1. 1/22/2016 St. Francis Institute of Management & Research 1

2. 1/22/2016 St. Francis Institute of Management & Research 2 Case Study on Satyam Computers “The Perspective of Corporate Governance” Presented to: Prof. Abhay Singh

3. Group Members Ritesh Gulrajani (106) Prachi Sawant (38) Evette Quadros () Vanitha Navada (120) Reuben Jacob () Eldrid Fernandes () 31/22/2016 St. Francis Institute of Management & Research

4. 1 Introduction to Satyam Computers, Maytas Infra & Maytas Properties 2 The Corporate Governance at Satyam 3 The Scam 4 The Confession 5 What Went Wrong… 6 People Involved In Scam 7 The New Beginning 8 Important Areas of Corporate Culture 9 Conclusion 41/22/2016 St. Francis Institute of Management & Research Flow of Presentation

5. Introduction 51/22/2016 St. Francis Institute of Management & Research

6. Introduction to Satyam Computers Icon among the IT companies and ranked 4 th Founded on 24 th June, 1987 by B. Ramalinga Raju in Hyderabad The company offers information technology (IT) services spanning various sectors, and is listed on the New York Stock Exchange and Euronext Satyam's network covers 67 countries across six continents Employs 40,000 IT professionals across the globe Serves over 654 global companies, 185 of which are Fortune 500 corporations Has strategic technology and marketing alliances with over 50 companies Owns development centres in India at Bangalore, Chennai, Pune, Mumbai, Nagpur, Delhi, Kolkata, Bhubaneswar & Visakhapatnam 61/22/2016 St. Francis Institute of Management & Research

7. In 1991 it was recognized as a public limited company and got its first Fortune 500 client, Deere and Co. In 90s it started Satyam Renaissance, Satyam Infoway, Satyam Spark Solutions and Satyam Enterprise Solutions Satyam Infoway became the first Indian internet company to be listed on the NASDAQ The company signed contracts with various international players like Microsoft, Emirates, TRW, i2 Technologies and Ford International Move - Offices in Singapore, Dubai and Sydney Introduction to Satyam Computers 71/22/2016 St. Francis Institute of Management & Research

8. The company had had various achievements like- – becoming the first ISO 9001:2001 company in the world, – certified by BVQI, – winning the Frost & Sullivan Award for Competitive Strategy in ASP in 2001, etc Selected by the Switzerland-based World Economic Forum and World Link magazine as one of India's most remarkable and rapidly growing entrepreneurial companies Received the National HRD award - 2000 for outstanding contributions to HRD Role Model for IT companies across the Globe. Introduction to Satyam Computers 81/22/2016 St. Francis Institute of Management & Research

9. Introduction to Maytas Infra & Maytas Properties Started in the late 1980’s by Ramalinga Raju & run by Sons of Raju - Teja Raju & Rama Raju 35% stakes was owned by Raju & his immediate family members Overloaded Project book Huge land banks Merger with Satyam  Sudden fall in Land Prices  to hide the Satyam Scam 91/22/2016 St. Francis Institute of Management & Research

10. The Corporate Governance At Satyam 101/22/2016 St. Francis Institute of Management & Research

11. The Corporate Governance at Satyam 111/22/2016 St. Francis Institute of Management & Research Corporate Governance Associate Delight Investor Delight Customer Delight Pursuit of Excellence Corporate Governance is given lots of importance in its Annual Report and website

12. THE SCAM 121/22/2016 St. Francis Institute of Management & Research

13. Satyam Computers had on December 16, 2008, announced that it will acquire two group firms - Maytas properties and Maytas Infra The BOD of Satyam had approved the founder’s proposal to buy 51 per cent stake in Maytas Infrastructure and 100 % in Maytas Properties The total outflow for both the acquisitions was expected to be US$ 1.6 bn comprising of US$ 1.3 bn for the 100% stake in Maytas Properties and US$ 0.3 bn for the 51% stake in Maytas Infra This is the move that sparked a row over alleged violation of corporate governance laws. This deal is not profitable for investors. So after this announcement they started to raise their voices against the deal The scam 131/22/2016 St. Francis Institute of Management & Research

14. Satyam’s justification for Maytas buy-out deal: de-risk the core business the integrated organization would be stronger and more diversified to deal with the uncertainty of the market. feeling that in the recent times it is difficult to make a strategic deal with other IT companies. However….. Satyam’s share prices drastically came down in U.S.A. after the bid was announced. The interrogation by investors forced Raju to reconsider his decision, which he pulled off within hours. World Bank, one of Satyam’s esteemed customers banned it from providing service for next 8 years. The aborted buy-out deal and the ban indicated that something seriously went wrong at the board level. 141/22/2016 St. Francis Institute of Management & Research The scam

15. Satyam’s image in front of its customers, investors, and more importantly, the entire nation got dented. Share prices tumbled even further by about 16% Valuation of Maytas turned out to be fraudulent Merrill Lynch was hired to advise on alternatives to the failed acquisition. But they resigned the engagement All of the four firms, including Merrill Lynch and JP Morgan denied having done any valuation 151/22/2016 St. Francis Institute of Management & Research The scam

16. The move sparked row between the institutional investors from across the world and Satyam’s board members. One of company’s two independent directors Mr. T.R. Prasad defended the decision of buy-out believing it to be increasing share value. Another director Mr. Shrinivasan quit before it was too late. Mr. Vinod Dham (founder of Pentium) was also one of the non-executive directors of Satyam who later resigned in the wake of controversy. 1/22/2016 St. Francis Institute of Management & Research 16 The scam

17. The Confession….. 171/22/2016 St. Francis Institute of Management & Research

18. The confession It is not a mere coincidence that MaytaS is SatyaM spelt in reverse way. As spelled out in Raju’s letter it was an effort to cover-up Satyam Fiasco. Raju wanted to acquire Maytas in order to cover up the scam he was cooking, but failed miserably. He tried to fill the gap between the actual profits of the company and the profits that were shown in records, balance sheets etc. and also tried to cope up the situation till last minute. But the situation were beyond his hands and therefore he confessed the frauds (on Jan 7, 2009) made by him by showing inflated profits in the balance sheet. According to the ‘confessional’ statement of Mr. Raju, the balance sheet shortfall was more than Rs.7000 crore. 181/22/2016 St. Francis Institute of Management & Research

19. 191/22/2016 St. Francis Institute of Management & Research

20. Satyam’s financial statements for years were totally false, cooked up and...  Never had Rs 5064 crores (US$ 1.05 Billion) shown as cash for several years.  Its liability was understated by $ 1.23 Billions  The Debtors were overstated by 400 millions plus.  The interest accrued and receivable by 376 Millions never existed What Went Wrong ??? 201/22/2016 St. Francis Institute of Management & Research

21. 5312.62 ACTUAL CASH IN BANK WAS 321 INFLATED 5040cr 2651.6 ACTUAL DEBT WAS 2161 OVERSTATED 490 Cr CURRENT ASSESTS 376 NO ACCRUED INTEREST 376 Cr UNDERSTATED LIABILITY 1230 Cr which was arranged by Mr.Raju 5040+376+1230 + 490= 7136 LIABILITIES REVENUE2700 OPERATING MARGIN 690 ARTIFICIALLY ADDED 588 OPERATING PROFIT ADDED 588 INCREASING THE CASH RESERVE ONLY FOR Q2 ALONE TO 588 1/22/201621 St. Francis Institute of Management & Research

22. ACTUAL OPERATING MARGIN 61 Cr REPORTED-649 Cr( CREATED AN ARTIFICIAL REVENUE OF 588) GROWTH IN THE OPERATING PROFIT 1/22/201622 St. Francis Institute of Management & Research

23. INFLATING THE PROFIT AND REVENUE 1/22/201623 St. Francis Institute of Management & Research

24. People Involved in Scam 1/22/201624 St. Francis Institute of Management & Research

25. Mr. Raju is by far the father of this fraud. With only 9% stake in company the guy tried to transfer $1.5bn of cash to the completely unrelated business. Raju’s perception on Satyam-Maytas deal: “Combined entity would deliver greater shareholder value” Correct perception: “Maytas promoters are getting benefited at the cost of Satyam's shareholders” The Promoters 251/22/2016 St. Francis Institute of Management & Research

26. 1/22/2016 St. Francis Institute of Management & Research 26 The Auditors

27. 1/22/2016 St. Francis Institute of Management & Research 27 The Auditors

28. 1/22/2016 St. Francis Institute of Management & Research 28 The Auditors “Satyam's financial statements are the responsibilities of the company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.”

29. 1/22/2016 St. Francis Institute of Management & Research 29 The Auditors "We have neither come across any instance of fraud on or by the company (Satyam), noticed or reported during the year, nor we have been informed of such case by the management."

30. 1/22/2016 St. Francis Institute of Management & Research 30 The Auditors "We conducted our audit in accordance with the auditing standards in India. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatements"

31. Auditors do bank reconciliation to check whether the money has indeed come or not. They check bank statements and certificates. There may be an argument that the audit firm was defrauded as well. There is complicity, incompetence or both with either the auditors or their customers or both. Inadequate procedures over confirmation indicates that the auditors missed something really big. The Auditors 311/22/2016 St. Francis Institute of Management & Research

32. PwC gave wrong PAN to Satyam, as it turns out. – PWC gave their Bangalore PAN Number to Satyam instead of New Delhi. PwC Hyderabad falls in New Delhi jurisdiction As per Satyam's accounts, vetted by Price Waterhouse, auditors were paid Rs 3.73 crore during 2007-08 as against Rs 3.67 crore in the previous fiscal. 1/22/2016 St. Francis Institute of Management & Research 32 The Auditors

33. 1/22/2016 St. Francis Institute of Management & Research 33

34. “A company filing returns in the US according to (its) Security Exchange Commission (SEC) guidelines could not have done this without the cognizance of key executives,” It’s impossible to go by the claim that none of the board members had any clue about the inconsistencies in Satyam’s balance sheet; if the fraud went on for ’several years’, it won’t be wrong to rule out that most of them, if not all, had some idea about the happenings. Satyam's CFO Srinivas Vadlamani has been arrested. The Board of directors 341/22/2016 St. Francis Institute of Management & Research

35. Independent directors of Satyam Computers, who agreed to the company's proposal of buying out two promoter-related companies, failed to be independent in ‘spirit’. The Satyam board, including its 5 independent directors had approved the founder's proposal to buy 51 % stake in Maytas Infrastructure and 100 % in Maytas Properties The role of Satyam's independent directors is termed as ‘unpardonable’, since they acted against the interest of larger shareholders especially when the promoters themselves owned a little more than 9% stake in the company and institutional investors owned more than 45 %. All independent directors voted in favour of Satyam-Maytas proposal. The Independent directors 351/22/2016 St. Francis Institute of Management & Research

36. If the auditors were conned, it means that the bank statements and certificates were forged Satyam's banks - ICICI Bank, HDFC Bank, Bank of Baroda, etc The BANKERS 361/22/2016 St. Francis Institute of Management & Research

37. The Stock Exchange Board of India had in December given a clean chit to Satyam in the probe on violation of Corporate Governance Law. The SEBI 371/22/2016 St. Francis Institute of Management & Research

38. The government too is equally guilty in not having managed to save the shareholders, the employees and some clients of the company from losing heavily. There was lack of Regulation on part of Government for not keeping in check such frauds. 381/22/2016 St. Francis Institute of Management & Research Government

39. The New Beginning 1/22/201639 St. Francis Institute of Management & Research

40. The scam affected the reputation of Satyam Computers as well as the whole of IT industry in India. Govt. of India was very concerned about it’s image in International Market especially IT, as it is also main source of foreign exchange for the country and drives economic growth of the country. The IT industry contributes 5.7 % to the GDP of India. In value terms, in 2007-08, it was around $ 40 billion. Also the Govt. wants to give a clear message to the International Clients that the problem will be taken care-off and it will not be repeated in future and they can continue their engagements with Indian companies without suspicion. Government intervention 401/22/2016 St. Francis Institute of Management & Research

41. Also to safeguard the interest of small investors, so that faith can be restored in the market again. – Small investors are the largest number of buyers in the Capital Market. If they will go away it would be difficult for other companies to raise money through Public Issues. Also to take care of the employees working in Satyam, as it was never their fault for whatever happened. Their job has to be secured by the Govt. that too in economic recession time. Also to give the message to the people and to investors that the guilty will be punished and will not go scot free as it used to happen earlier. That’s the only reason why Mr. Raju is still behind the bars and not able to secure a bail till now. Government intervention 411/22/2016 St. Francis Institute of Management & Research

42. Steps Taken After Satyam Fraud : Introduction of new rules by the stock market regulator, making it compulsory for promoters of companies to disclose the percentage of shares pledged by them to lenders Appointment of Independent Auditors and Company Secretary by Company Law Board to conduct Audit of any private organization. Set-up of 5 member Committee to suggest how to implement effective compliance and Corporate Governance in private sector by CLB. Government intervention 421/22/2016 St. Francis Institute of Management & Research

43. Change the name of the company. Reconstitution of the board : Restore the management of the company and appoint some reputed people as the board of directors. Try building confidence in the clients to get back the lost projects. The image of the company could be revived by a series of press conferences highlighting the ongoing contracts with the clients. It could also be merged with any other software company. Steps taken by Management 431/22/2016 St. Francis Institute of Management & Research

44. Tech Mahindra paid Rs1757 crore for a 31% stake in the company, or Rs 58 per share. Satyam Computer Services has now zoomed 15% to Rs 54.20 ahead of the announcement of the highest bidder for the company on April 13, 2009. In India, this moment was full of praise for the manner and speed with which the reconstituted board of Satyam Computer Services found a strategic investor. This would send a strong signal globally that the country can respond well and fast to financial crisis. Mahindra - satyam 441/22/2016 St. Francis Institute of Management & Research

45. Important areas of corporate culture 1/22/201645 St. Francis Institute of Management & Research

46. The Corporate Governance in India is in a very rotten state due to vicious promoter-politician nexus endemic across different sectors of the economy. It would be naive to believe in the comments by select industry leaders and select politicians that the Satyam case is one-off and that the entire Indian IT sector (or for that matter, the entire Indian business fraternity) cannot be tarred by the same paintbrush. Satyam most certainly is not a only one-off high profile situation that India has been forced to face. It is not the first one and will certainly not be the last of the high profile ones. It should be a "principle-based" system rather than being "rule-based” Corporate governance 461/22/2016 St. Francis Institute of Management & Research

47. Independent directors need to be more active and need to maintain their independent spirit. In instances of larger issue of change in the entire business focus of the company, the Independent Director should take the decision to the shareholders before approving. Independent directors need to be vigilant in protecting minority interest and be ‘brave’ enough to take adequate steps. It is cumulative responsibility of the independent directors to protect the interest of shareholders and strategy of the organisation. There is no point in having independent directors if they can't guide the management on critical issues. Role of Independent Directors 471/22/2016 St. Francis Institute of Management & Research

48. 1/22/2016 St. Francis Institute of Management & Research 48 Investor Activism

49. In the past, institutional investors in this country haven't really spoken up against corporate misbehaviour. The promoters were enriching themselves, at the cost of minority shareholders. There have been numerous other instances, admittedly of smaller consequence. But now it's time institutional shareholders got together to show promoters that they simply cannot get away with this kind of behaviour. Now, in case of Satyam, the same institutional shareholders have found their tongues. This time, their stake is big. In India it only needs a 10 % stake to call an EGM. The shareholders need to use this provision. Managements should be asked to take shareholders into confidence for any unrelated diversification, with the definition of 'unrelated' clearly spelt out. Investor Activism 491/22/2016 St. Francis Institute of Management & Research

50. Satyam & Business Ethics 1/22/201650 St. Francis Institute of Management & Research

51. 1/22/2016 St. Francis Institute of Management & Research 51 Satyam & Business Ethics Individual Level Organizational Level Association Level Societal Level International Level

52. 1/22/2016 St. Francis Institute of Management & Research 52 Satyam & Business Ethics Individual Level Organizational Level Association Level Societal Level International Level

53. Individual Level 1/22/2016 St. Francis Institute of Management & Research 53 Satyam & Business Ethics

54. 1/22/2016 St. Francis Institute of Management & Research 54 Satyam & Business Ethics Individual Level Organizational Level Association Level Societal Level International Level

55. Organizational Level  Satyam  Maytas  Promoters  Management  Independent Directors  Auditors  Bankers 1/22/2016 St. Francis Institute of Management & Research 55 Satyam & Business Ethics

56. 1/22/2016 St. Francis Institute of Management & Research 56 Satyam & Business Ethics Individual Level Organizational Level Association Level Societal Level International Level

57. Association Level  ICAI  SEBI  Law – Companies Act  Corporate Governance Committees  National Association of Software and Services Company (NASSCOM) 1/22/2016 St. Francis Institute of Management & Research 57 Satyam & Business Ethics

58. 1/22/2016 St. Francis Institute of Management & Research 58 Satyam & Business Ethics Individual Level Organizational Level Association Level Societal Level International Level

59. Societal Level 1/22/2016 St. Francis Institute of Management & Research 59 Satyam & Business Ethics

60. 1/22/2016 St. Francis Institute of Management & Research 60 Satyam & Business Ethics Individual Level Organizational Level Association Level Societal Level International Level

61.  World Bank  New York Stock Exchange  International Clients and Operations 1/22/2016 St. Francis Institute of Management & Research 61 Satyam & Business Ethics

62. Conclusion 1/22/201662 St. Francis Institute of Management & Research

63. There was lack of Regulation on part of Govt. as well as other bodies responsible for keeping in check such frauds. Stringent rules and regulations regarding compliance should be introduced to check fraud like this. The Auditors and Independent Directors should take their role seriously and act responsibly. Corporate Non Governance – India Indeed need such blow so that Corporate Governance can be properly adhered to in practice and just not be taught in Business Schools alone. Conclusion 631/22/2016 St. Francis Institute of Management & Research