1. ATLAS Results M. Cobal, INFN & University Udine PART II XXIV SEMINARIO NAZIONALE di FISICA NUCLEARE E SUBNUCLEARE OTRANTO, Serra degli Alimini, 21-27 Settembre 2012

2. Why M top and M W are interesting? 2 M top, M W and EW precision measurements = cross check of SM and constrain M H EW fit dominating uncertainties: ΔM top and ΔM W For ΔM W not to be the dominant error in the EW fit: ΔM W ∼ 0.007ΔMtop

3. EWK fit 3 Private communication M. Gru ̈ newald: adding m H =125 ± 2 GeV to the EWK fit: -gives χ2 / Ndf = 17.95 / 14, Prob = 20.9% Extending the concept to a BSM framework,

4. Key SM background processes 4

5. The typical analysis 5 Design a selection at a given mass maximizing an estimator (eg s/√bkg). Often cutting the phase-space in many regions Compute the expected SM background from control samples, side bands, etc.. also with the help from MC simulation (shapes). Assess the systematic error. Evaluate the signal efficiency using SM Higgs MC simulation Compute with statistical methods the largest signal cross section one can accommodate in the data.

6. The typical plot 6 Analyses optimized for exclusion.The result is expressed at a given mass as exclusion at 95% of a cross section The excluded cross section is computed in unit of SM cross section (μ). Expected sensitivity: measures how performing is the analysis The colored bands give the expected statistical ⊕ systematic variation of the result wrt to the “expected” Nearby points are correlated depending on the mass resolution

7. H →  7 Composition of  sample: 75-80% QCD  production 20-25%  -jet or jet-jet, jet mis-ID eg due to hard  0 Separation of  -  o in Lar Calo  pointing to locate primary vertex

8. H →  8

9. H → ZZ*→ 4 leptons (e,  ) 9 Golden channel: few events but small background. Good mass resolution

10. H → WW*→ e  10

11. Combined Significance 11

12. P-value evolution adding modes 12  and ZZ combo only 5  excess (expect 4.7  ) Is it a boson: yes, significance from di- photon channel Adding WW 5.1  excess (expect 5.2  ) All channels together 4.9  excess (expect 5.9  )

13. Significance of the p-value 13 5.9 (ATLAS) and 4.9 (CMS) σ excess Impressive consistency between 7TeV and 8TeV data

14. The LHC discovery 14 Heinemeyer et al, Implications of LHC results for TeV-scale physics: signals of electroweak symmetry breaking, Submitted to the Open Symposium of the European Strategy Preparatory Group. A=ATLAS C=CMS √ = channel analyzed most of the LHC sensitivity comes from

15. The LHC discovery 15 ATLAS and CMS: significance driven by the γγ, ZZ and WW channels Besides the excess at 125-126 GeV: 95% CL exclusion of a SM-like Higgs up to ~600 GeV

16. Properties of the new boson 16 Mass spin and parity ( JP ) CP (even, odd, or admixture?) couplings to vector bosons: is this boson related to EWSB, and how much does it contribute to restoring unitarity in WLWL scattering couplings to fermions - is Yukawa interaction at work? - contribution to restoring unitarity? couplings proportional to mass ? is there only one such state, or more? elementary or composite? self-interaction

17. Signal strenght

18. Mass vs Signal strenght 18 Mass compatibility between different channels estimated with 2D likelihood, fitting simultaneously μ and m H in each channel Probability that a single boson produces mass peaks in H→γγ and H→4l separated by more than the amount observed is 20% Mass measurement: performed using profile likelihood ratio with m H floating (channels used: H→γγ and H→4l with separate μ parameters) Main systematics from energy scale expected precision at the LHC: ~100 MeV expected precision at a linear collider: ≾ 40-50 MeV

19. J P and CP STATUS AND QUESTIONS: decay to two photons: cannot be spin 1 (Landau- Yang theorem) J P : currently tested at the LHC, using angular correlations in ZZ*, WW* and γγ J P : by end of 8 TeV run, assuming 35/fb per exp: ~4 σ separation of 0+ vs 0- and 0+ vs 2+ CP: more tricky, basic question of possible mixture of CP-even and CP-odd If focus at LHC stays on WW*, ZZ* and VBF: limited sensitivity to distinguish pure CP-even state from admixture CP-even / CP-odd Linear collider: threshold behaviour of e+e-→ttH gives precision measurement of CP mixing. arXiv:1208.4018v1 [hep-ph JP: LHC 2012 prospects for 35/fb per exp.

20. Projections 20 coupling scale factors: 5-10% with 300/fb at 14 TeV ratios of partial widths: 5- 30%, for luminosities up to 3/ab very rare channels H→μμ accessible at the 20% level, with a HL-LHC Higgs self-coupling (double-Higgs production): currently under study. 3σ/exp possible at HL-LHC, and 30% prec. on λHHH possible if more channels added and exps. combined

21. 1.I The fundamental symmetries: Are there more general symmetries than SU(3) C  SU(2) L  U(1) Y ? Of course we will be happy to include the gravity in the extend theory. 2.Astrophysics observations: - Neutrino oscillations - Dark matter - Dark Energy 3.The standard model problems: - Higgs NO  unitarity violation New interactions to cancel this amplitude; - Higgs YES  hierarchy problem for the higgs mass Beyond the SM 21 P f < 

22. Supersymmetry 22

23. Minimal MSSM 23

24. Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model 24

25. ATLAS SUSY strategy Search in every corners of the SUSY phase space

26. Status of SUSY searches 1. Inclusive searches 2. Natural SUSY 3. Long lived particles 4. RPV

27. Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model SUSY theory phase space MSSM: 29 sparticles+5 Higgs undiscovered Goal: find hints of (N)MSSM particles in the 100 GeV – 1 TeV range

28. Status of exotic searches

29. Conclusions Probed a wide variety of SUSY – motivated final states Nothing found so far, but developed detailed understanding of BG, prerequisite for a discovery Transinioning to targeted searches, optimized for specific well-motivated models (eg: natural SUSY) Strong push on naturalness dedicated searches for L=2-4.7 fb-1 Direct sbottom & stop Gluino mediated stop/sbottom Direct Gauginos [Also sensitive to direct slepton !] Analyses of 8 TeV data are in progress. Expect 20 fb-1 of data by the end of the year.