Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Testing of Unknown Foundation: A Case Study with Comparison of Different NDT Methods Present at Ohio Transportation Engineering Conference Oct 23-24, 2007.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Testing of Unknown Foundation: A Case Study with Comparison of Different NDT Methods Present at Ohio Transportation Engineering Conference Oct 23-24, 2007."— Presentation transcript:

1 Testing of Unknown Foundation: A Case Study with Comparison of Different NDT Methods Present at Ohio Transportation Engineering Conference Oct 23-24, 2007 Bill X. Yu Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, OH, USA, 216-368-6247, xxy21@case.eduxxy21@case.edu

2 Acknowledgements  Jian Fang, Josh Adams, Guoming Lin, WPC, Inc., 2201 Rowland Avenue, Savannah, GA 31404, 912-629-4000  Bin Zhang, Case Western Reserve University

3 Introduction  Project Background St. Joseph hospital expansion

4 NDT Testing Plan After WPC Inc. Report, 2006

5 Impact Echo: Testing Schematic

6 Impact Echo: On-site Photos

7 Impact Echo: Examples of Analyzed Signals

8 Parallel Seismic Testing  Schematic Borehole SCPT

9 Parallel Seismic Test: Photo During Test

10 Parallel Seismic Testing: Ground Conditions by SCPT

11 Parallel Seismic Testing: Recorded Signal

12 Parallel Seismic Testing: After Signal Processing

13 Parallel Seismic Testing: Wave Train Determination

14 Parallel Seismic Testing: Wave Train

15 Parallel Seismic Testing: Wave Train Validation

16 Parallel Seismic: Sensitivity Analyses

17 Magnetometer Method: Principle

18 Magnetometer: Validation of Concept 1 ft Vertical motion

19 Magnetometer: Validation of Concept Vertical cyclic motion of rodSlow vertical motion of rod At distance of 1 ft

20 Magnetometer: Validation of Concept

21

22 Magnetometer Method: Recorded signal

23 Magnetometer: Signal Analyses for Pile Length

24 Design Recommendations Based on Testing Results 50 Ton

25 Advantages and Pitfalls Impact Echo Fast, easy Challenge in signal interpretation  Influence of internal reflection (due to geometry, crack etc)  Signal attenuation with depth  Wave modes Source of error: assumption of wave speed

26 Advantages and Pitfalls (cont.) Parallel Seismic Method Requires borehole Less influenced by pile integrity Requires careful signal interpretation  Wave trains  Inflection point

27 Advantages and Pitfalls (cont.) Magnetometer Method Fast, easy Requires borehole Can be influenced by soil strata

28 Summary of Experience  Geophysical methods are important tools to supplement engineering decisions  Different testing methods can serve Properly applied Properly interpreted  Geotechnical complexity needs to be considered

29 Thank you !


Download ppt "Testing of Unknown Foundation: A Case Study with Comparison of Different NDT Methods Present at Ohio Transportation Engineering Conference Oct 23-24, 2007."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google