1. Copyright © 2008 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Chapter 6: Slides Selected by Prof. Clapp Forecasting Ownership Benefits and Value: Market Research

2. 7-2 Multiple Factors Affect Real Estate Demand  Needs for access (“linkages”) “location, location, and location”  Non-locational factors Housing (style, design, size; financing available) Commercial (tenant mix and character; parking facilities) Offices (style, design, floor plate size; amenities and services; electrical and communications service)

3. 7-3 Market Segmentation  Market segmentation: Differences in preferences or needs among market subgroups  Implication of market segmentation: Market research must focus on relevant market segments  Corollary 1: Most real estate data irrelevant in studying any particular property  Corollary 2: Most important data for a particular market segment may not be readily available

4. 7-4 Challenges Posed by Market Segmentation  Market segmentation is an empirical notion: Cannot be described without investigating first Important facts of segmentation may vary with location and property type  Research process must recognize this challenge  No simple, universal procedure

5. 7-5 No? Create Market Defining Story Product? Customer? Where is Customer? Customer Sensitivities? Competition? Collect Initial Data Evaluate Results Refine Research End Research Sufficient? Yes? Real Estate Market Research as a Cycle

6. 7-6 Writing a Market Story  All market research is someone’s particular story (Best to write down the assumptions of the story)  Clues about market segments can come from industry literature (Urban Land Institute)  Initial collection of data should depend on the assumptions about segmentation  Object: Estimate critical market parameters (rental rates, sales projections, etc.)

7. 7-7 Three Examples of Property Market Research 1.Elysian Forest – planned unit development 2.Palm Grove – Prof. Clapp Deleted these Slides 3.Plane Vista – proposed apartment expansion  Why look only at development projects? No difference in market analysis questions between existing and proposed properties Much more market information for existing properties Therefore, critical parameters should be clearer for existing properties Development projects demonstrate more of the challenging data issues

8. 7-8 Elysian Forest: Proposed Planned Unit Development (PUD)  PUD characteristics Mixed density (single family to townhouses) Smaller individual lots for single family Common areas and recreation facilities  Elysian Forest was bold and big (for University City) First PUD 900 units (several times the size of typical development

9. 7-9 Elysian Forest: Projected Sales and Market Projected Sales of Elysian Forest Year12345 All unit types*88212236260104 * Condos, townhouses, patio homes, small-lot single family Estimated Sales in the University City Housing Market Year12345 All sales1,500 1,5501,6001,700 New units5006008509001,100

10. 7-10 Typical Elysian Forest Patio Home Pair

11. 7-11 “Competitive Norm” from Local Parade of Homes

12. 7-12 Typical Elysian Forest Patio Home Cluster

13. 7-13 Market Defining Story for Elysian Forest  What is the product? (upper income, high-density ownership residences)  Who are the customers? (top 30% of household income, but not top 8%; not traditional family with children at home)  Where are the customers? (retirement buyers; “empty nesters”; single parents, other adults (mixed sources))  What do customers care about in Elysian Forest? (good access to work; good recreation and social facilities; distinctive, contemporary design)  What is the competition? (no other comparable projects; Parade of Homes)

14. 7-14 All Households in University City Core Market Segments 0 99 House Price Percentile 92 70 “Traditional” Families Empty Nesters Single Parents Other family Unrelated Individuals Owner Occupant HouseholdsRental Households Core Market Segments for Elysian Forest In terms of %

15. 7-15 Initial Market Analysis  Determine income range that best approximates the target 22%  Determine owner household “market share” within each income interval for traditional families  Using result from step 2, determine percentage of owner households in our core market segments

16. 7-16 Initial Data Collection  Basic source: U.S. Census Detailed Tables Table HCT11: Tenure by Household Income in 1999 (income intervals for the 22% of households targeted for Elysian Forest) PCT38: Family Type by Presence of Own Children Under 18 Years of Age by Family Income in 1999 (portion of each type of household that is income eligible; portion of traditional households with children at home)

17. 7-17 Core Market Segments 0 99 House Price Percentile 92 70 “Traditional” Families Empty Nesters Single Parents Other family Unrelated Individuals Owner Occupant Households: 48,084 Core Market Segments for Elysian Forest 10,121 3,479 10,121 – 3,479 = 6,642 Core Market Share 6,642 ÷ 48,084 =.1381 or 13.81%

18. 7-18 Implications of Analysis for Elysian Forest Sales Year12345 Total target sales88212236260104 Total market sales 1,500 1,5501,6001,700 Total market segment potential (all sales x 13.81%)207 214221235 Projected sales at capture rate of 20%41 434447

19. 7-19 Actual Outcome for Elysian Forest  Built 20 speculative units  Staffed a sophisticated and expensive sales center  Never sold one unit  Project went to foreclosure  Firm went into bankruptcy

20. 7-20 Case 3: Plane Vista Apartments  Proposed project: Add 400 units to present 500 units.  Existing project: Four years old High quality, wide variety of floor plans Indoor gymnasium with large weight room Diverse mix of tenants Location: Immediately north of Orlando airport Weakness: Perimeter of city; no special amenities

21. 7-21 Location of Plane Vista in Orlando Disney World CBD Orlando International Airport Plane Vista Apartments Univ. of Central Florida

22. 7-22 Market Defining Story for Plane Vista  What is the product? Standard design, broad appeal; high-quality apartments  Who are the customers? Assume a broad spectrum of working rental households; upper third of rental household income distribution  Where are the customers? Initial assumption: Persons employed throughout east, south and central Orlando Influenced by commuting distance to work  What do customers like about Plane Vista? Should be well known from existing project

23. 7-23 Initial Data Collection  Concerned with commuter access of Plane Vista relative to competing apartment projects  Must see: locations of new, high-quality apartments and where jobs are concentrated Obtained apartment locations from dominant apartment market research firm in Orlando No solid information on job locations

24. 7-24 Constructing Estimates of Job Locations  Available job related data: Property appraiser’s database on 43,000 business and government properties Square footage of structures Location by geographic coordinates Classified by over 200 land use categories U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics website: County employment by NAICS category  For 20 major categories of land use compute: Total county employment per category Total county building space ÷= Ratio of space per worker  For each property compute: Space ÷ Ratio of space per worker = Est. no. of workers at property

25. 7-25 Where People Work in Orlando Disney World CBD Orlando International Airport Plane Vista Apartments Univ. of Central Florida Source: Allocate CY empl. using parcel sf

26. 7-26 Initial Market Analysis  Distribution of new apartments shows a discrepancy between initial story and map: Most new apartments are very distant from Plane Vista Suggests that Plane Vista is isolation from larger Orlando market  Jobs map shows a similar clustering: Jobs concentrated at airport and on the arterial leading north Jobs scarce to south, west, and east

27. 7-27 Revised Market Defining Story: “Airport Island”  Assumption: 75% of Plane Vista occupants work on “airport island.”  Future of Plane Vista market depends on “airport island” “Airport Island” CBD

28. 7-28 Data Collection: Round Two  Total of jobs on airport island is 25,000  Airport is 60% of total  New firms will add 550 jobs to airport island  Conclusion: Total job growth on airport island is about 5.2% per year for next two years; Metro Orlando job growth at 2.5%  Other apartments on airport island Construction permits for other apartments are zero Competitive apartments number about 3,500 units with 90% occupancy

29. 7-29 Final Market Analysis: Key Assumptions  All else equal, apartment rental rates grow at the rate of inflation  Job growth drives apartment demand on airport island  No other new apartments for two years

30. 7-30 Projections of Critical Parameters for Plane Vista 20042005 Years 200620072008 Total units500 900 Occupancy rate 90%91%-93%90%-93%91%-95%92%-95% Rental rate growth0%1%-2%2%-3%2%-4%

31. 7-31 Questions about the Plane Vista Analysis  Which of the key assumptions seems most vulnerable to error?  What could be done to reduce it’s riskiness?  Does the projection of job growth on “Airport Island” seem safe?

32. 7-32 Some Final Observations on the Plane Vista Analysis  A market analysis is always a story No market analysis is purely numbers Goal: Put together as much objective evidence as possible before making final judgments Articulate the key assumptions as clearly as possible (Example: Airport growth was crucial to the Plane Vista story)  Next step: How to translate these into an estimate of value

33. 7-33 A Perspective on Real Estate Value  James Graaskamp: “When you buy real estate, you are buying a set of assumptions about the future”  We have set out our assumptions about Plane Vista

34. 7-34 Some Points about Real Estate Market Cycles  Real estate markets differ in cyclicality Office demand follow business cycles, and is very cyclical Apartments are less so since households must live somewhere  Longer construction lead time means more cyclicality  Poorer market information means more cyclicality

35. 7-35 High-Tech Tools for Real Estate Market Research  Geographic information systems (GIS) Made analysis of Plane Vista possible Widely used in store location research  Psychographics Market segmentation research seeks to relate product preferences to “attitudes, interests, opinions, and values, and to demographics Used to date in retail real estate, but may also apply to housing

36. 7-36 GIS in Store Location Research: Columbia, SC

37. 7-37 Survey Research  Potentially powerful tool if used carefully  Example applications Coastal Condo design: How many bedrooms do prospective buyers want? Plane Vista: Where do current residents really work?  Risk: Ending up with meaningless questions or a meaningless sample  Key preventative tools: Obtain review and advice from experienced survey researchers Pretest

38. Copyright © 2008 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin End of Chapter 6