1. Cohort Review Presentation Cohort Status Report: {Insert Cohort Name} Complete by: {Insert you name} Date: {Insert Date}

2. Instructions Please complete this template for your cohort and submit to Paul and Daniel We will review with you and help suggest changes Final version is presented to Brett and Dale about 1 week after the cohort finished the second university phase Note – we have tried to minimize duplicative documentation (really), but we are assuming that Prideforce and Salesforce are up-to-date.

3. Executive Summary Summarize Highlights of the Cohort X Y Z Summarize Challenges of the Cohort X Y Z Key Lessons Learned to Date:

4. Summary of Campaign Status (completed by Sean G)

5. Campaign 1: Summary (1/4) One per campaign SMART Objectives (at least one per stage in the TOC) Insert final TOC

6. Campaign 1: Summary (2/4) Please discuss the barrier removal partner: Partner name: Main skill: Your assessment of their likelihood of success: Who is monitoring results Please discuss the main areas of the Campaign Manager relationship: Work ethic/attitude Responsiveness Quality of work Note – conversations with LAP senior mgt staff should be document within Prideforce Cost of BR Total Cost of BR Likelihood of achieving funding (low, medium, high) Total cost From partner From Rare Number of people adopting tool Cost per tool Cost per adopter Please discuss the main areas of the LAP relationship: Partner name: Strengths: Weaknesses Please discuss the quality of the BROP submitted:  X  Y  Conservation impact and validation:

7. Campaign 1: Summary (3/4) Demonstration Projects) Please discussion how the Demonstration Project will be brought to scale: Reach a broad enough audience to make an impact Achieve some level of cost effectiveness or justification of the expense (low cost is not always good, but neither is high cost) so that the expense is relative to the problem. Demonstration projects are projects in which there is: Uncertainly about whether the BR strategy will work (has not been done at any similar site in the world), so there are key questions that must be tested Funding is contingent upon success at this site Note – conversations with LAP senior mgt staff should be document within Prideforce

8. Campaign 1: Summary (4/4) – complete only for at risk campaigns Summary of Problem: Why we should continue: Why we should cancel: Recommendation & summary of next steps that determine issues are being solved: Issues Is this more headache and heartache than the benefits Is Pride still the right solution (is it worth the funds) Factors to consider: Will continuing this Campaign distract you from running good Campaigns? Will the Campaign adversely impact other campaigns? How will canceling the Campaign effect our relationship with the LAP, BINGO and other donors, and how can we remediate any adverse consequences What are the financial and legal risks of continuing/canceling the campaign 1 2a 2b 3

9. Cohort RankNameAvg. Status on Weekly Flash Report Approved all Deliverable s Due TR Feasibility (1 – 5) from BROP TR Impact (1 – 5) from BROP Director / VP recommen d return (y/n) Next steps Completed by QMI and sent 5 days before the presentation

10. Additional Comments X Y Z