Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byLucy Dickerson Modified over 9 years ago
1
Provider Evaluation & Management Training Christi Wesson, Assistant Director Misty Skelton, Assistant Director VMG Coding and Charge Entry 1
2
NP Billing There are separate rules for billing Nurse Practitioner’s and nonbilling Nurse Practitioners. Non Billing Nurse Practitioners can not bill for any services. The attending can only reference their ROS, Past, Family and Social history in order to bill. 2
3
Non Billing Acknowledgement 3
4
NP BILLING NP billing for the admission service (this includes admission H&P’s) According to the Vanderbilt Bylaws NP’s can not bill without the attending provider seeing the patient(except for CNM). Prior to billing the attending will need to document his own note or countersign stating that he saw the patient and agrees with the NP’s note. The preceptor will also need to review 20% of NP charts. See next slides for appropriate Countersignature. 4
5
NP Countersignature For Reviewing 20% of the NP’s notes. For billing a shared visit and then documenting Key findings. 5
6
NP Billing cont. Nurse Practitioners can bill and see patients for consults and consulting subsequent visits. The attending does not have to attest or document a note prior to billing for these services. These services are not shared visits. If the attending and NP both document a note these can not be combined in order to bill. Billing Nurse Practitioners can bill for procedures if it is within their scope of practice. Critical Care cannot be a shared service. 6
7
Evaluation & Management Coding 3 Key Components in an E&M service History Exam Medical Decision Making The level of service selected is based on the extent of the history &/or exam, and the complexity of the medical decision making required and documented by the provider. 7
8
Elements of History Chief Complaint (CC) History of present illness (HPI) Review of systems (ROS) Past medical, family, social history (PFSH) 8
9
History of Present Illness Location – Where is the pain/problem? Quality – What type of pain? (throbbing, constant, improving, worsening, acute, chronic) Severity – How bad is the pain? (scale of 1-10, functional status, compared to other types of pain) Timing – When did you first experience the problem? Specific time of day? Nocturnal? Duration – How long do the symptoms last? (Onset 3 days ago, since last Monday, yesterday) Context – What are you doing when the problems occurs? Associated with meals, exercise, or stress? Modifying factors – What have you tried to alleviate the problem? Medications? What changes/alters the complaint? Associated signs and symptoms – What else is bothering you when this occurs? (Fever w/ chills, headache w/ blurry visions, diaphoresis w/ chest pain) 9
10
History of Present Illness cont. Tip – 4 HPI needed for admits & consults levels 3-5 Tip – If any part of the history is unobtainable, you can document history unobtainable due to ______ (state the reason) Ex: pt intubated & sedated 10
11
Review of Systems (ROS) An inventory of body systems obtained through questions seeking to identify signs and/or symptoms which the patient has or has had. Constitutional symptoms (e.g. fever, weight loss) Eyes Ears, Nose, Mouth, Throat Cardiovascular Respiratory Gastrointestinal Genitourinary Musculoskeletal Integumentary (including breasts) Neurological Psychiatric Endocrine Hematologic/Lymphatic Allergic/Immunologic
12
May be recorded by ancillary staff or on a form completed by the patient Provider must document that he/she reviewed and confirmed information recorded by others. If unable to obtain, document why Pertinent positives and negatives must be referred to in the notes Review of Systems (ROS)
13
Unacceptable (ROS) statements Review of system: negative Review of system: None Review of system Non-contributory Review of system: unremarkable Review of system: Full ROS was notable only for the findings listed in the HPI 10 point review of systems was completed and is negative unless otherwise stated Review of systems per HPI otherwise negative
14
Acceptable (ROS) statements Review of systems are obtained based on medical necessity. Systems with pertinent positive or negative responses must be individually documented. Example: Review of (# of systems reviewed) system is negative except for: MSK: chronic back pain that is flaring, no HSM Review of (# of systems reviewed) system is negative except as discussed per HPI Document all pertinent positive and negative findings and document “All other systems reviewed and negative”
15
Past, Family & Social History Past (past illness, injuries, operations, treatments, current medications, allergies) Family (medical events of patient’s family, hereditary disease) Social (living arrangements, level of education) Tip: DON’T use “noncontributory” Can use negative, but must document negative for what 15
16
Physical Exam Findings Body Areas (7) Head including face Neck Chest, including breast Abdomen Genitalia, groin Back including spine Each extremity Organ Systems (12) Constitutional Eyes ENMT Cardiovascular Respiratory GI GU Musculoskeletal Skin Neuro Psych Hem/Lymph/Immo
17
Examples of Organ system exam: Constitutional: Vital signs and general appearance Eyes: Pupils: size, shape, equality, reaction to light & accommodation ENMT: Sinus tenderness, pharynx, tonsils Cardiovascular: Thrill, Rhythm, Sounds, Murmur, Edema Respiratory: Breath Sounds, Wheeze, Spoken or Whispered voice. GI: Hepatomegaly, Splenomegaly, Bowel sounds, bruits, rubs GU: Examination of Bladder, Palpation of kidney -enlargement, CVA tenderness Physical Exam Findings
18
Examples of Organ system exam: Musculoskeletal: ROM (range of motion), Strength, Stability, Gait Skin: Color, texture, lesions, moles, birthmarks, rashes, dermatitis, dermatoses, hyperhidrosis, actinic damage, ulcers Neuro: Sensory examination, Reflex Examination Psych: hallucinations, delusions, obsessions, compulsions, Time, place, person Hem/Lymph/Immo: Palpable cervical, axillary, inguinal nodes 18
19
Medical Decision Making 2 of the 3 elements must be met or exceeded Number of Diagnoses/Treatment Options Amount & Complexity of Data Level of Risk 19
20
Number of Diagnoses/Treatment Options Each encounter should have an assessment/plan and diagnosis that is documented Self limited/minor = 1 Est problem: stable/improved = 1 Est problem: worsening = 2 New problem: no work-up = 3 New problem: add work-up = 4 20
21
Amount & Complexity of Data If a diagnostic service is ordered, planned, reviewed, or performed at the time of the E/M encounter, the type of service should be documented Lab Test (80000 series) = 1 X-Ray (70000 series) = 1 Medical Test (90000 series) = 1 Discuss test with performing physician = 1 Independent review of images, testing or specimen = 2 Decision to obtain old records and/or hx from someone other than patient =1 Review/summarize old records and/or obtain hx from someone other than patient = 2 21
22
Table of Risk Highest level of risk in any category determines the level of risk Presenting Problem Diagnostic Procedure Management Options 22
23
Score Sheet – Table of Risk 23
24
Score Sheet – Type of Decision Making To qualify for a given type of decision making, 2 of the 3 elements in the table must be either met or exceeded. Type of Decision Making Str. ForwardLowModerateHigh # of Dx or Mgmt Options 0 or 1234+ Amount & Complexity of Data 0 or 1234+ Overall RiskMinimalLowModerateHigh 24
25
Evaluation & Management Services Inpatient Consultation (3 out of 3) LevelHXPEMDMTime 99251Problem Focused Straightforward20 99252Expanded PF Straightforward40 99253Detailed Low55 99254Comprehensive Moderate80 99255Comprehensive High110 Initial Hospital Care (3 out of 3) 99221Detailed/ Comprehensive Straightforward/ Low 30 99222Comprehensive Moderate50 99223Comprehensive High70 Subsequent Hospital Care (2 out of 3) 99231Problem Focused Straightforward/ Low 15 99232Expanded PF Moderate25 99233Detailed High35 25
26
Questions 26
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.