1. Case 3-4 HP Care Analysis Jose Felix Walter Kao Tracy Shannon John Simhachalam

2. Consider the Facts List particulars of the situation ▫Board meeting spying ▫Investigation through pretexting ▫Insider trading ▫Stock buyback ▫Breach of fiduciary duty ▫Lawsuit

3. Assess Alternatives Identify available options: ▫Whistleblower policies ▫Meetings and assemblies ▫Internal control measures ▫Inquire Dawn Kawamoto ▫Legal action vs CNET ▫Publicity and a new Board of directors

4. Review Resources Refer to rules and sources of guidance and support ▫Ethics officer ▫CNET ▫Legal Action ▫Whistleblower policies ▫KPMG Care model ▫Law and Lawyers ▫Board of directors business conduct ▫HP’s standard of business conduct

6. Evaluate Outcomes Engage in pretexting Alternative option

7. Consistency Would we apply the alternative solution if a similar situation arose in the future? Would we want everyone to decide in the same way?

8. Accountability Have we behaved responsibly? Are we proud of my decision? Would we want it to be public knowledge?

9. Rationality Is our decision impartial? Is our decision supported by logic?

10. Equity Would we want to be treated in this way? Do we treat everyone equally regardless of who they are?