Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byCharlene Booth Modified over 9 years ago
1
Rules of Participation in Framework Programme 7 Brussels Office Helmholtz Association of German Research Centres Rue du Trône 98 B-1050 Brüssel http://www.helmholtz.de/de/Helmholtz_International/Buero_Bruessel.html
2
Rules of Participation in FP7 Project partners: who? How many? Calls for proposals Instruments Funding rates Cost models Grant agreements/Consortium agreements Guarantee fund IPR
3
Project partners: who? How many? General: Collaborative projects („Cooperation“): minimum 3 participants from 3 Member States (MS) or 3 Associated Countries (AC) Natural persons Joint Research Centres, EEIG, organisations established unter European law are considered different from MS Special conditions specified in specific programmes or work programmes
4
Project partners: who? How many? Specific: Collaborative projects addressing international cooperation objectives (INCO): minimum of 4 partners (2 MS, 2 Third Countries Frontier research actions („Ideas“): minimum 1 legal entity from MS or AC Coordination or specific support actions: minimum 1 partner Actions for training and career development of researchers: 1 partner Partners from Third Countries or international research organisations over and above minimum conditions
5
Calls for proposals Always with the exception of: Coordination and specific support actions specified in the work programmes as provided in the specific programmes The appointment of independent experts The purchase of goods or service for the Community Where otherwise provided in the Financial Regulation
6
Instruments Collaborative projects („large integrating projects“, „small to medium-sized, focused research projects“) Networks of Excellence Coordination actions Specific support actions Integrated Infrastructure Initiatives Frontier research actions Actions for training and career development of researchers (Marie Curie Programme) Other special actions provided for in the specific programmes or work programmes (e.g. Marie Curie Awards)
7
Maximum funding rates Research and technological activities: 50% except for: Public bodies – 75% Secondary schools and higher education establishments – 75% Non-profit research organisations with a public mission – 75% SMEs – 75% Demonstration activities – 50% Frontier research actions – 100% Coordination actions, specific support actions – 100% Marie Curie actions – 100%
8
Funding schemes - General Principles Forms of grants: Reimbursement of eligible costs Flat rates: percentage of indirect costs or scales of unit costs Lump sums Combination Cost-reporting models eliminated Participants charge eligible direct and indirect costs Indirect costs: flat rate is an option Flat rates: special rules may be agreed for certain categories of participants (e.g. universities) Co-financing: no profit
9
Lump-sum financing Networks of Excellence: Special rule applies (if allowed in the work programme) Lump sum per researcher per year: 23,500 € (to be reviewed every two years) Payments contigent on assessment of progress in achieving milestones in joint programme of activity as measured by indicators of integration (???)
10
Guarantee mechanism Replaces joint collective responsibility of past framework programmes Commission assesses risk of default amongst partners and may establish liability and risk fund to cover possible consequences of defaulting partners Retains a to-be-specified percentage of Community contribution before payment to project partners as liability insurance Public bodies, secondary and higher education establishments, entities guaranteed by MS or AS to be exempted For collaborative projects, not Marie Curie, frontier research projects,
11
Contractual arrangements Grant agreements between project coordinator and Commission (collaborative projects), frontier research projects, Marie Curie actions Consortium agreements amongst project partners compulsory unless exempted by work programmes (Commission to publish guidelines) Changes in consortium membership possible If project is not carried out to completion, Commission may terminate it
12
Intellectual property rights Simplification compared with FP6: Pre-existing knowledge and sideground (FP6) background Knowledge of partners prior to entering into project Needed to carry out project or use its results No need to exclude from access Knowledge arising out of project (FP6) foreground
13
Access rights to knowledge Partners define background they need, may exclude background Requests for access rights within one year or else within a period agreed upon by participants Possible to grant exclusive licenses to background and foreground if other participants waive their rights Commission need no longer be informed of granting access rights to third parties Special provisions apply for certain actions (frontier research, research for the benefit of special groups, security research)
14
new
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.