Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

1 Implicant Expansion Methods Used in The BOOM Minimizer Petr Fišer, Jan Hlavička Czech Technical University, Karlovo nám. 13, 121 35 Prague 2 e-mail:

Published byStewart Wilkinson Modified over 9 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "1 Implicant Expansion Methods Used in The BOOM Minimizer Petr Fišer, Jan Hlavička Czech Technical University, Karlovo nám. 13, 121 35 Prague 2 e-mail:"— Presentation transcript:

1 1 Implicant Expansion Methods Used in The BOOM Minimizer Petr Fišer, Jan Hlavička Czech Technical University, Karlovo nám. 13, 121 35 Prague 2 e-mail: hlavicka@fel.cvut.cz, fiserp@fel.cvut.cz

2 2 1. Introduction 2. Problem Statement 3. BOOM Structure 4. Iterative Minimization 5. CD-Search 6. Implicant Expansion 7. Tree Buffer 8. Experimental Results 9. Conclusions Outline

3 3 Problem Statement Given Boolean function of n input variables F(x 1, x 2, … x n,), by truth table: 1-terms (on-set) 0-terms (off-set) only few of the 2 n minterms have an output value assigned (care terms) the rest are don't care states. Task Formulate a synthesis algorithm, which will produce a two-level disjunctive form of F, whose complexity is close to the minimal disjunctive form.

4 4 BOOM Structure Single-output functions: CD-Search (generation of implicants) Implicant Expansion (generation of PIs) Covering problem solution Multi-output functions: CD-Search (generation of implicants) Implicant Expansion (generation of PIs) Implicant Reduction (generation of group implicants) Solution of the Group Covering Problem Output Reduction

5 5 Iterative Minimization The solution depends on random events CD-Search, IE and IR are repeated - more implicants, then covering problem is solved

6 6 CD - Search Combines the implicant generation with covering problem solution Greedy algorithm - implicants need not be prime CD_Search(F,R) { H =  do F’ = F t = 1 do l = most_frequent_literal(F’) t = t * l F’ = F’ – cubes_not_including(t) while (t  R   ) H = H  t F = F - F’ until (F ==  ) return H }

7 7 CD-Search Example abcde y 1. 01010 0 2. 01100 1 3. 01110 1 4. 11100 0 5. 11011 0 6. 01000 0 7. 01111 1 8. 10110 0 9. 01011 0 10. 01101 1 11. 10000 1 12. 10101 0 13. 10100 1 14. 00010 1 15. 00000 1 16. 11010 0 17. 00110 0 18. 00100 1 19. 00011 0 20. 11110 0

8 8 CD-Search Example abcde y 1. 01010 0 2. 01100 1 3. 01110 1 4. 11100 0 5. 11011 0 6. 01000 0 7. 01111 1 8. 10110 0 9. 01011 0 10. 01101 1 11. 10000 1 12. 10101 0 13. 10100 1 14. 00010 1 15. 00000 1 16. 11010 0 17. 00110 0 18. 00100 1 19. 00011 0 20. 11110 0 abcde f(1):..... f(0):.....

9 9 CD-Search Example abcde y 1. 01010 0 2. 01100 1 3. 01110 1 4. 11100 0 5. 11011 0 6. 01000 0 7. 01111 1 8. 10110 0 9. 01011 0 10. 01101 1 11. 10000 1 12. 10101 0 13. 10100 1 14. 00010 1 15. 00000 1 16. 11010 0 17. 00110 0 18. 00100 1 19. 00011 0 20. 11110 0 abcde f(1): 2.... f(0): 7....

10 10 CD-Search Example abcde y 1. 01010 0 2. 01100 1 3. 01110 1 4. 11100 0 5. 11011 0 6. 01000 0 7. 01111 1 8. 10110 0 9. 01011 0 10. 01101 1 11. 10000 1 12. 10101 0 13. 10100 1 14. 00010 1 15. 00000 1 16. 11010 0 17. 00110 0 18. 00100 1 19. 00011 0 20. 11110 0 abcde f(1): 24... f(0): 75...

11 11 CD-Search Example abcde y 1. 01010 0 2. 01100 1 3. 01110 1 4. 11100 0 5. 11011 0 6. 01000 0 7. 01111 1 8. 10110 0 9. 01011 0 10. 01101 1 11. 10000 1 12. 10101 0 13. 10100 1 14. 00010 1 15. 00000 1 16. 11010 0 17. 00110 0 18. 00100 1 19. 00011 0 20. 11110 0 abcde f(1): 246.. f(0): 753..

12 12 CD-Search Example abcde y 1. 01010 0 2. 01100 1 3. 01110 1 4. 11100 0 5. 11011 0 6. 01000 0 7. 01111 1 8. 10110 0 9. 01011 0 10. 01101 1 11. 10000 1 12. 10101 0 13. 10100 1 14. 00010 1 15. 00000 1 16. 11010 0 17. 00110 0 18. 00100 1 19. 00011 0 20. 11110 0 abcde f(1): 2463. f(0): 7536.

13 13 CD-Search Example abcde y 1. 01010 0 2. 01100 1 3. 01110 1 4. 11100 0 5. 11011 0 6. 01000 0 7. 01111 1 8. 10110 0 9. 01011 0 10. 01101 1 11. 10000 1 12. 10101 0 13. 10100 1 14. 00010 1 15. 00000 1 16. 11010 0 17. 00110 0 18. 00100 1 19. 00011 0 20. 11110 0 abcde f(1): 24632 f(0): 75367 selected

14 14 CD-Search Example abcde y 1. 01010 0 2. 01100 1 3. 01110 1 4. 11100 0 5. 11011 0 6. 01000 0 7. 01111 1 8. 10110 0 9. 01011 0 10. 01101 1 11. 10000 1 12. 10101 0 13. 10100 1 14. 00010 1 15. 00000 1 16. 11010 0 17. 00110 0 18. 00100 1 19. 00011 0 20. 11110 0 abcde f(1): -3245 f(0): -4532 TERM IN PROGRESS a‘ SOLUTION selected

15 15 CD-Search Example abcde y 1. 01010 0 2. 01100 1 3. 01110 1 4. 11100 0 5. 11011 0 6. 01000 0 7. 01111 1 8. 10110 0 9. 01011 0 10. 01101 1 11. 10000 1 12. 10101 0 13. 10100 1 14. 00010 1 15. 00000 1 16. 11010 0 17. 00110 0 18. 00100 1 19. 00011 0 20. 11110 0 abcde f(1): -1-33 f(0): -4-22 TERM IN PROGRESS a‘c SOLUTION selected

16 16 CD-Search Example abcde y 1. 01010 0 2. 01100 1 3. 01110 1 4. 11100 0 5. 11011 0 6. 01000 0 7. 01111 1 8. 10110 0 9. 01011 0 10. 01101 1 11. 10000 1 12. 10101 0 13. 10100 1 14. 00010 1 15. 00000 1 16. 11010 0 17. 00110 0 18. 00100 1 19. 00011 0 20. 11110 0 abcde f(1):..... f(0):..... TERM IN PROGRESS SOLUTION a‘bc

17 17 CD-Search Example abcde y 1. 01010 0 2. 01100 1 3. 01110 1 4. 11100 0 5. 11011 0 6. 01000 0 7. 01111 1 8. 10110 0 9. 01011 0 10. 01101 1 11. 10000 1 12. 10101 0 13. 10100 1 14. 00010 1 15. 00000 1 16. 11010 0 17. 00110 0 18. 00100 1 19. 00011 0 20. 11110 0 abcde f(1): 20210 f(0): 35345 TERM IN PROGRESS SOLUTION a‘bc selected

18 18 CD-Search Example abcde y 1. 01010 0 2. 01100 1 3. 01110 1 4. 11100 0 5. 11011 0 6. 01000 0 7. 01111 1 8. 10110 0 9. 01011 0 10. 01101 1 11. 10000 1 12. 10101 0 13. 10100 1 14. 00010 1 15. 00000 1 16. 11010 0 17. 00110 0 18. 00100 1 19. 00011 0 20. 11110 0 abcde f(1): 2-210 f(0): 3-345 TERM IN PROGRESS b‘ SOLUTION a‘bc selected

19 19 CD-Search Example abcde y 1. 01010 0 2. 01100 1 3. 01110 1 4. 11100 0 5. 11011 0 6. 01000 0 7. 01111 1 8. 10110 0 9. 01011 0 10. 01101 1 11. 10000 1 12. 10101 0 13. 10100 1 14. 00010 1 15. 00000 1 16. 11010 0 17. 00110 0 18. 00100 1 19. 00011 0 20. 11110 0 abcde f(1): 2-21- f(0): 3-34- TERM IN PROGRESS b‘e‘ SOLUTION a‘bc selected

20 20 CD-Search Example abcde y 1. 01010 0 2. 01100 1 3. 01110 1 4. 11100 0 5. 11011 0 6. 01000 0 7. 01111 1 8. 10110 0 9. 01011 0 10. 01101 1 11. 10000 1 12. 10101 0 13. 10100 1 14. 00010 1 15. 00000 1 16. 11010 0 17. 00110 0 18. 00100 1 19. 00011 0 20. 11110 0 abcde f(1):..... f(0):..... TERM IN PROGRESS SOLUTION a‘bc + b‘e‘d‘

21 21 CD-Search Example abcde y 1. 01010 0 2. 01100 1 3. 01110 1 4. 11100 0 5. 11011 0 6. 01000 0 7. 01111 1 8. 10110 0 9. 01011 0 10. 01101 1 11. 10000 1 12. 10101 0 13. 10100 1 14. 00010 1 15. 00000 1 16. 11010 0 17. 00110 0 18. 00100 1 19. 00011 0 20. 11110 0 abcde f(1): 00010 f(0): 11101 TERM IN PROGRESS SOLUTION a‘bc + b‘e‘d‘ selected

22 22 CD-Search Example abcde y 1. 01010 0 2. 01100 1 3. 01110 1 4. 11100 0 5. 11011 0 6. 01000 0 7. 01111 1 8. 10110 0 9. 01011 0 10. 01101 1 11. 10000 1 12. 10101 0 13. 10100 1 14. 00010 1 15. 00000 1 16. 11010 0 17. 00110 0 18. 00100 1 19. 00011 0 20. 11110 0 abcde f(1): 0-010 f(0): 1-101 TERM IN PROGRESS b‘ SOLUTION a‘bc + b‘e‘d‘ selected

23 23 CD-Search Example abcde y 1. 01010 0 2. 01100 1 3. 01110 1 4. 11100 0 5. 11011 0 6. 01000 0 7. 01111 1 8. 10110 0 9. 01011 0 10. 01101 1 11. 10000 1 12. 10101 0 13. 10100 1 14. 00010 1 15. 00000 1 16. 11010 0 17. 00110 0 18. 00100 1 19. 00011 0 20. 11110 0 abcde f(1): 0-01- f(0): 1-10- TERM IN PROGRESS b‘e‘ SOLUTION a‘bc + b‘e‘d‘ selected

24 24 CD-Search Example abcde y 1. 01010 0 2. 01100 1 3. 01110 1 4. 11100 0 5. 11011 0 6. 01000 0 7. 01111 1 8. 10110 0 9. 01011 0 10. 01101 1 11. 10000 1 12. 10101 0 13. 10100 1 14. 00010 1 15. 00000 1 16. 11010 0 17. 00110 0 18. 00100 1 19. 00011 0 20. 11110 0 SOLUTION a‘bc + b‘e‘d‘ + b‘e‘c‘

25 25 Implicant Expansion Methods Sequential Search candidates for rejection from a term are selected one by one Multiple Sequential Search more PIs are produced Exhaustive Expansion all primes are generated Distributed Exhaustive Expansion literal elimination distributed over several consecutive iterations

26 26 Multiple Sequential Search Example Term: 010010 Off - set: 000010 011110 011000 010011 110000

27 27 Multiple Sequential Search Example Term: 010010 Off - set: 000010 011110 011000 010011 110000 010010

28 28 Multiple Sequential Search Example Term: 010010 Off - set: 000010 011110 011000 010011 110000 010010 -10010 - OK

29 29 Multiple Sequential Search Example Term: 010010 Off - set: 000010 011110 011000 010011 110000 010010 -10010 - OK --0010 - COLLISION

30 30 Multiple Sequential Search Example Term: 010010 Off - set: 000010 011110 011000 010011 110000 010010 -10010 - OK --0010 - COLLISION -1-010 - OK

31 31 Multiple Sequential Search Example Term: 010010 Off - set: 000010 011110 011000 010011 110000 010010 -10010 - OK --0010 - COLLISION -1-010 - OK -1--10 - COLLISION

32 32 Multiple Sequential Search Example Term: 010010 Off - set: 000010 011110 011000 010011 110000 010010 -10010 - OK --0010 - COLLISION -1-010 - OK -1--10 - COLLISION -1-0-0 - COLLISION

33 33 Multiple Sequential Search Example Term: 010010 Off - set: 000010 011110 011000 010011 110000 010010 -10010 - OK --0010 - COLLISION -1-010 - OK -1--10 - COLLISION -1-0-0 - COLLISION -1-01- - COLLISION PRIMES: -1-010

34 34 Multiple Sequential Search Example Term: 010010 Off - set: 000010 011110 011000 010011 110000 010010 0-0010 - COLLISION 01-010 - OK 01--10 - COLLISION 01-0-0 - COLLISION 01-01- - COLLISION -1-010 - OK PRIMES: -1-010 skip next position

35 35 Multiple Sequential Search Example Term: 010010 Off - set: 000010 011110 011000 010011 110000 010010 010-10 - OK 010--0 - OK 010--- - COLLISION -10--0 - COLLISION 0-0--0 - COLLISION 01---0 - COLLISION PRIMES: -1-010 010--0

36 36 Multiple Sequential Search Example Term: 010010 Off - set: 000010 011110 011000 010011 110000 010010 0100-0 - OK 0100-- - COLLISION -100-0 - COLLISION 0-00-0 - COLLISION 01-0-0 - COLLISION 010--0 - OK PRIMES: -1-010 010--0

37 37 Multiple Sequential Search Example Term: 010010 Off - set: 000010 011110 011000 010011 110000 010010 01001- - COLLISION PRIMES: -1-010 010--0 SAME AS FIRST POSITION

38 38 Multiple Sequential Search Example Term: 010010 Off - set: 000010 011110 011000 010011 110000 010010 -10010 - OK -1-010 - IGNORED -10-10 - OK ! -10--0 - COLLISION -10-1- - COLLISION PRIMES: -1-010 010--0 -10-10 BUT! => EXHAUSTIVE EXPANSION

39 39 Implicant Expansion Strategies Evaluation Time growth for different IE methods

40 40 Implicant Expansion Strategies Evaluation Primes growth for different IE methods

41 41 Accelerating Iterative Minimization Already processed implicants are not considered in next iterations

42 42 TREE BUFFER Main Features: High look-up speed Low memory demands Simple operations

43 43 TREE BUFFER Operations: Insert term Find term Find & Insert Find & Delete

44 44 TREE BUFFER 0 - 1 Depth = number of input variables Tree buffer node: Ternary tree

45 45 Tree Buffer Example Inserting: a‘b‘c‘d (0001-)

46 46 Tree Buffer Example Inserting: a‘b‘c‘d (0001-) a

47 47 Tree Buffer Example Inserting: a‘b‘c‘d (0001-) a b

48 48 Tree Buffer Example Inserting: a‘b‘c‘d (0001-) a b c

49 49 Tree Buffer Example Inserting: a‘b‘c‘d (0001-) a b c d

50 50 Tree Buffer Example Inserting: a‘b‘c‘d (0001-) a b c d e 0001-

51 51 Tree Buffer Example a b c d e 00000 0001--0-10-0-11101-111--011111

52 52 Tree Buffer Example a b c d e 00000 0001--0-10-0-11101-111--011111 Searching: ab‘c‘d (1001-) failure

53 53 Tree Buffer vs. Linear Buffer Tree bufferLinear buffer max. size< n * i, if i << 3 n n * i min. size< 3 n-1, if i ~ 3 n n * i ~ n * 3 n max. lookup timenn * i min. lookup time1i Input variables: n Inserted terms: i

54 54 Experimental Results Comparison with ESPRESSO : Percentage of time needed by BOOM

55 55 Experimental Results Time for one iteration on very large problems

56 56 Time Complexity Evaluation

57 57 Conclusions New Boolean minimization method was presented Applicable to problems of large dimensions Advantageous for problems with large DC set The results are comparable with ESPRESSO Run times are shorter For problems with more than 100 input variables beats ESPRESSO both in time and minimality

Download ppt "1 Implicant Expansion Methods Used in The BOOM Minimizer Petr Fišer, Jan Hlavička Czech Technical University, Karlovo nám. 13, 121 35 Prague 2 e-mail:"

Similar presentations

CSEE 4823 Advanced Logic Design Handout: Lecture #2 1/22/15

CSEE 4823 Advanced Logic Design Handout: Lecture #2 1/22/15
Figure 4.1. The function f (x1, x2, x3) =  m(0, 2, 4, 5, 6).

Figure 4.1. The function f (x1, x2, x3) =  m(0, 2, 4, 5, 6).
EEE324 Digital Electronics Ian McCrumRoom 5B18, 02890366364 Lecture 5: Software for.

EEE324 Digital Electronics Ian McCrumRoom 5B18, Lecture 5: Software for.
Universal logic design algorithm and its application to the synthesis of two-level switching circuits §H.-J.Mathony §IEEE Proceedings 1989.

Universal logic design algorithm and its application to the synthesis of two-level switching circuits §H.-J.Mathony §IEEE Proceedings 1989.
ECE C03 Lecture 31 Lecture 3 Two-Level Logic Minimization Algorithms Hai Zhou ECE 303 Advanced Digital Design Spring 2002.

ECE C03 Lecture 31 Lecture 3 Two-Level Logic Minimization Algorithms Hai Zhou ECE 303 Advanced Digital Design Spring 2002.
©GoldSim Technology Group LLC., 2012 Optimization in GoldSim Jason Lillywhite and Ryan Roper June 2012 Webinar.

©GoldSim Technology Group LLC., 2012 Optimization in GoldSim Jason Lillywhite and Ryan Roper June 2012 Webinar.
It Is Better to Run Iterative Resynthesis on Parts of the Circuit Petr Fišer, Jan Schmidt Faculty of Information Technology Czech Technical University.

It Is Better to Run Iterative Resynthesis on Parts of the Circuit Petr Fišer, Jan Schmidt Faculty of Information Technology Czech Technical University.
ECE 667 Synthesis & Verification - Boolean Functions 1 ECE 667 Spring 2013 ECE 667 Spring 2013 Synthesis and Verification of Digital Circuits Boolean Functions.

ECE 667 Synthesis & Verification - Boolean Functions 1 ECE 667 Spring 2013 ECE 667 Spring 2013 Synthesis and Verification of Digital Circuits Boolean Functions.
Two-Level Logic Synthesis -- Heuristic Method (ESPRESSO)

Two-Level Logic Synthesis -- Heuristic Method (ESPRESSO)
ECE 331 – Digital System Design

ECE 331 – Digital System Design
Logic Synthesis 2 Outline –Two-Level Logic Optimization –ESPRESSO Goal –Understand two-level optimization –Understand ESPRESSO operation.

Logic Synthesis 2 Outline –Two-Level Logic Optimization –ESPRESSO Goal –Understand two-level optimization –Understand ESPRESSO operation.
EDA (CS286.5b) Day 15 Logic Synthesis: Two-Level.

EDA (CS286.5b) Day 15 Logic Synthesis: Two-Level.
Chapter 3 Simplification of Switching Functions

Chapter 3 Simplification of Switching Functions
1 CK Cheng CSE Dept. UC San Diego CS 140, Lecture 2 Combinational Logic.

1 CK Cheng CSE Dept. UC San Diego CS 140, Lecture 2 Combinational Logic.
Logic Synthesis Outline –Logic Synthesis Problem –Logic Specification –Two-Level Logic Optimization Goal –Understand logic synthesis problem –Understand.

Logic Synthesis Outline –Logic Synthesis Problem –Logic Specification –Two-Level Logic Optimization Goal –Understand logic synthesis problem –Understand.
Logic Synthesis 1 Outline –Logic Synthesis Problem –Logic Specification –Two-Level Logic Optimization Goal –Understand logic synthesis problem –Understand.

Logic Synthesis 1 Outline –Logic Synthesis Problem –Logic Specification –Two-Level Logic Optimization Goal –Understand logic synthesis problem –Understand.
Penn ESE535 Spring 2009-- DeHon 1 ESE535: Electronic Design Automation Day 4: February 25, 2009 Two-Level Logic-Synthesis.

Penn ESE535 Spring DeHon 1 ESE535: Electronic Design Automation Day 4: February 25, 2009 Two-Level Logic-Synthesis.
Give qualifications of instructors: DAP

Give qualifications of instructors: DAP
Gate Logic: Two Level Canonical Forms

Gate Logic: Two Level Canonical Forms
Contemporary Logic Design Two-Level Logic © R.H. Katz Transparency No. 4-1 Chapter #2: Two-Level Combinational Logic Section 2.3, 2.4 -- Switches and Tools.

Contemporary Logic Design Two-Level Logic © R.H. Katz Transparency No. 4-1 Chapter #2: Two-Level Combinational Logic Section 2.3, Switches and Tools.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google