Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byNicholas Job Carroll Modified over 9 years ago
1
ASSIMILATION OF HIGH-FREQUENCY RADAR SURFACE CURRENTS INTO A COASTAL OCEAN MODEL OF THE MIDDLE ATLANTIC BIGHT Alan F. Blumberg George Meade Bond Professor Director Davidson Laboratory Stevens Institute of Technology Liang Kuang and Nickitas Georgas I EEE-MTS 12 Ocean Meeting October 17, 2012
2
New York Harbor Observing and Prediction System Integrated system of observing sensors and forecast models TO OBSERVE TO PREDICT TO COMMUNICATE Weather Currents Water Level Salinity Temperature Waves
3
How? Observe Ground-Truth Serve Automatically Forecast
4
A fully automated system of systems New York Harbor Observing and Prediction System 0.5 hrs + 1.5 hrs + 2.0 hrs
5
C:\Documents and Settings\hroarty\My Documents\COOL\01 CODAR\MARCOOS\Renewal HF radar System
6
6 SLDMB Drifter
7
Methodology—Data Assimilation Data Assimilation- Nudging Scheme 7
8
Non-tidal mean surface currents: HF radar vs. NYHOPS BeforeAfter From Jun 9 th, 2011 to Jul 21 st, 2011. Scale is in 10cm/s. 8
9
Tidal currents(M2 ellipses) after DA Before After From Jun 9 th, 2011 to Jul 21 st, 2011. Scale is in 10cm/s. 9
10
10 RMSE between NYHOPS Hindcast, Drifter currents before and after data assimilation (cm/s) UU_DAU_diffVV_DAV_diff 112.111.80.38.68.50.1 311.110.11.013.712.90.8 4A15.514.70.814.313.70.6 4B17.515.61.916.916.00.9 4C17.216.60.616.814.91.9 average 14.713.61.114.113.01.1 Positive means improvement
11
11 43 (3X) Reseeding particle-tracking simulations
12
12 RMSE of NYHOPS Forecast, Drifter currents before and after data assimilation (cm/s) UU_DAU_diffVV_DAV_diff 117.517.30.211.211.00.2 317.316.11.213.512.41.1 4A19.819.10.716.315.40.9 4B22.420.61.822.320.32.0 4C27.625.91.722.421.41.0 Average 21.0 20.0 1.017.116.30.8
13
13 43 (3X) Reseeding particle-tracking simulations
14
Conclusions NYHOPS established as an urban ocean forecast system – large following with multiple constituencies Using currents derived from drifters for validation: Average RMS errors of hindcast and 1 day forecast shows 8% improvements Particle-tracking simulations showed improvements of 7% (hindcast) and 10% ( 1 day forecast) based on separation distances The future work - assimilation using more advanced schemes, such as Kalman Filter/LRTKF, 3D and 4D var 14
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.