Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Sensors Directorate and ATR Overview for Integrated Fusion, Performance Prediction, and Sensor Management for ATE MURI 21 July 2006 Lori Westerkamp Sensor ATR Technology Division Sensors Directorate Air Force Research Laboratory
2
AFRL Technology Directorates
MGen T. Bowlds Staff XP Air Vehicles Space Vehicles Directed Energy Information Munitions Materials & Manu- facturing Human Effectiveness AFOSR Sensors Propulsion
3
Sensors Directorate Our Mission Our Vision
To lead the discovery, development, and integration of affordable sensor and countermeasure technologies for our warfighters. Our Vision Robust sensors and adaptive countermeasures that guarantee complete freedom of air and space operations for our forces, and deny these capabilities to our adversaries at times and places of our choosing.
4
Priority Warfighter Needs
Being Addressed by Sensors Directorate Sense, identify, and track all air and surface targets and threats world wide and in all weather Counter “difficult” targets (WMD, hidden, LO) Protect air and space assets Control the battlespace electromagnetic spectrum Rapidly prosecute time-critical targets and threats Balance: Performance & Affordability
5
Application Sub-thrusts
Sensors Directorate Technology Thrusts Radio Frequency Sensors & Countermeasures Electro-Optical Sensors & Countermeasures Automatic Target Recognition & Sensor Fusion Battlespace Access Persistent ISR of the Battlespace Prosecution of Time Sensitive Targets Application Sub-thrusts Signatures & Modeling Assessment & Foundation Innovative Algorithms Radio Frequency Apertures Algorithms & Phenomenology Digital Receivers & Exciters Reference Systems Components Transmitters & Receivers Phenomenology & Algorithms Optical Apertures Enabling Sub-thrusts
6
Potential Growth Areas
Hidden Target Detection & Identification Automatic Target Recognition (ATR) & Sensor Fusion Electronic Warfare Time Critical Targeting (TCT)
7
ATR Scope FUNCTIONS SENSORS MATURATION PROCESS ID TRACK GEOLOCATE FIND
Algorithms Signatures 10 1 PD FAR MATURATION PROCESS Assessment
8
ASSESSMENT& FOUNDATION INNOVATIVE ALGORITHMS
ATR Approach FIND FIX TRACK & ID Characterized Performance High Performance Computing Operational Databases Operational Target Models/Databases ENGAGE TARGET TRACK FIX ASSESS FIND ASSESSMENT& FOUNDATION SIGNATURES & MODELING INNOVATIVE ALGORITHMS Sensor Data Management System (SDMS) Signature Center Phenomenology Exploration EM Modeling Synthetic Data Challenge Problems Standard Metrics ATR Theory
9
ATR Facilities Advanced Recognition Capability (ARC) Facility
10 1 PD FAR PID Sensor Resolution Signature Center Sensor Data Management System (SDMS)
10
Operating Conditions (OCs)
Targets Sensors Interactions Environment
11
How can we make ATR easier?
“Better” Features Greater discriminating power Less variability “Better” Data Resolution, dwell, persistence, … Multiple sources (modes, looks, phenomenologies) Often conflicting! Fuel Drums Side Fenders Smoke Canisters Length 6.9 m Width 3.6 m Height 2.2 m Length 6.6 m Width 3.5 m Height 2.4 m
12
ATR-Driven Sensing Cueing, Prioritization for the Human
13
‘Clear Box’ View of ATR Environment Detect Track Geolocate ID Sensor
10 1 PD FAR Environment Detect Track Geolocate ID Sensor ATR Decisions Human Decisions Target Target Models & Database Feature Extractor Discriminator Target Knowledge Target Knowledge Decision Rule Trained Features Templates Models
14
Multiple Sensor ATR Behavior Models Performance Model
Sensor Management Registration Behavior Models Anticipate Performance Model Environment Model Sensor Model Environment Detect Track Geolocate ID Sensor(s) ATR Decisions Human Decisions Target Adaptation Target Models & Database
15
ATR Theory Goals Performance Prediction Performance Bounds
Algorithm (or feature) dependent As a function of sensing, target, and environment conditions Tool for developers (how will this new feature help?), “maturers” (does this work well enough for my application?), and users (is this system going to work in my scenario today?) Performance Bounds Algorithm independent performance limits Is the limit the algorithm (keep working) or the sensor (motivate sensor improvements)? Performance Models Packaged tools from Performance Prediction usable by sensor management and fusion algorithms to weigh sensor contribution
16
Growing ATR Complexity
Targets Dismounts Smaller More Variable Civilian Vehicles Military Vehicles Tougher Clutter More Obscuration Aircraft Environments Detect Open Forested Urban Track More Specific ID Function
Similar presentations
