Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Construction Spending, Labor & Materials Outlook

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Construction Spending, Labor & Materials Outlook"— Presentation transcript:

1 Construction Spending, Labor & Materials Outlook
Beck Presentation Dallas, January 12, 2016 Ken Simonson Chief Economist, AGC of America

2 Construction spending & employment, 2006-15
Total spending, Feb. ‘06 (peak)-Nov. ‘15 billion $, seasonally adjusted annual rate (SAAR) Total employment, Apr. ’06 (peak)-Dec. ‘15 thousands, seasonally adjusted 7.7 million $1.21 trillion $1.12 trillion (7% below peak) 6.5 million Total Total (15% below peak) Private Residential Nonres (10% below peak) Private nonresidential Residential (27% below peak) Public November 2014-November 2015: Total: 10% private res. 11%, private nonres. 14%, public 6% December 2014-December 2015: Total: 4.2%, residential 5.7%, nonresidential 3.2%

3 Private residential spending: MF continues to outpace SF
seasonally adjusted annual rate (SAAR): Jan. ‘11 ($238 B)-Nov. ’15 ($428 B) Multifamily (MF) (Nov. ‘15: $57 B) Single family (SF) (Nov. ‘15: $227 B) Improvements (Nov. ‘15: $144 B) 12-month % change: January 2011 (-5.3%)-November 2015 (10.8%) Multifamily: 25% Total: 11% Single family: 9% Improvements: 8% Source: Census Bureau construction spending reports

4 2016 residential spending forecast: 5-9%
SF: 6-9%; ongoing job gains add to demand; student debt, fears of lock-in, limited supply will cap growth MF: 8-12%; upturn should last through 2016 low vacancies, high rent growth encourage investors millennials show continued preference for cities nearly all MF construction is rental, not condo public MF is growing but remains tiny (1% of total) Improvements: 0-10%; newly corrected Census data shows loose relationship to SF spending Source: Author

5 Population change by state, July 2014-July 2015 (U.S.: 0.79%)
decrease 0-0.49% % % 1.5%+ 1.5% 1.2% 0.9% -0.1% 1.5% 2.3% 0.6% NH 0.2% 0.1% 0.2% 0.2% VT -0.1% 0.6% 0.3% 0.9% 1.9% 0.5% 0.1% MA 0.6% 1.7% 0.7% -0.2% 0.1% 0.3% 1.9% -0.3% 0.3% 0.7% CT -0.1% RI 0.1% 0.3% 0.3% 1.5% 1.0% -0.02% 0.8% 0.8% DE 1.1% NJ 0.2% 1.8% 0.4% 1.4% -0.04% 0.3% 1.2% MD 0.5% DC 1.9% 0.5% 0.2% 1.8% HI 0.8% Source: U.S. Census Bureau News

6 AGC members’ expectations for 2016
Net % (US/TX) who expect dollar volume of projects to be higher 34/44 All projects 12/30 K-12 school 21/23 Retail/warehouse/lodging 12/17 Public building 19/13 Private office 8/13 Water/sewer 19/34 Hospital 6/20 Highway 14/ 2 Multifamily 3/20 Other transportation 13/30 Higher education 1/ 0 -1/-12 Power Direct federal construction Source: AGC Construction Outlook Survey, Jan (1,580 responses, 175 from Texas)

7 Nonresidential segments: year-to-date, 2016-17 forecast
Jan.-Nov. YTD 2015 vs. 2014 July-Nov annualized 2016 and 2017 (per year) Nonresidential total (public+private) 9 % -2 4-8 Power (incl. oil & gas structures, pipelines) -15 -16 0 to 10 Educational 7 8 3 to 5 Highway and street 1 to 4 Manufacturing 47 -10 -10 to +10 Commercial (retail, warehouse, farm) 14 Office 22 5 to 15 Transportation 2 0 to 5 Health care 5 1 3 to 8 Sewage and waste disposal -24 Amusement & recreation 26 -20 Lodging 31 -10 to +15 Other (communication; water; public safety; conservation; religious): 8% of total 6 Source: Census Bureau construction spending report; Author’s forecast

8 Construction spending: industrial, heavy (billion $, SAAR)
Power (88% private) Manufacturing (99% private) Total Total Electric Chemical Oil & Gas Other Latest 12-mo. change: 5% (oil & gas 29%; electric -4%) Latest 12-mo. change: 29% (chemical 39%; other 19%) Transportation facilities (70% public) Public & private transportation facilities Public Private Latest 12-mo. change: 3% Latest 12-mo. change: private 7%; public 2% Source: Census Bureau construction spending reports

9 Key points: power, mfg., transportation
Cutbacks in coal-fired plants, oil & gas fields have hit bottom; surge in gas-fired plants, pipelines into ‘18 Mfg growth led by chemicals (petrochemical plants, ethane crackers, LNG) and transportation equipment (cars, light & heavy trucks, jets, railcars, barges); cuts in plants tied to farming, mining or exports Private (mainly rail) investment in transportation will slow; flat funding for public airports, ports, transit Source: Author

10 Construction spending: public works (billion $, SAAR)
Highways (99.6% public) Sewage/waste (99% public) Latest 12-mo. change: 5% Latest 12-mo. change: -2% Amusement & recreation (48% public) Water supply (96% public) Latest 12-mo. change: 16% Latest 12-mo. change: -5% Source: Census Bureau construction spending reports

11 Key points: roads, recreation, sewer/water
Only slight rise in federal highway funding even with long-term bill; gradual pick-up in state funding & P3s Amusement & recreation spending is very “lumpy”—a few big stadiums at irregular intervals; but funding for local, state, federal parks keeps eroding Eastern & Midwestern cities under orders to make long-term upgrades to sewer systems that should boost spending; water utilities hurt by drought, conservation Source: Author

12 Construction spending: institutional (private + state/local)
Total education (79% public) Education (state & local K-12, higher; private) S/L preKindergarten-12th grade S/L higher ed Private Latest: state/local preK-12 24%, higher 7%; private 9% Latest 12-mo. change: 14% Total healthcare (77% private) Hospitals (private, state & local) Private S/L Latest 12-mo. change: 5% Latest 12-mo. change: private 18%; state & local -8% Source: Census Bureau construction spending reports

13 Key points: education & health care
Higher-ed enrollment is shrinking, so colleges need fewer dorms & classrooms; apts. (MF) replacing dorms (ed.) PreK-12 enrollment is flat; more children staying in cities and filling underused or charter schools, so construction no longer matches population growth Hospitals face more competition from standalone urgent care, outpatient surgery, clinics in stores; more investment in small facilities, short stays Source: Author

14 Construction spending: developer-financed (billion $, SAAR)
Retail (private) Office (86% private) Total Private Public Latest 12-mo. change: -1% Latest 12-mo. change: 21% (private 23%; public 7%) Warehouse (private) Lodging (private) Latest 12-mo. change: 6% Latest 12-mo. change: 28% Source: Census Bureau construction spending reports

15 Key points: retail, warehouse, office, hotel
Retail now tied to mixed-use buildings & renovations, not standalone stores or shopping centers; consumer pivot to online buying will continue Warehouse market largely built out for now but may heat up if Panama Canal changes distribution lanes Employment sets records each month but office space per employee keeps shrinking; growth mainly in cities & renovations, not suburban office parks Ongoing RevPAR gains still driving hotel growth but market is vulnerable to sudden reversals Source: Author

16 Major locations for data centers
Seattle Portland Minneapolis Boston Northern New Jersey Des Moines Chicago Philadelphia Salt Lake City Denver Silicon Valley Omaha Las Vegas Northern Virginia Colorado Springs St. Louis Kansas City Southern California Phoenix Atlanta Dallas Northern Florida Houston Source: from CBRE, ASHRAE

17 Construction Employment in United States, 1/90-11/15
(seasonally adjusted; shading = recessions) Peak: Apr. ‘06 -16% vs. peak Construction Employment in Texas, 1/90-11/15 (seasonally adjusted; shading = recessions) Peak: Nov. ‘11 Source: BLS

18 Construction Employment Change from Year Ago 1/08-11/15 (not seasonally adjusted)
Dallas-Plano-Irving, TX Div.* 2% (150 out of 358) Texas 2% (36 out of 51) Source: BLS

19 Change in construction employment, 11/14-11/15 not seasonally adjusted (NSA)
Metro area or division 12-mo. empl. change (NSA) Rank (out of 358) Statewide (Construction only) 2% Laredo* 0% 191 Statewide* (Const/mining/logging) -2% Longview* 3% 126 Abilene* 150 Lubbock* Amarillo* McAllen-Edinburg-Mission* Austin-Round Rock* 5% 92 Midland* 0.3% 190 Beaumont-Port Arthur* 13% 19 Odessa* 1% 173 Brownsville-Harlingen* San Angelo* College Station-Bryan* -1% 256 San Antonio-New Braunfels 10% 38 Corpus Christi* 6% 78 Sherman-Denison* Dallas-Plano-Irving Div.* Texarkana, TX-AR* -8% 330 El Paso* Tyler* Fort Worth-Arlington Div.* -7% 322 Victoria* 11% 31 Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land Waco* Killeen-Temple* -6% 315 Wichita Falls* -5% 306 *The Bureau of Labor Statistics reports employment for construction, mining and logging combined for metro areas in which mining and logging have few employers. To allow comparisons between states and their metros, the table shows combined employment change for these metros. Not seasonally adjusted statewide data is shown for both construction-only and combined employment change. Source: AGC rankings, calculated from BLS state and area employment reports

20 Construction employment change by TX metro, 11/14-11/15
El Paso Amarillo Lubbock Odessa San Angelo Mid land Abilene Wichita Falls Brownsville-Harlingen McAllen-Edinburg-Mission Laredo San Antonio- New Braunfels Austin- Round Rock- Killeen- Temple Waco Corpus Christi Victoria Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land Beaumont-Port Arthur College Station- Bryan Longview Tyler Sherman- Denison Dallas- Plano- Irving Div. Fort Worth- Arlington Div. Texarkana, TX-AR Over 10% 5.1% to 10% 0.1% to 5% 0% -0.1% to -5% -5.1% to -10% Over -10% Shading based on unrounded numbers Source: BLS state and regional employment report

21 State construction employment change (U. S. : 4
State construction employment change (U.S.: 4.2%) 11/14 to 11/15: 44 states + DC up, 6 down Over -10% -5.1% to -10% -0.1% to -5% 0% 0.1% to 5% 5.1% to 10% Over 10% 6% 11% 3% -0.4% 2% NH 3% 2% -4% 7% 1% 9% VT 1% 12% 5% 6% MA 7% 12% CT 3% RI -7% 9% -1% 7% 0.4% 2% 1% NJ 7% 0.1% 8% -15% MD 5% DE 5% 5% 3% 7% 6% 5% 3% -1% 6% 0.2% 2% 12% 8% 3% 6% 3% DC 1% 3% 3% 7% Shading based on unrounded numbers HI 12% Source: BLS state and regional employment report

22 Metro construction employment change 11/14 to 11/15: 190 metros up, 64 unchanged, 104 down
Over -10% -5.1% to -10% -0.1% to -5% 0.1% to 5% 5.1% to 10% Over 10% 0%

23 Hardest positions to fill
Source: AGC Member Survey, Sept (1,358 responses; 116 from Texas

24 How contractors are coping with worker shortages
Source: AGC Member Survey, Sept. 2015

25 Unemployed construction workers, Dec. 2000-Dec
Unemployed construction workers, Dec Dec (not seasonally adjusted) Source: BLS

26 Producer price indexes for key inputs, 1/11-11/15 (Jan. 2011=100)
Gypsum products Copper & brass mill shapes Latest 1-mo. change: -1.7%, 12-mo.: -1% Latest 1-mo. change: -3.0%, 12-mo.: -16% Flat glass Aluminum mill shapes Latest 1-mo. change: 0.0%, 12-mo.: 6% Latest 1-mo. change: -1.4%, 12-mo.: -13% Source: Author, based on BLS producer price index reports

27 Producer price indexes for key inputs, 1/11-11/15 (Jan. 2011=100)
Diesel fuel Concrete products Latest 1-mo. change: -3.5%, 12-mo.: -38% Latest 1-mo. change: 0.5%, 12-mo.: 3% Paving mixtures Steel mill products Latest 1-mo. change: -0.2%, 12-mo.: -6% Latest 1-mo. change: -3.3%, 12-mo.: -18% Source: Author, based on BLS producer price index reports

28 Spending, materials and labor forecast
2014 actual 2015 forecast annual average forecast Total spending 10% 10-12% 6-10 % Private – residential 14% 5-10 – nonresidential 11% 11-13% Public 2% 5-7% 2-5% Materials PPI -0.9% -3 to -5% 0-2 Employment cost index 1.8% 2-2.5% 3-4.5 Source: 2014: Census, BLS; : Author’s ests.

29 AGC economic resources (email simonsonk@agc.org)
The Data DIGest: weekly 1-page (subscribe at monthly press releases: spending; PPI; national, state, metro employment state and metro data, fact sheets: webinars


Download ppt "Construction Spending, Labor & Materials Outlook"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google