1. Elementary Crowding and Capacity Committee (ECCC) Drew Meeting October 30, 2007

2. ECCC Charge Establish a system-wide task group process to address crowding and capacity issues at identified schools. The charge to this task group is to consider any reasonable solution that over six years will: Resolve crowding at Tuckahoe and potential crowding at other identified schools Ensure that no other elementary school will be crowded as a result Provide at least one Pre-K program of any type (e.g., Head Start, VPI, Montessori, Pre-K special education) at every elementary school Not change choices available or admission policies The Task Group will report to the Superintendent with recommendations in December 2007.

3. The Task Group will consist of: 2 citizen co-chairs appointed by the School Board From each elementary school: 1 parent/1 parent alternate chosen by the PTA 1 principal or designee 1 representative from Montessori and 1 representative from VPI appointed by Early Childhood Advisory Committee 1 citizen representative from Facilities Advisory Committee 1 citizen representative from Advisory Council on Instruction Staff Liaisons: Assistant Superintendent, Administrative Services Special Projects Coordinator Facilities Planner ECCC Membership

4. ECCC Timeline The Task Group will follow this general timeline: February – April 2007 Inform PTAsInform PTAs Complete spring projectionsComplete spring projections Conduct surveyConduct survey Identify task group membersIdentify task group members April – June 2007 Hold initial organizational meeting to:Hold initial organizational meeting to: – Provide task group with data including spring projections and survey result, and – Plan work schedule

5. ECCC Timeline (continued) September – December 2007 Analyze data, including September 30, 2007 enrollment count, determine scope of problem, and develop possible solutionsAnalyze data, including September 30, 2007 enrollment count, determine scope of problem, and develop possible solutions Report to Superintendent in October, after receipt of enrollment count and new projections, status of the committee’s work and recommendations, if any, for change in scope of committee’s chargeReport to Superintendent in October, after receipt of enrollment count and new projections, status of the committee’s work and recommendations, if any, for change in scope of committee’s charge Keep track of related ancillary issues that arise during committee deliberations and report them to the Superintendent for potential consideration in a subsequent processKeep track of related ancillary issues that arise during committee deliberations and report them to the Superintendent for potential consideration in a subsequent process Make recommendations to Superintendent in December 2007Make recommendations to Superintendent in December 2007

6. ECCC Timeline (continued) January 2008 Superintendent makes recommendations to the School BoardSuperintendent makes recommendations to the School Board School Board holds public hearingSchool Board holds public hearing School Board takes actionSchool Board takes action

9. Elementary School Capacity Capacity Utilization = Enrollment/CapacityCapacity Utilization = Enrollment/Capacity Current Elementary Utilization is 87.4%Current Elementary Utilization is 87.4% Formula for Elementary CapacityFormula for Elementary Capacity (Number of K-5 Classrooms times 22.33) + PreK Spaces + Spec Ed Programs Factors Influencing Capacity – Program placement (PreK and SpEd) – Changes in planning factors – Specialized uses

10. Elementary Capacity Analysis

11. Questions

12. All students who live in the Nauck community (those children residing in the Nauck Civic Association neighborhood who also live within the Hoffman-Boston attendance area) are guaranteed admission to Drew Model School or, if they choose, to Hoffman-Boston Elementary School. APS Policy 25-2.2 Enrollment in Neighborhood Schools, Preschools, Area and Countywide Schools and Programs, and Transfers:

14. Year5yF5yA3yA3yWA Adjust, 5yF, 3yA 5 yr Trend2yA2yWA 200318333 200417961 200517600 200617613 200717820 20081801117694177751786918011177351793117964 20091845717571178341796618150177811809318131 20101911117495179081806718333178911823118292 20111990317474179381815918507179931838218458 20122089817447179931825518676182041852918624 20132217517373180461835118854184801867918791 07-13 Change4355-4472265311034660859971

15. PreK- 12 Diff from% of CapacityCap Util ELEMENTARYTOTALProjection CapacityUtilizationno dual en Abingdon 349356-798.0%57660.6%60.1% Arl. Science Foc. 4654605101.1%463100.4%99.6% Arlington Trad. 426442-1696.4%44296.4% Ashlawn 371381-1097.4%40392.1%91.3% Barcroft 33630828109.1%44276.0%74.2% Barrett 44540540109.9%51586.4% Campbell 30125942116.2%39775.8%74.8% Carlin Springs 479496-1796.6%56385.1%84.7% Claremont 4604591100.2%51589.3%89.1% Drew 52851414102.7%55894.6% Glebe 37736710102.7%377100.0%99.7% Henry 345360-1595.8%40984.4%83.6% Hoffman-Boston 332349-1795.1%58157.1%56.8% Jamestown 54653214102.6%57295.5%95.3% Key 586596-1098.3%62693.6%93.3% Long Branch 41942099.8%49385.0%84.6% McKinley 41438925106.4%402103.0%102.0% Nottingham 4504482100.4%444101.4%99.5% Oakridge 4474461100.2%55480.7%80.0% Randolph 342344-299.4%42081.4%80.7% Reed 2430-680.0%3080.0%76.7% Taylor 59756829105.1%63194.6%94.0% Tuckahoe 58858999.8%499117.8%116.2% TOTAL ELEM. 96279518109101.1%1091288.2%87.6%