Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMuriel Richardson Modified over 9 years ago
1
Selected Findings from The UC/CMI Journal Use and User Preference Studies The University of California Collections Management Initiative (UC/CMI) Brian E. C. Schottlaender University Librarian, UC-San Diego Reaping the Harvest: Studies of Electronic Journal Use Ohio State University, October 2003
2
What the Project Involved Removing from campus libraries selected print journals for which electronic access is available, and relocating those journals to storage. Gathering objective data, including cost and usage data, for both print and electronic versions of 300 journals. Surveying user attitudes and preferences with regard to the use of Digital and Print journals.
3
UC/CMI Journal Use Study: Titles
4
UC/CMI Journal Use Study: Publishers
5
UC/CMI Journal Use Study: Titles
6
UC/CMI Usage Summary
7
Year-to-Year Change in Digital Use Subject Category Control Campus Electronic UseExperimental Campus Electronic Use Prior Year Uses Study Year Uses Change from Prior Year to Study Year Prior Year Uses Study Year Uses Change from Prior Year to Study Year Arts & Humanities 4,7634,256-10.6%5,2787,73346.5% Life & Health Sciences 20,33327,40734.8%50,66565,18328.7% Physical Sciences & Engineering 32,46644,60737.4%33,19446,93741.4% Social Sciences1,8852,13213.1%3,3984,54633.8% Grand Total59,44778,40231.9%92,535124,39934.4%
8
Survey Respondents by Campus
9
Survey Respondents’ University Affiliation
10
Most Recent Use of Journals
11
Format Dependency
12
Print vs. Electronic Usage by Broad Discipline
13
E-Journals as Print Alternative
14
Access Characteristics
15
Types of Use: Discovery
16
Types of Use: Production
17
Format Preferences for Use in Course Assignments by Broad Discipline
18
Advantages of Electronic Journals
19
Content and Coverage Barriers
20
Usability Barriers
21
Computing Barriers
22
Barriers: Summary
23
Statistical Significance of Demographic Variables Demographic differences of degree, not kind Variables statistically significant, but in most cases relationships not strong (Cramer’s V < 0.10) Strongest variable = Affiliation Followed by: Discipline Age Gender Campus
24
Reaping the Harvest: Studies of Electronic Journal Use Ohio State University October 2003 The University of California Collections Management Initiative (UC/CMI) http://www.ucop.edu/cmi/ Brian E. C. Schottlaender University of California, San Diego
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.