1. QUALITY ASSURANCE Wp 7 Turku University of Applied Sciences Heikki Ellilä & Mari Lahti

2. AIM to ensure the high quality of the project.

3. GENERAL EVALUATION The general task of quality assurance endeavors are to ensure that the whole project is manageable and implemented as planned. Evaluation Inputs and outputs Outcomes in the light of the aims Internal External

4. INTERNAL - Self-and (peer evaluation FEB 2015 ? ) (every work package) - Careful documentation and reports of the different phases of the projects states - Risk assessment and financial analysis Monitoring-tool ( in TAMK intra net) February (2014) Virtual network platform ( Tampere) to give and get feed-back Moderator (Turku)

5. Project meetings Face to face project meetings (3) /2 days Kick-off meeting Closing event Virtual meetings (3) Extra meetings if needed

6. EXTERNAL Steering group Audits and supervises the whole project (strategy). A consulting organ of mental health nursing, e-learning and higher education Face-to-face meeting (1) Online meetings (3) Closing event

7. External evaluation and auditing Steering group members: one from every university ( higher nursing education), one mental health professional, one representative of service users organization. External evaluator External auditor Project manager Project coordinator.

8. External External evaluator, senior academic, experience from international development projects in higher education. Main evaluation ( project process) half-way of the project External auditor (finance) evaluation twice during the project period.

9. MILESTONES Finalization of the quality plan 11/2013 Introduction of the self-evaluation monitoring tool (1/2014) Project meetings (face-to-face and virtual) 02/2014, 05/2014, 09/2014, 02/2015, 08/2015, 02/2016 External evaluation (3/2015) External audit (9/2016)

10. WHAT ELSE ????? IMPLICATION How can we make this happen ?