1. Field test results on W5: Self care Margie Schneider 6 th Meeting of the Washington Group Kampala,Uganda 10 – 13 th October 2006

2. Structure of presentation Results –Core vs detailed Questions –Crosstabulations for core Q by individual detailed Qs (correspondence) –Analysis by age and sex (Vietnam) Separate analysis of –cognitive data set –Gambia –Vietnam –South Africa

3. Core vs detailed Only 1 detailed Q with full response options – picking up objects No real relationship Not measuring the same domain

7. Cog test data: W5 X Fingers/hands for picking up objects

8. Gambia: W5 X washing

9. Gambia: W5 X dressing

10. Gambia: W5 X feeding self

11. Gambia: W5 X stay alone

12. Vietnam: W5 X 7 Qs –Stretch over head –Button up with fingers –Put on socks –Tie shoelaces –Combing hair –Feed self –Use fingers/hands to pick up objects All similar pattern –OK for no and some –‘a lot’ on detailed = ‘some’ on W5

13. Vietnam by sex

14. Vietnam by age