Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

March 16, 2011. Announcements  Remember that essays are due this Thursday, March 17 at 4pm  All module information is available at www.jkarp.com/s2010.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "March 16, 2011. Announcements  Remember that essays are due this Thursday, March 17 at 4pm  All module information is available at www.jkarp.com/s2010."— Presentation transcript:

1 March 16, 2011

2 Announcements  Remember that essays are due this Thursday, March 17 at 4pm  All module information is available at www.jkarp.com/s2010 NOT webct! www.jkarp.com/s2010

3 Voter Turnout  Turnout in comparative perspective. What is low?  How (and why) does voter turnout change over time?  The role of age and education  Does low voter turnout matter?

4 Voting is the most common form of political participation  Many people also talk about politics and try to persuade others to vote  Very few participate in any other specific way.

5 Why do people vote?  Voting is the most common form of political participation.  Voting is a “collective good” which means that citizens can enjoy the benefits (ie. policies derived from electoral outcomes) without paying the costs.  Rational citizens may then choose not to vote.  Why then do people vote?

6 Trends in Voter Turnout

7 Trends in Voter Turnout in the UK

8 Trends in Voter Turnout in the US VAP=Voting age population (includes everyone over 18, non citizens, felons, etc; VEP=Voting eligible population

9 Theories of Voter Turnout  pB + D > C  B=collective benefits of voting (ie. Having desired candidate win)  P=Probability of deriving that benefit  D=Civic duty (or any other selective benefit)  C=Cost of voting

10 Convenience and Cost

11 Impact of Compulsory Voting on Turnout in Australia

12 Impact of the (abolition) of Compulsory Voting on Turnout in the Netherlands

13 Lack of Salience (Cost)

14

15 Party Mobilisation in Comparative Perspective (Reduced Cost/Increase Benefit)

16 Party Mobilisation and Electoral Competition

17 Declining Benefits Source: Dalton (2004)

18 Are the media to blame? Source: Putnam (2000)

19 Changes in Attitudes During a Campaign

20

21 Political Participation in Comparative Perspective Source: Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (CSES), Module 2, 2004

22

23 Summary  Can pB + D > C explain political engagement?


Download ppt "March 16, 2011. Announcements  Remember that essays are due this Thursday, March 17 at 4pm  All module information is available at www.jkarp.com/s2010."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google