1. NIKOLE LOBB DOUGHERTY, MA JESSI LAROSE, MPH OCTOBER 2011 H&AC Promising Strategies: Evaluation & Technical Assistance

2. Presentation Overview Overview of H&AC Evaluation Team and Goals The H&AC Initiative Evaluation Evaluation Technical Assistance

3. The H&AC Evaluation Team Washington University George Warren Brown School of Social Work Saint Louis University School of Public Health  Doug Luke, PhD  Nikole Lobb Dougherty, MA  Chris Robichaux, MS  Tanya Montgomery, MPH  Cheryl Kelly, PhD  Darcy Scharff, PhD  Jessi LaRose, MPH  Trina Ragain, MPH

4. Evaluation Team Goals 1. Conduct a modest multi-site evaluation of the H&AC Initiative Develop evaluation plan and logic model Implement evaluation plan 2. Increase grantees’ evaluation capacity through intensive technical assistance and training Work with grantees to develop individual evaluation plans Work with grantees to implement evaluation plans

5. The H&AC Initiative Evaluation

6. Definition of Internal Program Evaluation and the H&AC Evaluation Internal Program Evaluation: Evaluation conducted by each individual grantee for their own program H&AC Evaluation: Evaluation of the entire H&AC initiative (i.e., across all grantees) conducted by the evaluation team at Washington University and Saint Louis University

7. H&AC Evaluation Focus Capacity of programs Reach of programs Partnerships Policy Change Built Environment Opportunities Promising Practices Sustainability Behavior Change

8. How will we collect data? Healthy & Active Programs and Policies Evaluation (HAPPE) System  Quantitative data collection  Monthly and quarterly data submission throughout all three years of funding  Focuses on your activities (what, when, where and who), capacity, & partnerships One-on-one interviews with program staff  Qualitative data collection  Conducted in the 1 st and 3 rd years of the project  Focuses on lesson’s learned, capacity, collaborations Sustainability Assessment Survey  Online survey  Focuses on structures and processes related to likelihood of sustaining project elements

9. The HAPPE System

10. Benefits of the Evaluation H&AC Evaluation: Have a greater understanding of the impact of the H&AC Initiative on Missouri Identification and dissemination of promising practices to guide future obesity prevention efforts Individual Program: Easy and organized access to your own data Ability to generate your own reports of your data

11. Preview of H&AC Evaluation Activities November 2011 – January 2012 Training on the HAPPE System/Logic Model Development Spring 2012 Qualitative interviews with project representatives

12. Evaluation Technical Assistance

13. Technical Assistance Goals  To increase internal evaluation capacity  To address evaluation needs of grantees  To provide evaluation resources and networking opportunities to grantees

14. What We Can Help With Evaluation plans (e.g., logic models, evaluation questions) Quantitative and qualitative instruments Data management and analysis Database development Reports and presentations Evaluation resources Networking opportunities with other evaluators Interim reports/contract reporting tool

15. Preview of TA activities Evaluation capacity online needs assessment  November 2011 (a follow-up needs assessment will be conducted in the fall of 2014) Site visits  November 2011-January 2012 Individualized technical assistance plans and program logic model  Based on needs assessment and first site visit Regular communication to assist with needs  Conference calls, visits, emails

16. Contact Information Technical Assistance Contacts Jessi LaRose ericksjl@slu.edu 314.977.8280 Trina Ragain tragain@slu.edu 314.977.8189 Initiative Evaluation Contacts Nikole Lobb Dougherty Evaluation Coordinator nlobbdougherty@.wustl.edu 314.935.3741 Chris Robichaux HAPPE Coordinator crobichaux@gwbmail.wustl.edu 314. 935.3648