1. 27 August 2004Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik1 ALICE Performance Physics motivation Experimental conditions Physics performance

2. 27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 2 LHC Energy For A-A collisions: E cms = 5500 A GeV E lab = E cms 2 / (2A m N ) = 1.6  10 7 A GeV for lead ions E lab Pb-Pb = 3.3  10 9 GeV = 3.3  10 12 MeV = 0.5 kg  10 cm g And for pp collisions: E lab pp(14TeV) = 70 g  2 cm g For those who don’t like to be seated on a lead ion (and to fly inside LHC vacuum pipe) E cms Pb-Pb = 5500 A GeV = 1.14  10 9 MeV = 1 g  2 cm g Still, macroscopic energy !!! (one can actually hear it) But the size of ions is by factor more than 10 -12 smaller

3. 27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 3 hep-ph0104010 √s (GeV) 1010 2 10 3 1.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 N ch /(0.5N part ) 5 10 2 10 3 10 4 dN ch /d  |  <1 2 5 10 3 Still no safe way to extrapolate  shadowing/saturation (might decrease charged multiplicity)  jet quenching (might increase it dramatically)  A-scaling (importance soft vs. hard changes with energy) ALICE optimized for dN ch /dy = 4000 Checked up to 8000 (reality factor 2) dN ch /d  ~ 1500 What multiplicity do we expect? old estimates: dN ch /dy = 2000 – 8000, now we can extrapolate from RHIC data dN ch /d  ~ 2500 (from K.Kajantie, K.Eskola)

4. 27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 4 Use different Ion species to vary the energy density central minimum bias and pA

5. 27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 5 ALICE Physics Program (has to cover in one experiment what at the SPS was covered by 6-7 experiments, and at RHIC by 4!!)  Global observables:  multiplicities,  distributions  Degrees of freedom as a function of T:  hadron ratios and spectra  dilepton continuum, direct photons  Geometry of the emitting source:  HBT, impact parameter via zero-degree energy  Early state manifestation of collective effects:  elliptic flow

6. 27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 6 ALICE Physics Program Deconfinement: charmonium and bottomium spectroscopy Energy loss of partons in quark gluon plasma: jet quenching high pt spectra open charm and open beauty Chiral symmetry restoration: neutral to charged ratios resonance decays Fluctuation phenomena - critical behavior: event-by-event particle composition and spectra pp collisions in a new energy domain

7. 27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 7 ALICE detector acceptance 20 0 1 -2 2 0 1 23  ptpt PHOS HMPID TRD TOF TPC ITS tracking ITS multiplicity 100 Muon arm 2.4<  <4 PMD 2.3<  <3.5 FMD -5.4<  <-1.6, 1.6<  <3 Central Detectors

8. 27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 8 ALICE LAYOUT: TRACKING (and event characterization) Inner Tracking System (ITS): 6 Si Layers (pixels, drift, strips) Vertex reconstruction, dE/dx -0.9<  <0.9 TRD electron identification, tracking -0.9<  <0.9 TPC Tracking, dE/dx -0.9<  <0.9

9. 27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 9 If you thought this was difficult... NA49 experiment: A Pb-Pb event

10. 27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 10 STAR A central Au-Au event @ ~130 GeV/nucleon and this was even more difficult...

11. 27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 11 ALICE Pb-Pb central event N ch (-0.5<  <0.5)=8000 … what about this!

12. 27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 12 Tracking performance Tracking eff. In TPC vs. p T TPC and ITS tracking efficiency – better then 90%

13. 27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 13 Track reconstruction in TPC-ITS p T resolution The track momentum is measured (mainly) by TPC With ITS: resolution improves by a factor ~10 for high p T tracks  Lever arm larger by 1.5 accounts for a factor ~ 2  Remaining effect due to high resolution of points measured in ITS  More improvement comes including the TRD in the tracking

14. 27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 14 Tracking-II: Momentum resolution resolution ~ 9% at 100 GeV/c excellent performance in hard region!

15. 27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 15 ALICE LAYOUT: PID TOF PID (K,p,  ) -0.9<  <0.9 HMPID: High Momentum Particle Identification ( , K, p) RICH Hard Probes

16. 27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 16 ALICE PID , K, p identified in large acceptance (2  * 1.8 units  ) via a combination of dE/dx in Si and TPC and TOF from ~100 MeV to 2 (p/K) - 3.5 (K/p) GeV/c Electrons identified from 100 MeV/c to 100 GeV/c (with varying efficiency) combining Si+TPC+TOF with a dedicated TRD In small acceptance HMPID extends PID to ~5 GeV Photons measured with high resolution in PHOS, counting in PMD, and in EMC 0 1 2 3 4 5 p (GeV/c) 1 10 100 p (GeV/c) TRD e /  PHOS  /   TPC + ITS (dE/dx)  /K K/p e /  HMPID (RICH) TOF Alice uses ~all known techniques! Aerogel Cherenkov 10 GeV/c

17. 27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 17 Under study: extension of PID to even higher momenta Combine TPC and TRD dE/dx capabilities (similar number of samples/track) to get statistical ID in the relativistic rise region 8<p<10 GeV/c

18. 27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 18 PID combined over ITS, TPC and TOF (Kaons) ITSTPC TOF Efficiency of the combined PID is higher and the contamination is lower than the ones given by any of the detectors stand-alone ITS & TPC & TOF Selection : ITS & TPC & TOF (central PbPb HIJING events)

19. I. Belikov27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 19 Example : Particle spectra Preliminary Needs corrections for decays, tracking and PID efficiency generated reconstructed

20. I. Belikov27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 20 Example:  analysis All candidates from the ESD S ~ p0 = 124 S/B ~ p0/p3 = 1.9 PID with C  : C K : C p = 1 : 0 : 1 S ~ p0=127 S/B ~ p0/p3 = 7.1 (290 events from the jet production) Fitted with p0*exp(-0.5*(x-p1)*(x-p1)/p2) + p3 Mass=p1=1115 MeV  =√p1=1.3 MeV

21. 27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 21 Λ Reconstruction with pt dependent geometrical cuts  Efficiency ~ 50 % 13 Λ / event S/N ~ 1.2 10 000 000 Pb+Pb events signal noise  = Acc * Eff  0 yield

22. 27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 22 HBT correlations 3D fit, (range 0-50MeV): Qout=7.92 ± 0.03 fm Qside=7.84 ± 0.02 fm Qlong=8.16 ± 0.02 fm =0.87 ± 0.01  2/NDF=1.48

23. 27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 23 Single event pion-pion interferometry (dN/dy = 6000)

24. 27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 24 Parton Energy Loss Effects:  Reduction of single inclusive high p t particles  Parton specific (stronger for gluons than quarks)  Flavour specific (stronger for light quarks)  Measure identified hadrons ( , K, p, , etc.) + partons (charm, beauty) at high p t  Suppression of mini-jets  same-side / away-side correlations  Change of fragmentation function for hard jets (p t >> 10 GeV/c)  Transverse and longitudinal fragmentation function of jets  Jet broadening  reduction of jet energy, dijets,  -jet pairs p+p and p+A measurements crucial

25. 27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 25 Accessible transverse energy

26. 27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 26 Q Heavy Quarks – dead cone Heavy quarks with momenta < 20–30 GeV/c  v << c Gluon radiation is suppressed at angles < m Q /E Q “dead-cone” effect  Due to destructive interference  Contributes to the harder fragmentation of heavy quarks Yu.L.Dokshitzer and D.E.Kharzeev: dead cone implies lower energy loss Yu.L.Dokshitzer and D.E.Kharzeev, Phys. Lett. B519 (2001) 199 [arXiv:hep-ph/0106202]. D mesons quenching reduced Ratio D/hadrons (or D/  0 ) enhanced and sensitive to medium properties

27. 27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 27 Detection strategy for D 0  K -  + Weak decay with mean proper length c  = 124  m Impact Parameter (distance of closest approach of a track to the primary vertex) of the decay products d 0 ~ 100  m STRATEGY: invariant mass analysis of fully-reconstructed topologies originating from (displaced) secondary vertices  Measurement of Impact Parameters  Measurement of Momenta  Particle identification to tag the two decay products

28. 27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 28 Track reconstruction in TPC-ITS d 0 measurement Measurement of impact parameters is crucial for secondary vertex reconstruction

29. 27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 29 Selection of D 0 candidates Secondary vertex: from minimization of distance between the 2 tracks After reconstruction and rejection of ( ,  ) pairs (in |M[K,  ]-M(D 0 )| < 3  =36 MeV/c) : S/B = 4.6  10 -6 Geometric & Kinematic selection (track dist. 800 MeV/c) increases S/B by a factor 100 S/B ~ 10 -4 Displaced vertex selection:  pair of tracks with large impact parameters  good pointing of reconstructed D 0 momentum to the primary vertex increases S/B by a factor 1000 S/B ~ 0.1 d 0 K  d 0  <<0 cos  pointing  1

30. 27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 30 Hadronic charm Combine ALICE tracking + secondary vertex finding capabilities (  d0 ~60  m@1GeV/c p T ) + large acceptance PID to detect processes as D 0  K -  + ~1 in acceptance / central event ~ 0.001/central event accepted after rec. and all cuts S/  B+S ~ 37 S/  B+S ~ 8 for 1<p T <2 GeV/c (~12 if K ID required) significance vs p T Results for 10 7 PbPb ev. (~ 1/2 a run)

31. 27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 31 Sensitivity on R AA for D 0 mesons ‘High’ p t (6–15 GeV/c) here energy loss can be studied (it’s the only expected effect) Low p t (< 6–7 GeV/c) Nuclear shadowing + k t broadening + ? thermal charm ? A.Dainese nucl-ex/0311004

32. 27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 32 D quenching (D 0  K -  + ) Reduced Ratio D/hadrons (or D/  0 ) enhanced and sensitive to medium properties A.Dainese nucl-ex/0311004

33. 27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 33 Jet reconstruction Jets are produced copiously p t (GeV) 2 20100200 100/event1/event 100K/year 4 10 8 central PbPb collisions/month 6 10 5 events ALICE Acceptance

34. 27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 34 50 GeV jet 50 – 100 GeV jets in Pb–Pb η–φ lego plot with Δη 0.08  Δφ 0.25 At large enough jet energy – jet clearly visible But still large fluctuation in underlying energy Central Pb–Pb event (HIJING simulation) with 100 GeV di-jet (PYTHIA simulation) C. Loizides 100 GeV

35. 27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 35 Energy fluctuation in UE Mean energy in a cone of radius R coming from underlying event Fluctuation of energy from an underlying event in a cone of radius R

36. 27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 36 Irreducible limits on jet energy resolution Small radius of jet cone (R = 0.3)  we don’t see 30% of energy  underlying event fluctuation ~ 16% for 100 GeV jet Larger jet-cone radius (R = 0.7)  we don’t see 10% of energy  underlying event fluctuation ~ 35% for 100 GeV jet We cannot just add non-seen energy outside jet cone  as is usually done in pp where jet shape is known  that depends on energy distribution which we have to study It’s impossible to know jet energy better than 22 – 30% (for 100 GeV jets)  we are now at 30 %, pretty close… E = 100 GeV 22% Intrinsic limit

37. 27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 37 Jet energy resolution using charged particles 160-190 90-110 64-77 44-53 30-37 Input spectrum for given interval of reconstructed energy. Cone-size: R = 0.3, p T > 2 GeV (R<1 = parton energy) Charged/neutral fluctuations dominate:  E/E > 50%

38. 27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 38 Proposed ALICE EMCAL EM Sampling Calorimeter (STAR Design) Pb-scintillator linear response -0.7 <  < 0.7  12 super-modules 19152 towers Energy resolution ~15%/√E Improved jet-energy resolution Trigger for high-energy jets Larger acceptance for high-p t 

39. 27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 39 EMCAL Directional and Energy Resolution Modified UA1 cone algorithm Uses combination of tracking and calorimeter information Cone Radius: R = 0.3, Seed 4.6 GeV, Minimum Jet energy 14 GeV Background HIJING PbPb b = 0-5 fm S. Blyth QM’04

40. 27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 40 Jet quenching Excellent jet reconstruction… but challenging to measure medium modification of its shape… E t =100 GeV (reduced average jet energy fraction inside R):  Radiated energy ~20%  R=0.3  E/E=3%  E t UE ~ 100 GeV R Medium induced redistribution of jet energy occurs inside cone C.A. Salgado, U.A. Wiedemann hep-ph/0310079

41. 27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 41 Fragmentation functions 00.51 z 10 -4 10 -2 1 vacuum medium p jet z ktkt z=p t /p jet Look also for transverse fragmentation function (k t )

42. 27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 42 Fraction of energy inside cone all particles – and low p t

43. 27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 43 pp physics All of previously mentioned observables have to be measured also in pp collisions for comparison with heavy-ion results However, there are interesting questions regarding pp collisions themselves, for example  charged multiplicity distribution  correlations between mean p t and multiplicity or strangeness  study of diffractive events - with large rapidity gaps  jet physics  … ALICE advantages w.r.t. other pp detectors  lower p t cut-off  particle identification (see ALICE Note: P.Giubellino, K.S. et al.: Day One…)

44. 27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 44 Who carry baryon number Standard point of view  quarks have baryon charge 1/3  gluons have zero baryon charge Baryon number is carried by quarks, not by gluons It is not obvious  baryon number can be transferred by specific configuration of gluon field

45. 27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 45 Exchange in t-channel Exchange of spin 1/2 (quark)  exp (-1/2  y) (~ s -1/2 )  strong damping with rapidity interval (i.e. for annihilation with energy) Exchange of spin 1 (gluon)  const.  no damping at all Q: what is actually exchanged ? q q q J This exchanged is suppressed q q J This exchange is not

46. 27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 46 Central region at LHC Asymmetry A B = 2 * (B – anti-B) / (B + anti-B) in % at LHC (B. Kopeliovich) – 9 ← η H1 (HERA) Δη ~ 7

47. 27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 47 Statistics needed For proton – antiproton one needs precision ~ 1%  the effect is about 7%, compare to 3 % in ‘normal’ case  using ALICE acceptance, efficiency etc. this needs few times 10 4 minimum bias pp events, i.e. something like first 100 sec of running Larger effect expected for strange particle, Lambda – anti-Lambda about 15%  for this few times 10 5 events will do For Omega – anti-Omega a huge effect is expected (under some assumptions even 100%)  100 Omegas would be enough for that – order of 10 7 events  a ‘good day’ of running will do it all

48. 27/8/2004 Physics Reach and Performance of ALICE K.Safarik 48 ALICE is open for new ideas