Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Hydrologic Indices Yuba River Development Project FERC Project 2246 Relicensing Thursday, April 11, 2013.

Published byMeghan Cain Modified over 8 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Hydrologic Indices Yuba River Development Project FERC Project 2246 Relicensing Thursday, April 11, 2013."— Presentation transcript:

1 Hydrologic Indices Yuba River Development Project FERC Project 2246 Relicensing Thursday, April 11, 2013

2 Yuba River Development Project (YRDP) – FERC Project 2246 Relicensing Hydrologic Indices  Introduction  Hydrologic index usage  Existing indices in the Yuba River watershed  Unimpaired Yuba River flow at Smartsville  Comparison of indices  Comparison of indices and Middle Yuba River flow  Comparison of year-type classifications

3 Yuba River Development Project (YRDP) – FERC Project 2246 Relicensing Yuba River Watershed

4 Yuba River Development Project (YRDP) – FERC Project 2246 Relicensing Hydrologic Index Usage  Hydrologic Indices have two purposes:  Characterize hydrology  Define year-type classifications  Characterizing hydrology is critical to ensure accurate representation of a natural process  Year-type classifications are a statistical exercise to make sure “bins” capture correct flow ranges

5 Yuba River Development Project (YRDP) – FERC Project 2246 Relicensing Existing Indices in Yuba River Watershed  Existing YCWA FERC License (4 WY)  Based on annual unimpaired flow at Smartsville  Year-types defined by percentage of 50-year average unimpaired flow  Yuba River Index (5 WY)  Part of RD-1644, no current application for determining flows  Based on weighted unimpaired flow at Smartsville  0.2*(prev index) + 0.3*(Oct-Mar) + 0.5*(Apr-Jul)  North Yuba Index (6 WY)  Part of Yuba River Accord  Based on end-of-Sept. New Bullards Bar storage + annual inflow  YB/DS Index (6 WY)  Part of proposed license conditions  Based on annual unimpaired flow at Smartsville

6 Yuba River Development Project (YRDP) – FERC Project 2246 Relicensing Annual Unimpaired Yuba River Flow at Smartsville

7 Yuba River Development Project (YRDP) – FERC Project 2246 Relicensing Annual Unimpaired Yuba River Flow at Smartsville

8 Yuba River Development Project (YRDP) – FERC Project 2246 Relicensing Selected Comparisons of Existing Indices

9 Yuba River Development Project (YRDP) – FERC Project 2246 Relicensing Selected Comparisons of Existing Indices

10 Yuba River Development Project (YRDP) – FERC Project 2246 Relicensing Comparisons of Existing Indices  Three primary indices generally characterize hydrology similarly.  Slight differences due to variations in approach  YRI emphasizes April-July runoff, so years like WY 2013 are represented as drier than in YB/DS  NYI includes storage, so transitions from dry to wet are represented as drier than in YB/DS (and inverse)

11 Yuba River Development Project (YRDP) – FERC Project 2246 Relicensing Existing Indices vs. Middle Yuba River Flow

12 Yuba River Development Project (YRDP) – FERC Project 2246 Relicensing Existing Indices vs. Middle Yuba River Flow

13 Yuba River Development Project (YRDP) – FERC Project 2246 Relicensing Existing Indices vs. Middle Yuba River Flow

14 Yuba River Development Project (YRDP) – FERC Project 2246 Relicensing Existing Indices vs. Middle Yuba River Flow

15 Yuba River Development Project (YRDP) – FERC Project 2246 Relicensing Existing Indices vs Middle Yuba River Flow  Existing indices do a good job of representing annual hydrology of the Middle Yuba River  Monthly variability in Middle Yuba River flow is not well represented

16 Yuba River Development Project (YRDP) – FERC Project 2246 Relicensing Comparison of Year-Type Classifications

17 Yuba River Development Project (YRDP) – FERC Project 2246 Relicensing Comparison of Year-Type Classifications

18 Yuba River Development Project (YRDP) – FERC Project 2246 Relicensing Comparison of Year-Type Classifications Index Schedule 1/ Wet Schedule 2/ Above Normal Schedule 3/ Below Normal Schedule 4/ Dry Schedule 5/ Critical Schedule 6 (7)/ Extremely Critical (Conference) North Yuba Index 2275320 (1) Yuba River Index 166649- YB/DS Index10135931

19 Yuba River Development Project (YRDP) – FERC Project 2246 Relicensing Comparison of Year-Type Classifications

20 Yuba River Development Project (YRDP) – FERC Project 2246 Relicensing Year-Type Distribution

21 Yuba River Development Project (YRDP) – FERC Project 2246 Relicensing Year-Type Distribution

22 Yuba River Development Project (YRDP) – FERC Project 2246 Relicensing Year-Type Distribution

23 Yuba River Development Project (YRDP) – FERC Project 2246 Relicensing Where do we go from here?

Download ppt "Hydrologic Indices Yuba River Development Project FERC Project 2246 Relicensing Thursday, April 11, 2013."

Similar presentations

U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Streamflow conditions across North Carolina Assessment of hydrologic conditions observed through.

U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Streamflow conditions across North Carolina Assessment of hydrologic conditions observed through.
Skill Analysis for Runoff Forecasts on the Western Slope of the Sierra Nevada B. D. Harrison; R. C. Bales Sierra Nevada Research Institute University of.

Skill Analysis for Runoff Forecasts on the Western Slope of the Sierra Nevada B. D. Harrison; R. C. Bales Sierra Nevada Research Institute University of.
Yellowtail Dam & Bighorn Lake Water Supply & Operations Meeting Billings, Montana October 8, 2009 RECLAMATION Managing Water in the West.

Yellowtail Dam & Bighorn Lake Water Supply & Operations Meeting Billings, Montana October 8, 2009 RECLAMATION Managing Water in the West.
Cynthia Palmer – Forecaster National Weather Service – Sacramento.

Cynthia Palmer – Forecaster National Weather Service – Sacramento.
The Normal Distribution

The Normal Distribution
1 Overview of South Yuba River Hydrology Bob Center Presented to FERC Academy on December 10, 2005.

1 Overview of South Yuba River Hydrology Bob Center Presented to FERC Academy on December 10, 2005.
ESTIMATING THE 100-YEAR FLOOD FORDECORAH USING THE RAINFALL EVENTS OF THE RIVER'S CATCHMENT By Kai TsurutaFaculty Advisor: Richard Bernatz Abstract:This.

ESTIMATING THE 100-YEAR FLOOD FORDECORAH USING THE RAINFALL EVENTS OF THE RIVER'S CATCHMENT By Kai TsurutaFaculty Advisor: Richard Bernatz Abstract:This.
Start Audio Lecture! FOR462: Watershed Science & Management 1 Streamflow Analysis Module 8.7.

Start Audio Lecture! FOR462: Watershed Science & Management 1 Streamflow Analysis Module 8.7.
The hydrograph for Ten Mile Creek is shown to the right. Hydrographs are calculated for each of the 30 Subcatchments. Radar data is used to create rainfall.

The hydrograph for Ten Mile Creek is shown to the right. Hydrographs are calculated for each of the 30 Subcatchments. Radar data is used to create rainfall.
June 26, 2007 2-1 PCWA - Middle Fork Project Project Operations 6-26-2007.

June 26, PCWA - Middle Fork Project Project Operations
Recap of Water Year 2008 Hydrologic Forecast and Forecasts for Water Year 2009 Francisco Munoz-Arriola Alan F. Hamlet Shraddhanand Shukla Dennis P. Lettenmaier.

Recap of Water Year 2008 Hydrologic Forecast and Forecasts for Water Year 2009 Francisco Munoz-Arriola Alan F. Hamlet Shraddhanand Shukla Dennis P. Lettenmaier.
Hydrological Modeling FISH 513 April 10, 2002. Overview: What is wrong with simple statistical regressions of hydrologic response on impervious area?

Hydrological Modeling FISH 513 April 10, Overview: What is wrong with simple statistical regressions of hydrologic response on impervious area?
Normal Distributions What is a Normal Distribution? Why are Many Variables Normally Distributed? Why are Many Variables Normally Distributed? How Are Normal.

Normal Distributions What is a Normal Distribution? Why are Many Variables Normally Distributed? Why are Many Variables Normally Distributed? How Are Normal.
As with averages, researchers need to transform data into a form conducive to interpretation, comparisons, and statistical analysis measures of dispersion.

As with averages, researchers need to transform data into a form conducive to interpretation, comparisons, and statistical analysis measures of dispersion.
1 (Student’s) T Distribution. 2 Z vs. T Many applications involve making conclusions about an unknown mean . Because a second unknown, , is present,

1 (Student’s) T Distribution. 2 Z vs. T Many applications involve making conclusions about an unknown mean . Because a second unknown, , is present,
1 1 Slide © 2003 South-Western/Thomson Learning TM Slides Prepared by JOHN S. LOUCKS St. Edward’s University.

1 1 Slide © 2003 South-Western/Thomson Learning TM Slides Prepared by JOHN S. LOUCKS St. Edward’s University.
CRFS Technical Committee Fall Meeting LC Operations Update November 20, 2014.

CRFS Technical Committee Fall Meeting LC Operations Update November 20, 2014.
Hood River Basin Study Water Resources Modeling (MODSIM) Taylor Dixon, Hydrologist February 12, 2014.

Hood River Basin Study Water Resources Modeling (MODSIM) Taylor Dixon, Hydrologist February 12, 2014.
CRFS March 30, 2010. Virgin River NWS-SWS: 90 NWS-ESP: 60 55 (+8-15% El Nino weighted) NRCS daily: 80 NRCS statistical: 78 Coordinated: 80 / 195% median.

CRFS March 30, Virgin River NWS-SWS: 90 NWS-ESP: (+8-15% El Nino weighted) NRCS daily: 80 NRCS statistical: 78 Coordinated: 80 / 195% median.
Reclamation Mid-Term Operational Modeling Seasonal to Year-Two Colorado River Streamflow Prediction Workshop CBRFC March 21-22, 2011 Katrina Grantz, PhD.

Reclamation Mid-Term Operational Modeling Seasonal to Year-Two Colorado River Streamflow Prediction Workshop CBRFC March 21-22, 2011 Katrina Grantz, PhD.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google