Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Non-Federal Development at Reclamation Facilities.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Non-Federal Development at Reclamation Facilities."— Presentation transcript:

1 Non-Federal Development at Reclamation Facilities

2 Reclamation Power Program Own and operate 53 hydropower plants 176 Units 14,639 MW Installed Capacity 2nd Largest Hydropower Producer in United States 40 Million MWH Annual Average Net Generation Approximately 7 Percent of Power in West 2

3 Reclamation Power Program Offsets 27 million tons of carbon dioxide Saves 6.8 million tons of coal Saves 23.5 million barrels of oil 3

4 4

5 Non-Federal Development 76 power plants added to Reclamation dams and canals by non-federal entities –Specific legislation –Lease of Power Privilege –FERC licenses 5

6 Non-Federal Development Current interest in more than 10 projects that fall under the Lease of Power Privilege process Current interest in over 20 projects that fall under FERC licensing process 6

7 1981 Reclamation/FERC MOU If authorized for Federal development –Reclamation can develop the site –A Non-Federal Developer can enter into a Lease of Power Privilege Agreement If not authorized for Federal development –FERC License 7

8 1992 Reclamation/FERC MOU Establishes a process for the early resolution of jurisdictional issues related to non-federal hydropower development at Bureau of Reclamation facilities 8

9 Lease of Power Privilege Reclamation Project Act of 1939 – 40 year lease (max) Selection of the lessee through a public process Preference to municipalities, public corporations or agencies, and cooperatives financed through the Rural Electrification Act of 1936 9

10 Lease of Power Privilege (continued) Adequate design information Satisfactory environmental analysis and impacts And must not be detrimental to the existing project 10

11 Lease Payments Lease payments to the United States shall be consistent with Section 9(c) of the Reclamation Project Act of 1939 –Equitable amount charged for the use of the Reclamation facility. –Lessee shares in the cost of operation, maintenance, replacement, and security of any existing Federal facilities that benefit the lessee’s power facility unless otherwise provided by law. 11

12 Sustainable Hydropower Development Opportunities Resource Assessment at Existing Reclamation Dams –65 Sites show potential –962,000 MWh and over 200 MW of Capacity –Draft Report Released October 2010 (report located at www.usbr.gov) –Public Comments collected –Final Report expected in March 2011 12

13 Sustainable Hydropower Development Opportunities Canal Resource Assessment –Inventory technical potential by December 2011 Pilot Project to Demonstrate Low Head Technologies –Funding Opportunity Announcement March 2011 WaterSMART Grants criteria now encourage energy-water integrated projects Laguna Madre Water District Swalley Irrigation District Central Oregon Irrigation District 13

14 Next Steps Standardization of lease of power privilege Standardized lease cost methodology Research into pumped storage development Basin Scale Opportunity Assessments 14

15 Thank You! Kerry McCalman Power Resources Office kmccalman@usbr.gov (303) 445-2923 Power Website: http://www.usbr.gov/power


Download ppt "Non-Federal Development at Reclamation Facilities."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google