Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byVincent Moore Modified over 9 years ago
1
Cho Nai Cheung Accidental Release Prevention Engineer, Supervisor Hazardous Materials Programs June 14 th, 2012
2
Facility Audit Trends Audit findings by Program Level Results of Safety Culture Survey Impact of Safety Programs 2June 14, 2012
3
Nox Reduction Pollution Abatement (13) Chemical Mfg Plants (11) Water Treatment (11) Ammonia Refrigeration (8) Petroleum Refineries (4) Swimming Pools (1) Hazardous Waste Storage Facility (1) June 14, 2012’3
4
June 14, 20124 Audit every three years Track previous actions in new audits Ensures and Considers “ensure” actions not the best indicator Number of ensures over time
5
June 14, 20125
6
6
7
7
8
8
9
9
10
10
11
June 14, 201211 ◦ PHA (10% overall, 13% P2,13% P3 ) Recommendation tracking, timely Program 3: siting, seismic revalidation, HF, previous incidents, Program 2: revalidation, inspect equipment ◦ Operating Procedures (10%,14%.11%) COD, Program 3: S&H information/PPE, certification Program 2: missing procedure for task, shutdown procedure (emergency & normal), start-up
12
June 14, 201212 ◦ Hazard Assessment (7% overall,11% P2, 9% P3 ) WCS & ARS background documentation, parameters, OCA update ◦ Training (6%, 9%, 7%) Refresher training, Records Program 2: initial training, contractor Program 3: document training was understood
13
January 31, 2011 13 June 14, 2012
14
14 ◦ Operating Procedures (14%) COD, S&H information/PPE, certification ◦ CSE (13%) Review cancelled permits, permit and conditions, rescue plan ◦ PHA (11%) Incidents reviewed, document recommendation & tracking, seismic revalidation ◦ MOC (10%) Document training (op & maintenance), MOC for operating procedure, proper authorization
15
June 14, 201215 ◦ Inherently Safer System (21%) PHA recommendations analyzed for ISS categories (I,P,A,P) and approach (m,s,m,s), ISS for new process and guidance ◦ Latent Conditions Checklist (13%) Sign-off, feedback, rationale for customization, tracking of training and recommendations ◦ Operating Procedures (13%) Evaluating HF, task/gap analysis, procedure writing training ◦ Safety Culture (11%)
16
Completed survey of employees No of Deficiencies: ◦ Range: 2 – 6 ◦ Average: 3.3 (28%) ◦ Median: 2 June 14, 201216
17
Develop metrics (100%) Milestones in improvement plans (67%) Various requirements (33%): ◦ Evaluate work groups ◦ Identification of target ◦ Assessment having all required component ◦ Records maintained ◦ Report out to the workforce June 14, 201217
18
June 14, 201218
19
Cho Nai Cheung Telephone: (925) 335-3212 E-Mail: chonai.cheung@hsd.cccounty.uschonai.cheung@hsd.cccounty.us Website: http://www.cchealth.org/groups/hazmat Jun2 14, 201219
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.