Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Controls on particle settling velocity and bed erodibility in the presence of muddy flocs and pellets as inferred by ADVs, York River estuary, Virginia,

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Controls on particle settling velocity and bed erodibility in the presence of muddy flocs and pellets as inferred by ADVs, York River estuary, Virginia,"— Presentation transcript:

1 Controls on particle settling velocity and bed erodibility in the presence of muddy flocs and pellets as inferred by ADVs, York River estuary, Virginia, USA Kelsey Fall*, Carl Friedrichs, and Grace Cartwright Virginia Institute of Marine Science

2 Motivation: Determine fundamental controls on sediment settling velocity and bed erodibility in muddy estuaries Physical-biological gradient found along the York estuary : -- In the middle to upper York River estuary, disturbance by sediment transport reduces macrobenthic activity, and sediment layering is often preserved. (e.g., Clay Bank – “Intermediate Site”) -- In the lower York and neighboring Chesapeake Bay, layering is often destroyed by bioturbation. (e.g., Gloucester Point – “Biological Site”) -- NSF MUDBED project ADV tripods provide long-term observations within a strong physical-biological gradient. Study site: York River Estuary, VA (X-rays courtesy of L. Schaffner) Schaffner et al., 2001 1/11

3 ADV at deployment -- ADVs often provide quality long-term data sets despite extensive biofouling. -- ADVs provide continual long-term estimates of: Suspended mass concentration (c) from acoustic backscatter Bed Stress (τ b ): ρ* Bulk Settling Velocity (w sBULK ): /c set Erodibility (ε) given by ε = τ b /M, where M is depth-integrated C ADV after retrieval Observations provided by an Acoustic Doppler Velocimeter Sensing volume ~ 35 cmab (Photos by C. Cartwright) Fugate and Friedrichs,2002; Friedrichs et al., 2009; Cartwright, et al. 2009 and Dickhudt et al., 2010 2/11

4 Biological site Generally < 1 kg/m 2 /Pa Intermediate site ε varies from ~ 3 kg/m 2 /Pa (Regime 1) to ~ 1 kg/m 2 /Pa (Regime 2) 1 2 3 4 5 6 ε (kg/m 2 /Pa) Seasonal Variability in bulk settling velocity (W sBULK ) and bed erodibility (ε) is observed at the Intermediate Site. 3-day mean of ε from fits to M = ε τ b using ADVs Biological site W sBULK ~1 mm/s Intermediate site W sBULK varies from ~ 0.5 mm/s (Regime 1) to ~ 1 mm/s (Regime 2) 3- day Mean W sBULK from fits to = W sBULK using ADVs 2 1.5 1.0 0.5 0 W sBULK (mm/s) Cartwright et al., 2009 3/11

5 Biological site Generally < 1 kg/m 2 /Pa Intermediate site ε varies from ~ 3 kg/m 2 /Pa (Regime 1) to ~ 1 kg/m 2 /Pa (Regime 2) 1 2 3 4 5 6 ε (kg/m 2 /Pa) 3-day mean of ε from fits to M = ε τ b using ADVs Biological site W sBULK ~1 mm/s Intermediate site W sBULK varies from ~ 0.5 mm/s (Regime 1) to ~ 1 mm/s (Regime 2) 3- day Mean W sBULK from fits to = W sBULK using ADVs 2 1.5 1.0 0.5 0 W sBULK (mm/s) Cartwright et al., 2009 What is happening at Intermediate Site when Regime 1  Regime 2? 3/11

6 W sBULK = / (mm/s) (a) Sediment Bulk Settling Velocity, W sBULK Phase-Averaged Settling Velocity for Two Regimes Regime 1 Regime 2 Increasing |u| and τ b Tidal Velocity Phase (  ) 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 Similar W sBULK at the beginning of tidal phase suggest presence of flocs during both regimes Regime 1: Flocs -Lower observed W sBULK at peak |u| and τ b (<0.8 mm/s) Regime 2: Pellets+Flocs -Higher observed W sBULK at peak |u| and τ b (~1.2 mm/s) -Influence of pellets on W sBULK 7/11 (Note that Bulk Settling Velocity, w sBULK = /c set is considered reliable for mud only during accelerating half of tidal cycle.)

7 Tidal Analysis highlights differences in Regime 1 and Regime 2. Tidal Velocity Phase (θ/π) Increasing IuI Decreasing IuI (b) Bed Stress (Pa) (d) Concentration (mg/L) 0 0.5 1 50 100 150 200 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 (c) Drag Coefficient 0 0.5 1 0.00004 0.00008 0.0012 0.0016 C WASH (a) Tidal Current Speed (cm/s) 15 30 45 Tidal Velocity Phase (θ/π) Increasing IuI Decreasing IuI 5/11

8 (a) Tidal Current Speed (cm/s) 15 30 45 Tidal Analysis highlights differences in Regime 1 and Regime 2. Tidal Velocity Phase (θ/π) Increasing IuI Decreasing IuI (b) Bed Stress (Pa) (d) Concentration (mg/L) 0 0.5 1 50 100 150 200 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 (c) Drag Coefficient 0 0.5 1 0.00004 0.00008 0.0012 0.0016 C WASH Regime 1: Flocs -High C at relatively low τ b -Lower ADV derived Cd (more stratified water column) -Lower τ b despite higher similar current speeds Regime 1 Tidal Velocity Phase (θ/π) Increasing IuI Decreasing IuI 5/11

9 (a) Tidal Current Speed (cm/s) 15 30 45 Tidal Analysis highlights differences in Regime 1 and Regime 2. Tidal Velocity Phase (θ/π) Increasing IuI Decreasing IuI (b) Bed Stress (Pa) (d) Concentration (mg/L) 0 0.5 1 50 100 150 200 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 (c) Drag Coefficient 0 0.5 1 0.00004 0.00008 0.0012 0.0016 C WASH Regime 1: Flocs -High C at relatively low τ b -Lower ADV derived C d (more stratified water column) -Lower τ b despite higher similar current speeds Regime 2: Pellets+Flocs -Lower C at high τ b -Increase in C d (Water column less stratified) Regime 2 Tidal Velocity Phase (θ/π) Increasing IuI Decreasing IuI 5/11

10 Concentration (mg/L) (a)(b) Hysteresis plots of C vs.  b for the top 20 % of tidal cycles with the strongest  b for (a) Regime 1 and (b) Regime 2. τ cDEP flocs = ~ 0.08 Pa Washload (~20%) Flocs (~80%) Washload (~20%) Flocs (~50%) Pellets (~30%) Bed Stress (Pa) Concentration (mg/L) τ cDEP flocs = ~ 0.08 Pa τ cINT = ~ 0.05 Pa τ cINT = ~ 0.02 Pa Regime 1 Regime 2 -- Once  b increases past a critical stress for initiation (  cINIT ), C continually increases for both Regime 1 and for Regime 2 Erosion -- As  b decreases for Regime 1, C does not fall off quickly until  b ≤ 0.08 Pa, suggests that over individual tidal cycles, cohesion of settling flocs to the surface of the seabed is inhibited for τ b larger than ~ 0.08 Pa. -- As  b decreases for Regime 2, C decreases more continually, suggesting pellets without as clear a  cDEP. But the decline in C accelerates for  b ≤ ~ 0.08 Pa, suggesting (i) a transition to floc deposition and (ii) that settling C component is ~ 3/8 pellets, ~ 5/8 flocs. Deposition 6/11

11 W sBULK = / (mm/s) (a) Sediment Bulk Settling Velocity, W sBULK Phase-Averaged Settling Velocity for Two Regimes Regime 1 Regime 2 Increasing |u| and τ b Tidal Velocity Phase (  ) 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 Similar W sBULK at the beginning of tidal phase suggest presence of flocs during both regimes Regime 1: Flocs -Lower observed W sBULK at peak |u| and τ b (<0.8 mm/s) Regime 2: Pellets+Flocs -Lower observed W sBULK at peak |u| and τ b (~1.2 mm/s) -Influence of pellets on W sBULK 7/11 (Note that Bulk Settling Velocity, w sBULK = /c set is considered reliable for mud only during accelerating half of tidal cycle.)

12 W sBULK = / (mm/s) W sDEP = (c/(c-c wash ))*W sBULK (mm/s) Analysis of W sBULK by removing C WASH and solving for settling velocity of the depositing component (W sDEP ) during increasing  b allows separate estimates for settling velocities of flocs (W sFLOCS ) and pellets (W sPELLETS ). (a) Sediment Bulk Settling Velocity, W sBULK (b) Phase-Averaged Settling Velocity for Two Regimes Remove c wash Regime 1 Regime 2 Tidal Velocity Phase (  ) 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 Regime 1 Regime 2 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 (b) Depositing component of Settling Velocity, W sDEP Increasing |u| and τ b 8/11 Recall: peak τ b ~ 0.15 Pa for Regime 1, and peak τ b ~ 0.22 Pa for Regime 2

13 W sBULK = / (mm/s) W sDEP = (c/(c-c wash ))*W sBULK (mm/s) Analysis of W sBULK by removing C WASH and solving for settling velocity of the depositing component (W sDEP ) during increasing  b allows separate estimates for settling velocities of flocs (W sFLOCS ) and pellets (W sPELLETS ). (a) Sediment Bulk Settling Velocity, W sBULK (b) Phase-Averaged Settling Velocity for Two Regimes Remove c wash Regime 1 Regime 2 Tidal Velocity Phase (  ) 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 Regime 1 Regime 2 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 (b) Depositing component of Settling Velocity, W sDEP Increasing |u| and τ b W sFLOC = ~ 0.85 mm/s Implies floc size is limited by settling-induced shear rather than  b. W sDEP = W sFLOCS 8/11 Recall: peak τ b ~ 0.15 Pa for Regime 1, and peak τ b ~ 0.22 Pa for Regime 2

14 W sBULK = / (mm/s) W sDEP = (c/(c-c wash ))*W sBULK (mm/s) Analysis of W sBULK by removing C WASH and solving for settling velocity of the depositing component (W sDEP ) during increasing  b allows separate estimates for settling velocities of flocs (W sFLOCS ) and pellets (W sPELLETS ). (a) Sediment Bulk Settling Velocity, W sBULK (b) Phase-Averaged Settling Velocity for Two Regimes Remove c wash Regime 1 Regime 2 Tidal Velocity Phase (  ) 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 Regime 1 Regime 2 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 (b) Depositing component of Settling Velocity, W sDEP Increasing |u| and τ b W sDEP = W sFLOCS W sDEP = f F W sFLOCS + f F W sPELLETS = ~ 1.5 mm/s at peak  b Assume: f F = 5/8, f P = 3/8 This gives: W sPELLETS = ~ 2 mm/s 8/11 W sFLOC = ~ 0.85 mm/s Implies floc size is limited by settling-induced shear rather than  b. Recall: peak τ b ~ 0.15 Pa for Regime 1, and peak τ b ~ 0.22 Pa for Regime 2

15 25 or 120 Hour Averaged Bed Stress (Pa) 25 Hour Averaged Erodibility, (kg/m 2 /Pa) Daily-averaged erodibility is correlated either to 5-Day-averaged  b (Regime 1) or to daily-averaged  b (Regime 2), revealing two distinct relationships between ε and  b. Regime 1: Erodibility ( ε ) increases proportional to the average stress over the last 5 days, consistent with cohesive bed evolution dominated by the consolidation state of flocs. Regime 2: Erodibility ( ε ) decreases with greater stress, possibly associated with the effects of bed armoring by the pellet component. Influence of Stress History on Bed Erodibility for Two Regimes Regime 1 Regime 2 9/11

16 Summary and Future Work: York River sediment settling velocity (W s ) and erodibility (ε) are described by two contrasting regimes: (i) Regime 1: a period dominated by muddy flocs [lower W s, higher ε]. (ii) Regime 2: a period characterized by pellets mixed with flocs [higher W s, lower ε]. Tidal phase-averaging of ADV records for the strongest 20% of tides for June to August 2007 reveals: A non-settling wash load (C WASH ) is always present during both Regimes. Once stress (τ b ) exceeds an initial critical value (τ cINIT ) of ~ 0.02 to 0.05 Pa, sediment concentration (C) continually increases with τ b for both Regimes. As τ b decreases, cohesion of settling flocs to the surface of the seabed is inhibited for τ b larger than ~ 0.08 Pa for both Regimes. Subtraction of C WASH from W SBULK for Regime 1 results in a stable floc settling velocity of W sFLOC ≈ 0.85 mm/s. The constant floc settling velocity implies that floc size is limited by settling- induced shear rather than turbulence associated with bed stress. Separation of W sFLOC and C WASH from W SBULK for Regime 2 finally yields W SPELLET ≈ 2 mm/s. During Regime 1, ε increases with  b averaged over the previous 5 days, consistent with cohesive bed evolution; while for Regime 2, ε decreases with daily  b, perhaps consistent with bed armoring. Future work will include (i) vertically stacked ADVs and (ii) deployment of a high-definition particle settling video camera. 10/11

17 Acknowledgements Marjy Friedrichs Tim Gass Wayne Reisner Funding: Julia Moriarity Carissa Wilkerson Questions? 11/11


Download ppt "Controls on particle settling velocity and bed erodibility in the presence of muddy flocs and pellets as inferred by ADVs, York River estuary, Virginia,"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google