Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Discrete Optimization Lecture 1 M. Pawan Kumar Slides available online

Published byDale Morrison Modified over 9 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Discrete Optimization Lecture 1 M. Pawan Kumar Slides available online"— Presentation transcript:

1 Discrete Optimization Lecture 1 M. Pawan Kumar pawan.kumar@ecp.fr Slides available online http://cvn.ecp.fr/personnel/pawan/

2 Outline Problem Formulation –Energy Function –Energy Minimization –Computing min-marginals Reparameterization Energy Minimization for Trees Loopy Belief Propagation

3 Energy Function VaVa VbVb VcVc VdVd Label l 0 Label l 1 Random Variables V = {V a, V b, ….} Labels L = {l 0, l 1, ….} Labelling f: {a, b, …. }  {0,1, …}

4 Energy Function VaVa VbVb VcVc VdVd Q(f) = ∑ a  a;f(a) Unary Potential 2 5 4 2 6 3 3 7 Label l 0 Label l 1 Easy to minimize Neighbourhood

5 Energy Function VaVa VbVb VcVc VdVd E : (a,b)  E iff V a and V b are neighbours E = { (a,b), (b,c), (c,d) } 2 5 4 2 6 3 3 7 Label l 0 Label l 1

6 Energy Function VaVa VbVb VcVc VdVd +∑ (a,b)  ab;f(a)f(b) Pairwise Potential 0 1 1 0 0 2 1 1 41 0 3 2 5 4 2 6 3 3 7 Label l 0 Label l 1 Q(f) = ∑ a  a;f(a)

7 Energy Function VaVa VbVb VcVc VdVd 0 1 1 0 0 2 1 1 41 0 3 Parameter 2 5 4 2 6 3 3 7 Label l 0 Label l 1 +∑ (a,b)  ab;f(a)f(b) Q(f;  )= ∑ a  a;f(a)

8 Outline Problem Formulation –Energy Function –Energy Minimization –Computing min-marginals Reparameterization Energy Minimization for Trees Loopy Belief Propagation

9 Energy Minimization VaVa VbVb VcVc VdVd 2 5 4 2 6 3 3 7 0 1 1 0 0 2 1 1 41 0 3 Q(f;  ) = ∑ a  a;f(a) + ∑ (a,b)  ab;f(a)f(b) Label l 0 Label l 1

10 Energy Minimization VaVa VbVb VcVc VdVd 2 5 4 2 6 3 3 7 0 1 1 0 0 2 1 1 41 0 3 Q(f;  ) = ∑ a  a;f(a) + ∑ (a,b)  ab;f(a)f(b) 2 + 1 + 2 + 1 + 3 + 1 + 3 = 13 Label l 0 Label l 1

11 Energy Minimization VaVa VbVb VcVc VdVd 2 5 4 2 6 3 3 7 0 1 1 0 0 2 1 1 41 0 3 Q(f;  ) = ∑ a  a;f(a) + ∑ (a,b)  ab;f(a)f(b) Label l 0 Label l 1

12 Energy Minimization VaVa VbVb VcVc VdVd 2 5 4 2 6 3 3 7 0 1 1 0 0 2 1 1 41 0 3 Q(f;  ) = ∑ a  a;f(a) + ∑ (a,b)  ab;f(a)f(b) 5 + 1 + 4 + 0 + 6 + 4 + 7 = 27 Label l 0 Label l 1

13 Energy Minimization VaVa VbVb VcVc VdVd 2 5 4 2 6 3 3 7 0 1 1 0 0 2 1 1 41 0 3 Q(f;  ) = ∑ a  a;f(a) + ∑ (a,b)  ab;f(a)f(b) f* = arg min Q(f;  ) q* = min Q(f;  ) = Q(f*;  ) Label l 0 Label l 1

14 Energy Minimization f(a)f(b)f(c)f(d) Q(f;  ) 000018 000115 001027 001120 010022 010119 011027 011120 16 possible labellings f(a)f(b)f(c)f(d) Q(f;  ) 100016 100113 101025 101118 1100 110115 111023 111116 f* = {1, 0, 0, 1} q* = 13

15 Outline Problem Formulation –Energy Function –Energy Minimization –Computing min-marginals Reparameterization Energy Minimization for Trees Loopy Belief Propagation

16 Min-Marginals VaVa VbVb VcVc VdVd 2 5 4 2 6 3 3 7 0 1 1 0 0 2 1 1 41 0 3 f* = arg min Q(f;  ) such that f(a) = i Min-marginal q a;i Label l 0 Label l 1

17 Min-Marginals 16 possible labellings q a;0 = 15 f(a)f(b)f(c)f(d) Q(f;  ) 000018 000115 001027 001120 010022 010119 011027 011120 f(a)f(b)f(c)f(d) Q(f;  ) 100016 100113 101025 101118 1100 110115 111023 111116

18 Min-Marginals 16 possible labellings q a;1 = 13 f(a)f(b)f(c)f(d) Q(f;  ) 100016 100113 101025 101118 1100 110115 111023 111116 f(a)f(b)f(c)f(d) Q(f;  ) 000018 000115 001027 001120 010022 010119 011027 011120

19 Min-Marginals and MAP Minimum min-marginal of any variable = energy of MAP labelling min f Q(f;  ) such that f(a) = i q a;i min i min i ( ) V a has to take one label min f Q(f;  )

20 Summary Energy Minimization f* = arg min Q(f;  ) Q(f;  ) = ∑ a  a;f(a) + ∑ (a,b)  ab;f(a)f(b) Min-marginals q a;i = min Q(f;  ) s.t. f(a) = i Energy Function

21 Outline Problem Formulation Reparameterization Energy Minimization for Trees Loopy Belief Propagation

22 Reparameterization VaVa VbVb 2 5 4 2 0 1 1 0 f(a)f(b) Q(f;  ) 007 0110 105 116 2 + - 2 Add a constant to all  a;i Subtract that constant from all  b;k

23 Reparameterization f(a)f(b) Q(f;  ) 007 + 2 - 2 0110 + 2 - 2 105 + 2 - 2 116 + 2 - 2 Add a constant to all  a;i Subtract that constant from all  b;k Q(f;  ’) = Q(f;  ) VaVa VbVb 2 5 4 2 0 0 2 + - 2 1 1

24 Reparameterization VaVa VbVb 2 5 4 2 0 1 1 0 f(a)f(b) Q(f;  ) 007 0110 105 116 - 3 + 3 Add a constant to one  b;k Subtract that constant from  ab;ik for all ‘i’ - 3

25 Reparameterization VaVa VbVb 2 5 4 2 0 1 1 0 f(a)f(b) Q(f;  ) 007 0110 - 3 + 3 105 116 - 3 + 3 - 3 + 3 - 3 Q(f;  ’) = Q(f;  ) Add a constant to one  b;k Subtract that constant from  ab;ik for all ‘i’

26 Reparameterization VaVa VbVb 2 5 4 2 31 0 1 2 VaVa VbVb 2 5 4 2 31 1 0 1 - 2 + 2 + 1 - 1 VaVa VbVb 2 5 4 2 31 2 1 0 - 4+ 4 - 4  ’ a;i =  a;i  ’ b;k =  b;k  ’ ab;ik =  ab;ik + M ab;k - M ab;k + M ba;i - M ba;i Q(f;  ’) = Q(f;  )

27 Reparameterization Q(f;  ’) = Q(f;  ), for all f  ’ is a reparameterization of , iff  ’    ’ b;k =  b;k  ’ a;i =  a;i  ’ ab;ik =  ab;ik + M ab;k - M ab;k + M ba;i - M ba;i Equivalently Kolmogorov, PAMI, 2006 VaVa VbVb 2 5 4 2 0 0 2 + - 2 11

28 Recap Energy Minimization f* = arg min Q(f;  ) Q(f;  ) = ∑ a  a;f(a) + ∑ (a,b)  ab;f(a)f(b) Min-marginals q a;i = min Q(f;  ) s.t. f(a) = i Q(f;  ’) = Q(f;  ), for all f  ’   Reparameterization

29 Outline Problem Formulation Reparameterization Energy Minimization for Trees Loopy Belief Propagation Pearl, 1988

30 Belief Propagation Belief Propagation is exact for chains Some problems are easy Exact MAP for trees Clever Reparameterization

31 Two Variables VaVa VbVb 2 5 2 1 0 VaVa VbVb 2 5 40 1 Choose the right constant  ’ b;k = q b;k Add a constant to one  b;k Subtract that constant from  ab;ik for all ‘i’

32 VaVa VbVb 2 5 2 1 0 VaVa VbVb 2 5 40 1 Choose the right constant  ’ b;k = q b;k  a;0 +  ab;00 = 5 + 0  a;1 +  ab;10 = 2 + 1 min M ab;0 = Two Variables

33 VaVa VbVb 2 5 5 -2 -3 VaVa VbVb 2 5 40 1 Choose the right constant  ’ b;k = q b;k Two Variables

34 VaVa VbVb 2 5 5 -2 -3 VaVa VbVb 2 5 40 1 Choose the right constant  ’ b;k = q b;k f(a) = 1  ’ b;0 = q b;0 Two Variables Potentials along the red path add up to 0

35 VaVa VbVb 2 5 5 -2 -3 VaVa VbVb 2 5 40 1 Choose the right constant  ’ b;k = q b;k  a;0 +  ab;01 = 5 + 1  a;1 +  ab;11 = 2 + 0 min M ab;1 = Two Variables

36 VaVa VbVb 2 5 5 -2 -3 VaVa VbVb 2 5 6-2 Choose the right constant  ’ b;k = q b;k f(a) = 1  ’ b;0 = q b;0 f(a) = 1  ’ b;1 = q b;1 Minimum of min-marginals = MAP estimate Two Variables

37 VaVa VbVb 2 5 5 -2 -3 VaVa VbVb 2 5 6-2 Choose the right constant  ’ b;k = q b;k f(a) = 1  ’ b;0 = q b;0 f(a) = 1  ’ b;1 = q b;1 f*(b) = 0f*(a) = 1 Two Variables

38 VaVa VbVb 2 5 5 -2 -3 VaVa VbVb 2 5 6-2 Choose the right constant  ’ b;k = q b;k f(a) = 1  ’ b;0 = q b;0 f(a) = 1  ’ b;1 = q b;1 We get all the min-marginals of V b Two Variables

39 Recap We only need to know two sets of equations General form of Reparameterization  ’ a;i =  a;i  ’ ab;ik =  ab;ik + M ab;k - M ab;k + M ba;i - M ba;i  ’ b;k =  b;k Reparameterization of (a,b) in Belief Propagation M ab;k = min i {  a;i +  ab;ik } M ba;i = 0

40 Three Variables VaVa VbVb 2 5 2 1 0 VcVc 460 1 0 1 3 2 3 Reparameterize the edge (a,b) as before l0l0 l1l1

41 VaVa VbVb 2 5 5 -3 VcVc 660 1 -2 3 Reparameterize the edge (a,b) as before f(a) = 1 -22 3 Three Variables l0l0 l1l1

42 VaVa VbVb 2 5 5 -3 VcVc 660 1 -2 3 Reparameterize the edge (a,b) as before f(a) = 1 Potentials along the red path add up to 0 -22 3 Three Variables l0l0 l1l1

43 VaVa VbVb 2 5 5 -3 VcVc 660 1 -2 3 Reparameterize the edge (b,c) as before f(a) = 1 Potentials along the red path add up to 0 -22 3 Three Variables l0l0 l1l1

44 VaVa VbVb 2 5 5 -3 VcVc 612-6 -5 -2 9 Reparameterize the edge (b,c) as before f(a) = 1 Potentials along the red path add up to 0 f(b) = 1 f(b) = 0 -2-4 -3 Three Variables l0l0 l1l1

45 VaVa VbVb 2 5 5 -3 VcVc 612-6 -5 -2 9 Reparameterize the edge (b,c) as before f(a) = 1 Potentials along the red path add up to 0 f(b) = 1 f(b) = 0 q c;0 q c;1 -2-4 -3 Three Variables l0l0 l1l1

46 VaVa VbVb 2 5 5 -3 VcVc 612-6 -5 -2 9 f(a) = 1 f(b) = 1 f(b) = 0 q c;0 q c;1 f*(c) = 0 f*(b) = 0f*(a) = 1 Generalizes to any length chain -2-4 -3 Three Variables l0l0 l1l1

47 VaVa VbVb 2 5 5 -3 VcVc 612-6 -5 -2 9 f(a) = 1 f(b) = 1 f(b) = 0 q c;0 q c;1 f*(c) = 0 f*(b) = 0f*(a) = 1 Dynamic Programming -2-4 -3 Three Variables l0l0 l1l1

48 Dynamic Programming 3 variables  2 variables + book-keeping n variables  (n-1) variables + book-keeping Start from left, go to right Reparameterize current edge (a,b) M ab;k = min i {  a;i +  ab;ik }  ’ ab;ik =  ab;ik + M ab;k - M ab;k  ’ b;k =  b;k Repeat

49 Dynamic Programming Start from left, go to right Reparameterize current edge (a,b) M ab;k = min i {  a;i +  ab;ik } Repeat MessagesMessage Passing Why stop at dynamic programming?  ’ ab;ik =  ab;ik + M ab;k - M ab;k  ’ b;k =  b;k

50 VaVa VbVb 2 5 5 -3 VcVc 612-6 -5 -2 9 Reparameterize the edge (c,b) as before -2-4 -3 Three Variables l0l0 l1l1

51 VaVa VbVb 2 5 9 -3 VcVc 1112-11 -9 -2 9 Reparameterize the edge (c,b) as before -2-9 -7  ’ b;i = q b;i Three Variables l0l0 l1l1

52 VaVa VbVb 2 5 9 -3 VcVc 1112-11 -9 -2 9 Reparameterize the edge (b,a) as before -2-9 -7 Three Variables l0l0 l1l1

53 VaVa VbVb 9 11 9 -9 VcVc 1112-11 -9 9 Reparameterize the edge (b,a) as before -9-7-9 -7  ’ a;i = q a;i Three Variables l0l0 l1l1

54 VaVa VbVb 9 11 9 -9 VcVc 1112-11 -9 9 Forward Pass   Backward Pass -9-7-9 -7 All min-marginals are computed Three Variables l0l0 l1l1

55 Belief Propagation on Chains Start from left, go to right Reparameterize current edge (a,b) M ab;k = min i {  a;i +  ab;ik }  ’ ab;ik =  ab;ik + M ab;k - M ab;k  ’ b;k =  b;k Repeat till the end of the chain Start from right, go to left Repeat till the end of the chain

56 Belief Propagation on Chains A way of computing reparam constants Generalizes to chains of any length Forward Pass - Start to End MAP estimate Min-marginals of final variable Backward Pass - End to start All other min-marginals

57 Computational Complexity Each constant takes O(|L|) Number of constants - O(|E||L|) O(|E||L| 2 ) Memory required ? O(|E||L|)

58 Belief Propagation on Trees VbVb VaVa Forward Pass: Leaf  Root All min-marginals are computed Backward Pass: Root  Leaf VcVc VdVd VeVe VgVg VhVh

59 Outline Problem Formulation Reparameterization Energy Minimization for Trees Loopy Belief Propagation Pearl, 1988; Murphy et al., 1999

60 Belief Propagation on Cycles VaVa VbVb VdVd VcVc Where do we start? Arbitrarily  a;0  a;1  b;0  b;1  d;0  d;1  c;0  c;1 Reparameterize (a,b)

61 Belief Propagation on Cycles VaVa VbVb VdVd VcVc  a;0  a;1  ’ b;0  ’ b;1  d;0  d;1  c;0  c;1 Potentials along the red path add up to 0

62 Belief Propagation on Cycles VaVa VbVb VdVd VcVc  a;0  a;1  ’ b;0  ’ b;1  d;0  d;1  ’ c;0  ’ c;1 Potentials along the red path add up to 0

63 Belief Propagation on Cycles VaVa VbVb VdVd VcVc  a;0  a;1  ’ b;0  ’ b;1  ’ d;0  ’ d;1  ’ c;0  ’ c;1 Potentials along the red path add up to 0

64 Belief Propagation on Cycles VaVa VbVb VdVd VcVc  ’ a;0  ’ a;1  ’ b;0  ’ b;1  ’ d;0  ’ d;1  ’ c;0  ’ c;1 Potentials along the red path add up to 0

65 Belief Propagation on Cycles VaVa VbVb VdVd VcVc  ’ a;0  ’ a;1  ’ b;0  ’ b;1  ’ d;0  ’ d;1  ’ c;0  ’ c;1 Potentials along the red path add up to 0 -  a;0 -  a;1

66 Belief Propagation on Cycles VaVa VbVb VdVd VcVc  a;0  a;1  b;0  b;1  d;0  d;1  c;0  c;1 Any suggestions?Fix V a to label l 0

67 Belief Propagation on Cycles VaVa VbVb VdVd VcVc Any suggestions?Fix V a to label l 0  a;0  b;0  b;1  d;0  d;1  c;0  c;1 Equivalent to a tree-structured problem

68 Belief Propagation on Cycles VaVa VbVb VdVd VcVc  a;1  b;0  b;1  d;0  d;1  c;0  c;1 Any suggestions?Fix V a to label l 1 Equivalent to a tree-structured problem

69 Belief Propagation on Cycles Choose the minimum energy solution VaVa VbVb VdVd VcVc  a;0  a;1  b;0  b;1  d;0  d;1  c;0  c;1 This approach quickly becomes infeasible

70 Loopy Belief Propagation V1V1 V2V2 V3V3 V4V4 V5V5 V6V6 V7V7 V8V8 V9V9 Keep reparameterizing edges in some order Hope for convergence and a good solution

71 Belief Propagation Generalizes to any arbitrary random field Complexity per iteration ? O(|E||L| 2 ) Memory required ? O(|E||L|)

72 Graph Cuts as Reparameterization?

Download ppt "Discrete Optimization Lecture 1 M. Pawan Kumar Slides available online"

Similar presentations

MAP Estimation Algorithms in M. Pawan Kumar, University of Oxford Pushmeet Kohli, Microsoft Research Computer Vision - Part I.

MAP Estimation Algorithms in M. Pawan Kumar, University of Oxford Pushmeet Kohli, Microsoft Research Computer Vision - Part I.
POSE–CUT Simultaneous Segmentation and 3D Pose Estimation of Humans using Dynamic Graph Cuts Mathieu Bray Pushmeet Kohli Philip H.S. Torr Department of.

POSE–CUT Simultaneous Segmentation and 3D Pose Estimation of Humans using Dynamic Graph Cuts Mathieu Bray Pushmeet Kohli Philip H.S. Torr Department of.
Mean-Field Theory and Its Applications In Computer Vision1 1.

Mean-Field Theory and Its Applications In Computer Vision1 1.
Algorithms for MAP estimation in Markov Random Fields Vladimir Kolmogorov University College London Tutorial at GDR (Optimisation Discrète, Graph Cuts.

Algorithms for MAP estimation in Markov Random Fields Vladimir Kolmogorov University College London Tutorial at GDR (Optimisation Discrète, Graph Cuts.
Linear Time Methods for Propagating Beliefs Min Convolution, Distance Transforms and Box Sums Daniel Huttenlocher Computer Science Department December,

Linear Time Methods for Propagating Beliefs Min Convolution, Distance Transforms and Box Sums Daniel Huttenlocher Computer Science Department December,
Discrete Optimization Lecture 4 – Part 3 M. Pawan Kumar Slides available online

Discrete Optimization Lecture 4 – Part 3 M. Pawan Kumar Slides available online
Introduction to Markov Random Fields and Graph Cuts Simon Prince

Introduction to Markov Random Fields and Graph Cuts Simon Prince
Exact Inference in Bayes Nets

Exact Inference in Bayes Nets
ICCV 2007 tutorial Part III Message-passing algorithms for energy minimization Vladimir Kolmogorov University College London.

ICCV 2007 tutorial Part III Message-passing algorithms for energy minimization Vladimir Kolmogorov University College London.
Discrete Optimization in Computer Vision Nikos Komodakis Ecole des Ponts ParisTech, LIGM Traitement de l’information et vision artificielle.

Discrete Optimization in Computer Vision Nikos Komodakis Ecole des Ponts ParisTech, LIGM Traitement de l’information et vision artificielle.
An Analysis of Convex Relaxations (PART I) Minimizing Higher Order Energy Functions (PART 2) Philip Torr Work in collaboration with: Pushmeet Kohli, Srikumar.

An Analysis of Convex Relaxations (PART I) Minimizing Higher Order Energy Functions (PART 2) Philip Torr Work in collaboration with: Pushmeet Kohli, Srikumar.
Discrete Optimization for Vision and Learning. Who? How? M. Pawan Kumar Associate Professor Ecole Centrale Paris Nikos Komodakis Associate Professor Ecole.

Discrete Optimization for Vision and Learning. Who? How? M. Pawan Kumar Associate Professor Ecole Centrale Paris Nikos Komodakis Associate Professor Ecole.
Probabilistic Inference Lecture 1

Probabilistic Inference Lecture 1
1 Spanning Trees Lecture 20 CS2110 – Spring 2015 1.

1 Spanning Trees Lecture 20 CS2110 – Spring
Graph Algorithms: Minimum Spanning Tree 1 2 3 4 6 5 10 1 5 4 3 2 6 1 1 8 We are given a weighted, undirected graph G = (V, E), with weight function w:

Graph Algorithms: Minimum Spanning Tree We are given a weighted, undirected graph G = (V, E), with weight function w:
An Analysis of Convex Relaxations M. Pawan Kumar Vladimir Kolmogorov Philip Torr for MAP Estimation.

An Analysis of Convex Relaxations M. Pawan Kumar Vladimir Kolmogorov Philip Torr for MAP Estimation.
P 3 & Beyond Solving Energies with Higher Order Cliques Pushmeet Kohli Pawan Kumar Philip H. S. Torr Oxford Brookes University CVPR 2007.

P 3 & Beyond Solving Energies with Higher Order Cliques Pushmeet Kohli Pawan Kumar Philip H. S. Torr Oxford Brookes University CVPR 2007.
Improved Moves for Truncated Convex Models M. Pawan Kumar Philip Torr.

Improved Moves for Truncated Convex Models M. Pawan Kumar Philip Torr.
Message Passing Algorithms for Optimization

Message Passing Algorithms for Optimization
Efficiently Solving Convex Relaxations M. Pawan Kumar University of Oxford for MAP Estimation Philip Torr Oxford Brookes University.

Efficiently Solving Convex Relaxations M. Pawan Kumar University of Oxford for MAP Estimation Philip Torr Oxford Brookes University.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google