Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Mutability Driven Phase Transitions in a Neutral Phenotype Evolution Model Adam David Scott Department of Physics & Astronomy University of Missouri at.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Mutability Driven Phase Transitions in a Neutral Phenotype Evolution Model Adam David Scott Department of Physics & Astronomy University of Missouri at."— Presentation transcript:

1 Mutability Driven Phase Transitions in a Neutral Phenotype Evolution Model Adam David Scott Department of Physics & Astronomy University of Missouri at St. Louis Evolution – Snowbird, UT 23 June 2013

2 Acknowledgements Dr. Sonya Bahar Dawn King McDonnell Foundation Complex Systems Grant UMSL Department of Physics & Astronomy

3 Model variant Directed percolation – Critical exponents Complex behaviors Overview

4 Model ONLY phenotypic evolution – No genetics & no physical space – 2D Continuous with absorbing boundaries Asexual Branching & coalescing random walks – Reaction-diffusion process Clustering – sympatric Mutability – Maximum possible offspring mutation from parent – Control parameter Dawn’s: Random death percentage for each organism Control parameter is random death percentage THIS: Random death percentage of population Control parameter is mutability

5 Model: Clustering Phenetic species – Speciation by phenotypes Cluster seeds – Reference Nearest neighbor Second nearest neighbor Closed sets of cluster seeds

6 Generations Mutability

7 Phase Transitions: Order Parameters Results from: Scott et al. (Europhysics Letters, in press) 0.340.38 0.340.38

8 Directed Percolation Critical Exponents (Henkel, Hinrichsen, Lübeck)

9 Other Exponents

10 0.3100.3150.320 0.325 0.330 0.335 0.340 μ0.3100.3150.3200.3250.330 α3.4893.3262.5891.7730.462 Density Decay Rate

11 More Evidence: Times to Extinction

12 Complex Behaviors Similar behaviors at multiple levels – Organisms undergo clustering transition – Species (clusters of organisms) do too! Cluster centroid  cluster center of “mass”

13 R measure of clustering Clark & Evans 1954 Organism coordinates Centroid coordinates Aggregated, R<1 Purely Random, R=1 Uniform, R>1 0.34 0.38 Results from: Scott et al. (Europhysics Letters, in press) 0.34 0.38

14 Reaction-Diffusion at Multiple Levels Organisms coalesce: – A+B  A Species coalesce: – Merge with one or more species, A+B+C  A’

15 Multiple levels of selection Fitness selection on organisms – Therefore on species Potential selection on clusters – Directed Percolation Fewer species interactions Species density – Isotropic Percolation Phenotype range Samir Okasha, Evolution and the Levels of Selection

16 Conclusions Phenotype evolution – Neutral & non-neutral: Dees & Bahar, PLoS ONE 2010 – Sympatric Complex dynamics – Mutability driven maximum possible phenotypic variation – Multiple levels – Two transitions  Absorbing State Extinction Surviving AggregatedSpanning

17 Thank you! Absorbing State Extinction Surviving AggregatedSpanning Henkel, Hinrichsen, Lübeck, Non-Equilibrium Phase Transitions: Vol 1: Absorbing Phase Transitions, 2009 Scott, King, Marić, Bahar, “Clustering and Phase Transitions on a Neutral Landscape”, Europhysics Letters, in press Okasha, Samir, Evolution and the Levels of Selection, 2006

18 Directed Percolation Density Decay Rate


Download ppt "Mutability Driven Phase Transitions in a Neutral Phenotype Evolution Model Adam David Scott Department of Physics & Astronomy University of Missouri at."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google