Wetlands How to model the goals of the Land Protection Plan?

14. Software: Corridor Design Toolbox for ArcGIS Desktop

15. National Land Cover Database 2011 Deciduous, Evergreen and Mixed Forest Woody Wetlands

16. National Land Cover Database 2011 Percent Canopy Cover, >50 %

17. Canopy Height (NACP Aboveground Biomass and Carbon Baseline Data, 2000)

19. Small Preserves <250 acres: Large Preserves >250 acres:

20. Why not Distance to Roads? Roads are well represented by NLCD in this area. The US Fish and Wildlife Service requires physical and legal access to new refuge units, so a road is actually a required feature. For abundance of Acadian Flycatchers, no difference between number of buildings, road, pavement and lawn as percent cover. (Rodewald and Shustak, 2008) National Land Cover Database 2011

22. Buffered to allow linear features to affect tax parcel polygons Three Classes Refuge Associated Named Streams Unnamed Streams National Hydrography Dataset

23. US Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory

28. Drawbacks of the “Refuge Suitability” analysis Not a true habitat model – really a “Site Suitability” study. Each species needs its own model. Results strongly influenced by the area of the tax parcel. Most useful features of this process: Finding large parcel groups Forest Area calculations Locations of parks and conservation easements Locations of smaller streams Development of library of habitat data for modelling animal habitat. Discussion:

30. Joe Bishop, Phd. Pennsylvania State University Michael Lange US Fish and Wildlife Service Texas Midcoast Refuge Complex

31. Sarah McCabe Sarah.mccabe.tx@gmail.com

33. Prothonotary Warbler in Cypress Knee. Joel Sartore. http://archive.audubonmagazine.org/features0707/prothonotaryWarbler.htmlhttp://archive.audubonmagazine.org/features0707/prothonotaryWarbler.html Cape May Warbler and Northern Parula. Linda. http://www.phillybirdnerd.net/2011/10/all-righty-then.htmlhttp://www.phillybirdnerd.net/2011/10/all-righty-then.html Young Box Turtle. Lisa K Suits. http://mycologista.blogspot.com/2013/06/the-backlog-logjam-continuesheres-baby.htmlhttp://mycologista.blogspot.com/2013/06/the-backlog-logjam-continuesheres-baby.html Adult Box Turtle. Flicker User pondhawk. http://www.boxturtles.com/gulf-coast-box-turtle/http://www.boxturtles.com/gulf-coast-box-turtle/ Bobcat at Tule Lake National Wildlife Refuge. US Fish and Wildlife Service. http://digitalmedia.fws.gov/FullRes/natdiglib/5657706937_9b60048076_b.jpghttp://digitalmedia.fws.gov/FullRes/natdiglib/5657706937_9b60048076_b.jpg Prothonotary Warbler Pair. L. Pace. http://www.fws.gov/refuge/Dahomey/wildlife_and_habitat/warbler.htmlhttp://www.fws.gov/refuge/Dahomey/wildlife_and_habitat/warbler.html

34. Data Sets 1.County Tax Parcel Data Sets Brazoria.Available online from Houston-Galveston Area Council (H-GAC) Fort Bend.Available on disk from County Offices Also available online from Houston-Galveston Area Council Matagorda.Data downloadable from their website Wharton. Available on disk in.dng format from County Offices 2.Infrastructure Data Sets Roads (Texas Natural Resources Information System) Texas Railroad Commission (from H-GAC) 3.Land Cover National Land Cover Database 2011. National Land Cover Database Tree Canopy 2011 4. Wetlands National Wetlands Inventory, US Fish and Wildlife Service 5. Water features National Hydrography Data Set 6.Vegetation National Vegetation Classification – General Vegetation Classes Texas Ecological Systems Database Project (Texas Parks and Wildlife) 7.Vegetation Complexity US Basal Area-Weighted Canopy Heights 2000 (Woods Hole Research Center) 8.Topographic Complexity National Elevation Data (NED) Gulf Coast Counties ( 10 meter grid) 9. Preserve Areas Refuge Boundaries – US Fish and Wildlife Service Other protected areas: Texas Wildlife Management Areas National Conservation Easement Database County Parks Mitigation Banks – Army Corp of Engineers – RIBITS website

35. Software: