Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byBaldwin Dorsey Modified over 9 years ago
1
NMI3 meeting, ISIS, September 26-29, 2005 Contents: Overview of new capabilities of the RESTRAX software Numerical optimizations of TAS parameters Virtual TAS experiments - simulations with selected sample kernels Recent developments of RESTRAX Optimization of neutron optics and virtual triple-axis experiments Jan Šaroun 1, Jiří Kulda 2, Vasyl Ryukhtin 1 1 Nuclear Physics Institute, Řež 2 Institute Laue-Langevin, Grenoble RESTRAX homepage::http://omega.ujf.cas.cz/restrax/http://omega.ujf.cas.cz/restrax/
2
SIMRES Version for instrument optimizations - more detailed simulation of TAS components - mapping neutron beam in phase-space - tools for numerical optimization
3
NMI3 meeting, ISIS, September 26-29, 2005 SIMRES - virtual triple axis spectrometer collimator segments source sample crystals detector + setups that can be mapped onto a classical TAS layout (powder and strain diffratometers) multi-purpose components: source: arbitrary energy, spatial and angular distributions via look-up tables crystals: focusing arrays of elastically bent or mosaic crystals (incl. simulated extinction effects, absorption, etc...) collimators: universal components describing: Sollers, curved guides or benders, elliptic or parabolic guides, lobster-eye devices multiplexing: flat-cone multianalyzer and multidetector systems
4
NMI3 meeting, ISIS, September 26-29, 2005 Ray-tracing & numerical optimizations Fixed setup fast ray-tracing code, 10 3 -10 4 counts/sec ray-tracing results are used to find extremum of fm numerically. figure of merit, fm(a 1, a 2,...): I... incident intensity E... energy spread I / E, I / E 2... inelastic scattering I / , I / 2... diffraction free parameters, a 1, a 2,... a n crystal curvature, mosaicity, cutting angle, guide dimensions, curvature, divergence,... Speed problem: number of simulations / iteration = 1+2n 2 n 4 acceptable (CPU time < 1 hour)
5
NMI3 meeting, ISIS, September 26-29, 2005 Lobster-eye device & focusing monochromator spatial focusing monochromatic beam + spatial focusing ? Simultaneous optimization of the crystal curvatures and guide parameters –mutual correlations –ray-tracing: realistic model of the instrument components monochromatic focusing
6
NMI3 meeting, ISIS, September 26-29, 2005 Lobster-eye device & focusing monochromator Lobster-eye device 20 (hor.) or 30 (ver.) blades thickness 0.5 mm m=3 supermirror (concave sides) elliptic & parabolic profiles optimization: entry & exit width TAS - IN14 setup cold source straight 58 Ni guide, 6x12 cm 2 monochromator: PG 002, doubly focusing, =4.05 Å target (sample) area: 3x3 mm 2 optimization: crystal curvatures
7
NMI3 meeting, ISIS, September 26-29, 2005 Parabolic guide Focusing on small samples + perfect focusing of a parallel beam - large reflection angle at the entry
8
NMI3 meeting, ISIS, September 26-29, 2005 Focusing on small samples Elliptic guide - parallel beam does not focus to a point + lamellae are parallel at the entry
9
NMI3 meeting, ISIS, September 26-29, 2005 Lobster-eye device & focusing monochromator Optimization in 2 dimensions x Mapping the parameter space horizontal: 1) monochromator: 1/R H 2) guide: exit width vertical: 1) monochromator: 1/R V 2) guide: exit height adjustable parameters: Resolution 32x32 pixels 1024 simulations Number of blades is fixed adjusting focal distance
10
NMI3 meeting, ISIS, September 26-29, 2005 Mapping of parameter space Elliptic blades Optimization route in 2 dimensions Intensity/ E Intensity horizontalvertical
11
NMI3 meeting, ISIS, September 26-29, 2005 Mapping of parameter space Parabolic blades Optimization route in 2 dimensions Intensity/ E Intensity horizontalvertical
12
NMI3 meeting, ISIS, September 26-29, 2005 Lobster-eye device & focusing monochromator Optimization in 3 dimensions horizontal: 1) monochromator: 1/R H 2) guide: entry width 3) guide: exit width vertical: 1) monochromator: 1/R V 2) guide: entry height 3) guide: exit height adjustable parameters: mapping in 3D is not feasible 32768 simulations/map … Number of blades is fixed adjusting focal distance and spacing between blades
13
NMI3 meeting, ISIS, September 26-29, 2005 Lobster-eye device & focusing monochromator Optimization in 3 dimensions Elliptic blades
14
NMI3 meeting, ISIS, September 26-29, 2005 Lobster-eye device & focusing monochromator Optimization in 3 dimensions Parabolic blades
15
NMI3 meeting, ISIS, September 26-29, 2005 Lobster-eye device & focusing monochromator Optimization in 3 dimensions Focusing monochromator only
16
NMI3 meeting, ISIS, September 26-29, 2005 Lobster-eye device & focusing monochromator Optimization in 3 dimensions Results Total intensity (whole beam) [10 9 /s]: parabolic1.3 elliptic1.6 no3.4
17
RESTRAX Version for TAS resolution simulations and data analysis - simplified TAS setup with faster ray-tracing code - 4D resolution functions + convolution with S(Q, ) - dynamically loaded modules with S(Q, ) model - non-linear data fitting
18
NMI3 meeting, ISIS, September 26-29, 2005 Sample “exchanger” in RESTRAX TAS ray-tracing, R(Q, ) 4D convolution data simulation data fitting dynamically loaded modules, S(Q, ) Damped harmonic oscillators Damped harmonic oscillators, free dispersion gradient Bond charge model (phonons in Si, Ge,...) Incommensurate fluctuations (diffuse satellites) … others defined by users
19
NMI3 meeting, ISIS, September 26-29, 2005 TAS: conventional arrangement monochromator sample analyzer detector
20
NMI3 meeting, ISIS, September 26-29, 2005 TAS: flat-cone analyzer monochromator sample analyzer detector
21
NMI3 meeting, ISIS, September 26-29, 2005 TAS: flat-cone multianalyzer monochromator sample analyzer detector
22
NMI3 meeting, ISIS, September 26-29, 2005 Sweeping reciprocal space New flat-cone analyzer for ILL TAS instruments, 32 channels IN20: monochromator Si, k i =3 A -1 non-linear scans in rec. lattice a3a3 a4a4
23
NMI3 meeting, ISIS, September 26-29, 2005 Example 1: Incommensurate sattelites Incommensurate sattelites: E 210210 010 200 210 000 010010 110110 E raw data M.C. ray-tracing & convolution with S(Q,E)
24
NMI3 meeting, ISIS, September 26-29, 2005 Example 1: Incommensurate satellites... and transformed to rec. lattice space
25
NMI3 meeting, ISIS, September 26-29, 2005 Example 1: Incommensurate satellites detail...
26
NMI3 meeting, ISIS, September 26-29, 2005 Example 2: bond charge model (BCM) Model describing phonons in diamond lattice (Si, Ge, -Sn,...) Eigenvalues & eigenvectors are calculated using coulombic potential of bond charges for each of Q,E points representing simulated TAS resolution function W. Weber, Phys. Rev. B 15 (1977) 4789. phonons in Si
27
NMI3 meeting, ISIS, September 26-29, 2005 Phonons in Si E=10 meVE=20 meV
28
NMI3 meeting, ISIS, September 26-29, 2005 Phonons in Si E=30 meVE=40 meV
29
NMI3 meeting, ISIS, September 26-29, 2005 Phonons in Si E=50 meVE=60 meV
30
NMI3 meeting, ISIS, September 26-29, 2005 E=20 meV Phonons in Si MC simulation for IN20 k f =3A -1, E=20meV 64 channels, a4=1.25 o 91 steps, a3=0.75 o convolution with flat-cone resolution simulated by ray-tracing CPU time: 4 hours
31
NMI3 meeting, ISIS, September 26-29, 2005 Summary Numerical optimizations using ray-tracing simulations in numerical optimization is feasible multiple correlated TAS parameters can be optimized with respect to different figures of merit Lobster-eye guides high flux at small samples, leaves space for sample environment vertical and horizontal focusing can be splitted in 2 guide sections alternative to focusing monochromators at quasiparallel beams Dynamically loaded S(Q, ) modules data simulations and fitting with various sample kernels extensions provided by users RESTRAX homepage::http://omega.ujf.cas.cz/restrax/http://omega.ujf.cas.cz/restrax/
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.