Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byErik Cross Modified over 9 years ago
1
Technology Diffusion Leveraging Pollution Prevention Technical Assistance Kyle Bartholomew Minnesota Technical Assistance Program University of Minnesota May 9, 2006
2
contents background examples of demos and pilots next steps
3
fiberglass reinforced plastics ~100 facilities in Minnesota products: boats, truck bodies, electrical enclosures, sporting equipment major sources of styrene air emissions
4
input from industry FRP stakeholder process identified: –closed mold fabrication –gel-coat substitute –metering for raw materials –process measurements –recycle trimmings –robotics –waste heat recovery
5
why closed mold fabrication? cleaner reduced styrene emissions open mold closed mold
6
FRP Demo Day 2005 Closed-Mold Demonstration Session
7
FRP Closed Mold Demo Day held at local community college technologies demonstrated: –vacuum infusion –light resin transfer molding (light-RTM) –low styrene gel-coating 24 companies attended resulted in pilot test of low-shrink resin generated interest in other closed-mold pilots
12
Precision Fiberglass Closed Mold Case Study: Turkey Hatchery Computer Box
14
Precision Case Study Precision Fiberglass – Grove City, MN –had trouble with light-RTM process –50% bad parts being produced Troubleshooting session at Sunrise Fiberglass –mentor / novice knowledge transfer –wider range of variables tested –black resin gave visual indication of flow pattern –good parts produced at Sunrise
15
Precision Case - continued trials after troubleshooting session still resulted in failed parts –injection pressure lower at Precision –resin temperature lower at Precision different operating conditions resulted in different flow patterns –Precision’s flow pattern plugged vacuum port before mold was full simple port placement change solved problem –yields increased to nearly 100%
16
old port new port
17
computer simulation of resin flow can we predict where to put the injection and vacuum ports? computer simulation of flow gives us a good starting point question: does simulation predict the problem seen at Precision
18
input geometry
19
injection port vacuum port
20
simulate flow
24
injection port vacuum port observed problem spot
25
simulation results replicated Precision’s problem allows user to “play” with a design to make it more manufacturable software price is pretty high for the clients we serve
26
Sunrise Fiberglass case study Closed Mold Case Study: Closed Mold Port Location
27
Sunrise case study (cont’d) shared Precision’s simulation results with Sunrise Sunrise requested port location assistance for new mold design
34
put vacuum port here!
35
Sunrise case study (cont’d) Results: –simulation predicted port location –Sunrise built the parts as specified –process worked right the first time! no scrap no time wasted troubleshooting no emissions from “trial and error” design
36
Stone Products Intern Project Intern Project Case Study: Automated Gel-Coat Application
37
Stone Products Intern Project cultured marble manufacturer MnTAP engineering student –13 weeks on-site goals: reduce overspray –raw material losses –air emissions –occupational exposure
40
Next Steps - MnTAP FRP: continue closed-mold efforts FRP: demo & pilot raw material monitoring systems continue wood finishing efforts (not discussed today) expand into metal finishing expand into metal casting
41
summary demonstrated technologies to a large group (demo day) connected manufacturers to share knowledge (joint troubleshooting) demonstrated some new ways of thinking about design (computer simulation) provided in-depth assistance to encourage change (intern project)
42
conclusions demos and pilot tests encourage adoption of P2 technologies builds confidence by providing direct experiences focuses on needs identified by industry operations close to the core business require higher level of interaction
43
Thank You!
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.