1. RAISEonline Data Analysis for Governors and Staff Beaver Road Primary School Clive Davies OBE Beaver Road (c) 20151

2. Context This part of the Basic Characteristics for the school shows that the school is believed to be serving pupils from a mixed socio-economic area. It is reasonable to expect that without further information the expectations are that attainment on entry is in line with the national expectation. Beaver Road (c) 20152

3. School Context General Characteristics Above average size primary school. There are fewer girls than boys attending. Percentage of Free school meals at 12.7% is below the national average (26.0). Percentage of pupils with SEN support is 5.4 and is below the national average (13.0) and the percentage of pupils with a statement or ENC plan (0.7) is also below the national average (1.4) The school has a majority of British white pupils with 42.9% from minority ethnic backgrounds which is well above the national average (30.7). 3Beaver Road (c) 2015

4. Basic Characteristics Across the School The table below shows that: the current Year 6 has the largest percentage of FSM the current Year 2 has the greatest percentage of Minority ethnic pupils, the current Year 6 has the greatest percentage of pupils with EAL, and the current Year 5 has the greatest percentage of SEN pupils Beaver Road (c) 20154 Please note: The Year groups above refer to last year’s cohorts

5. Attainment on Entry into Key Stage 2 The table below shows that the current Year 6 started Year 3 above the attainment level of the last Year 6 cohort. The current Year 5 started at a position that was above the current Year 6. Each of the current cohorts started KS2 at a point above the national average. Beaver Road (c) 20155 Please note: The Year groups above refer to last year’s cohorts

6. Attainment on Entry into Key Stage 2 The table below shows that the current Year 6 had fewer pupils in the low attaining band at the end of Year 2 than nationally (8.2% compared with 14.7%) and more in the higher band compared to the national average (37.6% compared with 26.6%). Beaver Road (c) 20156 Please note: The Year groups above refer to last year’s cohorts

7. Beaver Road Primary School EYFS

8. EYFS: English and Mathematics Beaver Road (c) 20158 The percentage of pupils achieving a good level of development was in line with the national average at 61% compared with 61% nationally. The percentage of pupils with entitlement to FSM that achieved a good level of development was 20% which was below the national average for FSM pupils by 25%. The percentage of boys achieving a good level of development was 53% which matched the national average and the percentage of girls achieving a good level of development was 74% which was above the national average by 5%. The percentage of pupils achieving at least the expected standard was above average in listening and attention and understanding; numbers and shape, space and measures.

9. Beaver Road Primary School Phonics Check

10. Year 1 Phonics: 3 year trend Beaver Road (c) 201510 The 3 trend in Year 1 phonics results shows a slight decline with the 2013 position being the strongest in 3 years. Standards have been above average for the past 3 years. Over the 3 years the percentage of disadvantaged pupils achieving the standard has shown a falling trend: falling from 62% to 50%. The percentage of boys achieving the standard has fluctuated with 80% achieving the standard in 2013 and 2015 but 70% in 2014. The percentage of girls achieving the standard has also fluctuated with the highest being 89% in 2014.

11. Year 1 Phonics Check: Boys and Girls There were 91 pupils in the cohort with 78% achieving the expected standard. This was 1% above the national average of 77%. Of the 59 boys in the cohort 80% achieved the expected standard which was 7% above the national average. Of the 32 girls in the cohort 75% achieved the expected standard which was 6% below the national average. Beaver Road (c) 201511

12. Year 1 Phonics Check: FSM/ Disadvantaged Pupils There were only 5 pupils entitled to FSM in the cohort. Of the 5 FSM pupils, 40% achieved the standard which was 26% below the national average of 66%. Beaver Road (c) 201512

13. Year 2 Phonics Check: Boys and Girls There were 89 pupils in the cohort with 93% achieving the expected standard. This was 3% above the national average of 90%. Of the 46 boys in the cohort 89% achieved the expected standard which was above the national average by 1%. Of the 43 girls in the cohort 98% achieved the expected standard which was 6% above the national average. Beaver Road (c) 201513

14. Year 2 Phonics Check: FSM/ Disadvantaged Pupils There were 10 pupils entitled to FSM in the cohort. Of the 10 FSM pupils, 90% achieved the standard which was 6% above the national average of 84%. Beaver Road (c) 201514

15. Beaver Road Primary School Key Stage 1

16. Key Stage 1 Attainment The 2015 levels in Reading were above the national average at L2c+ (94%) by 4%, were above the national average at 2B+ (90%) by 8% but significantly above the national averages at L3 (48%) by 16%. In Writing the results were significantly above the national average at L2c+ (96%) by 8%, significantly above the national average at 2B+ (88%) by 16% and above the national average at L3 (21%) by 3%. In Mathematics the results were just above at L2c+ (94%) by 1%, significantly above the average at 2B+ (90%) by 8% and above the national average at L3 (31%) by 5%. 16Beaver Road (c) 2015

17. Key Stage 1 Test Results: All Subjects The overall points scores for 2015 (2015/16 Year 3) was 17.2 which was significantly above the national average by 1.9. The results have improved by 0.6 compared with the 2014 results. The results have been significantly above the national average for the past 4 years. 17Beaver Road (c) 2015

18. Key Stage 1 Test Results: Reading The reading points scores for 2015 (2015/16 Year 3) was 18.1 which was significantly above the national average by 1.5. The results have improved by 0.8 in comparison with 2014. Results have been significantly above average for the past 3 years. 18Beaver Road (c) 2015

19. Key Stage 1 Test Results: Writing The writing points scores for 2015 (2015/16 Year 3) was 16.4 which was significantly above the national average by 1.1. The results have improved by 0.6 compared with 2014. The results have significantly above the national average for 2 of the past 3 years. 19Beaver Road (c) 2015

20. Key Stage 1 Test Results: Mathematics The mathematics points scores for 2015 (2015/6 Year 3) was 17.1 which was above the national average by 0.7. Results have improved by 0.5 compared with 2014. The results have been above the national average for the past 4 years. 20Beaver Road (c) 2015

21. Key Stage 1: Boys/ Girls The performance of the boys was well below the girls overall by 2.0; but was above boys nationally by 0.5 with girls being above other girls nationally by 1.6. In Reading the boys were below the girls by 1.8; but above boys nationally by 1.1; girls were above other girls nationally by 1.8. In Writing the boys were well below the girls by 2.9 but above boys nationally by 0.4; girls were above girls nationally by 1.8. In Mathematics the boys were below the girls by 1.4 and matched boys nationally; girls were above other girls nationally by 1.3. 21Beaver Road (c) 2015

22. Key Stage 1: FSM/Disadvantaged There were 10 pupils entitled to FSM in this cohort. Our 10 FSM pupils performed in line with other FSM pupils nationally overall; they were just below other FSM nationally in reading by 0.2; were above others in writing by 0.4; and were just below others in mathematics by 0.2. Our FSM pupils performed well below our non FSM pupils by 2.7 in all subjects; they were well below our non FSM pupils by 3.4 in reading; were well below by 2.3 in writing and were well below by 2.3 in mathematics. 22Beaver Road (c) 2015

23. Key Stage 1: EAL There were 16 pupils with EAL in this cohort. Our 16 EAL pupils performed below other EAL pupils nationally by 0.4 overall; they were just above other EAL nationally in reading by 0.1; were below others in writing by 0.4; and were below others in mathematics by 1.0. Our EAL pupils performed well below our non EAL pupils by 2.3 in all subjects; they were well below our non EAL pupils by 2.4 in reading; were well below by 2.2 in writing and were below by 1.0 in mathematics. 23Beaver Road (c) 2015

24. Key Stage 1: SEN There were only 2 pupils on SEN support in this cohort. Our 2 SEN Support pupils performed below our non SEN Support pupils by 4.0 overall; below by 6.2 in reading; below by 2.5 in writing and below by 3.1 in maths. They performed above other SEN Support pupils nationally overall by 0.8; below by 0.8 in reading; well above by 2.4 in writing and above by 0.8 in maths. 24Beaver Road (c) 2015

25. Key Stage 1: Term of Birth The term of birth was not significant because Autumn born pupils’ performance was above that of Summer born pupils by not much more than noted nationally. Autumn born pupils’ performance was above the Summer born pupils by 1.9. The gap nationally is 1.5 in favour of Autumn born pupils. Our Autumn born pupils performed above other Autumn born pupils nationally by 1.1. Our Spring born pupils were above other Spring born pupils by 1.5, and Summer born pupils were above other summer born pupils nationally by 0.7. 25Beaver Road (c) 2015

26. Beaver Road Primary School Key Stage 2

27. Key Stage 2 Attainment: Levels 4/5/6 In 2015 the percentage attaining L4+ in maths (94%) was significantly above the national average by 7%. The percentage attaining a good level 4 (4b+) was 91% which was significantly above the national average by 14%. The percentage attaining L5+ (63%) was significantly above the national average by 22%. The percentage attaining L6 (28%) was significantly above the national average by 19%. In 2015 the percentage attaining L4+ in reading (92%) was above the national average by 3%. The percentage attaining a good L4 (L4b+) was 88% and above the national average by 8%. The percentage attaining L5 (65%) was significantly above the national average by 17%. 2% of pupils attained Level 6. In 2015 the percentage attaining L4+ in writing (95%) was significantly above the national average by 8%. The percentage attaining L5 (65%) was significantly above the national average by 29%. 10% attained Level 6. In 2015 the percentage attaining L4+ in SPAG (94%) was significantly above the national averages by 14%. The percentage attaining a good Level 4 (L4b+) was 90% and significantly above the national average by 17%. The percentage attaining L5 (79%) was significantly above the national average by 24%. 17% of pupils attained Level 6. 27Beaver Road (c) 2015

28. Key Stage 2: Percentages attaining Level 4+ 89% of boys attained Level 4+ in maths, reading and writing combined which was 12% above the national average; 95% attained Level 4+ in maths which was 8% above the national average; 92% attained Level 4+ in reading which was 5% above the national average; 95% did so in writing which was 12% above average; 95% did so in SPAG which was 19% above the average. 92% of girls attained Level 4+ in maths, reading and writing combined which was 9% above the national average; 94% of girls attained Level 4+ in maths which was 7% above the national average; 92% attained Level 4+ in reading which was 1% above the national average; 96% did so in writing which was 5% above the national average; 94% did so in SPAG which was 10% above average. 73% of disadvantaged children attained Level 4+ in maths, reading and writing combined which was 3% above the national average; 91% attained Level 4+ in maths which was 11% above the national average; 73% attained Level 4+ in reading which was 10% below the national average; 82% did so in writing which was 3% above the average; 82% did so in SPAG which was 11% above average. 28

29. Key Stage 2: Percentages attaining Level 5+ 58% of boys attained Level 5+ in maths, reading and writing combined which was 36% above the national average; 68% attained Level 5+ in maths which was 23% above the national average; 66% attained Level 5+ in reading which was 22% above the national average; 63% did so in writing which was 35% above average; 76% did so in SPAG which was 26% above average. 50% of girls attained Level 5+ in maths, reading and writing combined which was 24% above the national average; 58% of girls attained Level 5+ in maths which was 21% above the national average; 65% attained Level 5+ in reading which was 12% above the national average; 67% did so in writing which was 23% above average; 81% did so in SPAG which was 20% above the national average. 18% of disadvantaged children attained Level 5+ in maths, reading and writing combined which was 5% above the national average; 27% attained Level 5+ in maths which was 1% below the national average; 36% attained Level 5+ in reading which was 2% above the national average; 45% did so in writing which was 23% above the average; 64% did so in SPAG which was 21% above average. 29

30. Key Stage 2 Attainment: All Subjects The overall average points score in 2015 was 31.4 which was significantly above the national average by 2.6. Overall results have improved by 0.9 since 2014. Results have been significantly above the national average for the past 5 years. 30Beaver Road (c) 2015

31. Key Stage 2 Attainment: Mathematics The maths average points score in 2015 was 32.0 and was significantly above the national average by 3.0. Maths results improved by 1.2 in comparison with the 2014 position. Results have been significantly above the national average for the past 5 years. 31Beaver Road (c) 2015

32. Key Stage 2 Attainment: Reading The Reading average points score in 2015 was 30.5 which was significantly above the national average by 1.5. This is the same as the 2014 position. The results have been significantly above the national average for 4 of the past 5 years. 32Beaver Road (c) 2015

33. Key Stage 2 Attainment: Writing The Writing average points score in 2015 was 31.3 which was significantly above the national average by 3.1. This shows an improvement of 1.3 in comparison with the 2014 position. Results have been significantly above average for 4 of the 5 previous years. 33Beaver Road (c) 2015

34. Key Stage 2 Attainment: SPAG The English grammar, punctuation and spelling (SPAG) average points score in 2015 was 32.4 and was significantly above the national average by 3.3. Results have improved by 1.7 compared with 2014. Results have been consistently significantly above the national average for the past 3 years. 34Beaver Road (c) 2015

35. Key Stage 2 Attainment: Boys/ Girls The performance of the boys was above the girls for the combined maths, reading and writing by 0.3 but well above boys nationally by 3.0. Girls were well above girls nationally by 2.3. In mathematics the boys were above the girls by 1.2 and well above boys nationally by 3.4. Girls were well above girls nationally by 2.8. In reading the boys were below the girls by 0.3 but above boys nationally by 1.8. Girls were above girls nationally by 1.2. In writing the boys were below the girls by 0.8 but well above boys nationally by 3.5. Girls were well above girls nationally by 2.6. In the SPAG test the boys were below the girls by 0.5 but well above boys nationally by 3.7. Girls were well above girls nationally by 2.8. 35Beaver Road (c) 2015

36. Key Stage 2 Attainment: FSM/Disadvantaged Pupils The performance of the our 11 FSM pupils was well below our non FSM pupils for the combined maths, reading and writing by 3.7 but above other FSM pupils nationally by 1.0. In mathematics our FSM pupils were well below our non FSM pupils by 3.5 but above FSM pupils nationally by 0.8. In reading our FSM pupils were well below our non FSM pupils by 3.4 and just below FSM pupils nationally by 0.1. In writing our FSM pupils were well below our non FSM pupils by 2.4 but well above FSM pupils nationally by 2.6. In the SPAG test our FSM pupils were well below our non FSM pupils by 3.1 but well above FSM pupils nationally by 2.2. 36Beaver Road (c) 2015

37. Key Stage 2 Attainment: EAL Pupils The performance of the our 14 EAL pupils was well below our non EAL pupils for the combined maths, reading and writing by 3.5 but above other EAL pupils nationally by 0.4. In mathematics our EAL pupils were well below our non EAL pupils by 3.7 but just above EAL pupils nationally by 0.2. In reading our EAL pupils were well below our non EAL pupils by 3.3 and just below EAL pupils nationally by 0.2. In writing our EAL pupils were well below our non EAL pupils by 3.2 but above EAL pupils nationally by 1.1. In the SPAG test our EAL pupils were below our non EAL pupils by 1.0 but well above EAL pupils nationally by 2.4. 37Beaver Road (c) 2015

38. Key Stage 2 Attainment: Mobile Pupils There were 79 pupils (non mobile) in the cohort of 86 that had been at our school throughout Years 5 and 6. The performance of the our non mobile pupils was well above other non mobile pupils nationally for the combined maths, reading and writing by 2.7. In mathematics our non mobile pupils were well above other non mobile pupils nationally by 3.1. In reading our non mobile pupils were above other non mobile pupils nationally by 1.5. In writing our non mobile pupils were well above other non mobile pupils nationally by 3.2. In the SPAG test our non mobile pupils were well above other non mobile pupils nationally by 3.5. Beaver Road (c) 201538

39. Key Stage 2 Attainment: SEN Pupils There were 15 pupils in this cohort identified a s requiring SEN support and 0 with a statement or EHC plan. The performance of our 15 SEN Support pupils was 1.2 above other SEN Support pupils overall. They were 1.5 above in maths; matched other SEN Support in reading; were 1.9 above in writing and were 3.8 above in SPAG. The performance of our SEN Support pupils was below our non SEN pupils by 6.4 overall. They were 6.6 below in maths; 6.2 below in reading; 6.1 below in writing and 5.5 below in SPAG. Beaver Road (c) 201539

40. Key Stage 1 to 2: VA: All Subjects Value added for 2015 The overall progress for all subjects made by pupils in 2015 using the value added score was 102.8 which was significantly above the national expectation. This now puts the school in the top 1% of ranking in terms of progress between KS1 and KS2. The position has improved compared to 2014. 95% coverage means that 5% of KS1 results of pupils who took the 2015 SATs was not known. Note: This is guidance only 100 VA equals satisfactory progress 101.5 equals outstanding progress 98.5 equals inadequate progress 40Beaver Road (c) 2015

41. Key Stage 1 to 2: VA: Mathematics Value added for 2015 The progress made by pupils in maths in 2015 using the value added score was 103.4 and was significantly above the national average. This now puts the school in the top 1% of ranking in terms of progress between KS1 and KS2. The position has improved since 2014. 95% coverage means that 5% of KS1 results of pupils who took the 2015 SATs was not known. Note: This is guidance only 100 VA equals satisfactory progress 101.5 equals outstanding progress 98.5 equals inadequate progress 41Beaver Road (c) 2015

42. Key Stage 1 to 2: VA: Reading Value added for 2015 The progress made by pupils in reading in 2015 using the value added score was 101.6 and was significantly above the national expectation. This now puts the school in the top 4% of ranking in terms of progress between KS1 and KS2. The position has improved compared with 2014. 95% coverage means that 5% of KS1 results of pupils who took the 2015 SATs was not known. Note: This is guidance only 100 VA equals satisfactory progress 101.5 equals outstanding progress 98.5 equals inadequate progress 42Beaver Road (c) 2015

43. Key Stage 1 to 2: VA: Writing Value added for 2015 The progress made by pupils in writing in 2014 using the value added score was 102.6 and was significantly above the national expectation. This now puts the school in the top 1% of ranking in terms of progress between KS1 and KS2. The position has improved compared with 2014. 95% coverage means that 5% of KS1 results of pupils who took the 2015 SATs was not known. Note: This is guidance only 100 VA equals satisfactory progress 101.5 equals outstanding progress 98.5 equals inadequate progress 43Beaver Road (c) 2015

44. Expected progress in Reading between KS1 and KS2 The table shows that of the 7 pupils who were at Level 1 at the end of KS1: 100% achieved the expected progress which was 16% above the national average and 43% achieved more than the expected progress which was 19% below the national average. The table shows that of the 10 pupils who were at Level 2c at the end of KS1: 80% achieved the expected progress which was 4% below the national average and 20% achieved more than the expected progress which was 2% above the national average. The table shows that of the 19 pupils who were at Level 2b at the end of KS1: 100% achieved the expected progress which was 5% above the national average and 63% achieved more than the expected progress which was 30% above the national average. The table shows that of the 23 pupils who were at Level 2a at the end of KS1: 100% achieved the expected progress which was 1% above the national average and 87% achieved more than the expected progress which was 26% above the national average. The table shows that of the 22 pupils who were at Level 3 at the end of KS1: 100% achieved the expected progress which was 11% above the national average and 9% achieved more than the expected progress which was 8% above the national average. Overall, the school’s success rate for 2 levels progress was 98% compared with the national average of 91%. 49% achieved more than the expected progress which was 16% above the national average. 44

45. Expected progress by FSM pupils in Reading between KS1 and KS2 Beaver Road (c) 201545 The table shows that of the 11 pupils entitled to FSM 90% made at least 2 levels of progress through KS2 compared with 99% of our non FSM pupils and compared with 92% nationally. 30% of our FSM pupils made more than 2 levels of progress compared with 51% of our non FSM pupils and compared with 33% nationally.

46. Expected progress in Writing between KS1 and KS2 The table shows that of the 12 pupils who were at Level 1 at the end of KS1: 100% achieved the expected progress which was 6% above the national average and 75% achieved more than the expected progress which was 18% above the national average. The table shows that of the 10 pupils who were at Level 2c at the end of KS1: 100% achieved the expected progress which was 10% above the national average and 30% achieved more than the expected progress which was 20% above the national average. The table shows that of the 36 pupils who were at Level 2b at the end of KS1: 100% achieved the expected progress which was 2% above the national average and 81% achieved more than the expected progress which was 48% above the national average. The table shows that of the 14 pupils who were at Level 2a at the end of KS1: 100% achieved the expected progress which matched the national average and 100% achieved more than the expected progress which was 33% above the national average. The table shows that of the 9 pupils who were at Level 3 at the end of KS1: 100% achieved the expected progress which was 8% above the national average and 78% achieved more than the expected progress which was 65% above the national average. Overall, the school’s success rate for 2 levels progress was 100% compared with the national average of 94%. 77% achieved more than the expected progress which was 41% above the national average. 46

47. Expected progress by FSM pupils in Writing between KS1 and KS2 Beaver Road (c) 201547 The table shows that of the 11 pupils entitled to FSM 100% made at least 2 levels of progress through KS2 compared with 100% of our non FSM pupils and compared with 95% nationally. 60% of our FSM pupils made more than 2 levels of progress compared with 79% of our non FSM pupils and compared with 37% nationally.

48. Expected progress in Maths between KS1 and KS2 The table shows that of the 9 pupils who were at Level 1 at the end of KS1: 100% achieved the expected progress which was 19% above the national average and 67% achieved more than the expected progress which was 24% above the national average. The table shows that of the 10 pupils who were at Level 2c at the end of KS1: 90% achieved the expected progress which was 14% above the national average and 10% achieved more than the expected progress which was 2% above the national average. The table shows that of the 31 pupils who were at Level 2b at the end of KS1: 100% achieved the expected progress which was 7% above the national average and 74% achieved more than the expected progress which was 49% above the national average. The table shows that of the 22 pupils who were at Level 2a at the end of KS1: 100% achieved the expected progress which was 1% above the national average and 91% achieved more than the expected progress which was 33% above the national average. The table shows that of the 10 pupils who were at Level 3 at the end of KS1: 100% achieved the expected progress which was 10% above the national average and 90% achieved more than the expected progress which was 56% above the national average. Overall, the school’s success rate for 2 levels progress was 99% compared with the national average of 90%. 72% achieved more than the expected progress which was 38% above the national average. 48

49. Expected progress by FSM pupils in Mathematics between KS1 and KS2 Beaver Road (c) 201549 The table shows that of the 11 pupils entitled to FSM 100% made at least 2 levels of progress through KS2 compared with 99% of our non FSM pupils and compared with 91% nationally. 50% of our FSM pupils made more than 2 levels of progress compared with 75% of our non FSM pupils and compared with 37% nationally.

50. Summary of 2015 RAISEonline The school serves a mixed catchment area with attainment on entry expected to be in line with the national expectations; The current Year 6s attainment was above that of the last Year 6 on entry into Year 3. The current Year 6 had fewer pupils in the low attaining band at the end of Year 2 than nationally and more in the higher band compared to the national average. EYFS and Key Stage 1Key Stage 2 EYFS: The percentage of pupils achieving a good level of development was in line with the national average. Phonics: Year 1: The 3 trend in Year 1 phonics results shows a slight decline with the 2013 position being the strongest in 3 years. Standards have been above average for the past 3 years. There were 91 pupils in the cohort with 78% achieving the expected standard. This was 1% above the national average of 77%. Phonics: Year 2: There were 89 pupils in the cohort with 93% achieving the expected standard. This was 3% above the national average of 90%. Key Stage 1: The 2015 levels in Reading were above the national average at L2c+ (94%) by 4%, were above the national average at 2B+ (90%) by 8% but significantly above the national averages at L3 (48%) by 16%. In Writing the results were significantly above the national average at L2c+ (96%) by 8%, significantly above the national average at 2B+ (88%) by 16% and above the national average at L3 (21%) by 3%. In Mathematics the results were just above at L2c+ (94%) by 1%, significantly above the average at 2B+ (90%) by 8% and above the national average at L3 (31%) by 5%. The performance of the boys was well below the girls overall by 2.0; but was above boys nationally by 0.5 with girls being above other girls nationally by 1.6. Our 10 FSM pupils performed in line with other FSM pupils nationally overall; they were just below other FSM nationally in reading by 0.2; were above others in writing by 0.4; and were just below others in mathematics by 0.2. Our 16 EAL pupils performed below other EAL pupils nationally by 0.4 overall; they were just above other EAL nationally in reading by 0.1; were below others in writing by 0.4; and were below others in mathematics by 1.0. The term of birth was not significant because Autumn born pupils’ performance was above that of Summer born pupils by not much more than noted nationally. Attainment In 2015 the percentage attaining L4+ in maths (94%) was significantly above the national average by 7%. The percentage attaining a good level 4 (4b+) was 91% which was significantly above the national average by 14%. The percentage attaining L5+ (63%) was significantly above the national average by 22%. The percentage attaining L6 (28%) was significantly above the national average by 19%. In 2015 the percentage attaining L4+ in reading (92%) was above the national average by 3%. The percentage attaining a good L4 (L4b+) was 88% and above the national average by 8%. The percentage attaining L5 (65%) was significantly above the national average by 17%. 2% of pupils attained Level 6. In 2015 the percentage attaining L4+ in writing (95%) was significantly above the national average by 8%. The percentage attaining L5 (65%) was significantly above the national average by 29%. 10% attained Level 6. In 2015 the percentage attaining L4+ in SPAG (94%) was significantly above the national averages by 14%. The percentage attaining a good Level 4 (L4b+) was 90% and significantly above the national average by 17%. The percentage attaining L5 (79%) was significantly above the national average by 24%. 17% of pupils attained Level 6. Groups The performance of the boys was above the girls for the combined maths, reading and writing by 0.3 but well above boys nationally by 3.0. Girls were well above girls nationally by 2.3. The performance of the our 11 FSM pupils was well below our non FSM pupils for the combined maths, reading and writing by 3.7 but above other FSM pupils nationally by 1.0. The performance of the our 14 EAL pupils was well below our non EAL pupils for the combined maths, reading and writing by 3.5 but above other EAL pupils nationally by 0.4. Progress Value added information suggests that progress between KS1 and KS2 was significantly above the average overall and for maths, reading, writing separately. 100% of pupils made 2 levels progress in writing; 98% did so in reading and 99% did so in maths. 50