Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Proposal for LST-based IFR barrel upgrade Roberto Calabrese Ferrara University Workshop on IFR replacement, SLAC, 11/14/2002.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Proposal for LST-based IFR barrel upgrade Roberto Calabrese Ferrara University Workshop on IFR replacement, SLAC, 11/14/2002."— Presentation transcript:

1 Proposal for LST-based IFR barrel upgrade Roberto Calabrese Ferrara University Workshop on IFR replacement, SLAC, 11/14/2002

2 Outline General Overview Layout geometry Performance Readout methodology Electronics Gas, HV, DAQ Costs Other presentations

3 General overview The entire project is driven by the allowed space The intrinsic efficiency of a standard LST tube is about 90%. This is due to dead spaces in the LST tubes. Efficiency is too low for our purposes. Not enough space to put 2 standard layers.

4 Possibilities to improve efficiency (given the allowed space) Option 1: single-layer with a large cell (19x17 mm) Readout of x and y coordinates from outside strips

5 Possibilities to improve efficiency Option 2: double-layer with a small cell (9x8mm) Readout of x coordinate from wire and y coordinate from outside strips

6 Possibilities to improve efficiency Option 3: modified double-layer with a small cell (9x8mm) Readout of x and y coordinates from outside strips

7 Detector layout: segmentation of a detector layer Z strip readout Layer of LST Ф strip readout Z strip signal collection PCB Ф strip signal collection PCB (a similar one in the opposite corner) PCB for cable connectors Servizio Elettronico INFN Ferrara

8 Detector layout: details of strip signal collection PCB Servizio Meccanico INFN Ferrara

9 Performance Expected efficiency about 96% Position resolutionbetter than 3 mm (z) for standard LSTbetter than 9 mm (  ) We do not need such a resolution and we can increase the strip width, thus decreasing the number of channels (  MC simulation)

10 Detector layout: questions How many strips?  resolution, cost, space How many chambers/layer ?  installation, cost

11 Detector layout: answer to the questions We are considering 4 cm z-strips and 4.3 cm  -strips (2  -strips (along the wire)/LST tube)  96 z-strips for each layer, total 6912 z-strips  74  -strips for the outer layer, total 4572  -strips  About 11500 channels of electronics 2 chambers/layer (remove only one corner block at the time), but the number of z-strips doubles (more cables, but same number of electronics channels) or we need to decouple z-strips from the chambers

12 Readout methodology Only digital readout of strips Time measurements could be implemented:  OR of 16 discriminated pulses  Time resolution about 16 ns ( using BaBar reference clock)  Implemented with FPGA

13 Electronics FEC gain depends on the shape of the signal  FEC ampli cannot be used Existing FEC: to be modified if we want to use them (when?)  the baseline is to use new electronics

14 Front end module design : block diagram of the NEW 96 channel (1 view of 1 layer) FEC 96x Amplifier-Discriminator 11us Digital OneShot Shift/Load Ck_Chain Data Out SHIFT REGISTER 96 x Threshold 12us Digital OneShot 11us Digital OneShot 12us Digital OneShot Shift/Load To the Active Patch Panel ahead of the FIFO Board 6 x Implemented in a single high performance FPGA (Field Programmable Gate Array) Cost per channel inclusive of: -components -PCB -crate&power supply 10 € / channel Servizio Elettronico INFN Ferrara

15 Front end module design : schematic of the front end based on Off-The-Shelf components Power dissipation: 250mW Servizio Elettronico INFN Ferrara

16 Front end module design : analog simulations, effect of strip capacitance and impedance Simulation of the amplifier/discriminator output from a 4pC input signal (0.1mA * 40ns) Comparator threshold = 50mV dielectric thickness 0.75mm a) dielectric FOAM (ε r =1) b) dielectric PTE (ε r =3.3) c) dielectric FR4 (ε r =4.8) a) b) c) Servizio Elettronico INFN Ferrara

17 Gas system mass flow control system main gas transport pipe system (existing) final gas distribution and bubbling system. We assume all the tubes in a layer with a single in/out Safe gas mixture, like Ar/Iso/CO 2 (2.5/9.5/88) (SLD)

18 HV, DAQ Each tube has a separate HV connection ( 2 for a double layer tube)  Possibility to use a commercial HV system for LST available from CAEN (SY546 mainframe + 12 channel boards A548), 150 $/channel DAQ  No change, all signals are FEC-like

19 Costs: assumptions double layer LST with 8mm cells; each layer with a separate HV; each ground returning separately through a measuring resistor 96 strips (40 mm strips) in the z direction; 2 strips per LST in the  direction 2 chambers/layer (double the number of z strips signals) 12 active layers

20 Costs (I) Tubes:  30 K$ (setup)  450 K$ ( about 200 $/tube x 2280 double layer tubes) Total cost tubes 480K$ (using single layer tube this cost would be about 300K$) Strip readout planes 240 m 2 /layer x 6 layers x 50 $/m 2 = 72 K$ Signal collection (PCB’s) inside iron 18 K$ Total cost readout planes 90 K$ Grand total chambers 570K$ (double layers); 390K$ (single layers)

21 Total cost of signal flat cables 146 K$ (outside iron) 15 K$ (inside iron) Total cost of signal flat cable connectors 28 K$ Total cost of electronics 115 K$ Service panels 4 K$ Total cost of LV ground wire 5 K$ Total cost of LV plugs 4K$ TDC system 20K$ (optional) Total electronics + cables 322 K$ (maximum); 171 K$ (minimum) Costs (II)

22 Costs (III) Total cost of HV wire 23 K$ Total cost of HV banana plugs 9 K$ Total cost of HV power supply+distributors 170 K$ Total cost of mass flow control system 11 K$ Total cost bubbling system 4 K$ DAQ, cooling no expected cost Total this page 217 K$ Grand total detector 780 K$  1100 K$

23 Addressing the various issues R&D issues and statusChangguo Lu LST experience and production issuesMario Posocco Installation issuesLivio Piemontese


Download ppt "Proposal for LST-based IFR barrel upgrade Roberto Calabrese Ferrara University Workshop on IFR replacement, SLAC, 11/14/2002."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google