1. Double Digit Growth Agriculture Department Mandal : Rajupalem

2. Rajupalem Mandal Map

3. Agriculture Growth Engines Paddy Maize Bengalgram Cotton Groundnut Sun flower Sesamum

4. S.NoParticularsUnitArea 1Total Geographic AreaAcre 48840 2Forest AreaAcre0 3Barren & Uncultivable areaAcre129 4Cultivable wasteAcre968 5Permanent Pastures& Other grazing landsAcre0 6Area under orchardsAcre0 7Fallow LandsAcre2122 8Net area SownAcre a)KharifAcre13209 b) RabiAcre29150 Total Cropped AreaAcre 42370 9No.of.Villages/Gram PanchayatsNo15 10Total House HoldsNo8611 a)Total PopulationNo32819 b)MaleNo16087 c)FemaleNo16732 11Agriculture families a)Small FarmersNo2598 b)Marginal FarmersNo4219 c)OthersNo2788 12Area Under KC CanalAcre6390 13Area under MRC canalAcre1320 14No.of.Tubes wells % Area IrrigatedAcre205 / 1675 15No.of. Wells with oils enginesNo93 / 203.6 Rajupalem Mandal profile

5. S.NoCrop 2013 -142014 -15 Area in Ha Producti vity in Kgs./Ha Producti on in MTs. GVA in Crs. Area in Ha Producti vity in Kgs./Ha Producti on in MTs. GVA in Crs. 1Paddy 360459502144434.31 343559502043830.66 2Groundnut 6318901190.54 451625730.33 3Cotton 424046519728.38 19492105410317.44 4Bengalgram 8634 1820 1571459.71 67411020687626.13 5Sesamum 42418180.10 11084905432.93 6Maize2870901990.290 00 7Sunflower781001780.310 00 8Jowar625342021383.421435266538246.12 9Other Crops1020 9653.721914 17426.72 3. Normal Areas,Production &Productivity of crops ( for last 2 yrs) 2013-14& 2014-15. Mandal: Rajupalem

6. SL. NO. Name of the Crop 2014 -152015 -16Net Increases Area in Ha Product ivity in Kgs./H a Product ion in MTs. GVA in Crs. Area in Ha Product ivity in Kgs./H a Product ion in MTs. GVA in Crs. Area in Ha Product ivity in Kgs./H a Product ion in MTs. GVA in Crs. 1Paddy343559502043830.6634505990206663115402280.34 2Groundnut451625730.336320311280.5818406550.25 3Cotton19492105410317.442105 442118.7915603181.35 4Bengalgram67411020687626.13780013801076440.91059360388814.77 5Sesamum11084905432.9312565056343.4214815910.49 6Maize0 001569151060.151569151060.15 7Sunflower0 00461255580.23461255580.23 8Jowar1435266538246.12950266525314.050000 9Other Crops1914 17426.721363 13405.170000 4. Area, Production& Productivity of targets of Growth Engines for 2015-16. (last 2 years data of the same is also required) Mandal: Rajupalem

7. Interventions 1.Seed replacement 2.Integrated Nutrient Management (INM) a) Macro Nutrient Management b) Micro Nutrient application (Zinc Sulphate) 3.Green Manure 4.Integrated Pest Management (IPM) 5.Farm Mechanization 1.Seed replacement Area Proposed under Seed Replacement80 ha Cost reduction per Ha due to supply of Subsidy seedRs. 788 per ha Total benefit on subsidy seedRs 0.01 Crs. Yield increase per ha0.5 Qtls. Total Yield Increase40 Qtls. Benefit due to Yield increaseRs. 0.008 Crs. Net benefit due to Seed ReplacementRs. 0.01 Crs. Net benefit to the farmer due to seed replacement per haRs. 1,788 Interventions proposed to achieve Double Digit Growth Present and Projected scenario Year Area(Lakh Ha) Production (Lakhs MT) Productvity (Qtl per Ha) GVA (Rs. In crores) 2014-15343520438595030.657 2015-16345020666599030.999 Net Increase15228400.342 Mandal : RajupalemCrop : Paddy

8. 2.Integrated Nutrient Management a) Macro Nutrient Management Area Proposed under INM 1,052 ha NPK as per recommended Rs. 5, 995 per ha Cost of fertilizer as per farmers usagesRs 6,865 per ha Cost reduce per ha due to adopting INM Macro Rs.870 per ha Nutrient application Total benefit on Macro Nutrient applicationRs.0.09 crores Yield increase per ha0.1 Qtls. Total yield increase 105.20 Qtls Benefit due to yield increaseRs.0.021 crores Net benefit due to Macro Nutrient applicationRs. 0.11 crores Net benefit to the farmer due to Macro Nutrient Rs. 1,070 per ha Application per ha.

9. b.Micro Nutrient application (Zinc Sulphate) Area Proposed under Znic Sulphate application412 ha Cost reduction per Ha due to supply of Zinc SulphateRs. 790 per ha Total benefit on subsidy of Zinc SulphateRs. 0.03 Crs. Yield increase per Ha0.10 Qtls. Total Yield Increase41.20 Qtls. Benefit due to Yield increaseRs. 0.009 Crs. Net benefit due to Zinc Sulphate applicationRs. 0.04 Crs. Net benefit to the farmer due to Zinc Sulphate application per haRs. 990 3. Green Manure Area Proposed under Green Manure Practice1,925 ha Cost increase per Ha due to Green Manure Rs. 590 per ha Total benefit on Green Manure applicationRs. 0.11 Crs. Yield increase per Ha0.3 Qtls. Total Yield Increase577.50 Qtls. Benefit due to Yield increase0.115 Crs. Net benefit due to Green Manure practiceRs. 0.0055 Crs. Net benefit to the farmer due to Green Manure Practice per HaRs. 10

10. 4.Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Area Proposed under IPM application 1,285 ha IPM as per recommended doseRs. 1,763 per ha Farmer practice usages Rs. 2,025 per ha Cost reduction due to adopting of IPMRs. 262 per ha Total benefit on IPM applicationRs. 0.03 crores Yield increase per Ha0.1 Qtls. Total Yield Increase128.50 Qtls. Benefit due to Yield increaseRs.0.026 Crs. Net benefit due to IPM applicationRs. 0.06 Crs. Net benefit to the farmer due to IPM application per HaRs. 4,62

11. 5.Farm mechanization Area Proposed under Farm mechanization 980 ha Cost reduction per ha due to supply of farm implements i.e., rotovator, Transplanter and HarvestersRs. 1,150 per ha Cost reduction due to FM implementation on labourRs. 0.11 Crs. Yield increase per Ha due to reduces in harvesting losses0.0 Qtls. Total Yield Increase00.00 Qtls. Benefit due to Yield increaseRs.0.00 Crs. Net benefit due to FM usageRs. 0.11 Crs. Net benefit to the farmer due to FM usage per HaRs. 1,150 Summary Total area proposed3,450 ha Cost reduction /ha due to interventionsRs. 3,270 per ha Net benefit to the farmers due to interventions Rs. 5,140, per ha Total value increase Rs. 0.342 Crs

12. Interventions proposed to achieve Double Digit Growth Present and Projected scenario YearArea(Lakh Ha) Production (Lakhs MT) Productvity (Qtl per Ha) GVA (Rs. In crores) 2014-150000.00 2015-161510669150.15 Net Increase1510669150.15 Interventions 1. Area proposed to be brought under crop diversification Mandal : RajupalemCrop : Maize

13. 1. Additional area proposed to be brought under cultivation Area proposed to be increase 15 ha Increase in yield per ha69.15 Qtls Total yield increase1037.20 Qtls Benefit due to yield increaseRs. 0.15 crores Net benefit due to additional areaRs.0.15 crores Summary Total area proposed15 ha Cost reduction /ha due to interventionsRs. per ha Net benefit to the farmers due to interventions Rs. per ha Total value increase Rs. 0.15 Crs

14. Interventions proposed to achieve Double Digit Growth Interventions 1.Seed replacement 2. Integrated Nutrient Management (INM) a. Macro Nutrient application b.Micro Nutrient application (Zinc Sulphate) 3. Integrated pest management (IPM) 4. Farm Mechanization 5. Area proposed of previous year brought under cultivation Present and Projected scenario YearArea(Lakh Ha) Production (Lakhs MT) Productvity (Qtl per Ha) GVA (Rs. In crores) 2014-1567416876102026.13 2015-16780010764138040.90 Net Increase1059388836014.77 Mandal : RajupalemCrop : Bengalgram

15. 1.Seed replacement Area Proposed under Seed Replacement6,400 ha Cost reduction per Ha due to supply of Subsidy seedRs. 500 per ha Total benefit on subsidy seedRs 0.32 Crs. Yield increase per ha1.50 Qtls. Total Yield Increase9,600 Qtls. Benefit due to Yield increaseRs. 3.36 Crs. Net benefit due to Seed ReplacementRs. 3.68 Crs. Net benefit to the farmer due to seed replacement per haRs. 5,750 2.Integrated Nutrient Management a)Macro Nutrient Management Area Proposed under INM 6,350 ha NPK as per recommended Rs. 2,444 per ha Cost of fertilizer as per farmers usagesRs 3,737 per ha Cost reduce per ha due to adopting INM Macro Rs.1,293 per ha Nutrient application Total benefit on Macro Nutrient applicationRs.0.82 crores Yield increase per ha0.70 Qtls. Total yield increase 4445.00 Qtls Benefit due to yield increaseRs.1.56 crores Net benefit due to Macro Nutrient applicationRs. 2.38 crores Net benefit to the farmer due to Macro Nutrient Rs. 3,743 per ha Application per ha.

16. b. Micro Nutrient application (Zinc Sulphate) Area Proposed under Zinc Sulphate application627 ha Cost reduction per Ha due to supply of Zinc SulphateRs. 790 per ha Total benefit on subsidy of Zinc SulphateRs. 0.05 Crs. Yield increase per Ha0.55 Qtls. Total Yield Increase344.85 Qtls. Benefit due to Yield increaseRs. 0.12 Crs. Net benefit due to Zinc Sulphate applicationRs. 0.17 Crs. Net benefit to the farmer due to Zinc SulphateRs. 2,715 application per ha. 3.Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Area Proposed under IPM application 6,725 ha IPM as per recommended doseRs. 3,523 per ha Farmer practice usages Rs. 7,100 per ha Cost reduction due to adopting of IPMRs. 3,577 per ha Total benefit on IPM applicationRs. 2.41 crores Yield increase per Ha0.50 Qtls. Total Yield Increase3,362.50 Qtls. Benefit due to Yield increaseRs.1.18 Crs. Net benefit due to IPM applicationRs. 3.58 Crs. Net benefit to the farmer due to IPM application per HaRs. 5,327

17. 5. Additional area proposed to be brought under cultivation Area proposed to be increase 900 ha Increase in yield per ha10.00 Qtls Total yield increase9,000 Qtls Benefit due to yield increaseRs.3.15 crores Net benefit due to additional areaRs.3.15 crores Summary Total area proposed7,800 ha Cost reduction /ha due to interventionsRs. 3,370 per ha Net benefit to the farmers due to interventions Rs. 20,231 per ha Total value increase Rs. 14.77 Crs 4.Farm mechanization Area Proposed under Farm mechanization 6700 ha Cost reduction per ha due to supply of farm implements i.e., rotovator, Transplanter and HarvestersRs. 2,000 per ha Cost reduction due to FM implementation on labourRs. 1.34 Crs. Yield increase per Ha due to reduces in harvesting losses0.25 Qtls. Total Yield Increase1,331.75 Qtls. Benefit due to Yield increaseRs.0.47 Crs. Net benefit due to FM usageRs. 1.81 Crs. Net benefit to the farmer due to FM usage per HaRs. 2,696

18. Interventions proposed to achieve Double Digit Growth Present and Projected scenario YearArea(Lakh Ha) Production (Lakhs MT) Productvity (Qtl per Ha) GVA (Rs. In crores) 2014-15 19494103210517.44 2015-16 21054421210018.79 Net Increase 15631801.35 Interventions 1.Integrated Nutrient Management (INM) a. Macro Nutrient application b.Micro Nutrient application (Boron) 2. High density Population 3. Integrated pest management (IPM) Mandal : RajupalemCrop : Cotton

19. 1.Integrated Nutrient Management a. Macro Nutrient application Area Proposed under INM 1,920 ha NPK as per recommended Rs. 4,261 per ha Cost of fertilizer as per farmers usagesRs 5,480 per ha Cost reduce per ha due to adopting INM Macro Rs.1,219 per ha Nutrient application Total benefit on Macro Nutrient applicationRs.0.23crores Yield increase per ha0.2Qtls. Total yield increase 384.00 Qtls Benefit due to yield increaseRs.0.155 crores Net benefit due to Macro Nutrient applicationRs. 0.39 crores Net benefit to the farmer due to Macro Nutrient Rs. 2,029 per ha Application per ha. b.Micro Nutrient application (Boron) Area Proposed under Boron application2,470 ha Cost reduction per Ha due to supply of BoronRs. 135 per ha Total benefit on subsidy of BoronRs. 0.033 Crs. Yield increase per Ha0.34 Qtls. Total Yield Increase839.80 Qtls. Benefit due to Yield increaseRs. 0.34 Crs. Net benefit due to Boron applicationRs. 0.373 Crs. Net benefit to the farmer due to BoronRs. 1,512 application per ha

20. 3. High Density Population Recommended Plants per ha32,500 Plants Normal density population as per farmer practices per ha20,000 Plants Yield increase per Ha0.2 Qtls. Total Yield Increase600 Qtls. Benefit due to Yield increaseRs. 0.243 Crs. Net benefit due to Population densityRs. 0.24 Crs. Net benefit to the farmer due to BoronRs. 121.5 application per ha 4.Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Area Proposed under IPM application 1,850 ha IPM as per recommended doseRs. 2,000 per ha Farmer practice usages Rs.3,000 per ha Cost reduction due to adopting of IPMRs. 1,000 per ha Total benefit on IPM applicationRs. 0.20 crores Yield increase per Ha0.2 Qtls. Total Yield Increase370 Qtls. Benefit due to Yield increaseRs.0.15 Crs. Net benefit due to IPM applicationRs. 0.35 Crs. Net benefit to the farmer due to IPM application per HaRs. 1,891 Summary Total area proposed2,105 ha Cost reduction /ha due to interventionsRs. 2,354 per ha Net benefit to the farmers due to interventions Rs. 5,554 per ha Total value increaseRs. 1.35 Crs

21. Interventions 1.Seed replacement 2.Integrated Nutrient Management (INM) a) Macro Nutrient Management b) Micro Nutrient application (Gypsum) 3.Farm Yard Manure 4.Integrated Pest Management (IPM) 5.Area proposed to be brought under diversification 1.Seed replacement Area Proposed under Seed Replacement18 ha Cost reduction per Ha due to supply of Subsidy seedRs. 2,700 per ha Total benefit on subsidy seedRs 0.005 Crs. Yield increase per ha1.00 Qtls. Total Yield Increase18 Qtls. Benefit due to Yield increaseRs. 0.011 Crs. Net benefit due to Seed ReplacementRs. 0.016 Crs. Net benefit to the farmer due to seed replacement per haRs. 8,700 Interventions proposed to achieve Double Digit Growth Present and Projected scenario Year Area(Lakh Ha) Production (Lakhs MT) Productvity (Qtl per Ha) GVA (Rs. In crores) 2014-15457316250.3285 2015-166312820310.576 Net Increase18554060.2475 Mandal : RajupalemCrop : Groundnut

22. 2.Integrated Nutrient Management a) Macro Nutrient Management Area Proposed under INM 50 ha NPK as per recommended Rs. 2, 922 per ha Cost of fertilizer as per farmers usagesRs 4,825 per ha Cost reduce per ha due to adopting INM Macro Rs.1903 per ha Nutrient application Total benefit on Macro Nutrient applicationRs.0.01 crores Yield increase per ha0.6 Qtls. Total yield increase 30 Qtls Benefit due to yield increaseRs.0.018 crores Net benefit due to Macro Nutrient applicationRs. 0.03 crores Net benefit to the farmer due to Macro Nutrient Rs. 5,503 per ha Application per ha.

23. b. Micro Nutrient application (Gypsum) Area Proposed under Gypsum application 63 ha Cost reduction per Ha due to supply of Gypsum Rs. 1800 per ha Total benefit on subsidy of Gypsum Rs. 0.011 Crs. Yield increase per Ha 0.40 Qtls. Total Yield Increase 25.20 Qtls. Benefit due to Yield increase Rs. 0.015 Crs. Net benefit due to Gypsum application Rs. 0.026 Crs. Net benefit to the farmer due to Gypsum application per ha Rs. 4,200

24. 3.Farm Yard Manure application Area Proposed under FYM application 50 ha Cost increase per Ha due to application of FYMRs. 2,500 per ha Total benefit on subsidy of FYMRs. 0.0125 Crs. Yield increase per Ha0.5Qtls. Total Yield Increase25 Qtls. Benefit due to Yield increase0.02 Crs. Net benefit due to FYM applicationRs. 0.0025 Crs. Net benefit to the farmer due to FYM per HaRs. 500 4.Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Area Proposed under IPM application 60 ha IPM as per recommended doseRs. 1602 per ha Farmer practice usages Rs. 2537 per ha Cost reduction due to adopting of IPMRs. 935 per ha Total benefit on IPM applicationRs. 0.01 crores Yield increase per Ha0.3 Qtls. Total Yield Increase18 Qtls. Benefit due to Yield increaseRs.0.011 Crs. Net benefit due to IPM applicationRs. 0.02 Crs. Net benefit to the farmer due to IPM application per HaRs. 2,735

25. 5. Area proposed to be brought under crop diversification Area proposed to be increase 13 ha Increase in yield per ha20.31 Qtls Total yield increase264.03 Qtls Benefit due to yield increaseRs.0.158 crores Net benefit due to additional areaRs.0.158 crores Summary Total area proposed63 ha Cost reduction /ha due to interventionsRs. 2,840 per ha Net benefit to the farmers due to interventions Rs. 21,638 per ha Total value increase Rs. 0.247 Crs

26. Interventions proposed to achieve Double Digit Growth Present and Projected scenario YearArea(Lakh Ha) Production (Lakhs MT) Productvity (Qtl per Ha) GVA (Rs. In crores) 2014-15 0000.00 2015-16 465812550.23 Net Increase 465812550.23 Interventions 1. Area of previous brought under cultivation Mandal: RajupalemCrop : Sunflower

27. 1. Additional area proposed to be brought under cultivation Area proposed to be increase 46 ha Increase in yield per ha12.55 Qtls Total yield increase577.30 Qtls Benefit due to yield increaseRs. 0.23 crores Net benefit due to additional areaRs.0.23 crores Summary Total area proposed46 ha Cost reduction /ha due to interventionsRs. per ha Net benefit to the farmers due to interventions Rs. per ha Total value increase Rs. 0.23 Crs

28. Interventions proposed to achieve Double Digit Growth Present and Projected scenario YearArea(Lakh Ha) Production (Lakhs MT) Productvity (Qtl per Ha) GVA (Rs. In crores) 2014-1511085434902.93 2015-1612566345053.42 Net Increase14891150.49 Interventions 1.Integrated Nutrient Management (INM) a. Macro Nutrient application b.Micro Nutrient application (Boron) 2. Integrated pest management (IPM) Mandal : RajupalemCrop : Sesamum

29. 1.Integrated Nutrient Management a. Macro Nutrient application Area Proposed under INM 855 ha NPK as per recommended Rs. 2,177 per ha Cost of fertilizer as per farmers usagesRs 2,868 per ha Cost reduce per ha due to adopting INM Macro Rs.1,117 per ha Nutrient application Total benefit on Macro Nutrient applicationRs.0.10crores Yield increase per ha0.30 Qtls. Total yield increase 256.50 Qtls Benefit due to yield increaseRs.0.12 crores Net benefit due to Macro Nutrient applicationRs. 0.22 crores Net benefit to the farmer due to Macro Nutrient Rs. 2,557 per ha Application per ha. b.Micro Nutrient application (Boron) Area Proposed under Boron application250 ha Cost reduction per Ha due to supply of BoronRs. 135 per ha Total benefit on subsidy of BoronRs. 0.0002 Crs. Yield increase per Ha0.40 Qtls. Total Yield Increase100 Qtls. Benefit due to Yield increaseRs. 0.05 Crs. Net benefit due to Boron applicationRs. 0.05 Crs. Net benefit to the farmer due to BoronRs. 2,055 application per ha

30. 2.Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Area Proposed under IPM application 985 ha IPM as per recommended doseRs. 1,402 per ha Farmer practice usages Rs.1,970 per ha Cost reduction due to adopting of IPMRs. 568 per ha Total benefit on IPM applicationRs. 0.06 crores Yield increase per Ha0.35 Qtls. Total Yield Increase344.75 Qtls. Benefit due to Yield increaseRs.0.17 Crs. Net benefit due to IPM applicationRs. 0.22 Crs. Net benefit to the farmer due to IPM application per HaRs. 2,248 Summary Total area proposed1,256 ha Cost reduction /ha due to interventionsRs. 1,820 per ha Net benefit to the farmers due to interventions Rs. 2,055 per ha Total value increase Rs. 0.49 Crs

31. 5.Soil Health Profile based on soil test results conducted during 2015. Sl. No. ComponentTarget No.of soil samples collected by MAOs No.of Soil Sample received to Lab No.of Soil Sample analysed Soil Health Cards online Soil Health Cards distributed 1Macro230 460 2Micro230 S.NoParticularsStatusS.NoParticularsStatus 1Ogranic CarbonLow1Zinc94% deficient 2NitrogenLow2Boran40 % deficient 3PhosphorousMedium3Iron53% deficient 4PotashHigh4Sulphar36 % deficient

32. Potassium Content in Soils is Very high, hence Farmers recommended not to apply Potassium to Soils apply of Phosphate as Basal dose only in follow of recommendations Apply of Neem coated Urea for increase efficiency of Nitrogen As per the analysis reports received Micronutrient deficiencies observed as detailed Zinc- 94% deficiency, Iron- 53% deficiency, Sulphure- 36% deficiency, Boron- 40% deficiency. To correct Micronutrient deficiencies, the following Micronutrients proposed to Supply by Department of Agriculture as follows Zinc targeted area proposed is 1032 ha, allotted 11.0mts Boron targeted area proposed is 2720 ha, allotted 0.92mts Gypsum targeted area proposed is 63 ha, allotted 124 MTs

33. 6. Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) I Additional Areas:- Additional Areas under irrigation provided by Irrigation department.:- nil Areas crop wise targeted by Department of Agriculture:- Areas crop wise brought under diversification and previous area brought under cultivation detailed below. CropPaddyMaize Bengal gram Cotton Ground nut Sunflower Sesamu m Jower Other s Total Area in ha15 105915618461484855512493

34. CropPaddyMaize Bengal gram Cotton Ground nut SunflowerSesamumJowerTotal 100% Seed replacement in Qtls 2587.5348752368.1141.752.362.8107.610148.05 30% Seed replacement in Qtls 776.2511462.5710.442.50.6918.8432.283044.4 6. Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) II Varietal Replacement:- A)Total quantity of seed required crop wise for 100 % Seed Replacement and 30% Seed Replacement.:-

35. CropPaddyRemarks Name of VarietyNDLR-7 Seed availability is the major constrain No. of ha’s proposed50.0 Qty of Seed required in qtls 37.50 CropBengal gramRemarks Name of VarietyNBG-3 Seed availability is the major constrain No. of ha’s proposed6400 Qty of Seed required in qtls 4800.0 B) Varietal Replacement plan targeted for 2015-16:- 6. Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) C) Area of problematic soils and situations like rain fed (paddy), submergence, saline, alkaline, salt etc. No problematic soils found in the Mandal D) Action taken for testing resistant varieties for these soils.Nil.

36. SnoYear Mandal Normal areaUreaDAPMOPNPKTotal 12013-14165972926102824947839019 22014-1516648356479822940218612 III Soil Health Management A. Fertilizer requirement as per Normal Areas for last 2 years. SnoYear Mandal Normal areaUreaDAPMOPNPKTotalRemarks 12013-14165976872661167871856 Fertilizer Consumption assumed based on the Fertilizer sales at Mandal level B.Actual chemical fertilizer consumed for last 2 years.

37. SnoYear Mandal Normal areaUreaDAPMOPNPKSSPTotal 12015-161659795035025022501552205 C.As per the targeted area, fertilizer requirement for 2015-16 (as per the soil test based recommendations).

38. D.Saving of fertilizer by following soil test based recommendations.. Potassium Content in Soils is Very high, hence Farmers recommended not to apply Potassium to Soils.. Apply of Phosphate as Basal dose only in follow of Recommendations.. Apply of Neem coated Urea for increase of efficiency E.Micro nutrient deficiency in Normal areas and targets of Micro nutrient supply during 2015-16..As per the analysis reports received Micronutrient deficiencies observed as detailed Zinc- 94% deficiency, Iron- 53% deficiency, Sulphure- 36% deficiency, Boron-40% deficiency. To correct Micronutrient deficiencies, the following Micronutrients proposed to Supply by Department of Agriculture as follows Zinc targeted area proposed is 1032 ha, allotted 11.0mts Boron targeted area proposed is 2720 ha, allotted 0.92mts Gypsum targeted area proposed is 63 ha, allotted 124 mts F. Problematic soils like Saline, Alkaline, salt etc. and areas and measures taken for reclamation (quantify Nil).

39. Detailed good agronomical practices to be adopted crop wise. Paddy:-. Seed Treatment with Carbendazim-1g/kg seed. Basal application of Zinc 50kgs /ha. Drain out the Field at Tillering stage for increasing productive Tillers. Making of allies for every 2mts in East-West direction. 4-5 split applications of Fertilizer. Line sowing/ Drum seeding Method. Mechanized Harvesting Cotton:-.Seed treatment with Imidacloprid -48%- 7gms/kg.Basal application of Zinc-50kg/ha, Boron-2.5kg/ha, Magnesium- 10kg/ha Application of Fertilizer within 90DAS.Stem application method within 60DAS. Inter cropping with Redgram crop. To reduce pesticide consumption sowing of Non-Bt cotton. IV Good Agricultural Practices

40. 3.Bengal gram:-.Seed treatment with T.viridae-8-10g/kg of Seed./ Hexaconazole-2ml/kg of seed. Inter cropping with Coriander @8:2 ratio Highlight locally adopted best agronomical practices and indigenously developed practices.:- Nil Crop sequence:- 1. Paddy- Paddy, 2.Paddy-Sesamum, 3.Paddy- Pulses(Green gram or Black gram) Crop rotation:- 1. Turmeric- Paddy 2. Cotton-Bengal gram 3. Bengal gram- Coriander Double cropping 1. Paddy-Paddy 2.Paddy- Pulses Inter cropping:- 1.Cotton-Redgram IV Good Agricultural Practices

41. Strategies and techniques followed to reduce cost of cultivation. Chemical fertilizer applications (Nitrogen ):- By application of Green manure seed, improves the Fertilizer efficiency, there by reduces the Application of Nitrogenous Fertilizers up to 30%. Without green manures applies 375kgs/ha, With green manure applies 250kgs/ha. Pest management.:- Application of Neem oil 3000ppm reduces the Pest infestation. Promotion of organic pesticides, fertilizers and other botanicals.:- Seed treatment with Pseudomonas, Application of PSB 10kgs/ha, Application of Weedicide:- Application of Weedicides as pre-emergence and Post-emergence will reduces cost. V Cost Reduction

42. VI. Extensions and Capacity building Polam pilusthondhi- schedule detailed information required ChandrannaRythukshetralu S.NoDate Name of the Village Time 102-06-2015 Gopayapalli8.30 A.M to 12.00 Pagidala2.00 P.M To 5.30 203-06-2015 Vellala8.30 A.M to 12.00 Kummarapalli2.00 P.M To 5.30 309-06-2015 Parlapadu8.30 A.M to 12.00 Ramachandrapuram2.00 P.M To 5.30 410-06-2015 CSPalli8.30 A.M to 12.00 Pottipadu2.00 P.M To 5.30 516-06-2015 Korrapadu8.30 A.M to 12.00 Velavali2.00 P.M To 5.30 617-06-2015 Kulur8.30 A.M to 12.00 Daddanala2.00 P.M To 5.30 723-06-2015 Tanguturu8.30 A.M to 12.00 Ayyavaripalli2.00 P.M To 5.30 824-06-2015 Vellala8.30 A.M to 12.00 Kummarapalli2.00 P.M To 5.30 930-06-2015 Rajupalem8.30 A.M to 12.00 Vengulayapalli2.00 P.M To 5.30

43. S.NoDate Name of the Village Time 1001-07-2015 Arkatavemula8.30 A.M to 12.00 Somapuram2.00 P.M To 5.30 1107-07-2015 Thondaladinne8.30 A.M to 12.00 Eruvapalem2.00 P.M To 5.30 1208-07-2015 CSPalli8.30 A.M to 12.00 Pottipadu2.00 P.M To 5.30 1314-07-2015 Gadeguduru8.30 A.M to 12.00 Kottala2.00 P.M To 5.30 1415-07-2015 Gopayapalli8.30 A.M to 12.00 Pagidala2.00 P.M To 5.30 1521-07-2015 Tanguturu8.30 A.M to 12.00 Ayyavaripalli2.00 P.M To 5.30 1622-07-2015 Parlapadu8.30 A.M to 12.00 Ramachandrapuram2.00 P.M To 5.30 1728-07-2015 Rajupalem8.30 A.M to 12.00 Vengulayapalli2.00 P.M To 5.30 1829-07-2015 Korrapadu8.30 A.M to 12.00 Velavali2.00 P.M To 5.30 VI. Extensions and Capacity building

44. S.NoDate Name of the Village Time 1904-08-2015 Kulur8.30 A.M to 12.00 Daddanala2.00 P.M To 5.30 2005-08-2015 CSPalli8.30 A.M to 12.00 Pottipadu2.00 P.M To 5.30 2111-08-2015 Vellala8.30 A.M to 12.00 Kummarapalli2.00 P.M To 5.30 2212-08-2015 Rajupalem8.30 A.M to 12.00 Vengulayapalli2.00 P.M To 5.30 2318-08-2015 Arkatavemula8.30 A.M to 12.00 Somapuram2.00 P.M To 5.30 2419-08-2015 Thondaladinne8.30 A.M to 12.00 Eruvapalem2.00 P.M To 5.30 2525-08-2015 CSPalli8.30 A.M to 12.00 Pottipadu2.00 P.M To 5.30 2626-08-2015 Gadeguduru8.30 A.M to 12.00 Kottala2.00 P.M To 5.30 VI. Extensions and Capacity building

45. Sno Name of Mandal VillageCrop Seaso n Organized by NameCadre 1 Rajupalem TanguturuBengalgramRabi Maheswaramm aAEO 2ArkatavemulaCottonKharifKrishnareddyAEO 3ParlapaduBengalgramRabiP prasannaMAO 4ThondaladinnePaddyKharif V Venkata SubbaiahADA 5KummarapalliPaddyKharifGowriMPEO 6KulluruPaddyKharifRojaMPEO Statement showing the details of CRKs proposals in Rajupalem for the Year 2015-16

46. Special awareness programs and trainings conducted to MPEOs and Farmers in highlighting cost reduction and promotion of Natural Farming.:- Trainings organized on Organic Farming in Co-ordination with Scientists from KVK, ARS, DAATT center. Identification of Best Adoptive Farmers as Master Trainers.:- Involvement RMGs, SHGs, NGOs & other Organisations. Exposure of farmers to CMSA villages. VI. Extensions and Capacity building

47. Farm machinery- item wise required to cover 100%.:- Rotavators-20no.s, 9-Tyne cultivators-45 no.s, 7-Tyne Cultivators-25 no.s, Seed drills-100 no.s, Combined paddy Harvesters- 5no.s, Taiwan sprayers-50no.s, Tarpaulins-500 no.s, MCTs-15no.s, CHC(Cotton)-10no.s, ISS-10No.s Action plan for supply of farm machinery as per allocation 2015- 16.:- Planned In JBMV program and collected implement wise Farmer details. After allotment details intimated to the Farmers. Cost reduction through farm mechanization.:- Cost is reduced by application of Rotavator up to Rs. 2000/ha, By application of Mechanized harvesting it reduces up to Rs.2200/ha. Use threshing Machinery reduces cost upto Rs.2500/ha. Enhancement of yields through farm mechanization:- Nil Farm Mechanisation

48. Enrolment of farmers to M-Kissan portal.:- 1. This fastens the advising of the Farmers. 2.This creates awareness on Modern practices 3. All beneficiary farmers of all schemes of department to be enrolled in M- Kissan.:- 1.This is useful to get the details of Farmers who availed schemes previously 2. This prevents repetition, there by more Farmers availing Scheme benefits. VIII. IT – Applications

49. The Rajupalem mandal people are mainly depending on Agriculture and majority of the farmers are big and marginal farmers. They cultivating Bengalgram as major rain fed crop for their Livelyhood and also growing paddy, Cotton as a major crops in Kharif under Kundu River. The soils also having poor organic carbon, low Nitrogen, P 2 O 5 medium and having High K 2 O and also deficient in micro nutrients such as Zinc. Advocating of farmers through Department personnel adopting Neam Coated Urea and Straight Fertilizers to improve Fertilizere use Efficiency and micronutrients application in all the crops to correct the deficiencies. Farmers are advising to raise Green Manuring crops in all the cultivating areas before raising crop to increase organic carbon in soil. Conclusion:

50. The extension staff of the mandal are extensively giving wide publicity though trainings and distributing Phamplets to create awareness to all the farmers on Soil sampling and advantages of soil sampling, duly adopting the Soil test based fertilizer application for all the crops. The rural poor living standards and economical standards there is a need of technology transfer to the farmer by giving trainings, exposure visits, conducting Demos with increases the capacity building of the individual farmer will increases the confidence Leeds to adopt new practices in future for getting better results. Promoting farm mechanization, organic farming, and application of Bio agents reduce the cost of cultivation and maintains the ecology. Due to above efforts of the Department the cost benefit ratio of farming community in the mandal has been increased which results in successful achievement of double digit growth for the year 2015-16. Conclusion: